[00:32] <^Phantom^> Hi
[00:32] <^Phantom^> I come back to recieve word on my ban.
[00:55] <elky> ^Phantom^, can you describe what happened please. Remembering that you will always be held responsible for what others do with your login, etc.
[00:56] <^Phantom^> It was discussed a few days ago, and I was asked to return for the final decision.
[04:59] <bazhang> ^Phantom^, why were you banned in the first place
[05:00] <^Phantom^> posting xchat crash codes
[05:01] <bazhang> ^Phantom^, why would you do that
[05:04] <^Phantom^> a friend and i were trolling all over irc networks with it
[05:05] <bazhang> ^Phantom^, who did you discuss removing the ban with
[05:06] <^Phantom^> I think it was AlanBell
[05:07] <^Phantom^> I don't have it in the xchat backlog for this os :S
[05:07] <^Phantom^> I think DJones is the one that had me come here to talk about it
[05:07] <bazhang> ^Phantom^, why do you need back into #ubuntu ? if you see it as a place to troll
[05:07] <^Phantom^> It was a 1-2 day stint
[05:08] <^Phantom^> It won't happen again
[05:08] <bazhang> that doesnt answer my question. and you have had issues in #ubuntu in the past as well, so you know the channel guidelines by now
[05:55] <Myrtti> ^Phantom^: hello?
[06:07] <Tm_Tr> Myrtti: I recall he said before he did that on many channels (and networks), staff comment on DoS behaviour appreciated as usual
[06:12] <Myrtti> sadly I personally have very little to say on the subject
[06:30] <^Phantom^> Hi
[06:30] <^Phantom^> Sorry I went afk for a bit
[07:43] <DJones> That was Amador, removed from channel
[09:23] <ikonia> ^Phantom^: are you still there please ?
[09:23] <AlanBell> ^Phantom^: the attemt to crash the clients of other users is a huge problem. I have no inclination at all to let you back into our larger channels
[09:23] <^Phantom^> I am here
[09:23] <^Phantom^> I guarantee it won't happen again.
[09:24] <AlanBell> there are plenty of channels that are not #ubuntu and there is the rest of the internet available for you to enjoy
[09:33] <ikonia> ^Phantom^: you now have your answer, could you please leave the channel
[14:09]  * Pici slides ikonia a coffee
[14:10] <ikonia> thank you
[14:45] <bazhang> :0
[14:46]  * knome doesn't like nick-games
[15:06] <bazhang> a PPA that breaks dpkg?
[15:07] <Pici> eh?
[15:37] <bazhang> no means NO!
[15:40] <bazhang> Mr UOBTTU!
[15:40] <bazhang> whoops
[15:42] <ikonia> what dell blockade of ubuntu is AGrinsPaul on about ?
[15:43] <Pici> no idea
[15:43] <Pici> I'm done with good_samaritan.
[15:43] <Pici> Hopefully he'll stop now.
[15:44] <ikonia> good
[15:45] <Fuchs> ikonia: just out of interest, why pointing him to defocus and not your offtopic channel?
[15:45] <ikonia> Fuchs: because it's just nonsense
[15:45] <Pici> hah
[15:45] <Fuchs> ikonia: then that is not a nice thing to do, just passing the nonsense over to us to handle :(
[15:46] <ikonia> the same way he's desperate to tell people in #ubuntu rather than join #defocus suggests he wants to shout in #ubuntu
[15:46] <ikonia> Fuchs: that wasn't the intention
[15:46] <Fuchs> okay
[15:46] <Pici> #defocus is more moderated than it used to be, its not the melting pot of nonsense that it used to be
[15:46] <ikonia> the guy just appears to want to vent
[15:47] <ikonia> it's still more flexible than #ubuntu-offtopic
[15:47] <ikonia> (unless it's now not)
[15:47] <Pici> Is Aline making any sense?
[15:47] <ikonia> of course not
[15:47] <Fuchs> Pici: thanks, and that costs us lots of manpower, thats why i am happy to not collect everyone that other chans dont want :)
[15:47] <Fuchs> anyway, sorry for ot and read you later, train awaits
[15:48] <ikonia> Fuchs: lets see what he says in #defocus
[15:48] <ikonia> Fuchs: it's a reasonable question, no need to apologise
[15:48] <Pici> oh, its a bot. how nice.
[15:48] <Pici> 11:48:09 <?Aline> One toilet space could be found on boot options?
[15:48] <ikonia> ahhh it's the EFI OS lock from windows he's ranting about
[15:51] <GrueGRUUUUUUuue> Nobody responded in defocus so I had to ask in -offtopic instead. It's no spam; just a youtube vid of discussion.
