[06:32] <tkamppeter> ScottK, hi
[06:48] <tkamppeter> ScottK, bug 932882 updated.
[06:48] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 932882 in gutenprint "Update of a printer driver package does not update the PPD files of the existing queues for this driver" [High,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/932882
[06:58] <tkamppeter> ScottK, bug 1002699 updated.
[06:58] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 1002699 in foomatic-filters "cups not respecting printing options" [High,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1002699
[09:29] <xnox> there is a 'stamp' http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/daily-live/current/quantal-desktop-amd64.OVERSIZED
[09:30] <xnox> was that adjusted for the 800M(something) size?
[09:31] <Laney> doesn't look like it
[09:31] <Laney> quantal-desktop-amd64.iso           19-Jun-2012 07:53  722M
[09:39] <xnox> Laney: I wasn't sure if 722 is over 800 using the M-unit of the day
[09:40] <xnox> three apport popups in quantal daily =) and I didn't even start testing the thing I was meant to test! =)
[10:01] <micahg> seb128: can you please release the firefox updates from the lucid, natty, oneiric, and precise queues?
[10:02] <seb128> micahg, how do I do that? I don't do security copies usual so I'm a bit unsure ;-)
[10:02] <micahg> seb128: it's AA approval in queue
[10:02] <micahg> they're in unapproved
[10:02] <seb128> ok
[10:03] <seb128> micahg, done
[10:03] <micahg> seb128: thanks, here's to hoping I caught the publisher :)
[10:05] <cjwatson> Can somebody who isn't an archive admin give me a quick hand with a bit of Launchpad QA?
[10:05] <cjwatson> I just want to make sure that the new API method is correctly restricted
[10:06] <cjwatson> It'll take about two minutes
[10:06] <micahg> cjwatson: I suppose I have a few minutes if it's doesn't require me to be too awake :)
[10:08] <cjwatson> micahg: Thanks.  Grab http://paste.ubuntu.com/1050621/, run it as './change-override -l qastaging -p extra -y fonts-droid' - it should fail, and I'd like to see the output
[10:08] <cjwatson> (Saves me having to set up an appropriately unprivileged account on qastaging ...)
[10:09] <cjwatson> It'll want LP auth
[10:09] <cjwatson> (But on qas not prod)
[10:10] <micahg> cjwatson: it seems to be letting me do it
[10:12] <micahg> cjwatson: do you want a pastebin of the output?
[10:19] <cjwatson> micahg: Yes please
[10:20] <micahg> cjwatson: http://paste.ubuntu.com/1050632/
[10:20] <cjwatson> micahg: Damnit.  Glad I asked.  Thanks.
[10:21] <micahg> np
[10:21]  * cjwatson goes over the permissions again
[10:21] <cjwatson> Oh, wait, you're in ubuntu-security
[10:22] <cjwatson> That explains it
[10:22] <tumbleweed> you want someone who isn't?
[10:22] <cjwatson> Magic launchpad.Append on IArchive strikes again
[10:22] <cjwatson> Yeah, please
[10:22] <cjwatson> (So this slightly broadens ubuntu-security's abilities, but only temporarily since that hack will be going away soonish)
[10:22] <micahg> ubuntu-security can override archive permissions?
[10:23] <cjwatson> It's a consequence of your crazy syncSource hack
[10:23] <micahg> ah, ok
[10:23]  * micahg stopped using that anyways :)
[10:23] <cjwatson> Well, you don't have a replacement that works
[10:23] <cjwatson> Yet
[10:24] <cjwatson> So, heh, this means that technically you guys can currently remove packages as well
[10:24] <cjwatson> Best not to rely on that though
[10:25] <cjwatson> tumbleweed: './change-override -l qastaging -p extra -y ttf-droid' please?
[10:25] <cjwatson> micahg: So, uh, what *are* you using to unembargo from private PPAs right now then?
[10:25] <tumbleweed> cjwatson: http://paste.ubuntu.com/1050639/
[10:25] <micahg> cjwatson: oh, I don't use the private PPA :)
[10:26] <cjwatson> Ah
[10:26] <cjwatson> tumbleweed: Great, that's as expected - thanks
[10:26] <tumbleweed> np
[13:39] <ogasawara> could I get the linux-3.5.0-1.1 and linux-meta-3.5.0.1.1 packages accepted and copied from quantal-proposed to the release pocket?
[15:58] <ogasawara> infinity: when you have a moment, could I get the linux-3.5.0-1.1 and linux-meta-3.5.0.1.1 packages accepted and copied from quantal-proposed to the release pocket?
[16:01] <infinity> ogasawara: Will get to it in a bit, yeah.
