[07:01] <dholbach> good morning
[07:03] <ajmitch> hi dholbach
[07:06] <geser> good morning
[07:10] <dholbach> hi ajmitch, geser, toabctl
[07:10] <toabctl> hey dholbach
[08:33] <Laney> ello
[08:45] <geser> Hi Laney
[08:55] <iulian> Morning.
[10:11]  * tumbleweed waves from back home in cape town
[10:29] <directhex> are you wearing a cape?
[10:29] <tumbleweed> wouldn't be a bad idea, it's getting chilly
[13:45] <paultag> Hi there, MOTU. I've recieved a report about one of my maintained packages having a bug by default in Ubuntu, which I've ACK'd and fixed. New upload is sitting in sid - but -P is still affected. I've never done a SRU, but I've got a minimal patch. Should I just apply the patch to the version in -P, call it $VERSIONubuntu1, and push it to a PPA for ACK builds, then ask for it to be sponsored?
[13:45] <Laney> target to precise-proposed, file a bug report with the required information, seek sponsorship
[13:45] <Laney> !sru
[13:46] <paultag> Laney: ACK'd, thank you
[13:46] <paultag> Laney: bug is sitting as #1014425 - I've triaged it already.
[13:46] <Laney> cool, then you just need to edit the description to have the required information
[13:47] <paultag> Should I also attach a debdiff there or use REVU or something? I'm like 3 years out of date on any chance of up-to-date policy
[13:47] <Laney> attaching the debdiff is fine
[13:47] <paultag> right, thanks.
[13:48] <Laney> make sure the changelog closes the SRU bug, and just subscribe ubuntu-sponsors to get it on the queue
[13:48] <paultag> yep
[14:18] <vibhav> Ill write a poem dedicated to MOTU's one day
[14:18] <vibhav> :D
[17:43] <aboudreault> Hi.... I'm trying to use pbuilder-dist in a LXC container and can't get it to work since I've upgraded to precise.
[17:43] <aboudreault> the problem is related to the mount /proc
[17:43] <aboudreault> : Failure trying to run: chroot /var/cache/pbuilder/build/22607/. mount -t proc proc /proc
[17:43] <aboudreault> E: debootstrap failed
[17:43] <aboudreault> are you aware of the issue?
[17:45] <tumbleweed> isn't chrooting blocked by apparmor in precise? (or something like that)
[17:46] <aboudreault> it might be, but can't find the proper solution
[17:46] <aboudreault> tried something I've seen in a launchpad bug with no luck
[17:47] <stgraber> aboudreault: hallyn replied to your bug report
[17:47] <aboudreault> stgraber, ha, checking.
[17:52] <aboudreault> great. it worked.
[19:26] <jpds> If a package is at version 3.0.2-1 and I prepare an SRU, the SRU's version is 3.0.2-1ubuntu1 or 3.0.2-1ubuntu0.1 ?
[19:26] <kees> jpds: the latter
[19:26] <kees> (so that it does not conflict with a possible next-release version numbered 3.0.2-1ubuntu1)
[19:27] <jpds> kees: Aha, thought so, thanks.
[19:27] <kees> np :)
[19:29] <micahg> jpds: depends if it's in a previous release at the same version or not
[19:30] <kees> that's that too, yes
[22:09] <micahg> hrm, we have 79 core devs and 72 MOTUs (not including core-devs)
[22:11]  * ajmitch wonders how many of each have uploaded something in the last 6 months, as a measure of activity
[22:11] <ajmitch> could probably find out with UDD
[22:14] <iulian> ajmitch: Core-dev or MOTU? If the latter please don't use UDD or rather don't look for my name.
[22:15]  * iulian should probably jump in and do so some uploads.
[22:15] <ajmitch> iulian: not a matter of finding people to pick on, just trying to see how many people are active in each group :)
[22:16]  * ajmitch should probably do some uploads as well for non-ARB stuff
[22:16]  * ajmitch waits for micahg to mention asterisk :)
[22:17] <iulian> Heh. :)
[22:18] <iulian> I bet he has an evil grin on his face right now. :)
[22:18] <ajmitch> of course
[22:19] <micahg> :D
[22:20] <micahg> out of the top 9 uploaders in precise which account for 50% of the uploads, we have 6 core devs, 2 MOTUs, and 1 Kubuntu dev :)
[22:20]  * ajmitch shall probably just upload it & not sync, since it built
[22:20] <micahg> s/precise/quantal/
[22:22]  * micahg sees that 13 out of the top 50 are MOTU as well
[22:41] <ScottK> KDE has enough packages that I was one of the top sponsors in precise by virtue of have done one complete KDE SC upload.
[22:42] <ScottK> tumbleweed: Would you be up for adding the number of uploads next to each name in http://people.ubuntuwire.org/~stefanor/ubuntu-activity/ - it should make things more sporting.
[22:43] <ScottK> micahg: Possibly worth mentioning that one or your MOTUs in there is a Xubuntu dev.
[22:45]  * Laney hasn't done Haskell yet
[22:45]  * Laney cackles
[22:45] <ajmitch> Laney: more ABI breakage?
[22:46] <Laney> I got the boulder to the top of the hill and it just rolled back down again
[22:46] <ajmitch> oh good, so I can cheat my way onto the charts again? :)
[22:47] <Laney> first fix it on armel
[22:47] <ajmitch> that sounds like work, how'd you break it there?
[22:47] <Laney> blame infinity
[22:48] <ajmitch> ok
[22:48] <ajmitch> are you going to get ghc 7.4.2 in?
[22:49] <Laney> when the time is right
[22:51] <micahg> ScottK: I only mentioned the Kubuntu dev part since he's not a MOTU or core dev
[22:51] <ScottK> OK.