[05:58] morning [06:10] same [06:20] Good afternoon :) [07:03] crazy australians and their upside down time ;) [07:54] bryceh: still awake? [08:10] RAOF: was thinking of having a weekly small meeting for x where we discuss things, wouldn't have to long :) [08:10] be* [08:10] We're probably getting big enough to make that worthwhile, yeah. [08:12] Wouldn't need to be big or anything, just so that we're all together to talk for a bit due to being in 3 different timezones [08:17] yeah [08:19] was thinking the same time as last one at least until timezone shifts, think it was 21.30 utc? [08:19] steam client coming later this year [10:03] hmm, kernel build time.. there are some drm commits that need testing, hoping they'd fix ivybridge instability too [10:04] is ben hutchings the v3.2-stable maintainer now? [10:04] yes [10:04] good [10:04] I'll check his tree first === ara_ is now known as ara === yofel_ is now known as yofel [13:15] bryceh (and others): I've built a kernel with three drm/i915 commits on top of the precise-proposed kernel, available here http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~tjaalton/precise-kernel/ [13:15] those map to bugs 982415 974830 and 983146 [13:15] Launchpad bug 982415 in xserver-xorg-video-intel (Ubuntu) "[i915gm] False GPU lockup render.IPEHR: 0x3f800000" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/982415 [13:17] only amd64 version though [14:26] mlankhorst, I saw there was a question about synaptics srus [14:26] what's up? [14:35] O_O [14:36] cnd do you remember the question at least :) [14:36] mlankhorst, it was in the middle of a couple discussions in my irc backlog, so if you could explain again I would appreciate it :) [14:39] we were discussing sru's, and I guess mlankhorst suggested we should get 1.6.1 in precise :) [14:39] "bugfix microrelease" :P [14:39] hehehe my backlog is cut off exactly 1 line before that [14:39] 09:46 < mlankhorst> cnd: ^ [14:39] check irclogs.u.c [14:40] mlankhorst, yes, 1.6.1 needs to get into precise, but we also need a couple patches since then, IIRC [14:40] cnd: speaking of which, is the xserver input code uptodate with current 1.12 fixes? [14:40] tjaalton, IIRC, jeremyhu just put out 1.12.2 last week? [14:41] out server is up to date with 1.12.1 [14:41] cnd: Ah k, was just wondering if you felt it was worth pushing entire 1.6.1 or not, and if there have been patches that need to be in X server for it :) [14:41] cnd: yeah, ok good [14:41] mlankhorst, I don't think there are any patches that must be in the xserver before pushing an update to synaptics [14:44] mlankhorst, http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/driver/xf86-input-synaptics/log/?h=synaptics-1.6-branch [14:44] yeah the quantal has all the commits [14:44] good [14:44] but precise needs them all too [14:45] especially any having to do with touches [14:45] yeah I just wanted to run it on quantal and look for bugs before sru'ing :) [14:45] good idea [14:45] mlankhorst, will you be handling srus for xorg-server too? [14:45] or is someone else doing that? [14:45] Not sure who is doing it atm [14:45] maybe that someone is assumed to be me :) [14:46] I have no rights but I can poke the others for it I suppose :) [14:46] bryceh, tjaalton: do we normally do srus for each upstream point release? [14:46] or only pull patches for bugs that people file [14:46] cnd: heh, that was the point of the discussion.. [14:46] ahh [14:47] tjaalton, and the outcome was? [14:47] we've not done point-releases because they're nigh impossible to get accepted [14:47] but we'd like to change that [14:47] then again, the new sru policy is actually more strict about the paperwork [14:47] and requirementes [14:47] -e [14:47] tjaalton, ok [14:48] but, we could always try again.. [14:49] tjaalton: In this case it's a pre-release version so maybe less strict.. [14:49] mlankhorst: ..we're updating from, so yep