/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2012/06/21/#ubuntu-unity.txt

=== salem_ is now known as _salem
Andy80hi all. I've two different versions of QtSDK installed on my system. The last one I installed is the one I do NOT want visible on the Launcher. Every time I start the old QtCreator, I click on "Keep on Launcher", but if I exit and the click again on it, the NEW one is loaded instead. Where can I change this? Thanks.07:24
sil2100Trevinho: hi!08:13
sil2100Trevinho: did you have a look at that failing test08:13
sil2100Trevinho: https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/automerge-bamf/71/console08:14
sil2100bilal: I looked at the MRQ for software center integration - looking rather nice, but we would probably need some automated tests for these08:33
sil2100bilal: as Didier said, software center integration usually breaks everything, so we need to be utterly sure that it's safe08:34
greghi i have a basic question09:34
greghow can i make my ubuntu LTS 12 work with unity... its not an optio when im logging in09:35
gregand niether are Gnome or anything09:35
sil2100greg: what do you mean?09:46
=== zyga-afk is now known as zyga
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel
=== MacSlow is now known as MacSlow|lunch
sil2100Trevinho: ping12:35
alkazarpong?12:41
=== _salem is now known as salem_
sil2100andyrock: hiii!12:48
=== MacSlow|lunch is now known as MacSlow
Trevinhosil2100: hi, I'll look at the fail soon12:57
Trevinhosil2100: I got the mail but I was not at home12:57
Trevinhosil2100: checking soon12:57
sil2100Trevinho: thanks12:58
andyrocksil2100, hey12:58
sil2100Trevinho: I was actually building this branch on my quantal system and I didn't see the test failing12:58
sil2100Trevinho: but jenkins thinks otherwise12:58
sil2100andyrock: you know what I want to ask of you..? ;)12:59
andyrocksru something?12:59
sil2100https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/994163 <- exactly, 5.0 MRQ pretty please with cherry-pick on top ;)12:59
ubot5Ubuntu bug 994163 in unity (Ubuntu Precise) "Unity launcher shows internal partitions after they have been unmounted" [Medium,Confirmed]12:59
andyrocksil2100, will ok13:00
sil2100andyrock: big thanks13:00
andyrocksil2100, big welcome13:00
smoserhi.13:17
smoseri upgraded to quantal yesterday. i use pentadactyl with firefox. pentadactyl released version has some issues with newer firefox so i'm using a nightly build from pentadactyl.13:18
smoserthe menu bar is present in the UI, and normally its not (File, Edit, View, History...). in pentadactyl, you can toggle this by 'set guioptions' but that has no affect for me.13:19
smoseri'm wondering if it could be related to a change in how the menu-bar-in-panel-bar works rather than in firefox/pentadactyl13:20
smoserseb128? ^ sorry to be so ignorant as to not be able to diagnose the problem more than that.13:54
smoser(sorry to single you out also. i opened http://code.google.com/p/dactyl/issues/detail?id=883 which is possibly invalid if this is an ubuntu issue)13:54
seb128smoser, better to ask chrisccoulson, but firefox works so that seems an issue with pentadactyl, whatever that stuff does13:55
smoserseb128, thanks. as i said, this is all magic to me :) thanks for the redirect.13:56
=== mfisch` is now known as mfisch
=== mfisch is now known as Guest31330
=== zyga is now known as zyga-food
=== dandrader is now known as dandrader|afk
=== zyga-food is now known as zyga
sil2100Trevinho: did you have a moment to look at that failing test?14:31
=== dandrader|afk is now known as dandrader
Trevinhosil2100: checking....14:59
Trevinhosil2100: I can't get why it's failing... I've not changed the test at all15:14
Trevinhosil2100: also it's not the test itself to fail15:14
Trevinho(otherywise we would have logs for that)15:15
Trevinhosil2100: probably there are problems running it15:15
Trevinhosil2100: if it doesn't run over X or Xvfb can fail, but again I get no warnings for that (on the server)15:15
Trevinhoseb128: are the bamf tests running under X or not?15:16
seb128Trevinho: not sure but I would assume under xvfb15:16
Trevinhoin the meanwhile I'll try again... maybe it was only one issue15:16
Trevinhoseb128: there's not one by default, I mean I must run it manually... right?15:17
seb128trevinho: what? xvfb? I would assume that whatever run the test run it for you, i.e make check15:17
seb128didrocks probably knows better15:18
didrocksright15:18
sil2100hm15:18
