[06:48] <tjaalton> http://memegenerator.net/Angry-Linus
[06:57] <mlankhorst> :')
[06:59] <mlankhorst> http://memegenerator.net/instance/22148640
[13:00] <JanC> http://memegenerator.net/instance/22173609  ;)
[13:44] <Cimi> hi guys, in quantal my X kbd layout is not set
[13:44] <Cimi> and resets after suspend and such stuff..
[13:45] <tjaalton> blame gnome
[13:45] <Cimi> tjaalton: known bug?
[13:46] <tjaalton> no, but sounds like gnome-settings-daemon isn't behaving
[13:54] <Cimi> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-settings-daemon/+bug/1014656
[13:54] <seb128> tjaalton, Cimi: gnome-settings-daemon didn't change since precise
[13:54] <Cimi> seb128: well, doesn't work
[13:55] <seb128> Cimi, yeah, I'm just saying
[13:55] <Cimi> seb128: oh no
[13:55] <Cimi> seb128: maybe it's ricotz PPA
[13:55] <tjaalton> hah
[13:55] <seb128> Cimi, try to ppa purge it?
[13:56] <Cimi> seb128: trying to get it
[13:58] <Cimi> ok, was it
[13:58] <Cimi> I apologize
[13:58] <seb128> Cimi, no worry, I'm the one who told you to try it to get the new gtk ;-)
[15:23] <cnd> mlankhorst, where do we stand on getting the fixes in -synaptics 1.6.2 into precise?
[15:33] <Sarvatt> ricotz: here's hoping this update builds, disabled dricore
[15:34] <ricotz> Sarvatt, damn mesa :P
[15:35] <Sarvatt> yeah 8.1 has been a nightmare with all the automakification :(
[15:36] <ricotz> Sarvatt, i hope it doesnt need a newer wayland ;)
[15:36] <Sarvatt> oh man
[15:36] <ricotz> crossing fingers for now
[15:36] <jcristau> isn't there a --disable-wayland or something?
[15:36] <ricotz> yes, but we want it
[15:37] <Sarvatt> jcristau: yeah its an inside joke, every time we manage to get the build fixed something like a newer wayland update is needed
[15:37] <jcristau> :/
[16:25] <mlankhorst> cnd: hm I'll ask RAOF about it :)
[16:27] <cnd> mlankhorst, weren't you preparing srus for it?
[16:28] <mlankhorst> i wanted to let it sit in quantal a little to watch for regressions, but I think it sat there long enough now :)
[16:29] <cnd> ok
[16:58] <bryceh> honestly we probably won't get much testing feedback until after alpha-2
[16:58] <mlankhorst> bryceh: I know, but it's at least broken in any obvious way..
[16:58] <bryceh> well, unless something breaks *really* bad ;-)
[16:58] <mlankhorst> so can we sru it for precise?
[16:58] <bryceh> mlankhorst, go for it
[16:59] <bryceh> mlankhorst, keep in mind it'll get an additional couple week's testing as part of the sru process
[17:01] <bryceh> speaking of releasing things...  for mesa 8.0.3 are we waiting on anything else?  anyone know of a reason not to put it in quantal now?
[17:01] <mlankhorst> bryceh: yeah, the synaptics corruption I was getting, has that been sru'd yet?
[17:03] <bryceh> mlankhorst, https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-input-synaptics
[17:19] <mlankhorst> is that website overloaded? a lot of the time launchpad returns error
[17:35] <bryceh> mlankhorst, works for me
[17:36] <bryceh> mlankhorst, however lp does have time out problems.
[17:36] <mlankhorst> yeah it pops up randomly, quite annoying though
[17:36] <bryceh> mlankhorst, if it gives you an OOPS ID, you can file bug reports against launchpad and they'll investigate (and sometimes fix)
[17:37] <bryceh> all they need is the OOPS ID, and maybe a sentence about what you did
[17:38] <mlankhorst> it's random, eg works fine on reload
[17:42] <bryceh> mlankhorst, they have some cache filling problems.  E.g. the first time the page isn't in the cache so it gets loaded
[17:42] <bryceh> however launchpad times out before the load has finished, so oopses
[17:42] <bryceh> but then you click reload and now it's in the cache so comes right up
[17:42] <bryceh> :-/
[17:42] <mlankhorst> yeah..
[17:43] <bryceh> anyway
[17:43] <bryceh> is 1.6.0-0ubuntu1~precise1 the version you're expecting to see in precise, or did you need a fix on top of that?  looks like it's been out for a few weeks now
[17:43] <mlankhorst> 1.6.2 quantal has it minus the version bump
[17:44] <mlankhorst> eg 1.6.1+something
[17:51] <bryceh> mlankhorst, ok, what's the bug number?  Did you fill in the SRU details yet?
[17:53] <mlankhorst> didn't find a form for it :/
[17:53] <mlankhorst> ill look up the bug number, but brb
[17:53] <bryceh> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates
[17:54] <bryceh> mlankhorst, here's the form I use:  http://paste.ubuntu.com/1047726/
[17:54] <bryceh> mlankhorst, you'll be filing many, many, many SRUs going forward, so worth bookmarking ;-)
[18:12] <mlankhorst> bryceh: I mean, where do I send it in
[18:14] <tjaalton> you modify the bug header
[18:16] <bryceh> mlankhorst, yeah click the edit button next to the bug description and prepend it in there
[18:17] <mlankhorst> ah ok, do I need to mark it in any way or just bring it up to the attention of RAOF ?
[18:17] <bryceh> mlankhorst, when you've finished adding it, and the package has been uploaded to precise-proposed, you then subscribe the 'ubuntu-sru' team to the bug report, so they'll be notified and do a review
[18:18] <bryceh> after that just follow up with the directions they give
[18:18] <mlankhorst> regression potential is hard to identify though..
[18:18] <bryceh> yeah
[18:19] <bryceh> what I often do is describe what *types* of regressions one might watch for
[18:19] <mlankhorst> ah k
[18:20] <mlankhorst> and i bypassed sru for linux now, got the nouveau changes in stable queue :)
[18:21]  * bryceh nods
[18:21] <bryceh> that's the best way to do it
[18:21] <bryceh> bbiab (lunch)