| ScottK | armhf is armv7 in both instead of armv3 and armv7. | 03:30 |
|---|---|---|
| micahg | ScottK: in quantal it's armv4t and armv5 AIUI | 03:32 |
| micahg | err...sid vs quantal | 03:33 |
| micahg | for armel | 03:33 |
| ScottK | Pretty sure we're v7. | 03:33 |
| ScottK | jaunty was v5, IIRC. | 03:33 |
| === Amaranthus is now known as Amaranth | ||
| dholbach | good morning | 07:08 |
| cousteau | could someone do something with bug #860045 please? it's almost 9 months old | 07:59 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 860045 in gdb-msp430 (Ubuntu) "package gdb-msp430 7.2~mspgcc-7.2-20110612-1 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/share/gdb/python/gdb/__init__.py', which is also in package gdb 7.3-0ubuntu2" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/860045 | 07:59 |
| === almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan | ||
| === al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away | ||
| badfox | some one can help me with how to choose basic beginner merges | 12:34 |
| badfox | some one please | 12:35 |
| badfox | dholbach, ping | 12:35 |
| dholbach | hi badfox | 12:35 |
| badfox | hi dholbach | 12:36 |
| dholbach | I think there's no way to just pick them somewhere, but it helps if you check out the REPORT file of a few merges on merges.ubuntu.com and see how complicated the changes sound | 12:37 |
| badfox | dholbach, my problem is i am a basic starter of merging . i have done merging to one package . That is dnprogs . so now i want your help to help me on merges . i mean some easy merges i can do . | 12:37 |
| dholbach | for example if it says "demoted X from recommends to suggests" then that's a simple change | 12:37 |
| dholbach | but if there's a gazillions lines of changes it might be harder :) | 12:37 |
| dholbach | yes, I'd go through the list of merges on merges.u.c and check out a few | 12:38 |
| badfox | ok | 12:38 |
| badfox | i have opened that already | 12:38 |
| badfox | dholbach, https://merges.ubuntu.com/universe.html#outstanding i am here now | 12:38 |
| dholbach | cool | 12:38 |
| badfox | so confuse what to choose | 12:38 |
| dholbach | as I said: pick one, check out the changes in the report which were done in the past | 12:39 |
| dholbach | does anyone else have a secret recipe? | 12:40 |
| badfox | ok i will try | 12:40 |
| dholbach | ok cool | 12:41 |
| dholbach | if you have questions, just ask in here | 12:41 |
| dholbach | I've got to go out for a bit now, but I'm sure somebody else can answer as well :) | 12:41 |
| badfox | https://merges.ubuntu.com/a/activiz.net/REPORT this one seems , good for a basic starter like me | 12:41 |
| dholbach | good luck! :) | 12:43 |
| dholbach | see you in a bit | 12:43 |
| badfox | dholbach, is it fine ight | 12:43 |
| badfox | right ? | 12:43 |
| Laney | you should be able to sync activiz.net | 12:43 |
| Laney | fyi :-) | 12:43 |
| badfox | means Laney ? | 12:44 |
| Laney | it means that the changes we have are no longer needed, so we can copy the version from debian | 12:44 |
| Laney | in this case it looks like -2 incorporated them | 12:44 |
| Laney | but of course you should confirm this | 12:45 |
| Laney | !sync | 12:45 |
| ubottu | Helpful information for filing a sync request can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SyncRequestProcess | 12:45 |
| badfox | Laney, now i am getting it to download | 12:47 |
| badfox | so you mean we can directly get it right ? | 12:47 |
| Laney | you should verify this yourself | 12:47 |
| Laney | but I think so. | 12:47 |
| badfox | Laney, whats the meaning of this message " It looks like this package is maintained in revision control:" | 12:50 |
| === ikonia is now known as ikonia_ | ||
| === ikonia_ is now known as ikonia | ||