didrocksmake check after a configuration with --headless-tests15:18
Trevinhoseb128: currently the bamf's Makefile uses xvfb... exactly15:18
didrocksto run all the test, normally under xvfb                                                           │ Daekdroom15:18
DaekdroomHm.15:19
didrocksDaekdroom: sorry, copy and pasting xvfb to not make a typo and middle click15:20
didrocksDaekdroom: seems it copied until the end of the line :)15:20
Trevinhodidrocks: mhmhm... bamf used to listen to the --enable-headless-tests configure flag... has been that changed?15:21
didrocksTrevinho: it didn't AFAIK15:22
didrocksTrevinho: and that's what I'm running on the merger15:22
didrocksso the test seems to be flacky in headless env15:22
Trevinhodidrocks: make check-headless when is ran?15:23
Trevinhodidrocks: if I run make check on tty1, with --enable-headless-tests it works to me...15:23
didrocksTrevinho: it's make check-headless which is run15:23
didrocksTrevinho: right, but you are not in a chroot15:23
didrockswith a fake dbus15:23
didrocks(the one runned by dbus-test-runner)15:24
Trevinhodidrocks: libbamf doesn't listen to make check-headless:15:25
Trevinho+ make check-headless15:25
Trevinhomake: *** No rule to make target `check-headless'.  Stop.15:25
Trevinho+ make check15:25
TrevinhoMaking check in lib/libbamf15:25
Trevinho(from https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/automerge-bamf/71/console )15:25
didrocksTrevinho: if this target doesn't exist, the merger is using make check15:26
Trevinhodidrocks: make check exsists, make check-headless doesnt'15:26
didrocksyep, so it runs make check15:26
Trevinhodidrocks: yes... But I'm wondering, are them running on a different environment, or not (and it's up to me to setup a fake xserver?)15:30
didrocksTrevinho: the "only" differences is that it's running under a chroot, xfvb and dbus-test-runner are installed15:31
Trevinhodidrocks: yes, but I mean... make check-headless and make check, would run in the same place, right?15:32
didrocksTrevinho: oh indeed15:32
didrocksno difference between them15:32
didrocksthe code is stupid and simple15:32
didrocksmake check-headless || make check15:33
Trevinhook...15:33
didrocksso if the first one succeed -> fun, enjoy, stop15:33
didrocksif it fails || to the second one15:33
didrocksand return the status of the second :)15:33
didrocksno rocket science here, just… shell! :)15:33
Trevinhoit would probably nice to get even a make xcheck to get the fake env on the builder reducing some makefile duplication between different projects... isn't it?15:34
didrocksTrevinho: yeah, that would be lovely :)15:34
Trevinhodidrocks: ah, one thing... is G_MESSAGES_DEBUG set to a value there?15:34
didrocksTrevinho: hum, nothing done in particular no15:35
Trevinhodidrocks: because if the problem would be the missing xserver, then the test should warn about it15:35
Trevinhowhile I get only an unknown error with no messages... :o15:35
didrocksTrevinho: yeah, I think sil2100 can log into the machine with me and we can have a look building with this15:36
didrocksif this can help you15:36
Trevinhodidrocks: yes, thanks...15:43
Trevinhoplease sil2100 can you check that?15:43
Trevinhosil2100: it failed again... but I get no output here15:43
TrevinhoI don't know what has been changed15:44
Trevinhofew weeks ago it was passing with no problems15:44
sil2100Trevinho: it fails on your machine as well?15:44
sil2100Or do you mean the merger?15:44
sil2100It's indeed strange, since I remember running the test this morning on the new branch and all tests were successful15:45
Trevinhosil2100: I get no failures here15:46
Trevinhosil2100: both running it under x and under tty1 with headless...15:47
sil2100Really strange thing...15:48
Trevinhosil2100: any discovery so far?16:24
sil2100Trevinho: sadly, no... something's wrong in the merger probably?16:27
Trevinhosil2100: I don't know... I've retried and it failed again... is a file like test-bamf-results.xml generated locally (on the merger server?)16:52
=== dandrader is now known as dandrader|lunch
sil2100Trevinho: hm, not sure now17:27
sil2100Trevinho: since we have to pack up for today17:27
sil2100But I'll look at it when I'm in the hotel17:27
sil2100Trevinho: if you find anything, drop me an e-mail17:27
sil2100Trevinho: big thanks!17:27
=== dandrader|lunch is now known as dandrader
=== zyga is now known as zyga-afk
=== salem_ is now known as _salem

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!