[07:40] <Rellis> Hi
[08:57] <cjwatson> mdz: urgh, sorry, I completely missed this last night (same virtual sprint as stgraber, and so for once I finished work more or less on time)
[15:57] <jamespage> o/
[15:57] <arosales> Hello
[15:57] <smoser> o/
[15:59] <m_3> hola
[15:59] <rbasak> \o
[16:00] <arosales> Its top of the hour so lets get started. I am going to give chairing the meeting a whack. So please bear with me and correct me where needed :-)
[16:00] <arosales> #startmeeting ubuntu-server-team
[16:00] <meetingology> Meeting started Tue Jun 12 16:00:52 2012 UTC.  The chair is arosales. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology.
[16:00] <meetingology> Available commands: #accept #accepted #action #agree #agreed #chair #commands #endmeeting #endvote #halp #help #idea #info #link #lurk #meetingname #meetingtopic #nick #progress #rejected #replay #restrictlogs #save #startmeeting #subtopic #topic #unchair #undo #unlurk #vote #voters #votesrequired
[16:01] <arosales> #topic Review ACTION points from previous meeting
[16:01] <arosales> rbasak: how is the migration to ubuntuserver.org going?
[16:02] <rbasak> I had assumed that was a joke action. I have no knowledge of ubuntuserver.org or anything surrounding it whatsoever.
[16:02] <arosales> I think that was in reference to our server team blog, correct
[16:02] <smoser> hm.. funny. it probably was a joke action and then got carried over too.
[16:03] <smoser> nice. for shame on whoever chaired last week.
[16:03] <arosales> If so, are there any objections about where the blog current lives?
[16:03] <rbasak> I would just like to see the typo fixed, which is how I ended up with the joke action
[16:03] <m_3> rbasak: I think you were dissing the site and got volunteered by the meeting chair :)
[16:03] <arosales> rbasak: where is that typo again?
[16:03] <rbasak> In the headline
[16:03] <rbasak> peices
[16:04] <arosales> ah ok, here https://ubuntuserver.wordpress.com/
[16:04] <arosales> rbasak:  did you want to follow up with jamespage and see who has access and get that corrected?
[16:05] <arosales> rbask, if not I can.
[16:05] <jamespage> arosales, rbasak: I think I might have access
[16:05] <rbasak> I don't think it's worth me being involved. I know nothing about it, and am not sure what I can add
[16:05] <rbasak> (apart from another cook for the broth)
[16:05] <arosales> ok, I will follow up
[16:05] <SpamapS> o/
[16:06] <arosales> #action arosales to correct "pieces" on ubuntu server blog
[16:06] <meetingology> ACTION: arosales to correct "pieces" on ubuntu server blog
[16:06] <arosales> smoser:  did you have a chance to follow up with rbasak on bug 972077
[16:07] <smoser> rbasak, ping, re 972077
[16:07] <smoser> (no, i didn't. but i will)
[16:07] <arosales> ok thanks smoser
[16:07] <arosales> #topic Precise Development
[16:07] <arosales> bugs
[16:07] <arosales> http://reports.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/ubuntu-server/release-bugs.html
[16:07] <arosales> bug https://launchpad.net/bugs/974584
[16:08] <arosales> hallyn: were you taking a look at this one ^
[16:08] <arosales> bug 920197
[16:09] <arosales> zul: and jamespage this one queued up correctly for SRU in 12.04.1?
[16:09] <jamespage> yep
[16:09] <zul> yep
[16:09] <arosales> cool thanks zul and jamespage
[16:09] <arosales> bug 1001846
[16:09] <hallyn> hm, yeah, i dropped the fix for bug 974584 both in debian and ubuntu bugs, i don't have upload rights...
[16:10] <arosales> smoser: I think you were looking for more info on this one did airtonix give what was needed?
[16:10] <hallyn> think the debian maintainer got sick of me
[16:10] <arosales> hallyn: thanks for the update on 974584
[16:10]  * smoser re-looks
[16:10] <arosales> hallyn: let us know if you don't get a response soon
[16:10] <arosales> smoser: thanks
[16:11] <arosales> bug https://launchpad.net/bugs/1009294
[16:11] <smoser> hm... roaksoax is not around. i think there is enough info in that bug to move forward.
