| dholbach | good morning | 06:24 |
|---|---|---|
| micahg | siretart: are you handling the libav-extra upload? | 06:29 |
| siretart | micahg: I think I did the most annoying bunch of work here: http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-multimedia/libav.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/ubuntu.extra | 06:34 |
| siretart | micahg: I think it even builds properly, but it clearly needs more testing | 06:34 |
| siretart | micahg: would you have the time to finish/upload that work today? If not, I would eventually get to that during the week (probably not today) | 06:35 |
| micahg | siretart: I can try in about 21 hours if you don't get to it | 06:36 |
| siretart | ok. let's coordinate on short notice then | 06:36 |
| micahg | siretart: do I need to be able to commit or will anonymous access do it for me? | 06:36 |
| siretart | micahg: if you do commits, just place them somewhere from where I can fetch and push your commits | 06:36 |
| siretart | micahg: but I can also arrange write access for you, what's your alioth username? | 06:37 |
| micahg | siretart: I have write access, the problem is I haven;t added a key to alioth yet | 06:37 |
| siretart | well, that's the trivial part, isn't it? | 06:37 |
| micahg | yeah, should be :) | 06:37 |
| siretart | then go for it! :-) | 06:38 |
| micahg | maybe tomorrow night, about to go to sleep | 06:38 |
| siretart | rest well! | 06:38 |
| * siretart fetches coffee (it's 8.38am here) | 06:39 | |
| micahg | siretart: thanks, BTW, xubuntu seems interested in dropping libav support from gegl so it's not pulled in by gimp | 06:39 |
| === Guest95641 is now known as Adri2000 | ||
| === almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan | ||
| === al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away | ||
| === almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan | ||
| badfox | Hi I am new merge , i have tried to merge and getting the problem with debuild -S , here is the link http://pastebin.com/jXaVLrVC | 13:06 |
| === vibhav_ is now known as vibhav | ||
| === al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away | ||
| === jokerdino_ is now known as jokerdino | ||
| Daviey | dholbach: Hey, do you understand why underscore has a binary new package ? | 14:47 |
| dholbach | Daviey, it was introduced in Debian | 14:48 |
| dholbach | yolanda merged it | 14:48 |
| Daviey | dholbach: right, but the changelog doesn't make it clear why it's a new binary.. do you understand why? | 14:49 |
| Daviey | Or should i dig in deeper? | 14:49 |
| dholbach | Daviey, https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/underscore/1.3.3-1ubuntu1 | 14:49 |
| dholbach | → 1.1.6-2 | 14:49 |
| Daviey | doh! | 14:50 |
| Daviey | i thought it was bin 'underscore' new. | 14:51 |
| Daviey | which confussled me | 14:51 |
| dholbach | ah ok :) | 14:51 |
| Daviey | thanks | 14:51 |
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| cousteau | So... not sure where to direct this, but here it goes. The site packages.ubuntu.com seems to default to karmic when searching for package contents, this is, when no &suite=... parameter is in the URL | 17:46 |
| micahg | cousteau: you must have an old cached version, current default is precise | 17:47 |
| cousteau | this happens for example when I search from a search engine (one I found on mycroft; not sure how official it is) and then switch "Search package names" to "Search package contents" | 17:47 |
| micahg | karmic isn't even on the site anymore | 17:48 |
| micahg | hrm, it's true :( | 17:48 |
| cousteau | also if I search from the main URL in suite=all then switching to package content just gives an ugly error | 17:48 |
| * micahg wonders where rhonda is | 17:49 | |
| micahg | that's certainly a lack of sane defaults ;) | 17:49 |
| cousteau | micahg, well, this is a freshly installed Xubuntu 12.04 on a computer that didn't have any linux before (or if it once had, it was formatted) | 17:49 |
| micahg | cousteau: no, I confirmed it, it's weird though | 17:49 |
| cousteau | ...that was it, Rhonda | 17:49 |
| * cousteau and his memory for names... "Is here that... person whose name starts with a capital R... or B?" | 17:50 | |
| cousteau | micahg, suite=default is precise, however (I think) | 17:50 |
| cousteau | the problem is that no suite= becomes suite=karmic rather than =default | 17:51 |
| cousteau | I thought it was because I was using an outdated search plugin (noticed the same behavior at home), but now I confirmed it's from the site | 17:51 |
| cousteau | s/confirmed/think/ | 17:52 |
| * Elbrus wants to fix bug 1002520 in precise | 18:54 | |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1002520 in winff (Ubuntu) "winff can't convert MTS to MPG (PAL DVD Widescreen)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1002520 | 18:54 |
| Elbrus | it is not really a critical bug, some settings just don't work. | 18:55 |
| * Elbrus guesses that SRU is too far fetched for this | 18:55 | |
| Elbrus | should I make a backport (seems strange, as I only want to fix this issue) | 18:55 |
| micahg | Elbrus: how intrusive is the patch? | 18:56 |
| Elbrus | hardly | 18:59 |
