[01:44] <bkerensa> micahg: you said we had perhaps some source packages for the older seamonkey builds?
[01:45] <bkerensa> at UDS?
[01:47] <micahg> bkerensa: should be lp:seamonkey
[01:48] <bkerensa> micahg: and your still optimistic about the idea of having this packaged again and introduced?
[01:48] <micahg> optimistic is a strong word :)
[01:48] <micahg> if someone's willing to do the work, I'm willing to sponsor it
[01:49] <bkerensa> >.<
[01:49] <bkerensa> is someone prepared to help if someone runs into problems initially packaging?
[01:49] <bkerensa> :)
[01:49] <micahg> sure
[01:49] <bkerensa> ok im fair game then
[01:49] <bkerensa> :)
[01:50] <micahg> first thing to do would be to bring it up to date, lp:thunderbird/stable should be a good guide for that
[01:50] <bkerensa> k
[01:50] <micahg> bkerensa: and try to do one change per commit if you can (it makes review easier)
[01:51] <bkerensa> k
[02:01] <bkerensa> micahg: ok but just to confirm you really want ever single change as a single commit? :P you realize that could be a lot of commits to review :)
[02:13] <micahg> bkerensa: well, one general change, if stuff should be logically grouped in a commit, that's fine
[02:14] <bkerensa> ok
[02:48] <micahg> bkerensa: I'd suggest waiting until the package is almost ready for upload before proposing a merge
[02:49] <micahg> bkerensa: you also understand this means keeping it updated every 6 weeks, right?
[02:50] <bkerensa> micahg: I understand the commitment :)
[02:51] <bkerensa> and yeah ok will wait till I have them almost all done and the propose all at once
[02:54] <micahg> bkerensa: thanks
[02:54] <micahg> if you have questions along the way, feel free to ask, but I don't think it's worth merging until it's basically ready for upload since it's not even in the archive ATM