=== knome_ is now known as knome | ||
brendand | does anyone know the milestone at which the images go from being hosted on cdimage to being hosted on releases? | 09:12 |
---|---|---|
brendand | i see alpha1 is on cdimage. will alpha2 be? | 09:12 |
cjwatson | brendand: we normally put betas on releases.u.c, not alphas | 09:20 |
brendand | cjwatson, thanks. that would make the most sense. is there any sort of enforcement around that? will betas always be on releases? | 09:21 |
cjwatson | Why are you asking? | 09:21 |
cjwatson | It's currently implemented in lp:ubuntu-archive-tools publish-image-set.pyp | 09:22 |
cjwatson | .py | 09:22 |
cjwatson | if 'alpha' in milestone: | 09:22 |
cjwatson | official = 'no' | 09:22 |
cjwatson | else: | 09:22 |
cjwatson | official = 'named' | 09:22 |
brendand | good enough for me | 09:22 |
brendand | it's for a script that needs to assemble url's to iso's as part of it's operation | 09:23 |
cjwatson | OK | 09:23 |
brendand | cjwatson, are there a fixed number of possible milestones? | 09:54 |
cjwatson | brendand: No | 09:56 |
Laney | I would appreciate it if people could comment on my proposal on list so that it can be rolled out before A2 freezes start if indeed we want it. | 10:17 |
Laney | it would involve a DB change to LP, so the lead time is kind of long | 10:18 |
tumbleweed | Laney: is this a safe change to make, before we can get -backports to build against packages in -backports? | 10:23 |
Laney | I think the intended fix there is to have the buildds ignore it | 10:26 |
Laney | and I believe infinity was going to do that, so maybe it is a simple matter of pokage | 10:27 |
jamespage | please could someone reject 'simple-http' from the quantal NEW queue - uploaded with a crufty orig.tar.bz2 | 11:07 |
seb128 | jamespage, done | 11:24 |
jamespage | thanks seb128! | 11:24 |
seb128 | yw | 11:24 |
=== Ursinha` is now known as Ursinha | ||
stgraber | mute tracker | 13:40 |
stgraber | mute | 13:40 |
stgraber | unmute tracker | 13:40 |
stgraber | ^ upgraded to the multi-threaded version, should be lower latency for queue monitoring and when controling the mute entries | 13:41 |
xnox | stgraber: =)))) | 13:54 |
highvoltage | stgraber: I guess LP bug 1013172 is a security bug? | 13:59 |
stgraber | highvoltage: no, just private | 14:08 |
highvoltage | ah right I guess since it might contain passwords | 14:08 |
stgraber | highvoltage: and it's public now as it doesn't contain anything private that I could see | 14:09 |
highvoltage | stgraber: I think it might contain passwords entered in ubiquity | 14:09 |
stgraber | highvoltage: no, ubiquity wasn't running in debug mode, so the debconf transactions aren't logged and IIRC even when it's in debug mode, the passwords are stripped | 14:10 |
highvoltage | stgraber: ok great | 14:11 |
stgraber | highvoltage: oh, I see the problem. cjwatson ported ubiquity-bluetooth-agent to python3 but didn't add a dependency on python3-gobject | 14:12 |
stgraber | highvoltage: I'll quickly test that it's indeed the only missing bit and will add the dependency if that's the case | 14:12 |
highvoltage | stgraber: k | 14:17 |
cjwatson | stgraber: no such thing as python3-gobject | 14:19 |
cjwatson | stgraber: needs to be ported to gi | 14:19 |
stgraber | cjwatson: yeah, I just noticed. Moving it to Gobject from gi.repository | 14:20 |
cjwatson | (which looks like it should be easy) | 14:20 |
cjwatson | but yeah, my bad for not noticing that | 14:20 |
cjwatson | stgraber: "IIRC even when it's in debug mode, the passwords are stripped" sadly not | 14:20 |
cjwatson | (well, unless I've forgotten something) | 14:20 |
=== doko__ is now known as doko | ||
stgraber | cjwatson: that's too bad, though at least it's easy to check in the logs whether they're running in debug mode or not and carefuly check then... | 14:24 |
