| * tumbleweed waves bug 1008271 at jtaylor | 01:09 | |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1008271 in python-scipy (Ubuntu) "Bump to 0.10" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1008271 | 01:09 |
|---|---|---|
| shubham | hello | 01:09 |
| shubham | i am new to using irc so excuse me if i am to verbose | 01:10 |
| shubham | i want to try fixing a bug in natilus | 01:10 |
| shubham | #nautilus | 01:10 |
| shubham | i want to ask where should i get the source from | 01:11 |
| shubham | should i use github ? | 01:11 |
| shubham | anyone | 01:12 |
| tumbleweed | bzr branch lp:ubuntu/nautilus | 01:13 |
| shubham | thanks | 01:13 |
| tumbleweed | see http://developer.ubuntu.com/packaging/html/fixing-a-bug.html | 01:13 |
| shubham | @tumbleweed Thanks for the link i will look into the page | 01:14 |
| tumbleweed | np | 01:15 |
| * tumbleweed goes to bed | 01:15 | |
| === jbicha is now known as Guest40326 | ||
| dholbach | good morning | 07:02 |
| geser | good morning dholbach | 07:04 |
| dholbach | hey geser | 07:04 |
| === almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan | ||
| iulian | Morning dholbach, geser. | 08:09 |
| dholbach | hey iulian | 08:09 |
| iulian | Oh, it's Monday already. | 08:10 |
| iulian | Hmm. | 08:10 |
| Laney | yeah, how did that happen? | 08:11 |
| Zhenech | they skipped the weeked for some booze I heard | 08:17 |
| Zhenech | stupid gods | 08:17 |
| === dholbach_ is now known as dholbach | ||
| === Guest33157 is now known as Adri2000 | ||
| === al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away | ||
| === Guest40326 is now known as jbicha | ||
| === almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan | ||
| === ara_ is now known as ara | ||
| === barry` is now known as barry_ | ||
| === barry_ is now known as barry | ||
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| vibhav | tumbleweed: You there? | 13:07 |
| tumbleweed | yes, hi | 13:11 |
| vibhav | tumbleweed: I uploaded a debdiff (lucid) for bug 569514 , you might want to see it | 13:15 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 569514 in calamaris (Ubuntu Natty) "Doesn't work for squid3 logs" [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/569514 | 13:15 |
| tumbleweed | vibhav: where's the SRU paperwork? https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Procedure | 13:17 |
| tumbleweed | also. the version still needs to changed, the same version is published in lucid and natty | 13:17 |
| kendfinger | Has OpenSSH 6.0 been uploaded? | 14:24 |
| Laney | !info openssh quantal | 14:25 |
| ubottu | Package openssh does not exist in quantal | 14:25 |
| Laney | utter lies | 14:25 |
| Laney | yes, it has. | 14:25 |
| kendfinger | Cool! Thanks! | 14:26 |
| kendfinger | openssh-client is what I meant. | 14:27 |
| Laney | maybe that bot works on binary packages, indeed | 14:29 |
| Laney | !info openssh-client quantal | 14:29 |
| ubottu | openssh-client (source: openssh): secure shell (SSH) client, for secure access to remote machines. In component main, is standard. Version 1:5.9p1-5ubuntu1 (quantal), package size 937 kB, installed size 2297 kB | 14:29 |
| Laney | seems out of date | 14:30 |
| kendfinger | I am pretty sure that is wrong! | 14:33 |
| Zhenech | openssh-server | 1:6.0p1-1ubuntu1 | quantal | amd64, armel, armhf, i386, powerpc | 14:33 |
| Zhenech | thats what rmadisson says | 14:34 |
| Laney | yeah | 14:41 |
| Laney | Pici: ^^^^^ the bot is out of date :( | 14:41 |
| Pici | Laney: I'll see what I caan do. | 14:43 |
| Laney | cheers boss | 14:43 |
| === al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away | ||
| AmberJ_ | Hello | 16:05 |
| === nhandler_ is now known as nhandler | ||
