[00:03] <apachelogger> bdmurray: pingy
[00:03] <bdmurray> apachelogger: hi
[00:04] <apachelogger> bdmurray: aloha, could you please add ~kubotu to bugcontrol, it's our kubuntu bot user
[00:05] <micahg> hrm?
[00:05] <micahg> why should a bot be in bug control
[00:05] <micahg> in fact, I'd veto that
[00:05] <apachelogger> micahg: newpackage/newversion -> importance = whislist
[00:05] <apachelogger> micahg: how so?
[00:05] <micahg> apachelogger: and access to private bugs, which makes public disclosure easier
[00:06] <apachelogger> micahg: we don't have facilities to query bugs
[00:06] <apachelogger> nor would we
[00:06] <micahg> apachelogger: kubotu doesn't look up bug titles?
[00:06] <apachelogger> no
[00:06] <apachelogger> ubottu does that already
[00:10] <micahg> apachelogger: hrm, I guess if you have tight control over it, I guess that's fine (i.e. non-bug control people can't access the bot serverside or have the LP credentials for it)
[00:10] <apachelogger> it is on the same server as ubottu, so I doubt that should be a problem
[00:12] <micahg> apachelogger: ubottu doesn't have bug control and that is a problem
[00:12] <micahg> not all IRC ops have bug control access
[00:12]  * micahg wonders who can access that server
[00:13] <micahg> apachelogger: I would think a solution might be to have the bot tag and then you can have a bdmurray bot set the importance for you
[00:14] <bdmurray> new package ones, if tagged needs-packaging, will be auto wishlisted as it is
[00:15] <apachelogger> that is what prompted me asking :P
[00:15]  * apachelogger would not give a rats booty otherwise :P
[00:15] <bdmurray> new version ones makes sense for ubuntu too, so if we just settle on a tag my bot could do that too
[00:15] <micahg> bdmurray: I'm wondering if we should just auto wishlist upgrade-software-version tagged bugs as well
[00:16] <bdmurray> micahg: is that the right tag?  I forgot
[00:16] <micahg> bdmurray: I added it to LP, we decided on it a while back
[00:17] <bdmurray> okay, well wishlist makes sense to me
[00:17] <micahg> apachelogger: does that ^^ work for you (kubotu tags upgrade-software-version and bdmurray's bot wishlists)?
[00:17] <apachelogger> already doing
[00:17] <apachelogger> creates two mails though
[00:18] <bdmurray> I'm sure everybody already filters my bot's email ;-)
[00:19] <micahg> true, but the people subscribed to enough packages to have it make a difference are already drowning in mail
[00:21] <apachelogger> hehe, good point
[00:43] <brokenfingers> Wait, if a bug appeers not to be a problem anymore, set it to Fix Released or Incomplete?
[00:45] <micahg> depends, if the fix is unknown, invalid, if it is known fix released
[00:46] <micahg> if you think it might work for you and not someone else, incomplete
[00:52] <brokenfingers> micahg: Well, bug 814826 comment 13 Someone set it to Incomplete, "because it doesn't seem to happen in current Precise". I leave it, or change to FixRel?
[00:52] <ubot2`> Launchpad bug 814826 in bamf "bamfdaemon crashed with SIGSEGV in gdk_display_get_event()" [Critical,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/814826
[00:55] <micahg> brokenfingers: trevino is unity hacker, I'd go with him on this
[00:56] <brokenfingers> micahg: Okay. Thank you, and sorry about my horrible "lo Ciento" mixup. :)
[00:56] <micahg> brokenfingers: no problema
[06:47] <bullgard6> What article describes well the function of the  Ubuntu crash database submission daemon  »whoopsie«? "This program submits crash reports back to an Ubuntu server," is too short a description.
[07:13] <jibel> bullgard6, the spec at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ErrorTracker describes it well
[07:23] <bullgard6> jibel: This is good stuff. I will need a while to digest it. -- Thank you for your help. --  Does using whoopsie dispense with installing error diagnostic symbols, for example the package »banshee-dbg«?
[07:35] <jibel> bullgard6, if you want to retrace a crash locally you'll need debugging symbols, otherwise upload the report and let the retracers do their job
[07:44] <bullgard6> jibel: Thank you for advising.
[09:49] <bullgard6> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ErrorTracker: "The apport client will write a .upload file alongside a .crash file to indicate that the crash should be sent to the crash database." I had an Evince crash. I find the files  /var/crash/_usr_bin_evince.1000.crash  and /var/crash/ _usr_bin_evince.1000.upload. Are this the two files that  https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ErrorTracker: talks about?
[12:48] <hggdh>  bulldog98_ yes
[16:56] <jkbe> hi
[16:57] <LordOfTime> hi
[16:58] <jkbe> i have installed ubuntu 12.04 on a few intel desktops allready and i still have the same problem, my system is a intel i7 3930k and asus p9x79 deluxe motherboard, the other intel desktop i installed it on was a i7 920 with the x58 chipset mobo. They both had the same problem:
[16:58] <jkbe> the problem is that i cant click/select some buttons/windows
[16:59] <jkbe> it's like the gui is freezing but its not if i check in a terminal
[16:59] <jkbe> everything works perfectly if i go non-gui
[17:00] <jkbe> The same problem persists if i install the nvidia drivers so i dont think its gpu related
[17:01] <jkbe> I've searched google for hours now and i installed several other linux distro's, they all had the same problem
[17:01] <jkbe> any chance i can fix this?
[17:23] <xclusive585> micahg: When you have time do a swing by https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/boinc/+bug/1009536/comments/5 and read that last comment I posted. I feel we are kind-of at a standstill on the issue. Also maybe you could post a link to your PPA or email it to me? (I'm curious if that package of Boinc you built for your PPA and Quantal was debians SID 7.0.27)
[17:23] <ubot2`> Launchpad bug 1009536 in boinc "Ubuntu 12.04/7.0.24/ Seti@home" [Undecided,Confirmed]