[16:11] <arosales> smoser: looks like you had the todo here to get the fix commited. Is that now in the ubuntu cloud images?
[16:12] <arosales> well catch roaksoax later on the cobbler bug
[16:12] <arosales> bug 880339
[16:12] <smoser> someone should verify images are fixed for that cloud image bug
[16:12] <smoser> and we need to refresh the 12.04 images.
[16:13] <utlemming> smoser: I can do that...
[16:13] <SpamapS> arosales: that one is a dupe of one that I'm working on
[16:13] <arosales> jamespage:  I think you were tracking bug 880339, is that now fixed?
[16:13] <utlemming> smoser: and I plan on re-spinning precise ASAP
[16:13] <SpamapS> arosales: I think we can drop it from the list, having been incomplete without a response for so long
[16:13] <arosales> utlemming: could you help with verifying the fix smoser commited?
[16:13] <utlemming> arosales: yup
[16:13] <arosales> utlemming: thanks
[16:13] <hallyn> arosales: i've got a note in my tickler to bug ubuntu-devel on thu if no action from maintainer
[16:14] <jamespage> arosales, yes - SpamapS please could you ensure the bug that you are working on has a task for precise and is targetted to 12.04.1
[16:14] <arosales> #action drop 880339 from bug list — no response
[16:14] <meetingology> ACTION: drop 880339 from bug list — no response
[16:14] <SpamapS> arosales: no action needed
[16:14] <arosales> thanks SpamapS
[16:14] <arosales> ah, ok :-)
[16:14] <SpamapS> arosales: its already closed as Invalid actually
[16:14] <SpamapS> there was a recent response.. that the user had screwed it up themselves
[16:15] <arosales> I'll make sure to remove the subscription of ubuntu server team too
[16:15] <Daviey> (sorry for speaking out of turn.. but the ubuntuserver.org blog transition wasn't a joke action.. it needs to happen, and rbask wanted to see it improved.)
[16:15] <arosales> bug 993291
[16:16] <arosales> jamespage: looks like 993291 is tracking ok, correct?
[16:16] <jamespage> arosales, yeah - I just picked that up
[16:16] <arosales> jamespage: ok, thanks
[16:16] <arosales> bug 1009553
[16:17]  * jamespage is unsurprised
[16:17] <arosales> jamespage:  is this one a result of just droping -virtual kernel?
[16:17] <arosales> any fix needed?
[16:17] <jamespage> well its always close to the line - but yes that does seem to be the problem this release
[16:17] <Daviey> Well, we should dive for extra opportunities to reduce it's size
[16:18] <Daviey> but growth is expected.
[16:18] <jamespage> I'm not sure TBH - I though the -virtual piece was going to be managed with additional module packages
[16:18] <jamespage> which is the bulk of the oversize ATM
[16:18] <jamespage> ~60MB I think
[16:18] <jamespage> smb`, any opinion on ^^
[16:18]  * smb` tries to catch up
[16:19] <utlemming> jamespage: -virtual did indeed get dropped...and the kernel bloat in the AMI's is ~200M as a result
[16:19] <jamespage> utlemming, sounds about right :-)
[16:19] <arosales> in parallel for bug 920197, zul is that progressing as expected?
[16:20] <zul> arosales: no it needs some work still which im doing this afternoon
[16:20] <smb`> utlemming, Why there would be a virtual meta which only consists of the smaller part
[16:20] <utlemming> smb: is there a -virtual meta then?
[16:21] <arosales> zul: ok thanks. Make sure to ping smoser or jamespage both on the 12.04.1 team if any assistance is needed.