[17:34] <balloons> are we going to get a daily build on the iso's today?
[17:36] <stgraber> balloons: we did but I believe the all failed. Let me have a quick look at the reason and I can trigger a rebuild of at least Ubuntu if that's fixed
[17:37] <stgraber> apparently only a subset of the live images are affected
[17:39]  * stgraber tries a rebuild of ubuntu desktop
[17:40] <infinity> stgraber: I assume it was evolution* fallout?
[17:41] <stgraber> infinity: yeah
[17:42] <stgraber> balloons: so apparently ubuntu desktop (all architectures) and edubuntu failed to build. I'm rebuilding ubuntu desktop now, will then rebuild wubi and edubuntu. Do you also need the arm images (these are pretty long to build but I can start them in the background and forget about them ;))?
[17:44] <balloons> hehe.. i don' t have plans for arm, but sure
[17:47] <stgraber> balloons: apparently evolution is still broken, so I'll wait before triggering any more rebuild
[17:48] <balloons> ouch
[17:48] <stgraber> infinity: "evolution-data-server : Breaks: libebook-1.2-12 (< 3.4) but 3.2.3-0ubuntu7 is to be installed" <-- working on this one?
[17:48] <infinity> jbicha_: ^
[17:48] <balloons> stgraber, probably should use notice board for such things?
[17:48] <infinity> stgraber: I'll look in a sec.
[17:48] <jbicha_> micahg: were you going to work on thunderbird today? bug 1015723
[17:48] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 1015723 in thunderbird "thunderbird-gnome-support is uninstallable (depends on NBS evolution library)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1015723
[17:49] <balloons> saying daily's are being delayed
[17:49] <stgraber> balloons: I suppose we could, though the fact that the dailies weren't posted is usually a good indication of that. They're usually triggered by cron, so if they aren't there, something failed.
[17:49] <balloons> do you get any messages about when they fail, etc?
[17:50] <balloons> stgraber, yes but folks have been asking me about when they would appear, etc
[17:50] <balloons> seeing as I've asked them to test this week...
[17:50] <stgraber> balloons: I do for Edubuntu but I don't for the others, I guess I should just add myself to the e-mail notifications for all the builds...
[17:50] <balloons> you can add me also if you wish
[17:50] <balloons> so I don't have to ping you constantly
[17:50]  * highvoltage was actually going to test edubuntu today, so whenever there's a build feel free to poke me
[17:51] <stgraber> highvoltage: I also added you to the notifications of edubuntu
[17:51] <stgraber> *for
[17:51] <highvoltage> ok thanks
[17:53] <balloons> so stgraber I mean, it seems like a good idea to mention on the notice board when builds fail to build
[17:53] <balloons> is that something the cron job could do automagically?
[17:55] <stgraber> balloons: not without quite a bit of work as nusakan doesn't have a single place containing the state of all images and we don't have an API to update the notice board
[17:55] <balloons> I figured as much
[17:55] <stgraber> balloons: so we'd need some magic that'd write the state for every product we build (livefs and cd build) then something that publishes that to the notice board
[17:56] <stgraber> that's doable but I don't quite have the time to put in that at this point
[17:56] <balloons> yes, sure... I mean for now just knowing something is broken.. It can be manual
[17:56] <balloons> I'll post something on the board
[17:57] <xnox> stgraber: can't the success/fail emails be emailed to jenkins as a passive notification pass/fail/no-info
[17:58] <xnox> passive test-result, if there is such capability
[17:58] <xnox> stgraber: forwarding all of those to an automated / public mailing list would be great
[17:58] <xnox> email notifications that is
[18:01]  * stgraber stores his answer for when xnox is back...
[18:36] <jbicha_> balloons: where is the notice board you were talking about?
[18:37] <balloons> http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/
[18:37] <balloons> top of the page
[18:43] <infinity> chrisccoulson: Is there a new thunderbird upload happening today?
[18:44] <chrisccoulson> infinity, yes, quite possibly
[18:44] <infinity> chrisccoulson: The thunderbird/evolution skew is causing a sad.
[19:41] <stgraber> chrisccoulson: new thunderbird! thanks
[19:46] <infinity> chrisccoulson: Doing thunderbird-couchdb as well?
[19:46] <infinity> chrisccoulson: (It has a libedataserver-1.2-15 dep hardcoded in debian/control)
[19:47] <chrisccoulson> infinity, jbicha_ already did that. although, it needs more than the dependency in debian/control changing
[19:47] <chrisccoulson> we should just remove that from the archive ;)
[19:48] <infinity> Oh, I have an out-of-date source here.
