[00:47] <brokenfingers> VERIFY REGISTER brokenfingers dpgkncouoxye
[00:47] <brokenfingers> whoops!
[00:52] <penguin42> oops
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel
=== schmidtm_ is now known as schmidtm
=== schmidtm_ is now known as schmidtm
=== bulldog98_ is now known as bulldog98
=== vibhav is now known as Guest561234
=== Guest561234 is now known as vibhav
[15:21] <penguin42> ubuntu-bug won't let me report a problem with adobe-flashplugin but that seems to be the partner way to install flash? Is the right thing to remove that, put flashplug-installer back in and try again?
[16:07] <penguin42> right, looks like 11.2.202.0 flash is broke on that machine - bug 1008132
[16:07] <ubot2`> Launchpad bug 1008132 in flashplugin-nonfree "11.2.202.0 fails every time (nothing displayed, but shows in about:plugins), 11_1r102_62_32bit_debug works" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1008132
[16:21] <Ologn> Is it just my system, or does the "barrage" package not launch at all on 12.04?  I should warn people beforehand, it also seems to mess up the display to where you have to go to displays and reset your screen size
[16:21] <Ologn> I reported a bug anyhow...
[16:27] <penguin42> Ologn: Hmm, not happy for me either - I get a black screen witha  light blue bit to the left
[16:28] <Ologn> penguin42: Are you x86-64 or x86?
[16:28] <Ologn> penguin42: And you're 12.04?
[16:29] <penguin42> yep, kubuntu 12.04
[16:29] <Ologn> x86-64?
[16:29] <Ologn> or x86?
[16:29] <penguin42> 64
[16:30] <penguin42> what's your bug number?
[16:30] <Ologn> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/barrage/+bug/1008011
[16:30] <ubot2`> Launchpad bug 1008011 in barrage "Barrage does not open - crashes with SIGABRT" [Undecided,New]
[16:31] <Ologn> I did the dbgsym for the sdl packages and barrage
[16:32]  * penguin42 has mediumised it for you
[16:34] <Ologn> cool, thanks
[18:36] <brokenfingers> bug 813134 Has Anyone looked into this? It's pretty serious, but I don't know what to make of it or why there is relitively no activity
[18:36] <ubot2`> Launchpad bug 813134 in ubiquity "[DATALOSS] ubiquity overwrites luks-formatted device without warning" [Critical,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/813134
[18:37] <penguin42> brokenfingers: Thing is I thought it was fixed - I remember a discussion from a few months about it
[18:38] <brokenfingers> Yah. I just looked and like 5 people (inexperienced) had fooled with the status
[18:40] <brokenfingers> penguin42: The asignee assigned themselves the day they joined LP and just abandoned launchpad and people thought it was fixed :(
[18:42] <penguin42> brokenfingers: Ah ok, so I see why I remember it, see bug 762636 that links to a thread I commented on and then to bug 420080 that has a fix released
[18:42] <ubot2`> Launchpad bug 762636 in ubiquity "Ubuntu installer kills LUKS partitions without warning" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/762636
[18:42] <ubot2`> Launchpad bug 420080 in partman-crypto "Configure encrypted volumes destroys existing data" [Critical,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/420080
[18:44] <brokenfingers> punguin42: Oh, the I'll take care of changing bug 813134 and bug 762636 to FixRel and mark as duplicates
[18:44] <ubot2`> Launchpad bug 813134 in ubiquity "[DATALOSS] ubiquity overwrites luks-formatted device without warning" [Critical,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/813134
[18:44] <ubot2`> Launchpad bug 762636 in ubiquity "Ubuntu installer kills LUKS partitions without warning" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/762636
[18:45] <penguin42> brokenfingers: Yeh, I'd just dupe them to 420080
[18:45] <brokenfingers> penguin42: Im on it
[18:46] <penguin42> brokenfingers: actually, it might be worth checking....
[18:46] <brokenfingers> penguin42: how?
