[06:31] <dpm> good morning
[07:05] <dholbach> good morning
[07:32] <ajmitch> dholbach: hi, that app brancher looks useful
[07:33] <dholbach> nice :)
[07:34]  * ajmitch had mostly just done manual imports into branches
[07:36] <dholbach> bug 1011532 is something I need to deal with somehow
[07:36] <dholbach> 1010830 might be good to get sorted out too, before putting the importer into cron
[07:40] <ajmitch> in a few cases the submitter has a branch already
[07:40] <ajmitch> it'd be cool to parse the initial comment & look for a lp: ;)
[07:50] <dholbach> ajmitch, can you file a bug about that?
[08:08] <ajmitch> ok
[08:14] <dholbach> thanks
[08:16] <PaoloRotolo> Hi all!
[12:31] <dholbach> can somebody help me make a decision on bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/apps-brancher/+bug/1012098?
[14:45] <dpm> cielak, did you resubmit harmonyseq to myapps
[14:45] <dpm> ?
[14:47] <cielak> dpm: I have never thought I need to, developers who wanted to have their app copied from oneiric to precise were asked just to drop an e-mail
[14:48] <dpm> cielak, yeah, I'd recommend to resubmit, the apps are not copied automatically
[14:51] <cielak> dpm: I have asked ajmitch recently about the status of harmonyseq, and I had an impression that there is a really good progress - do I need to resubmit it even though?
[15:00] <dpm> cielak, afaik, it's up to the app developers to resubmit their apps for a new distro series. I'm mentioning it because I had a look through the queue and say yours as 'Published' on https://myapps.developer.ubuntu.com/dev/arb/?state=Published rather than on 'Pending Review' (https://myapps.developer.ubuntu.com/dev/arb/) - of course, I'm just an outside observer, so if ajmitch is doing the review, he's got the final say and knows what he's talking about :)
[15:00] <dpm> so you might want to double check with him
[15:02] <cielak> dpm: right, it seems it will indeed be the best to get in touch with him - yet thanks for making me aware of this potential issue :)
[15:03] <dpm> np ;-)
[15:44] <dholbach> can somebody please have a look at lp:~dholbach/ubuntu-app-reviews/vm-lens and see if I made the changes correctly?
[15:44] <dholbach> (r2-5)
[16:44] <dholbach> ajmitch, wendar, highvoltage: ^
[17:17]  * highvoltage is checking it out now..
[17:18] <highvoltage> dholbach: I'm a bit foggy on this, are unity lenses supposed to be in usr/bin/? (there's a usr/bin/unity-lens-vm in there)
[17:19] <highvoltage> (well, in the resulting binary package, at least)
[17:19] <dholbach> I compared it with the askubuntu package and that's how I came up with it
[17:19] <highvoltage> ok
[17:21] <highvoltage> the copyright file (and other related files) are now allowed to go into the /usr/share/doc/$packagename/ directory, which we encourage now, but it's probably not strictly necessary
[17:21] <dholbach> that'll make the package easier to review :)
[17:23] <highvoltage> dholbach: looks good to me
[17:24] <dholbach> highvoltage, also the usr/bin/ thing?
[17:28] <highvoltage> dholbach: well, I'm a bit fuzzy on that, I know there's *an* exception for unity lenses, just not sure which it is, but I guess that's it. but if ajmitch/wendar/stgraber can confirm then it will get a +1 from me
[17:28] <highvoltage> http://www.quickmeme.com/meme/3pnn9e/
[17:28] <highvoltage> I hate it when people do that
[17:30] <stgraber> highvoltage, dholbach: everything that can should go in /opt, exceptions are the dbus service file, the lens/scopes files and the usual /usr/share/doc/<package name>/ stuff
[17:30] <stgraber> anything outside of /opt needs to be properly namespaced using the package name to avoid any potential conflict
[17:30] <dholbach> stgraber, highvoltage: I just updated the branch - is it better now?
[17:30] <stgraber> (/usr/share/doc/<package name>/ does it by design, the others should use <package name>_ as filenames, or similar)
[17:31] <stgraber> dholbach: I'll let highvoltage look at it, I'm quite busy this week and need to get some lunch if I want to still be somewhat productive this afternoon
[17:32] <dholbach> stgraber, bon appetit
[17:33] <highvoltage> dholbach: that looks perfect
[17:33] <highvoltage> dholbach: (although I haven't tested the actual lens)
[17:33] <dholbach> perfect
[17:34] <dholbach> how would I follow up in the discussion with the updated app?
[17:38] <dholbach> highvoltage, ^
[17:39] <highvoltage> dholbach: the right place for that is probably https://myapps.developer.ubuntu.com/dev/apps/807/
[17:40] <dholbach> ok
[17:40]  * highvoltage adds link to bzr branch to there
[17:40] <dholbach> on the feedback page?
[17:40] <highvoltage> yep
[17:41] <highvoltage> oh I see I can't just add comments...
[17:42] <highvoltage> dholbach: I guess you're asking more for the submitter than yourself?
[17:42] <highvoltage> I'll put it to vote on the arb list, I think you're on there, at least
[17:43] <dholbach> yes, I'm on there - it just wasn't clear to me where discussion happens
[17:43] <dholbach> and where I'd say "here's a branch, can somebody double check?"
[17:48] <asomething> comments on the feedback page don't send any email to the list. I think there's a bug for that somewhere
[17:49] <dholbach> ah yes
[18:03] <highvoltage> dholbach: I send an email to the list putting it to a vote
[18:03] <highvoltage> s/send/sent/g
[18:04] <dholbach> highvoltage, you're a hero
[18:05] <dholbach> it was nice to see that it wasn't actually that hard with a good example to look at
[20:35] <ajmitch> highvoltage: did you see a file in /usr/bin in the AU lens?
[20:53] <highvoltage> ajmitch: dholbach fixed it in the last revision
[20:54] <ajmitch> in the au lens or the vm lens?
[20:55] <highvoltage> oops, vm lens
[20:55] <highvoltage> ajmitch: au lens?
[20:59] <ajmitch> highvoltage: askubuntu lens, sorry
[20:59] <ajmitch> for some reason my laptop just locked up...
[20:59] <ajmitch> or at least X did, I can still ssh in
[21:03]  * ajmitch doesn't like the look of those errors in syslog