[16:21] <smb`> utlemming, linux-generic-meta -> linxu-image-generic + linux-image-extra-generic   vs. linux-virtual-meta -> linux-image-generic
[16:21] <zul> arosales: ack
[16:21] <jamespage> smb`, utlemming: sounds like we are bloating out to much
[16:21] <jamespage> arosales, please action smb, utlemming and I to discuss offline
[16:21] <jamespage> well online but not in this meeting :-)
[16:22] <utlemming> +1, we'll discuss this right after
[16:22] <smb`> jamespage, At least that is the theory, we need to reality check but, yes put up an action
[16:22] <arosales> #action jamespage and utlemming to discuss dropping -virtual kernel; re bug 1009553
[16:22] <meetingology> ACTION: jamespage and utlemming to discuss dropping -virtual kernel; re bug 1009553
[16:22] <arosales> utlemming: jamespage and smb thanks
[16:22] <jamespage> ta
[16:22] <arosales> bug 1008537
[16:22] <arosales> failed to build
[16:23] <arosales> may be similar to bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/968308
[16:23] <arosales> anyone interested in taking a look ?
[16:24] <arosales> webkit and sphinx
[16:24] <arosales> any interested folks?
[16:25] <Daviey> i'll investigate it.
[16:25] <arosales> Daviey: thanks
[16:25] <arosales> moving onto blueprints http://status.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-quantal/ubuntu-server.html
[16:25] <arosales> so we got some good work items documented, and dependencies liked to topics.
[16:26] <arosales> please take a look if the dependency linkage looks correct for your blueprint
[16:26] <arosales> also be sure to be implementing the blueprint spec into blueprints, jamespage do you have a link handy?
[16:27] <jamespage> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/BlueprintSpec
[16:27] <arosales> jamespage: thanks
[16:27] <jamespage> I do - thanks skaet!
[16:27] <arosales> Any other items on blueprints?
[16:28]  * arosales forgot the two topics under quantal dev
[16:28] <hallyn> hm, in https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/servercloud-q-server-iso-tests-review, i hope someone will explain to me what that action item assigned to me is
[16:29] <arosales> jamespage:  can you assist hallyn with work items on the ISO tesing?
[16:29] <jamespage> hallyn, arosales: yep
[16:29] <arosales> #action jamespage to follow up with hallyn on servercloud-q-server-iso-tests-review
[16:29] <meetingology> ACTION: jamespage to follow up with hallyn on servercloud-q-server-iso-tests-review
[16:29] <arosales> jamespage: thanks
[16:29] <hallyn> thx
[16:29] <arosales> #topic Ubuntu Server Team Events
[16:29] <arosales> jim is at  http://static.usenix.org/events/config10/index.html
[16:30] <arosales> this week
[16:30] <arosales> Velocity coming up in a couple of weeks.
[16:30] <arosales> any other events?
[16:30] <jamespage> I pretending to be hazmat at EuroPycon at the start of July
[16:30] <arosales> cool, should be fun pretending to be hazmat :-)
[16:30] <SpamapS> jamespage: I can't wait to see your beard :)
[16:31] <arosales> #topic Weekly Updates & Questions for the QA Team (hggdh)
[16:31] <arosales> hggdh: Any updates from QA?
[16:31] <jamespage> SpamapS, I'm working on that :-)
[16:32] <jamespage> hggdh, whats the current status on UTAH?
[16:32] <arosales> perhaps hggdh isn't around at the moment. hggdh please feel free to comment if you return.
[16:32] <arosales> #topic Weekly Updates & Questions for the Kernel Team (smb)
[16:32] <arosales> smb`:  how is the kernel looking?
[16:33] <smb`> Mostly harmless...
[16:33] <arosales> any questions for smb` ?
[16:33] <arosales> thanks smb`
[16:34] <arosales> #topic Weekly Updates & Questions regarding Ubuntu ARM Server (rbasak)
[16:34] <rbasak> Calxeda's Highbank machine is now enabled in Quantal! We're planning a more detailed announcement on this soon, including installation instructions. MAAS support for this machine is now the next step.
[16:34] <rbasak> Any questions for me?