| AmberJ_ | I manually built a program and then did 'checkinstall' (essentially 'make install') to create a deb. The deb file has a lib/libpln.so of size ~47MB. | 16:09 |
| AmberJ_ | I created another deb using debuild and the same lib/libpln.so file is only ~2MB. | 16:09 |
| AmberJ_ | Why is there this vast difference in file sizes of same file? | 16:09 |
| AmberJ_ | In fact size of every file in lib/ created with checkinstall is greater than corresponding files created with debuild... | 16:09 |
| azeem_ | AmberJ_: maybe the checkinstall files are unstripped? | 16:13 |
| AmberJ | azeem_: "unstripped"? | 16:21 |
| azeem_ | yes | 16:21 |
| ogra_ | dressed :) | 16:21 |
| azeem_ | run "file" on both and compare the output | 16:21 |
| jtaylor | AmberJ: debug symbols are still in | 16:22 |
| jtaylor | removing them is called stripping | 16:22 |
| jtaylor | which is done by dh_strip during normal build | 16:22 |
| ogra_ | (and has nothing to do with dresses, despite my bad joke above :) ) | 16:24 |
| === ahasenack is now known as Guest47924 | ||
| AmberJ | Thanks jtaylor, very well explained. And azeem_'s 'file' explained the rest. | 16:55 |
| AmberJ | ogra_: I'll leave it to others to decide if that was a bad joke :D Thanks | 16:57 |
| ogra_ | :) | 16:58 |
| === almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan | ||
| === al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away | ||
| AmberJ | What's an indep (independent?) binary? | 19:40 |
| jtaylor | something that is architecture independent | 19:41 |
| jtaylor | = it runs everywhere without recompile | 19:41 |
| AmberJ | ah | 19:41 |
| jtaylor | usually interpreted stuff like python or cli | 19:41 |
| jtaylor | or documentation | 19:41 |
| AmberJ | ok | 19:43 |
| AmberJ | I use 'bzr dh-make' to setup debian/ templates... What should I choose if I plan to split upstream into multiple debs: multiple binary or library ? | 19:43 |
| jtaylor | probably multiple binary | 19:44 |
| AmberJ | I mean that upstream has multiple binary executables and libraries | 19:44 |
| jtaylor | unless its a library | 19:44 |
| jtaylor | hm thats more complicated | 19:44 |
| jtaylor | are the libraries "public" = they can be used by other programs too | 19:44 |
| AmberJ | jtaylor: yes, those libraries can be used independently without the need for other upstream 'components'. | 19:47 |
| jtaylor | k it should still be similar to the multiple binary package except that you build library packages from it too | 19:48 |
| AmberJ | That's why we plan to separate them into separate packages. Roughly speaking, any library that can be used independently goes in a separate package (and the same applies to executables) | 19:48 |
| jtaylor | which means following all conventions for them | 19:48 |
| jtaylor | correct library packaging is quite timeconsuming | 19:48 |
| AmberJ | I guess I should choose "multiple binary" and then use $package.install to fine tune library packages (?) | 19:49 |
| jtaylor | yes | 19:49 |
| jtaylor | you can create both templates to see what dh_make would give you | 19:49 |
| AmberJ | yes, that's a nice way t see how dh_make handles both | 19:50 |
| AmberJ | *to | 19:50 |
| AmberJ | Thanks :) | 19:50 |
| AmberJ | Tried both dh_make templates. It seems I'll need to combine template files from both templates | 20:15 |
| === Guest47924 is now known as ahasenack | ||
| jbicha | bdrung: light-themes was already uploaded to precise-proposed, it's just waiting in the queue | 22:31 |
| bdrung | jbicha: thanks. then it's less to do for me | 22:34 |
| bdrung | jbicha: btw, the current light-themes version still has some issues (background color of icons of selected apps wrong in the application selector) | 22:35 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!