[15:51] <ikonia> it's tedious and just hitting random channels with it
[15:52] <GrueGRUUUUUUuue> ikonia, they're off-topic... -_-
[15:52] <ikonia> the fact that you are still trying to push it in defocus as some sort of political agenda doesn't make me want to allow it in #ubuntu-offtopic
[15:52] <GrueGRUUUUUUuue> What am I gonna do if no one responds?
[15:52] <ikonia> GrueGRUUUUUUuue: nothing
[15:52] <ikonia> GrueGRUUUUUUuue: it means no-one wants to talk about it - so stop
[15:52] <GrueGRUUUUUUuue> I just want to find the right room to talk about it then.
[15:53] <ikonia> GrueGRUUUUUUuue: go and find one then
[15:53] <GrueGRUUUUUUuue> suggestions for which channels?
[15:53] <ikonia> none
[15:54] <ikonia> either way, if you change the topic of your discussion you are welcome back in #ubuntu-offtopic
[15:54] <ikonia> GrueGRUUUUUUuue: if you're done here could you please /part the channel
[15:55] <GrueGRUUUUUUuue> ok then.
[15:55] <ikonia> thanks
[15:59] <Myrtti> here's a GIF for all of you; please remember it when you need to play whack-a-troll. http://imgur.com/gallery/xUHdw
[16:02] <ikonia> please can someone watch Chuck_Norris
[16:03] <ikonia> he's just joined and I expect his quality support will start soon
[16:03] <Pici> watch mah channel.
[16:03] <ikonia> ha ha ha ha
[16:03] <ikonia> genuinly laughing, very nice
[16:29] <astraljava> Myrtti: lovely :)
[19:00] <Gentoo64> is this the right channel to request an unban?
[19:02] <ikonia> sure
[19:02] <ikonia> so what's changed since you got banned ?
[19:03] <Gentoo64> got banned ages ago, cant remember why
[19:03] <ikonia> really,
[19:03] <ikonia> pretty annoying and bad behaving
[19:04] <ikonia> and then trying to ban evade multiple times over the following weeks so you could join and say "ikonia you are a shit" and other such things
[19:04] <ikonia> none of that sound familer ?
[19:04] <Gentoo64> nope lol
[19:04] <Gentoo64> when you banned me i might have called u something
[19:05] <ikonia> this went on for a couple of weeks
[19:05] <Gentoo64> it cant have
[19:05] <ikonia> trying to dodge the ban so you could post offensive/stupid things into the channel and /part
[19:05] <Gentoo64> well that werent me
[19:05] <ikonia> really, so someone else was using your nikckname and account ?
[19:05] <Gentoo64> i doubt it
[19:05] <ikonia> so it was you then
[19:06] <Gentoo64> no...
[19:06] <Gentoo64> i never do stuff like that
[19:06] <ikonia> oh, really
[19:06] <ikonia> ok so parking that for a moment
[19:07] <ikonia> what's changed with you ?
[19:07] <Gentoo64> brb dinner
[19:07] <ikonia> Gentoo64: please /part then
[19:07] <ikonia> come back when you are free
[19:08] <ikonia> @mark #ubuntu-ops Gentoo64 requesting unban appears to have the same attitude as before when he was banned
[19:33] <mneptok> Gentoo64: are you actually available to discuss your ban?
[19:38]  * mneptok flicks the lights on and off
[19:38] <mneptok> Gentoo64, over.
[19:42] <mneptok> for the record, a CTCP version failed to summon.
[19:52] <ikonia> I suspect he's just trying to annoy....as he was when he actually got banned
[20:34] <IdleOne> @mark #ubuntu-server RoyK PM'ed Royk reminding them of the language policy in ubuntu channels.
[20:57] <ikonia> IdleOne: again.....
[20:58] <IdleOne> ikonia: He and tmb are often the offenders (repeat)
[20:58] <ikonia> I know, it's getting tiresome
[20:59] <IdleOne> so I sent them both on different days friendly PM's and next time I will remove/ban for a few days.
[21:39] <ikonia> hello RoyK thank you for joining
[21:40] <ikonia> RoyK: I didn't want to take up any more space in #ubuntu-server for this short discussion
[21:40] <ikonia> RoyK: I just wanted to ask you to use common sense in the ubuntu channels about swearing, there is no pre-defined set of words, however if your unsure of what is acceptable in polite conversation, I suggest you stick to using words you would use in a job interview
[21:41] <ikonia> is that clear/acceptable ?
[21:58] <ikonia> RoyK: you there ?
[23:30] <Jordan_U> !clone
[23:32] <Jordan_U> I would expect that most users would have some multiarch packages, does it really make sense to keep the factoid instructions as-is if it might (will?) break with the majority (maybe I'm wrong about that) of configurations?