[16:34] <arosales> woot :-)
[16:35] <arosales> no other questions for rbasak
[16:35] <arosales> #topic Open Discussion
[16:35] <utlemming> rbasak: so we need to get together
[16:35] <utlemming> and get the armhf images using the Highbank then
[16:36] <arosales> Daviey: I'll follow up with rbasak on seeing how we can get our server team blog moved to the correct home. I have an action items to correct the spelling so I'll investigate the move with rbask.
[16:36]  * rbasak just wanted the typo fixed!
[16:36] <rbasak> That'll be <5 minutes for someone with access, right?
[16:37] <Daviey> rbasak: we need to move it regardless
[16:37] <Daviey> rbasak: You volunteered AIUI.
[16:37] <rbasak> Where should it go?
[16:37] <arosales> #action utlemming to follow up with rbasak on getting armhf images using highbank.
[16:37] <meetingology> ACTION: utlemming to follow up with rbasak on getting armhf images using highbank.
[16:37]  * rbasak didn't volunteer. He just asked for the typo to be fixed.
[16:37] <Daviey> rbasak: canonical hosted.. under that domain (owned by canonical)
[16:37] <m_3> prob a good idea to talk to jcastro about it
[16:38] <Daviey> rbasak: just need to raise an RT and get IS to setup wordpress under that domain.
[16:38] <Daviey> and migrate content... can you take that?
[16:38] <rbasak> Who has access to the current wordpress?
[16:38] <rbasak> To migrate content I'll want access
[16:38] <Daviey> rbasak: it's wordpress.org.. so all of us.
[16:38] <Daviey> err, .com
[16:38] <rbasak> Credentials?
[16:38] <Daviey> rbasak: anyone on the team can have an account
[16:38] <rbasak> Who has admin access?
[16:39] <Daviey> rbasak: If you don't have one, i can add you.
[16:39] <rbasak> Please
[16:39] <Daviey> rbasak: lets take this offline.
[16:39] <arosales> ok, thanks Daviey
[16:39] <arosales> Any other topics to discuss?
[16:40] <arosales> ok, thanks for everyone's time
[16:40] <arosales> #topic Announce next meeting date and time
[16:40] <jamespage> o/
[16:40] <jamespage> I had one actually
[16:40] <arosales> Tuesday 2012-06-19 at 1600 UTC
[16:40] <arosales> jamespage:  go
[16:40] <jamespage> OK - so smoser and I and representing the server team for the 12.04.1 release
[16:41] <Daviey> so don't mess it up.
[16:41] <jamespage> we have a regular catchup with all of the other 12.04.1 folk every 2 weeks
[16:41] <jamespage> I spent some time updating zul's reports - http://people.canonical.com/~jamespage/server-sru/precise-sru.html
[16:42] <jamespage> it you come across any bugs that should be SRU'ed please raise tasks for precise and target them to 12.04.1 - that way they will appear in the report
[16:42] <jamespage> assigning someone or an upload being accepted into -proposed results in them moving to 'inflight'
[16:43] <jamespage> I'd also like to have a regular slot in the meeting as well
[16:43] <jamespage> not to review the entire report but to focus on any problematic bugs...
[16:43] <jamespage> oh - http://people.canonical.com/~jamespage/server-sru/ contains series based reports for all supported releases as well
[16:43] <arosales> perhaps after the quantal development section
[16:43] <jamespage> that would make sense to me
[16:44] <arosales> #action arosales to add 12.04.1 Development section
[16:44] <meetingology> ACTION: arosales to add 12.04.1 Development section
[16:44] <arosales> jamespage: and smoser 	thanks for rep'ing server in the 12.04.01 team
[16:45] <arosales> any other items to discuss
[16:45] <arosales> Next meeting is Tuesday 2012-06-19 at 1600 UTC. Thanks for attending, and bearing with me ;-)
[16:45] <arosales> #endmeeting
[16:45] <meetingology> Meeting ended Tue Jun 12 16:45:55 2012 UTC.
[16:45] <meetingology> Minutes (wiki):        http://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting/2012/ubuntu-meeting.2012-06-12-16.00.moin.txt
[16:45] <meetingology> Minutes (html):        http://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting/2012/ubuntu-meeting.2012-06-12-16.00.html
[16:46] <jamespage> thanks arosales - great first chair!
