=== cyphermox is now known as cyphermox_ === cyphermox_ is now known as cyphermox [02:52] broder: I'm creating that facebook ad now... let's see what happens :) [03:02] (it's $1.06 per click, so at $25 that doesn't buy much, but it's $0.16 per thousand impressions, which is) [03:44] highvoltage: cool. i'm happy to pitch in if you can figure out a way for me to get money to you [07:04] good morning === almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan === badfox is now known as raju === ninjak_ is now known as ninjak === yofel_ is now known as yofel [15:26] ../grab-merge.sh acpi-support not giving me its pkgs [15:26] i checked the script , its working [15:26] i have seen pkg link in debian too [15:26] http://packages.qa.debian.org/a/acpi-support.html [15:26] everything is fine [15:26] but still i am not getting why i am unable to do this [15:27] somebody could help me please [15:35] somebody please [15:42] hmm [15:50] am i right that if you enable the backports repository in your system, it doesnt have any apt pinning to lower priority? I'm pretty certain there are no apt pinning rules on any repositories, even if they're all active (unless you manually set otherwise) [15:51] broder: ^ [15:52] you are not right [15:52] since 11.04, backports default to not installing automatically [15:53] i think otherwise, then... [15:53] because that's not been the case when i've enabled the backports repo [15:53] (on 11.04 and 12.04) [15:53] * LordOfTime will reconfirm later, but perhaps his system is broken [15:54] yep, confirmed as a bug local to my system [15:54] it has in fact been "enabled" by default since 11.10 [15:54] * LordOfTime is annoyed [15:55] hmm [15:55] then why am i getting updates pulled from -backports... [15:55] i wonder... [15:55] *checks apt preferences* [15:55] maybe because you previously installed that package from backports [15:56] Laney: my precise system is a clean install [15:56] the fact its pulling backport updates still is... problematic... [15:56] exactly what are you seeing? [15:57] first off, no pinning file [15:57] secondly, a ton of "Installed" items with origin in backports [15:57] s/ton/few/ [15:58] the python-leveldb is one of them (this is a dev system, and one of the projects needs that program) [15:58] that package only exists in backports. [15:58] wth [15:58] * LordOfTime has it listed in main [15:58] * LordOfTime grabs the installation media to reinstall [15:58] so there is nowhere else you could have got it from [15:58] i think my packaging system is botched [15:59] s/system/lists/ [15:59] s/packaging/package/ [16:00] first time this has happened [16:00] * LordOfTime wiped the apt cache, and did an apt-get update, and now its showing right [16:01] *shrugs* [16:01] you should show some example incorrect behaviour next time [16:02] well this thing has Synaptic *shrugs* [16:02] i think its just being stupid [16:03] (this thing has been stupid before) [16:04] bugs should still be reported properly === al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away === nhandler is now known as StaffUnicorn === Myrtti is now known as StaffRingedSeal === ashams_ is now known as ashams [16:46] ../grab-merge.sh acpi-support not giving me its pkgs, i checked the script , its working .i have seen pkg link in debian too http://packages.qa.debian.org/a/acpi-support.html . everything is fine , but still i am not getting why i am unable to do this , somebody help me please [18:33] When I went to submit my app, they wanted it on a PPA. Long story short, I am trying to make my first source archive for the ppa and it's not going well. http://pastebin.com/JyriN0yx [18:33] Does anyone know what it wants me to add to rules? [18:33] I don't need it to build anything as I already have a separate make and install file. [18:39] http://dl.dropbox.com/u/34155613/debian.tar.gz is the full archive [18:50] Hello [18:50] I uploaded source package to Launchpad but it is getting rejected: http://pastebin.com/Mpg91nth [18:51] I think this has to do with me uploading this source package yesterday in this PPA but I deleted it from my PPA's web UI [18:52] deleting does not allow you to upload it again with the same version [18:53] Err ok, what if the first upload failed to build? How can I use the same version again? [18:54] you can't [18:54] Or maybe, I don't understand versioning completely (?) [18:54] Ah ok. I should read more about versioning conventions. [18:55] if you change the debian part just increase the revision [18:55] if you change upstream you have to increase the upstream version [18:57] ok. Thanks jtaylor :) === StaffUnicorn is now known as nhandler