| RAOF | mlankhorst: I've been looking at your -ati merge; there seem to be a couple of problems in it. Firstly, it looks like you've dropped some changelog entries (at least) - the archive currently has 1:6.14.99~really6.14.4-0ubuntu1, but that's nowhere in debian/changelog. | 02:59 |
|---|---|---|
| RAOF | Secondly, the version number is unhelpful; it should be 6.14.99~really6.14.4 again, as (as far as I can tell), that's what it's based on. | 03:00 |
| mlankhorst | RAOF: ugh no idea how changelog entries got lost though, fortunately there will be a 7.0 soon so maybe we could sync versioning then again properly | 05:50 |
| RAOF | HURRAY! | 05:50 |
| Sarvatt | mlankhorst: assuming there will be a 7.0 before we release 12.10 when theres a month before f18 might be crazy :) | 06:02 |
| mlankhorst | f18? | 06:03 |
| RAOF | Fedora | 06:07 |
| Sarvatt | 1.5 months tops until we can get libdrm updated and can just do a new git snapshot at least | 06:08 |
| Sarvatt | (mesa release schedule) | 06:09 |
| Sarvatt | i'm sure there will be a rc1 on mesa 8.1 at the beginning of august so even sooner | 06:10 |
| Sarvatt | anholt commited a ton of automakification late last week, hope its buildable out of tree now | 06:11 |
| Sarvatt | havent been able to make debian packages for over a month now because of how we build multiple versions of it at once in the source package :( | 06:12 |
| Sarvatt | theres UMS fixes post 6.14.5 so definitely will be another UMS release? | 06:18 |
| RAOF | Oh, dear. How much do I care that xf86-video-msm FTBFS? | 06:27 |
| Sarvatt | err | 06:28 |
| Sarvatt | thats the one that was a drop from 2 years ago wasnt it? | 06:28 |
| RAOF | Something like that. | 06:29 |
| RAOF | Grr! What moron builds a tarball with -Werror?! | 06:29 |
| Sarvatt | might be patches to fix it in collabora git somewhere | 06:30 |
| Sarvatt | i dont even see that on git.debian.org even though i remember fixing it up to build against xserver 1.7 years ago | 06:31 |
| RAOF | I guess I should test-build before uploading to quantal-proposed... | 06:32 |
| RAOF | Which means it's time for everyone's favourite! Xserver builds in qemu-user-static! Yay! | 06:33 |
| Sarvatt | 1.5 hour break while it builds? woohoo | 06:34 |
| Sarvatt | thats how long it takes on an i7-2600 :) | 06:34 |
| RAOF | Let's see how well the laptop ivb manages it. | 06:35 |
| Sarvatt | ya upgrade? | 06:36 |
| RAOF | No; that's the SDP I got. | 06:37 |
| Sarvatt | oh | 06:37 |
| mlankhorst | RAOF: why qemu? pandaboard? :p | 06:47 |
| RAOF | mlankhorst: I haven't finished setting that up; I only just got an .au power cable for it today :) | 06:47 |
| mlankhorst | oh | 06:47 |
| mlankhorst | the adapator seemed to be pretty standard though, i have at least 10 european power cables for that lying around here somewhere | 06:48 |
| RAOF | Yeah, it's standard. I just didn't happen to have a cable free. | 06:48 |
| RAOF | I'm in a continual state of cablelesness; I went out and bought two jug plugs and two flat figure 8 cables today. | 06:49 |
| RAOF | NOW I HAVE THE POWER (to power things) | 06:49 |
| mlankhorst | the power to empower | 06:50 |
| mlankhorst | suppose I should get off this pandaboard, wake up and get some work done. brb :) | 06:51 |
| Sarvatt | RAOF: you got a panda too? | 06:52 |
| Sarvatt | crazy the UE are all getting free pandaboards for some reason :) | 06:52 |
| Sarvatt | omapdrm might work in quantal on it! | 06:53 |
| Sarvatt | whenever libdrm and xf86-video-omap get synced | 06:55 |
| RAOF | Yup. The whole desktop team got pandads, I think. | 06:56 |
| RAOF | It will be *marvellous* to have an actual armhf device to build/test on. | 06:57 |
| RAOF | On the other hand, I can no longer disclaim responsibility for ARM stuff ;) | 06:57 |
| RAOF | libdrm-omap1. Why, hello! | 06:58 |
| Sarvatt | got to manually build http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/xf86-video-omap.git;a=summary against it | 07:00 |
| RAOF | Ok. I think everything but -msm is staged in quantal-precise now. Please feel free to check the quantal section of http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/pending-sru.html to see if I've missed anything. | 07:01 |
| RAOF | Ah. A non-framebuffer omap driver? Cool. | 07:01 |
| mlankhorst | is that driver open source? | 07:10 |
| mlankhorst | RAOF: Interesting, I remembered to check for .gov.au before applying for visa, else some site would have gotten my personal details :) | 07:27 |
| mlankhorst | scum sites :s | 07:32 |
| RAOF | Odd! | 07:33 |
| mlankhorst | RAOF: was thinking of going on vacation there in august :) | 07:40 |
| RAOF | Good plan; we're awesome! | 07:40 |
| RAOF | ☺ | 07:40 |
| RAOF | Although perhaps a little bit cold, depending on where you go. And not as cold as frigid Europe, anyway :) | 07:41 |
