[01:13] <Anxi80> Is canonical using OpenPGP or GnuPGP for the Ubuntu-Launcpad signing?
[01:15] <wgrant> Anxi80: GnuPG (http://gnupg.org/) is an open source project that implements the OpenPGP standard.
[01:15] <wgrant> So, both.
[01:17] <Anxi80> wgrant, thanks. I didn't understand the OpenPGP wikipedia page properly
[08:49] <kk1992> df
[11:20] <_The_Fred> hello
[11:36] <Sweetshark> is
[11:37] <Sweetshark> is launchpad little mind too small to copy libreoffice from ppa to ppa? I try to copy 3.5.5~rc2-0ubuntu1~ppa1 from https://launchpad.net/~bjoern-michaelsen/+archive/libreoffice-precisetest-20120327/+copy-packages? to https://launchpad.net/~libreoffice/+archive/ppa and only get timeouts...
[11:37] <Sweetshark> (copy with binaries)
[11:45] <Sweetshark> hmm, now it worked, but only without the binaries.
[12:09] <jrgifford> is the mail server being slow or something? I'm getting extrememly delayed PPA upload emails.
[12:10] <wgrant> jrgifford: There's a whole lot of Ubuntu language packs tying up the upload processor.
[12:11] <jrgifford> wgrant: ah, ok. that'd do it. :P
[12:11] <wgrant> jrgifford: It's just finished, so it should get to yours soon.
[12:11] <jrgifford> is there a status page where I can find that stuff out on my own?
[12:11] <wgrant> No :(
[12:12] <czajkowski> I'm sure wgrant wishes there was
[12:12] <czajkowski> :)
[12:12] <jrgifford> :(
[12:12] <jrgifford> oh well, thanks!
[12:12] <wgrant> You can see recent public uploads at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+ppas
[12:13] <wgrant> 5 minutes ago they would have been all langpacks
[12:13] <wgrant> Lots and lots and lots of langpacks.
[12:13] <wgrant> jrgifford: Do you have an email yet?
[12:14] <czajkowski> Sweetshark: do you get any error when the upload doesnt happen ?
[12:14] <jrgifford> wgrant: i do, yes.
[12:14] <czajkowski> am wondering if you bug is the same as https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/194558
[12:14] <wgrant> czajkowski: No
[12:14] <wgrant> czajkowski: It's the normal package copy timeout
[12:15] <wgrant> libreoffice has a not insignificant number of binaries, and a lot of them are very large
[12:15] <czajkowski> nods I know just I thought I saw a similar bug already so was trying to find the possible duplicate
[12:17] <wgrant> Sweetshark: In future, it's essential that you give an OOPS ID when filing a bug about an OOPS or timeout
[12:17] <wgrant> Sweetshark: It's very difficult to diagnose without that information.
[12:25] <qengho> Hi hi.  I think I see a bug.  You need a build recipe.  Go to your personal page and click on "View source package recipes" under PPAs.  Get sent to +recipes, and then redirected to a recipe.  I think it should show a list, even if I have only one item, and I think I should be able to start a new recipe there.
[12:25] <qengho> Perhaps last part is related to  https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/610379
[12:30] <Sweetshark> czajkowski, wgrant: i copied without binaries for now (hugging two buildd for 6 hours along the way)
[12:31] <Sweetshark> cjwatson provided me with a syncronous launchpadlib script on ubuntu-devel
[12:33] <Sweetshark> still: evading to lplib for everything nontrivial is not a solution. so filed bug 1018349  ...
[12:38] <Sweetshark> czajkowski: and no, I dont have the OOPS anymore and just copied the source, so I wont retry now.
[12:39] <Sweetshark> czajkowski, wgrant: thanks for the support anyway ;)
[12:42] <wgrant> OOPS IDs aren't just for looks; they're needed so we can actually see what went wrong.
[12:45] <_The_Fred> Hello
[12:46] <_The_Fred> Now that i have my code on Launchpad, will it appear on the Ubuntu Software Center?
[12:47] <czajkowski> _The_Fred: eh ?
[12:48] <_The_Fred> Now that i have my code on Launchpad, how do i get it into the Ubuntu Software Center?
[12:49] <davmor2> _The_Fred: is this for the app contest?
[12:49] <_The_Fred> no
[12:51] <davmor2> _The_Fred: No it won't appear in Software Center you would need to submit it to myapps.developer.ubuntu.com where it will be reviewed by the ARB if it is a free app or the Commercial Apps team if it isn't
[12:52] <_The_Fred> davmor2, thank you.... i was just as myapps reading when you replied...
[12:52] <_The_Fred> *at
[13:50] <_The_Fred> oh noes... i think the packaging tutorial i was working from is out of date... in the rules file the install dir is /usr/share ... but the upload page at myapps says to use /opt/...  do i *have* to change it or will it be ok?
[13:54] <davmor2> _The_Fred: it would need to be /opt/ the guide for packaging is only a general one and most apps you create would be /usr/share but these need to be separated out so if there are issue they can be quickly contained
[13:55] <_The_Fred> davmor2, I see, so its i best i change it beforehand...
[13:56] <davmor2> _The_Fred: Yeap or you are likely to be asked to change it and it be sent back to you anyway, sorry
[13:56] <_The_Fred> no, thats fine, its no major effort, just part of my learning curve :)
[13:57] <davmor2> _The_Fred: if this was an app going into the distro via a repo then /usr/share is correct because it isn't there needs to be better control is effectively the difference
[13:59] <_The_Fred> that makes sense... an easy way of separating any potential problem packages
[14:01] <czajkowski> _The_Fred: you might find it useful to join #ubuntu-packaging if you have packaging queries
[14:01] <_The_Fred> czajkowski, thanks for that, i must admit that im far below par today, and had not even thought of looking for that channel..