[16:54] <hggdh> for the record -- UTAH is getting ready to have some tests ported
[16:59] <arosales> thanks hggdh
[17:00] <jsalisbury> #startmeeting
[17:00] <meetingology> Meeting started Tue Jun 12 17:00:05 2012 UTC.  The chair is jsalisbury. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology.
[17:00] <meetingology> Available commands: #accept #accepted #action #agree #agreed #chair #commands #endmeeting #endvote #halp #help #idea #info #link #lurk #meetingname #meetingtopic #nick #progress #rejected #replay #restrictlogs #save #startmeeting #subtopic #topic #unchair #undo #unlurk #vote #voters #votesrequired
[17:00] <jsalisbury> ##
[17:00] <jsalisbury> ## This is the Ubuntu Kernel Team weekly status meeting.
[17:00] <jsalisbury> ##
[17:00] <jsalisbury> [LINK] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelTeam/Meeting
[17:00] <jsalisbury> [LINK] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelTeam/ReleaseStatus/Precise
[17:00] <jsalisbury> # Meeting Etiquette
[17:00] <jsalisbury> #
[17:00] <jsalisbury> # NOTE: '..' indicates that you are finished with your input.
[17:00] <jsalisbury> #       'o/' indicates you have something to add (please wait until you are recognized)
[17:00] <jsalisbury> Roll Call for Ubuntu Kernel Weekly Status Meeting
[17:00] <ppisati> o/
[17:00] <herton> o/
[17:00] <sforshee> o/
[17:00] <bjf> -\o/-
[17:00] <henrix> o/
[17:00] <cking> \o
[17:00] <kamal> o/
[17:00] <BenC> o/
[17:00] <sconklin_> o/
[17:00] <arges> o/
[17:00] <jsalisbury> [TOPIC] ARM Status (ppisati)
[17:00] <ppisati> Q/omap4: no new code was committed since last week, kept working on the configuration (delta reduction against master).
[17:00] <ppisati> ..
[17:01] <jsalisbury> [TOPIC] Release Metrics and Incoming Bugs (jsalisbury)
[17:01] <jsalisbury> Release metrics and incoming bug data can be reviewed at the following link:
[17:01] <jsalisbury> [LINK] http://people.canonical.com/~kernel/reports/kt-meeting.txt
[17:01] <jsalisbury> ..
[17:01] <jsalisbury> [TOPIC] Milestone Targeted Work Items (ogasawara)
[17:01] <ogasawara> yeek, just a sec
[17:02] <ogasawara> [LINK] http://status.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-quantal/canonical-kernel-distro-team-quantal-alpha-2.html
[17:02] <ogasawara> || apw         || hardware-q-kernel-config-review || 4 work item   ||
[17:02] <ogasawara> ||             || hardware-q-kernel-delta-review  || 3 work items  ||
[17:02] <ogasawara> ||             || hardware-q-kernel-versions-and-flavors || 1 work item ||
[17:02] <ogasawara> || cking       || hardware-q-kernel-delta-review  || 2 work items  ||
[17:02] <ogasawara> || cooloney    || hardware-q-kernel-config-review || 1 work item   ||
[17:02] <ogasawara> || jjohansen   || hardware-q-kernel-config-review || 1 work item   ||
[17:02] <ogasawara> || jk-         || hardware-q-kernel-config-review || 2 work items  ||
[17:02] <ogasawara> || ogasawara   || hardware-q-kernel-config-review || 2 work items  ||
[17:02] <ogasawara> || cyphermox   || hardware-q-kernel-delta-review  || 1 work item   ||
[17:02] <ogasawara> || ppisati     || hardware-q-kernel-config-review || 1 work item   ||
[17:02] <ogasawara> || sforshee    || hardware-q-kernel-delta-review  || 1 work item   ||
[17:02] <ogasawara> || smb         || hardware-q-kernel-delta-review  || 1 work item   ||
[17:02] <ogasawara> ||             || hardware-q-kernel-versions-and-flavors || 1 work item   ||
[17:02] <ogasawara> || tgardner    || hardware-q-kernel-config-review || 2 work items  ||
[17:02] <ogasawara> ||             || hardware-q-kernel-delta-review  || 2 work items  ||
[17:02] <ogasawara> || tlei        || hardware-q-kernel-delta-review  || 2 work items  ||
[17:02] <ogasawara> || kernel-team || hardware-q-kernel-config-review || 3 work items ||
[17:02] <ogasawara> ||             || hardware-q-kernel-versions-and-flavors || 2 work items ||
[17:02] <ogasawara> If your name is in the above table, please review your Alpha-2 work
[17:02] <ogasawara> items.