[18:46] <penguin42> brokenfingers: I mean the fixes in 420080 were in partman-crypto that was what the alternate installer used, is that the case in the graphical installer - I don't think the graphical installer used to be able to do encrypted stuff?
[18:47] <brokenfingers> penguin42: Oh... I see what you mean. What should I do? Dupe them?
[18:50] <penguin42> brokenfingers: I'd dupe 813134 and 762636 then add a comment that it looks like 420080 - but with a 'is it the same' - and add that comment to both your dupe and a comment on 420080
[18:51] <brokenfingers> pengin42: K. What about the status? Leave in "New" in Ubiquity?
[18:52] <penguin42> brokenfingers: It seems to me a confirmed since at least 2 people are suffering from it
[18:53] <brokenfingers> penguin42: Whitch One? 813134 and 762636 only affect 1.
[18:53] <penguin42> brokenfingers: One each, and when you dupe them together they'll affect 2
[18:54] <brokenfingers> penguin42: Oh yeah. That's right! Pffff
[18:55] <brokenfingers> penguin42: 762636 I cant change The Status.
[18:56] <penguin42> ah, because it's duped into 420080
[18:56] <penguin42> ah, it's all duped into 420080
[18:57] <penguin42> brokenfingers: You can't change status on a dupe
[18:58] <brokenfingers> penguin42: I Un-duped it, but still can't cant change it?
[18:58] <brokenfingers> penguin42: Are you bug-control?
[18:59] <penguin42> yep
[18:59] <brokenfingers> Oh? Can you chnge it?
[18:59]  * penguin42 scratches head - ok, so the intent is to dupe 762636 to 813134?
[19:00] <brokenfingers> penguin42: No, can you change it to cofirmed and then I'll dupe it?
[19:01] <penguin42> ok, try that - I took 813134 out of the dupe
[19:01] <penguin42> and set 762636 to confirmed
[19:02] <brokenfingers> penguin42: Ahhh.. THank you!
[19:02] <penguin42> np
[19:02] <brokenfingers> penguin42: sometime in the future I should prabably join Bug-cont myself tho.
[19:03] <penguin42> brokenfingers: Feel free to apply
[19:03] <penguin42> brokenfingers: are you a member of bug-squad?
[19:03] <brokenfingers> penguin42: Yes.
[19:03] <penguin42> ok
[19:04] <brokenfingers> penguin42: am I experienced enogh?
[19:06] <penguin42> brokenfingers: The criteria/knowledge is here: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBugControl   if you already can say yes to all those and feel experienced enough then apply
[19:08] <brokenfingers> penguin42: Ithink I can, I'll try applying
[19:08] <penguin42> good luck!
[19:08] <brokenfingers> Thank you
[20:00] <Kus> hello
[20:01] <Kus> i have a bug reported, but need to follow instructions for details, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1007765
[20:01] <ubot2`> Launchpad bug 1007765 in ubuntu "brightness adjusting crashes system" [Undecided,Incomplete]
[20:02] <Kus> what is the key combination? i do not know Sysrq+r e i s u b (reisub one letter at time)
[20:02] <Kus> what is Sysrq?
[20:32] <jtaylor> ctrl alt print
[20:32] <jtaylor> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magic_SysRq_key
[20:32] <jtaylor> reisub will reboot your system
[20:32] <jtaylor> (raising elephants is so utterly boring :) )
[21:02] <brokenfingers> penguin42: I'm writing my aplication now, I have a question, If I don't exactly have 5 AMAZINGLY SPECTACULARLY FABULOUS bugs, and I've never forwarded upstream(but I know how to), what do I do?
[21:04] <penguin42> brokenfingers: They don't have to be amazingly spectacular - they just have to show you're applying the rules and making decisions appropriately
[21:05] <brokenfingers> penguin42: Mmmm, but do they have to see 1 thats forwarded upstream? (bugzilla.gnome.org is down right now)
=== Adri2000 is now known as Guest33157