[07:28] <mlankhorst> morning
[07:28] <RAOF> Howdie ho!
[07:41] <mlankhorst> oh my, phoronix forums that had an 'article' about my winepulse provides diamonds of insight
[07:41] <mlankhorst> 'YOU are the piece of shit. Nobody would blow you anything, since you probably have a 1-inch penis. Go fuck yourself and kill yourself or die in a fire you pathetic, piece of shit loser.'
[07:42] <mlankhorst> (one of the repliers there to another)
[07:45] <tjaalton> quality
[07:46] <mlankhorst> unfortunately it is, I can't find anything wrong with the spelling. Only the assumption that everyone on the internet has a penis is wrong.
[07:51] <mlankhorst> the rest seems just as bad, nobody knowledgeable about the topic replying, thought I'd give looking at the comments a tree :s
[07:51] <mlankhorst> try*
[11:03] <mlankhorst> RAOF: well enough i915 work for now, any ideas for what to work on? :)
[11:05] <tjaalton> tons of bugs
[11:41]  * mlankhorst shakes head at nvidia bug still not fixed :P
[13:08] <mlankhorst> oh I get to start over on prime, making sure locking is correct first before going further
[13:14] <mlankhorst> *any* call to drm_gem_object_unreference must be done with prime lock held on shared dma-bufs. :\
[13:16] <mlankhorst> which means auditing i915, exynos, radeon, udl, nouveau.. eep
[13:48] <ara> bryceh, ping
[16:51] <bryceh> ara, yep
[16:52] <mlankhorst> bryceh: and third time to start over with synch here :)
[16:52] <bryceh> mlankhorst, yeah +1 on bugs :-)
[16:52] <mlankhorst> synchronization is hard..
[16:57] <mlankhorst> bryceh: the crtc_id corruption in nouveau for 3.4 is interesting https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43353 
[16:58] <mlankhorst> wish I could trigger it
[16:58]  * bryceh nods
[17:30] <bdmurray> mlankhorst: bug 941953 task for precise should not be fix released mlankhorst ... in progress would be fine then when it goes to -proposed it would move to fix committed and then when copied to -updates move to fix released
[17:33] <mlankhorst> bdmurray: ok I'll change status
[17:33] <mlankhorst> ah you already did :)
[17:34] <bdmurray> is the xserver-xorg-input-synaptics supposed to be for -proposed or -backports?
[17:35] <mlankhorst> proposed, it's fixes from the 1.6 branch
[17:36] <bdmurray> including one for bug 972927 which seems like it deliberately wasn't fixed for precise
[17:36] <bdmurray> er bug 972727
[17:36] <mlankhorst> erm I reverted that iirc
[17:36] <bdmurray> oh it might have just shown up in the changelog
[17:38] <mlankhorst> debian/patches/130_dont_enable_rightbutton_area.patch
[17:39] <bdmurray> okay, the scope of changes feels more like a microrelease to me
[17:40] <bdmurray> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#New_upstream_microreleases
[17:41] <mlankhorst> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/driver/xf86-input-synaptics/log/?h=synaptics-1.6-branch going from 1.6.0 to 1.6.2 so you would be right
[17:53] <mlankhorst> brb have to get something from store before it closes
[18:05] <mlankhorst> bdmurray: ok back :)
[18:25] <tjaalton> and again apport fails to send a crasher to lp
[18:25] <tjaalton> sigh
[18:26] <tjaalton> running unity --replace crashed the xserver
[18:27] <tjaalton> after I tried to recover from a blank screen after resume (killing indicator-printers-service seemed to finally bring it back)
[18:28] <mlankhorst> :\
[18:28] <mlankhorst> grr @ xserver still crashing btw
[18:30] <tjaalton> orly
[18:48] <tjaalton> bryceh: btw, apport asked the questions twice, that shouldn't be normal?
[18:49] <bryceh> tjaalton, no it shouldn't be normal.  I understand it's a fault of whoopsie daisy rather than the apport hook itself.  bdmurray probably knows more about this
[18:50] <tjaalton> ahh alright
[19:02] <bryceh> dingding, alpha-2 is released.  
[19:02] <tjaalton> whee
[19:03] <bryceh> time to upload all our X breakage :-)
[19:03] <tjaalton> was just about to ask that :)
[19:13] <mlankhorst> gogo
[19:13] <mlankhorst> testing? We do it in production :)
[19:17] <Sarvatt> planning on that synaptics thats in git?
[19:17] <Sarvatt> because i dont think that'll work right with 1.12
[19:17] <mlankhorst> input api wasn't bumped for 1.12 right?
[19:17] <Sarvatt> 125_option_rec_revert.patch
[19:17] <Sarvatt> 12.04 didn't have the full 1.12 input abi
[19:18] <mlankhorst> oh
[19:19] <mlankhorst> bryceh: maybe we want to rebuild that before copying over then?
[19:25] <tjaalton> just upload and it'll build itself?
[19:25] <tjaalton> oh well, doesn't matter
[19:26] <tjaalton> copying is easy
[19:26] <tjaalton> for some
[19:26] <tjaalton> needing special powers :)
[19:35] <mlankhorst> tjaalton: i think it implies removing that patch then
[19:40] <tjaalton> mlankhorst: guess so, don't see a mention of when it was added
[19:40] <tjaalton> oh there it is
[19:40] <tjaalton> yeah, drop it
[19:42] <mlankhorst> I'll temporarily add xorg 1.12 to build-depends and depends then
[19:43] <mlankhorst> cnd: any other patches we ought to drop?
[19:43] <mlankhorst> guessing 126_ubuntu_xi22.patch is unneeded too
[19:43] <tjaalton> right
[19:44] <mlankhorst> 124* too I think
[19:46] <tjaalton> you don't need to bump the depends
[19:46] <tjaalton> b-depends is enough
[19:46] <mlankhorst> ok
[19:51] <mlankhorst> pushed without the 124, I want confirmation first, so keep in for now
[19:55] <mlankhorst> tjaalton: can you upload to proposed?
[19:56] <tjaalton> mlankhorst: yup
[19:56] <tjaalton> hmm, the stack is in proposed and not staging?
[19:56] <mlankhorst> think so
[19:57] <tjaalton> yup
[20:00] <tjaalton> there
[22:13] <johanbr> The linux-image-3.5.0-2-generic kernel in xorg-edgers for precise breaks sound for me (pulseaudio hangs). Is this a known problem?