| Laney | badfox: What it says: the maintainer keeps the package in a revision control system. If it refers to a debian.org URL then you can probably ignore it. | 13:43 |
| Laney | (because we usually only care about Debian packages that have been uploaded to the archive) | 13:43 |
| badfox | Laney, thanks :) i have stopped that | 13:43 |
| Laney | stopped? | 13:43 |
| badfox | making start is really a big deal for me i think | 13:43 |
| badfox | yeah doing that | 13:44 |
| Laney | how come? | 13:44 |
| badfox | because i have got some errors and i am unable to understand where the error | 13:44 |
| badfox | you want see the report ? la | 13:44 |
| badfox | Laney, ^^ | 13:44 |
| Laney | no it's ok, give me a second | 13:45 |
| badfox | :) | 13:45 |
| badfox | http://pastebin.com/2eYjdYnm Laney | 13:46 |
| Laney | that means you need to install the package containing Debian/Debhelper/Sequence/cli.pm | 13:49 |
| Laney | which is cli-common-dev | 13:49 |
| Laney | badfox: http://paste.debian.net/hidden/195be63e/ | 13:53 |
| === ogra_ is now known as ogra | ||
| === ogra is now known as ogra_ | ||
| * Laney syncs it | 14:44 | |
| a-zorin | I'm having some issues with building a package on Launchpad. I would greatly appreciate any suggestions if anyone may have any. Full details of the problem are here: http://goo.gl/mrVdl | 16:14 |
| maxb | a-zorin: The problem is in this line: | 16:17 |
| maxb | cc -Wl,-Bsymbolic-functions -Wl,-z,relro -lX11 -lXext -lXrender xwinwrap.o -o xwinwrap | 16:17 |
| maxb | -l options for libraries need to occur *after* the things that refer to symbols in them | 16:18 |
| a-zorin | Sorry for my ignorance, but what file is this line in? | 16:19 |
| a-zorin | Sorry, it was in the buildlog. Is there anyway to make it build correctly? | 16:30 |
| psusi | is there a way to search a g_tree for either an exact match, OR the next higher node? | 19:15 |
| micahg | siretart: sorry, I haven't gotten to libav-extra yet, but hopefully this weekend (Ubuntu studio who is the main consumer has other issues they're working on ATM, so it's not the end of the world) | 19:31 |
| siretart | micahg: ok, thanks for keeping me informed | 19:32 |
| iulian | psusi: Are you talking about glib binary trees? If yes, you would probably have more luck in #ubuntu-desktop. | 20:58 |
| iulian | (no idea if the guys in there deal with these but it's worth asking) | 20:59 |
| AmberJ | How can I pass number of jobs to run simultaneously when using debuild? 'make' uses -j option to specify tthis. How can I pass -j value to debuild (to be used by make)? | 22:02 |
| Zhenech | call debbuild -j? | 22:02 |
| Zhenech | it works for dpkg-buildpackage | 22:03 |
| Laney | yes, you can't see it in the debuild manpage because it's a dpkg-buildpackage option (debuild passes unknown options down to dpkg-buildpackage) | 22:03 |
| AmberJ | noted. Thanks :) | 22:06 |
| AmberJ | If a file does not gets installed by upstream's 'make install', we add a line to debian/install... On my system built files goto a directory (in root of source directory) obj-x86_64-linux-gnu | 22:13 |
| AmberJ | Is it safe to assume that on any amd64 install, build files will always goto obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/ ? | 22:14 |
| AmberJ | *on any amd64 install of Ubuntu distro | 22:14 |
| AmberJ | In fact, on any debian-based amd64 install.. | 22:15 |
| jtaylor_ | AmberJ_: no you can't assume that, but its probably sensible to assume that only one folder exists | 22:47 |
| jtaylor_ | so you could use wildcards | 22:47 |
| AmberJ | jtaylor_: Is obj-* what you mean? | 22:51 |
| jtaylor_ | yes, you could also patch the buildsystem | 22:51 |
| AmberJ | ok thanks! | 22:54 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!