| Elbrus | it replaces the preset file with updated presets | 18:59 |
| Elbrus | Winff preset file contains the avconv/ffmpeg commands to run | 18:59 |
| Elbrus | see debian/presets.xml and debian/presets-libavcodec53.xml in http://code.google.com/p/winff/source/detail?spec=svn646&r=627 | 19:00 |
| Elbrus | (at least debian/presets.xml should be updated) | 19:01 |
| micahg | Elbrus: IMHO should be fine for SRU, but IANA SRU memebre | 19:01 |
| Elbrus | ok, I will go ahead with creating a debdif then | 19:01 |
| micahg | Elbrus: needs to be fixed in quantal first | 19:02 |
| Elbrus | it is already fixed (always was) | 19:03 |
| micahg | Elbrus: please comment in the bug to that regard and mark fix released, I"ll give you a precise task | 19:03 |
| Elbrus | or, I should say, since 1.4.2-1 | 19:03 |
| Elbrus | ok | 19:03 |
| Elbrus | done | 19:08 |
| micahg | Elbrus: done as well :) | 19:09 |
| Elbrus | micahg: thanks | 19:10 |
| micahg | Elbrus: thank you for working to improve Ubuntu | 19:10 |
| Elbrus | np | 19:11 |
| * Elbrus attached the debdiff and subscribed ubuntu-sponsors and ubuntu-sru. hope all is all right now | 19:43 | |
| * Elbrus signs off now | 20:16 | |
| AmberJ_ | Why purpose does dh_gencontrol serve? | 20:23 |
| AmberJ_ | manpage says that dh_gencontrol generates control files once for each package | 20:24 |
| AmberJ_ | http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/maint-guide/dreq.en.html#control says: "dh_gencontrol(1) generates DEBIAN/control for each binary package while substituting ${shlibs:Depends}, ${perl:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}, etc. " | 20:25 |
| AmberJ_ | Does that^ means that for a multi-package debian/control setup which we chose.... there will be multiple packages listed in debian/control created by us (and corresponding *.install files). | 20:26 |
| AmberJ_ | Then for each of package listed in debian/control by us, dh_gencontrol creates a (temporary) control file (?) | 20:27 |
| arand | AmberJ_: From my understanding it takes the debian/control that you create, reduces it to only concern the binary package currently being acted upon, substitutes the variables, and places the result in said binary package, see debian/binpackagename/DEBIAN/control after you run the build for the result. | 20:38 |
| arand | If you have a multi-package setup, the end result will be multiple different control files, one in each binary package. | 20:39 |
| AmberJ_ | Oh yes, this explains it. Thanks! | 20:40 |
| AmberJ_ | In a multi-package setup (with a single upstream source repo), if I put ${shlibs:Depends} and ${misc:Depends} under "Depends:" field in entries corresponding to EVERY package | 20:52 |
| AmberJ_ | Will this automatically find mutual dependencies between these packages (based on the contents/libs in these packages)? | 20:53 |
| arand | AmberJ_: Not as far as I know. | 21:03 |
| AmberJ_ | Ok, I'll do a build and see if putting ${shlibs:Depends} and ${misc:Depends} works... | 21:05 |
| AmberJ_ | Otherwise, I'll have to put mutual deb dependencies manually | 21:05 |
| AmberJ_ | If a package depends on another package in multi package setup, I can simply put the name of package as in filename.install file under Depends: | 21:16 |
| arand | Well, "package".install links to the "Package: "package"" field in d/control, so all three would be the same. | 21:20 |
| frcerm | If upstream source has *.h header files, all header files are supposed to be packed in deb (assuming *.so packed in debs have declarations in all *.h) | 22:05 |
| frcerm | ? | 22:05 |
| jtaylor | all headers that are needed to develop with the package | 22:06 |
| jtaylor | those are not necessarily all in the source | 22:06 |
| jtaylor | normally the source installation method installs what is needed | 22:06 |
| frcerm | [03:36] <jtaylor> those are not necessarily all in the source <-- If some headers might not be included in upstream source, how does one gets them? | 22:09 |
| jtaylor | phrased it badly | 22:10 |
| jtaylor | not all headers inside the source package are needed by to use the package | 22:10 |
| jtaylor | the installed headers should only expose the public interface and nothing private | 22:11 |
| frcerm | got it! Thank you very much... | 22:11 |
| bobweaver | hello there I am trying to make a video tutorial for a friend on how to package " bakgrounds " but the dang things will not show up under settings... permissions are correct do I have to make a xml file maybe? here is bzr branch (well pushng now) https://code.launchpad.net/~josephjamesmills/+junk/backgrounds | 22:15 |
| bobweaver | package builds great installs to /usr/share/backgrounds/ but will not show up under settings-->appearance->look | 22:16 |
| arand | Is /usr/share/gnome-background-properties/gnome-backgrounds.xml the crux? (Not sure of equivalent for Unity) | 22:17 |
| bobweaver | thanks arand | 22:18 |
| === julezz is now known as julez | ||
| LordOfTime | anyone here familiar with patch tagging guidelines? | 22:40 |
| arand | LordOfTime: Somewhat, if you mean the dep3 stuff. | 22:48 |
| LordOfTime | that's what i meant, but mdeslaur beat you to it in -hardened | 22:48 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!