[03:29] <FNStaffa> !ops
[03:38] <jbitcm-> hello
[03:38] <jbitcm-> i need help
[03:38] <jbitcm-> i want to be a ubuntu motu
[03:48] <FourDollars> me too
[03:51] <ScottK> Not really the best time of day for it.
[03:51] <ScottK> During European/US daytime is much better.
[04:13] <nhandler> Page title
[04:13] <nhandler> Path
[04:14] <nhandler> (Ignore that, sorry)
[07:07] <dholbach> good morning
[09:10] <iulian> Morning dholbach.
[09:11] <iulian> Beautiful morning of Tuesday, isn't it? :)
[09:31] <dholbach> hey iulian - it is :)
[13:46] <highvoltage> stgraber, tumbleweed: just got hold of bencer, I reminded him that we need to talk about the release schedule, freezes and the processes that goes along with it
[13:46] <highvoltage> stgraber, tumbleweed: he's out all week so we're going to do that early next week
[13:47] <tumbleweed> thanks for the follow-up
[13:51] <stgraber> highvoltage: sounds good, thanks
[13:59] <highvoltage> micahg: oops, meant to include you on that too ^^^
[14:14] <nhandler> /wo/whois tumbleweed
[14:15]  * tumbleweed is hig/lighted
[14:33] <astraljava> Hi gang, on previous schroots, I used to go into them with `schroot -c <name> -p`, but for quantal (yes, I've installed the debootstrap from precise-backports), it cannot apparently bind-mount my /home even though I have what seems to be a sane mount-defaults in /etc/schroot/
[14:34] <astraljava> Maybe I've forgotten a step somewhere. Anyone able to troubleshoot this with me?
[14:35] <micahg> highvoltage: thanks
[15:30] <astraljava> FWIW, the problem was a missing 'type=directory' in the schroot.conf file.
[17:36] <lgp171188> Hi, I am just getting started with contributing to Ubuntu. I was just looking at a few lintian issues that I could fix. I picked up the add-apt-key package for fixing such issues. I just tried to find out if the package sources are picked up from Debian and package in Ubuntu or directly packaged in Ubuntu. I visited the launchpad page of the project and couldn't find out the same. Where can I find such information?
[17:43] <arand> lgp171188: Hmm, that package hasn't been touched since 2007, is it still relevant (despite it being in the archive)?
[17:43] <tumbleweed> if it isn't, it should be removed
[17:43] <arand> lgp171188: And yes, from the changelog it looks like an Ubuntu-only package (which if it is useful, a similar package probably shouldn't be)
[17:46] <arand> My guess is that it duplicates the "apt-key add" functionality from the base 'apt' package...
[17:46] <lgp171188> arand: Hmm, does the add-apt-repository package supersede this? Because that is the command I remember using and I thought maybe that was internally using add-apt-key in some way. Looks like I am wrong. Do we have to initiate some process to get it removed?
[17:47] <arand> apt-file claims: "python-software-properties: /usr/bin/add-apt-repository"
[17:47] <arand> So a different package
[17:53]  * highvoltage wishes andrew SB could be on IRC more :)
[17:54] <lgp171188> arand: Then looks like I will have to pick up some other package. Btw, is there any way of finding out if the package is picked up from debian apart from the changelog?
[17:55] <arand> I'm not sure, besides looking at packages.debian.org then of course.
[17:57] <lgp171188> Ok, the next package I picked up was the awn-extras package. Clicking on the ubuntu info page takes me to the page of the package alright. But when I clicked the debian info link, it took me to a package containing the search results for the "awn-extras" keyword search. There was just a python-awn-extras packages which does look different from the ubuntu package awn-extras. How can I confirm the same? I want to know this because it would help me fi
[20:16] <Laney> broder: I suspect you have a script to create unix users with data harvested from LP. If that were the case, would the source be located somewhere that others could see?
[20:30] <broder> Laney: hmm, not currently, no
[20:30] <broder> i could fix that
[20:30] <Laney> you were just superhumanly fast at creating my account then :P
[20:30] <broder> err, sorry
[20:30] <broder> i do have a script
[20:31] <broder> it is not located somewhere others can see
[20:31] <Laney> oh, the former but not the latter
[20:31] <Laney> I get it
[20:31] <jtaylor> :q
[20:31] <jtaylor> EWIN
[20:36] <broder> Laney: can't actually put it in a proper repo or anything right now, but http://paste.ubuntu.com/1049887/
[20:37] <Laney> cheers
[20:37]  * Laney stashes
[20:38]  * ajmitch is sure there was a script like that elsewhere
[21:49] <Laney> bdrung: tumbleweed: Can we get a new udt release? I am being hit by cyphermox's bug now. Maybe something change in schroot…
[21:50] <cyphermox> Laney: LVM and btrfs right?
[21:51] <cyphermox> s/and/or/
[21:51] <Laney> no
[21:51] <Laney> just directory on ext4
[21:51] <cyphermox> ah, interesting
[21:51] <Laney> I don't see why that fix would be specific to filesystem
[21:51] <Laney> I guess schroot just changed something
[21:51] <Laney> anyway, thanks for the fix :-)
[21:52] <cyphermox> well, it's "not", but there weren't -source aliases created for lvm or btrfs, maybe now it's been totally dropped
[21:52] <cyphermox> yeah, I got hit by it again yesterday. fortunately the fix is simple and you don't have to re-create the chroots
[22:46] <bdrung> Laney, tumbleweed: yes, we should do a udt release
[23:34] <tumbleweed> jbicha: ah, you beat me to pypy
[23:34]  * tumbleweed wonders if it'll build
[23:35] <tumbleweed> timed out almost everywhere in Debian (as usual)