stgraber | cjwatson: "from gi.repository import GObject as gobject" did the trick, same API | 14:25 |
cjwatson | Good, but no need to use 'as gobject', you can just change the single place where it's used | 14:25 |
cjwatson | Sorry, two places | 14:26 |
stgraber | indeed :) | 14:27 |
stgraber | could someone review my -proposed upload of nagios-plugins in hardy-proposed, it's been waiting in the queue for 10 days now? | 14:33 |
xnox | stgraber: review or SRU verify? | 14:35 |
stgraber | xnox: just review and let through to -proposed. Verification is easy, I have 15 machines hitting the bug every day :) | 14:36 |
xnox | stgraber: ok =)))) | 14:36 |
stgraber | so I just need to upgrade them to that package and check that I don't get angry e-mail from Nagiosafter that | 14:36 |
* xnox has stopped reading automatic email from my server.... maybe I should make them less verbose | 14:37 | |
stgraber | yeah, I have adopted a policy of fixing the source of the e-mail rather than ignoring them, monitoring is pointless if you don't read the notifications :) | 14:38 |
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
henrix | infinity: hi. could you take a look at the hardy kernel, to copy it into -proposed? | 16:46 |
henrix | infinity: bug #1012143 | 16:46 |
ubot2 | Launchpad bug 1012143 in linux "linux: 2.6.24-31.102 -proposed tracker" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1012143 | 16:46 |
infinity | henrix: I thought you guys were doing the proposed copies yourselves these days (except where we need to clean up overrides after the fact) | 16:48 |
infinity | henrix: But this one shouldn't need override tidying, as there's no ABI bump. | 16:48 |
henrix | infinity: well, i know we execute the copy-proposed-kernel.py script, but that alone doesn't do the job, does it? | 16:48 |
henrix | infinity: i believe brad executed that script on this kernel already anyway | 16:49 |
henrix | infinity: (i don't actually have upload rights, so i can't run the script. but i can bug other guys on the stable team to do... something...?) | 16:50 |
infinity | henrix: copy-proposed-kernel.py is all that should be required in this case. | 16:50 |
henrix | infinity: hmm, ok. so maybe brad forgot to run it on this kernel. | 16:50 |
henrix | infinity: so, i'll ping him again to run it. | 16:51 |
henrix | infinity: thanks | 16:51 |
infinity | henrix: I can just do it right now. | 16:51 |
infinity | henrix: Was just pointing out that you guys can, and have been. :) | 16:52 |
henrix | infinity: yeah, i knew we were able to run that script but i though something else had to be done by an AA | 16:52 |
infinity | henrix: AAs need to intervene post-script-run if there's an ABI bump (because the new packages land in universe) | 16:52 |
henrix | infinity: but it looks like this is only needed for kernels that require the overrides | 16:52 |
infinity | henrix: For non-ABI-changing uploads (like this one), we don't need to get involved. | 16:53 |
henrix | infinity: ok, got it. thanks for the clarification. | 16:53 |
infinity | henrix: Oh, hah. | 16:53 |
infinity | henrix: It could be that the script has been run a few times and no one has accepted it from UNAPPROVED. | 16:53 |
infinity | :P | 16:53 |
infinity | La la la. | 16:54 |
infinity | Done. | 16:54 |
henrix | infinity: heh :) | 16:54 |
henrix | infinity: cool, thanks! :) | 16:54 |
infinity | Sorry, this is a rather Mondayish Monday. | 16:54 |
henrix | infinity: yeah, similar problem here! | 16:54 |
* slangasek blinks | 18:51 | |
slangasek | 2012-06-18 18:50:40 ERROR Cross-PARTNER copies are not allowed. | 18:51 |
slangasek | what's that about? | 18:51 |
slangasek | hmm, apparently requires --to-partner with it, ok | 18:53 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!