[17:02] <ogasawara> ..
[17:02] <jsalisbury> [TOPIC] Status: Quantal Development Kernel (ogasawara)
[17:03] <ogasawara> We have recently rebased the Quantal kernel to the latest v3.5-rc2
[17:03] <ogasawara> upstream kernel.  I'd like to see a little more smoke testing before
[17:03] <ogasawara> uploading.
[17:03] <ogasawara> We've also began providing the 12.10 kernel for 12.04.  We welcome any
[17:03] <ogasawara> early adopters to please install, test, and let us know your feedback.
[17:03] <ogasawara> It is available from the following PPA:
[17:03] <ogasawara> https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat/+archive/q-lts-backport
[17:03] <ogasawara> Important upcoming dates:
[17:03] <ogasawara>  * Thurs Jun 28 - Alpha 2 (~2 weeks)
[17:03] <ogasawara> ..
[17:03] <jsalisbury> [TOPIC] Status: Stable, Security, and Bugfix Kernel Updates - Precise/Oneiric/Natty/Lucid/Hardy (bjf/herton/henrix)
[17:03] <bjf> Here is the status for the main kernels, until today (June  05):
[17:03] <bjf>  
[17:03] <bjf>  * Hardy    - 2.6.24-31.102 - Being prepared; 2 CVEs
[17:03] <bjf>  * Lucid    - 2.6.32-41.91  - Being prepared; 2 CVEs
[17:03] <bjf>  * Natty    - 2.6.38-15.61  - Being prepared; 3 CVEs
[17:03] <bjf>  * Oneiric  - 3.0.0-22.36   - Being prepared; 1 upstream stable release (approx. 60 commits), 1 CVE
[17:03] <bjf>  * Precise  - 3.2.0-26.41   - Being prepared; 1 upstream stable release (approx. 137 commits)
[17:03] <bjf>  
[17:03] <bjf> Current opened tracking bugs details:
[17:03] <bjf>  * http://people.canonical.com/~kernel/reports/kernel-sru-workflow.html
[17:03] <bjf>  
[17:03] <bjf> For SRUs, SRU report is a good source of information:
[17:03] <bjf>  * http://people.canonical.com/~kernel/reports/sru-report.html
[17:03] <bjf>  
[17:03] <bjf> Future stable cadence cycles:
[17:03] <bjf>  * https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QuantalQuetzal/ReleaseInterlock
[17:03] <bjf>  
[17:03] <bjf> ..
[17:03] <jsalisbury> [TOPIC] Status: CVE's (sconklin)
[17:03] <sconklin_> == 2012-06-12 (weekly) ==
[17:03] <sconklin_> Currently we have 89 CVEs on our radar, with 0 new CVEs added this week.
[17:03] <sconklin_> See the CVE matrix for the current list:
[17:03] <sconklin_> [LINK] http://people.canonical.com/~kernel/cve/pkg/ALL-linux.html
[17:03] <sconklin_> There is no change in the backlog this week:
[17:03] <sconklin_> [LINK] http://people.canonical.com/~kernel/status/cve-metrics.txt
[17:03] <sconklin_> [LINK] http://people.canonical.com/~kernel/cve/pkg/CVE-linux.txt
[17:04] <sconklin_> ..
