[00:38] is it possible to do-release-upgrade from 12.04 to 12.10 alpha 1 on arm ? [00:38] do-release-upgrade currently says No new Ubuntu release available [00:39] -d [00:39] tried that, no love [00:39] which versino of update-manager shuld I have ? [00:42] Oh, you installed with 12.04, I assume. [00:42] See /etc/update-manager/release-upgrades [00:42] When you install with an LTS, it sets it to "Prompt=lts", and doesn't offer upgrades to non-LTS by default. [00:43] (change to Prompt=normal, and it'll work for you) [01:22] infinity: ta much, yes this was the LTS Omap SD image [01:23] infinity: all good now, thanks for your help === zyga is now known as zyga-afk === zyga-afk is now known as zyga [10:49] since updating to 12.10 alpha I see this error in my syslog ever 30 seconds [10:49] ti_hdmi_4xxx_phy_enable: hotplug absent after delay [10:49] known issue ? [10:50] On panda or what [10:50] panda, ya [10:51] is that whinging that I don't have a screen plugged in ? [10:51] NFI, someone else might [10:57] davecheney, feel free to file a bug, the 12.10 kernel is still pretty shaky [10:58] Did 12.10a1 come out before 12.04.1? [10:58] if so, boggle [10:59] ogra_: ta, done [11:00] twb, yes, indeed it did [11:00] .1 is scheduled for august [11:00] That seems pretty hectic to me [11:00] theer will be more 12.10 milestones before that [11:00] Glad I stick to LTS === rsalveti` is now known as rsalveti === zyga is now known as zyga-afk === plars-away is now known as plars === zyga-afk is now known as zyga === ericb2 is now known as Guest69439 [13:52] ogra_, marvin24 can either of you send me a bootimg based on 3.1 that boots on your laptop? I tried a few days ago with plymouthd unexecutable and it still did not boot, so I want to rule out other userland/hw issues [13:58] janimo, people.canonical.com/~ogra/jani-bootimg.img [13:58] ogra_, thanks [14:16] ogra_, it boots but no wifi, I wonder if I switched that off with some keypress [14:16] ah, figures, no modules for your kernel :) [14:34] want a tarball ? [14:34] janimo, ^^^ [14:35] ogra_, nah it's ok if it booted, that's what I wanted to see, thanks [14:36] according to marvin24_DT it actually boots for him, just has a black screen until lightdm comes up [14:36] (with plymounth enabled) [14:36] i havent tested that yet in detail [15:33] infinity: please could you review and sponsor my debdiff in bug 1004018? "make all_build" works. Is there anything I've missed? [15:33] Launchpad bug 1004018 in debian-installer "Add highbank images" [Wishlist,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1004018 [15:33] rbasak: Sorry, the first ping fell off my stack. I'm patch piloting today, so it's a good day for me to look at it. ;) [15:34] rbasak: (After I wake up) [15:34] thanks! [15:34] * ogra_ closes the bugpage again then :P [15:45] infinity: rbasak: I'll be around all day so when the installer builds I can test it out === satellit_TrimSli is now known as satellit_TS === infinity is now known as ogfinity === ogfinity is now known as infinity [17:25] rbasak: "highbank uses a different kernel ABI", should probably be "highbank uses the master kernel ABI", so someone doesn't get confused by the comment and not rev highbank with x86. [17:29] rbasak: I'll just make that change myself, and sponsor. [17:31] infinity: ok, thanks! === suihkulo1ki is now known as suihkulokki [17:58] rebooted [19:44] after latest 12.10 update on pandaboard ES system settings is continuously displayed, if you close it it just respawns. just thought i would let you guys know. i am off to file a bug. [20:09] jimerickson: you mean the initial system setup prompt you get for language, keyboard, time zone, and user account? that was fixed in 12.04 :/ [20:11] no the system settings dialog box for all the system stuff like display, color, appearance etc... [20:12] ahh === jase_ is now known as XaSe [21:00] if there is another bug just like it on amd64 do i still file one for omap4? [21:15] \o/ .../quantal/main/installer-armhf/current/images/highbank/netboot/ [21:50] filed bug #1010674 [21:50] Launchpad bug 1010674 in gnome-control-center "gnome-control-center won't close" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1010674 [22:05] jimerickson: If it happens on amd64 too, it's the same bug. [22:05] jimerickson: It's all the same code. [22:05] * infinity dupes the bug. [22:07] mahmoh: Looking at the output, I realise that the armadaxp output is wrong. :P [22:07] mahmoh: Will it upset you guys terribly if I fix it to drop uImage and uInitrd in armadaxp/netboot/ instead of aramadaxp/ ? [22:07] mahmoh: (highbank has this right) [22:10] infinity: I don't understand the question. I'm testing highbank install now, kernel fails to install [22:11] mahmoh: The mirror layout for d-i. If I change it a bit, will it make your automation explode? [22:11] mahmoh: See http://ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports/dists/quantal/main/installer-armhf/20101020ubuntu147/images/armadaxp/ [22:12] mahmoh: Those two files should be one level deeper in "netboot/" [22:16] infinity: it will break our automation but that can be fixed, if it's supposed to be like then then make it so. Yeah, it is different now that I look at omap and highbank. [22:17] mahmoh: Have you already had to special case to make armadaxp and omap work differently? :P [22:18] mahmoh: But yeah, I should fix it both in quantal and precise. I wonder if we have a precise branch yet. [22:25] infinity: the only thing that will really break is the installer path, easy fix - for us. I hope this doesn't break non-"us" (ie. others) but maybe we can add a bug in for it to announce the problem, then fix that - this will give others time to adjust [22:26] I really doubt anyone other than us is doing installs on armadaxp. [22:26] Given the availability of the hardware. [22:27] infinity: there are others but not many [22:27] Well, nobody in "production". [22:27] It's all testing. [22:27] And I'm okay with breaking testers. [22:27] right [22:28] shall I enter a bug or you? [22:30] You can file a bug and assign it to me, if you like. [22:31] I need to test and make sure the changes I make are actually sane and correct. Looks like there's some abuse of the build system going on here. :P [22:31] infinity: ok, thx. Is there a "package" to assign it to or should I leave that up to you? [22:32] debian-installer [22:39] bug 1010708 [22:39] Launchpad bug 1010708 in eilt "create armadaxp netboot directory and move files into it" [Low,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1010708 [22:40] infinity: ^ [22:43] infinity: I'm still looking at the highbank install issue, might take me a while since I may have to take a break [22:44] infinity: wrning configuring bootstrap-base failed with error code 30 [22:45] nm, it's, "base-installer: error: exiting on error base-installer/kernel/failed-install" [22:46] mahmoh: I assume base-installer doesn't know about highbank yet. [22:47] mahmoh: So, that seems reasonable. [22:48] infinity: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/1031228/ [22:48] biab [22:49] mahmoh: Oh, err. Try again? :P [22:49] mahmoh: That just looks like linux-firmware broke on you. [22:57] infinity: ok, I'll try again but will that really fix it? :) [22:57] I dunno. If linux-firmare.deb was actually broken, we'd have a lot of screaming, surely? [23:01] I'll double check and let you know [23:01] biab