[15:24] <hyperair> hi. how do i make launchpad spam me when there are build failures?
[15:25] <hyperair> i recall it did that in the past, but i don't seem to be seeing them any more
[15:25] <czajkowski> do you mean notify you?
[15:27] <Lasall> hi, sry I accidentally linked apt-fast as source package in oneiric: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/oneiric/+source/apt-fast . please unlink it
[15:29] <hyperair> czajkowski: yea
[15:29] <czajkowski> Lasall: done
[15:29] <czajkowski> I dont think it does
[15:29] <Lasall> thx czajkowski :)
[15:53] <sil2100> Hi!
[15:54] <sil2100> Is there a way to tell my LP PPA to build packages using the quantal-proposed archive during building?
[15:58] <czajkowski> jelmer: gmb any idea ? ^^
[16:00] <jelmer> hi sil2100
[16:00] <jelmer> sil2100: In the Edit Dependencies page, you should be able to enable proposed.
[16:10] <sil2100> jelmer: thanks!
[18:12] <kirkland> bac: ping
[18:13] <bac> hi kirkland
[18:13] <kirkland> bac: howdy!
[18:13] <kirkland> bac: looking at lp:~bac/ssh-import/bug-1018459
[18:13] <bac> how's it going?  having fun at the new place?
[18:13] <kirkland> bac: I am :-)
[18:14] <kirkland> bac: looking forward to the SEC?
[18:14] <kirkland> bac: should get the Aggies playing a few games closer to your neck of the woods
[18:14] <bac> yeah, that's true
[18:14] <kirkland> bac: okay, your fix, thanks, btw.
[18:14] <bac> it dates me, but i still miss the SWC
[18:14] <kirkland> bac: heh :-)
[18:14] <kirkland> bac: do you miss playing LSU?
[18:15]  * kirkland grew up in Baton Rouge...can't wait to play LSU every year again
[18:15] <bac> nope.  i don't think i ever saw them beat lsu
[18:15] <bac> anyway, trivial fix.  hope it is ok
[18:15] <kirkland> bac: A&M beat LSU 5 times in a row in the 90s
[18:16] <kirkland> bac: http://www.tigerdroppings.com/history/Results.aspx?Opponent=Texas%20A%26M
[18:16] <kirkland> bac: yeah, fix is okay
[18:16] <bac> kirkland: i've got five guys on my team, and ssh-import-lp-id rejected four of them!  :(
[18:16] <kirkland> bac: however
[18:17] <kirkland> bac: doh
[18:17] <kirkland> bac: okay, so the ssh-import project should really be "ssh-import-id"
[18:17] <kirkland> bac: can you help shut down that project in LP and point it to the other one?
[18:17] <kirkland> bac: i'm manually cherrypicking your patch
[18:17] <kirkland> bac: but to keep it from happening again
[18:17] <bac> kirkland: have you spun up a new one?
[18:18] <kirkland> bac: well, the new one has been around for a few years
[18:18] <bac> you could have just renamed it and created an alias
[18:18] <kirkland> bac: not sure what happened with the other one
[18:18] <kirkland> bac: yeah, sorry, i have no recollection
[18:18]  * bac looks
[18:20] <kirkland> bac: actually, this may be fixed in trunk
[18:20] <kirkland> bac: http://www.tigerdroppings.com/history/Results.aspx?Opponent=Texas%20A%26M
[18:20] <kirkland> bac: keys=$(grep -c "^ssh-[dr]s[sa] [a-zA-Z0-9: .\/=+-]\+ " "$1")
[18:21] <bac> kirkland: perhaps, i was getting the trunk from the old project
[18:21] <kirkland> bac: ah
[18:21] <kirkland> bac: let me try on your teammate
[18:21] <bac> kirkland: i have deactivated the old one.  if you get a webops to delete it then we can set up a forward...if that is important to you
[18:21] <kirkland> bac: lp id?
[18:21] <bac> frankban
[18:21] <bac> gmb
[18:21] <bac> gary
[18:21] <kirkland> bac: k
[18:21] <bac> oops, sorry guys
[18:21] <bac> :)
[18:22] <kirkland> bac: ./ssh-import-id -o - frankban
[18:22] <kirkland> bac: yeah, trunk works against all of those guys
[18:23] <kirkland> bac: there's a ppa build of trunk for all supported ubuntu releases, ppa:ssh-import-id/ppa
[18:23] <kirkland> bac: if this is important to you, propose an SRU, and I'll get it uploaded to proposed
[18:23] <bac> kirkland: my next question!  thanks.
[18:23] <bac> kirkland: i can work with the ppa.
[18:27] <kirkland> bac: great!
[18:27] <kirkland> bac: what version of Ubuntu are you seeing this in?
[18:28] <bac> kirkland: verify launchpad.net/ssh-import is dead for you
[18:28] <bac> kirkland: lucid...
[18:28] <kirkland> bac: ack!
[18:28] <bac> :)
[18:28] <bac> image on canonistack...
[18:28] <kirkland> bac: aha!  that's why you were seeing ssh-import as the source then
[18:29] <kirkland> bac: the package was ssh-import in lucid timeframe
[18:31] <bac> yep
[22:32] <dupondje> http://redmine.audacious-media-player.org/issues/138 => we don't seem to support those upstream bugtrackers, but maby it would be cool if we can link to it
[22:32] <dupondje> without fetching it status or so
[22:32] <dupondje> just to know it has been reported upstream
[22:32] <dupondje> ?