[19:49] <infinity> chrisccoulson: Removing it from the archive doesn't seem ideal.  It looks like it actually does something useful...
[19:50]  * stgraber waits for thunderbird to publish then start some rebuilds and an Edubuntu armhf test build
[19:50] <highvoltage> yay
[19:51] <stgraber> it's very very unlikely to succeed but trying it is the easiest way to check what's missing ;)
[19:51] <infinity> stgraber: You might need to wait for it to build first. :P
[19:51] <highvoltage> surely building is implied with publishing?
[19:51] <highvoltage> (well, completion of it :p)
[19:51] <infinity> You'd think. ;)
[19:52] <stgraber> infinity: I assumed you'd already done the build score bumping if it was needed ;)
[19:52] <infinity> stgraber: Also, wait, edubuntu armhf?
[19:53] <stgraber> infinity: yeah, we are planning on releasing 12.10 for the zapad (similar to kubuntu), though we kind of lack hardware and a kernel at the moment, so I'm planning a one off daily-preinstalled omap4 build so we can see how much of it explodes
[19:53] <infinity> stgraber: Oh dear.  Kay.  That'll be interesting, since we're dropping preinstalled images from Ubuntu.  You may be the only remaining consumer of that codepath when we do.
[19:54] <stgraber> infinity: no, we don't want to go with preinstalled for release, I'm just going to build a preinstalled image today as it's the easiest thing to build until ogra_ lands the live image change
[19:54] <infinity> stgraber: Well, I'm not sure how you'd install a tablet with a live image.
[19:55] <infinity> stgraber: Unless it has internal storage and a way to use external boot media, I guess.
[19:55] <highvoltage> the zatab has that, at least
[19:55] <highvoltage> (reportedly :p)
[19:55] <stgraber> infinity: well, it's a tablet with 16gb of internal storage and it's not locked or anything (made by zareason with their developer present on IRC)
[19:55] <infinity> I guess we'll see how it all turns out.
[19:56] <stgraber> kind of waiting on hardware to know how much of an headache that'll be :)
[19:56] <highvoltage> infinity: indeed, time will tell, but it seems like a good first device to try to get edubuntu on as a tablet: http://zareason.com/shop/zatab.html
[19:57] <tumbleweed> ajmtch has one...
[19:57] <highvoltage> yeah but he still runs android :)
[19:57] <stgraber> tumbleweed: we have 5 of them somewhere between zareason and sherbrooke at the moment, so shouldn't be long before we can see how much work will be needed to get something releasable
[19:58] <highvoltage> (at least he's willing to test kubuntu/edubuntu images when they exist)
[19:58] <tumbleweed> stgraber: ah, nice. I tried to get my hands on one before leaving SF but it didn't happen
[20:14] <stgraber> chrisccoulson: looks like at least powerpc will remain broken for a while...
[20:18] <herton> hi, can someone accept for precise-proposed linux-meta-ti-omap4 - 3.2.0.1415.15 and linux-ti-omap4 - 3.2.0-1415.20 in precise queue?
[20:28] <infinity> herton: Can do.
[20:29] <herton> infinity, thanks
[21:04] <stgraber> balloons: looks like you won't be getting a daily today, thunderbird just failed to build on i386
[21:04] <stgraber> chrisccoulson: ^ (but I guess you noticed already)
[21:05] <slangasek> stgraber: a daily being a daily quantal image?
[21:06] <stgraber> slangasek: right, today's dailies failed because of evolution requiring a bunch of rebuilds, including thunderbird (last one that needs building I believe)
[21:06] <Laney> it looks like he already uploaded again actually
[21:06] <slangasek> so it sounds like this is a transition that should have happened in quantal-proposed, no?
[21:06] <stgraber> slangasek: yeah, not sure why it didn't
[21:08] <slangasek> probably because whoever started it is not accustomed to thinking in terms of -proposed for library transitions yet :)  what upload tripped it off?  maybe it's worth a friendly reminder to the uploader
[21:08] <stgraber> Laney: oh, wasn't there when I last checked ;) so we might have the archive fixed in ~2hours then (for amd64 + i386 at least)
[21:10] <stgraber> slangasek: it was a sync of evolution-data-server, looking at who requested it now
[21:10] <stgraber> slangasek: that'd be jbicha
[21:39] <slangasek> stgraber: ah, and he's conveniently disconnected from irc ;)
[21:40] <slangasek> gema: hi, can you tell me about this work item I seem to have picked up on https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/qa-q-add-test-coverage ?  I know I wasn't in that session at UDS :)
[23:01] <jbicha> hi, sorry about the excitement today
[23:02] <jbicha> I believe eds would have autosynced today anyway