| mlankhorst | as long as I go north it's fine, you probably call 15°c cold :p | 07:41 |
| RAOF | Well, it got up to 6°C here today. | 07:43 |
| mlankhorst | sometimes gets -20°c here before sun comes up if unlucky during winter | 07:44 |
| RAOF | It does get genuinely cold sometimes. Not icy European cold, but sufficiently cold to rug up and say “ooh, that's nippy” | 07:44 |
| RAOF | Woo! Xserver almost finished. | 07:49 |
| RAOF | A mere 54 minutes! | 08:05 |
| mlankhorst | RAOF: hehe >:D | 11:07 |
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| dholbach | hiya | 14:40 |
| dholbach | a friend of mine ran into https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mesa/+bug/1017243 - is there anything else he should be adding to the report? | 14:40 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1017243 in Mesa "Program received signal SIGBUS, Bus error." [Medium,Confirmed] | 14:40 |
| mlankhorst | hey | 15:03 |
| mlankhorst | dholbach: sounds like a masive map though, if you shrink the file does it work? :) | 15:06 |
| dholbach | mlankhorst, maybe you can ask on the bug report? I personally don't have the problem - a friend of mine ran into it :) | 15:07 |
| mlankhorst | you asked what to add, but ill have to brb | 15:08 |
| mlankhorst | making food | 15:08 |
| dholbach | ah, enjoy :) | 15:09 |
| dholbach | mlankhorst, ok, I passed on the question and it seems to work with small files like /usr/share/icons | 15:10 |
| dholbach | but here the man is: toabctl :) | 15:10 |
| dholbach | toabctl, seems like mlankhorst just went to prepare some food | 15:11 |
| toabctl | mlankhorst, my files are about 3 mb large. after 3 files, i get the error | 15:11 |
| toabctl | it's reproducable with the attached python test program | 15:12 |
| toabctl | mlankhorst, i'll leave. i'll be back tomorrow if you need more infos. | 16:24 |
| bryceh | RAOF, no missing changelogs, I just corrected mlankhorst's version number before uploading it, just wasn't pushed to git. | 16:36 |
| mlankhorst | oh back | 16:42 |
| mlankhorst | Yikes lost train of thought. :( | 16:45 |
| mlankhorst | bryceh: | 17:55 |
| bryceh | mlankhorst, yep | 17:56 |
| mlankhorst | woops | 17:56 |
| bryceh | ?? | 17:56 |
| mlankhorst | http://people.canonical.com/~mlankhorst/prime-wip.patch can you poke a hole in it? I think it sucks.. | 17:56 |
| mlankhorst | but it's ok for a first attempt, I suppose. | 17:57 |
| bryceh | sure | 17:57 |
| bryceh | mlankhorst, in the dma-buf.c routines, I take it null pointer checks would be superfluous? | 17:59 |
| mlankhorst | not yet, sadly | 18:00 |
| mlankhorst | I think it's more something about general api at this point | 18:01 |
| bryceh | gotcha | 18:02 |
| mlankhorst | so i was thinking why not export the sync bo as dma-buf too | 18:02 |
| bryceh | (nvbo should also maybe be checked before deref) | 18:02 |
| mlankhorst | oh no that's all fine for hack | 18:03 |
| mlankhorst | I just care about generic api at this point | 18:03 |
| bryceh | well, one thing I'm wondering with the api, I notice you're adding another parameter to a bunch of functions that I gather is a function of the number of bufs. Is that really variable, or could it be a property of the fence? | 18:07 |
| bryceh | i.e., instead of passing as a parameter to the routines, could it be added to the nouveau_fence struct? | 18:08 |
| mlankhorst | bryceh: well i need to know in advance how much room is available | 18:09 |
| bryceh | mlankhorst, ok, well other than that, looks good to me. Does it work? | 18:10 |
| mlankhorst | not yet | 18:10 |
| mlankhorst | i needed today to work out some details | 18:10 |
| mlankhorst | started out entirely different | 18:10 |
| bryceh | any packages we need to get in before the alpha-2 window closes? | 22:16 |
| mlankhorst | bryceh: I think we have the important ones now so most graphics corruption is gone :) | 22:23 |
| RAOF | bryceh: We *could* copy xserver 1.12 from -proposed to quantal; everything but an obscure arm driver is ready. Although just-pre-alpha-2 might not be the *ideal* time to do that... ☺ | 22:34 |
| mlankhorst | which one btw? | 22:34 |
| RAOF | xf86-video-msm | 22:37 |
| RAOF | It's for the Galaxy Nexus. Or Nexus One, or some other Nexus phone. | 22:38 |
| bryceh | RAOF, if we were definitely going to be shipping 1.12, I might argue having it in A2 would be beneficial | 22:41 |
| bryceh | but given that we're hoping to get 1.13 in, seems like no reason to hurry. | 22:41 |
| bryceh | btw with 1.12 are we going to temporarily lose any prop drivers? or have they all been updated already? | 22:41 |
| RAOF | We don't lose nvidia, and I don't think we lose fglrx. | 22:42 |
| bryceh | legacy drivers? | 22:45 |
| RAOF | Not sure. | 22:53 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!