[17:04] <jsalisbury> [TOPIC] Open Discussion or Questions? Raise your hand to be recognized (o/)
[17:04] <kamal> o/
[17:04] <jsalisbury> kamal, go
[17:04] <BenC> o/
[17:04] <kamal> I've recently been working with the upstream Bufferbloat group: http://www.bufferbloat.net ...
[17:04] <kamal> They have implemented new network scheduler algorithms designed to address the performance drag induced by large unmanaged network buffers.  The new stuff ("fq_codel" and "codel") just landed in linux 3.5.
[17:04] <kamal> A good article about the bufferbloat problem and the new scheduling algo's is here: http://queue.acm.org/detail.cfm?id=2209336
[17:04] <kamal> The result is *very* impressive:  I see a 30X reduction in ping latency on a fully saturated 10Mbps network, just by switching on the new fq_codel scheduler.
[17:04] <kamal> For an interactive ssh session over that same saturated 10Mbps network, fq_codel totally eliminates the laggy keyboard response -- it feels like there's no other network traffic at all!
[17:04] <kamal> I have produced a Bufferbloat PPA to allow us to experiment with this stuff now in Precise and Quantal:
[17:04] <kamal> https://launchpad.net/~kamalmostafa/+archive/bufferbloat
[17:04] <kamal> The PPA includes a "quantal-3.4-plus-bufferbloat" kernel for precise and quantal.  (The new schedulers won't work on pre-3.3 kernels).  The PPA page links to a quick how-to-smoke-test-it guide and more info.
[17:05] <kamal> The Bufferbloat group is eager for testing and feedback and general eyeball time from the Ubuntu kernel team and the Ubuntu community.  Their channel is #bufferbloat on freenode.
[17:05] <kamal> Please give my PPA a whirl, and get a taste of the new cutting-edge network goodness.  Any questions about it -- I'll at least know who to direct you to, so feel free to ask me.
[17:05] <kamal> ..
[17:05] <jsalisbury> BenC, go
[17:05] <BenC> I had this on the meeting agenda, but don't see it above.
[17:05] <BenC> Trying to get some feedback for the patches I sent to kernel-team@, hoping to get it merged for next kernel upload
[17:05] <BenC> Re: PowerPC e500mc
[17:06] <BenC> ..
[17:07] <apw> BenC, i think that are being reviewed at the moment arn't they ?
[17:07] <BenC> If so, I'm unaware :)
[17:08] <BenC> Also, if there are any suggestions on changes to my workflow for getting powerpc stuff merged, let me know
[17:08] <bjf> we are looking at them and seeing if they scare us or not
[17:09] <BenC> bjf: The only scary one(s) are the mdio phy changes, but I have tested them extensively on non-ppc
[17:09] <tgardner> BenC: just got back after 5 days off. they are on my todo list.
[17:09] <BenC> Everything else is either nop or segmented on non-ppc
[17:09] <BenC> tgardner: thanks
[17:09] <bjf> a lot of the patches are sauce, are those also heading upstream ?
[17:10] <BenC> All of them have been pushed upstream
[17:10] <BenC> 2 have been accepted
[17:10] <tgardner> BenC: I should have some comments by tomorrow. got a huge pile of email to deal with...
[17:10] <BenC> Oh wait, not the SAUCE, not yet
[17:10] <BenC> freescale had 360+ patches last year, so they've done a lot to get this merged upstream
[17:10] <BenC> These are the last few, and are being dealt with in the coming months
[17:11] <BenC> tgardner: ok, please email, ping me if any questions come up…
[17:11] <tgardner> will do
[17:11] <tgardner> ..
[17:11] <BenC> ..
[17:12] <jsalisbury> Anything else for open discussion?
[17:12] <jsalisbury> Thanks everyone
[17:12] <jsalisbury> #endmeeting
[17:12] <meetingology> Meeting ended Tue Jun 12 17:12:39 2012 UTC.
[17:12] <meetingology> Minutes (wiki):        http://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting/2012/ubuntu-meeting.2012-06-12-17.00.moin.txt
[17:12] <meetingology> Minutes (html):        http://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting/2012/ubuntu-meeting.2012-06-12-17.00.html
[17:12] <kamal> thanks jsalisbury