=== meetingology` is now known as meetingology | ||
=== Mkaysi_ is now known as Mkaysi | ||
=== myrtti is now known as Myrtti | ||
=== cjwatson_ is now known as cjwatson | ||
=== LJL is now known as LjL | ||
=== elky` is now known as elky | ||
=== myrtti is now known as Myrtti | ||
=== ayan-afk is now known as ayan | ||
=== Cees_ is now known as Cees | ||
* skaet waves | 14:56 | |
mdeslaur | hi! | 14:56 |
---|---|---|
skaet | hiya mdeslaur :) | 14:56 |
ScottK | \0 | 14:57 |
brendand | hi! | 14:59 |
arosales | hello | 14:59 |
skaet | :) | 15:00 |
skaet | looks like quorum has emerged. :) | 15:00 |
skaet | #startmeeting | 15:00 |
meetingology | Meeting started Fri Jun 29 15:00:47 2012 UTC. The chair is skaet. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology. | 15:00 |
meetingology | Available commands: #accept #accepted #action #agree #agreed #chair #commands #endmeeting #endvote #halp #help #idea #info #link #lurk #meetingname #meetingtopic #nick #progress #rejected #replay #restrictlogs #save #startmeeting #subtopic #topic #unchair #undo #unlurk #vote #voters #votesrequired | 15:00 |
skaet | Agenda (and minute location): | 15:01 |
skaet | https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReleaseTeam/Meeting/2012-06-29 | 15:01 |
skaet | . | 15:01 |
skaet | Upcoming dates: | 15:01 |
skaet | 2012/07/05 - DebianImportFreeze | 15:01 |
skaet | 2012/07/23 - Alpha 3 image candidates start | 15:01 |
skaet | 2012/07/26 - Alpha 3 | 15:01 |
skaet | . | 15:01 |
skaet | Work Items: | 15:01 |
skaet | 2012/06/29 - 2782 (was 2926 last week): BEHIND trendline for this point. | 15:01 |
skaet | Please help get us back where we should be by making sure https://launchpad.net/~/+upcomingwork is up to date for your tasks. | 15:01 |
skaet | . | 15:01 |
skaet | Bugs: | 15:01 |
skaet | Quantal: http://reports.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-q-tracking-bug-tasks.html | 15:01 |
skaet | 12.04.1:http://status.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/kernel-bugs/reports/rls-p-tracking-bugs.html | 15:01 |
skaet | . | 15:01 |
skaet | A2 Testing Report: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/ReleaseReports/QuantalAlpha2TestReport | 15:01 |
skaet | Thank you to all the testers, and jibel for coordinating, and another excellent job in highlighting the key issues in a timely fashion. :) | 15:01 |
skaet | . | 15:01 |
skaet | Pending action items: | 15:01 |
skaet | [skaet] - SRU team vanguards: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates/#Publishing - DONE | 15:01 |
skaet | [seb128] - summarize on ubuntu-release mail list what desktop wants for 12.04.1 (201206 15:15:33:13) - ? | 15:01 |
skaet | [skaet] - start off a blueprint for -r release for people to record ideas and thoughts on logical steps for making progress to the long term goal. (skaet, 20120622 16:25:27) - https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/other-r-future-release-brainstorming - DONE | 15:01 |
skaet | . | 15:01 |
skaet | Weekly Status Received: | 15:01 |
skaet | https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-release/2012-June/001462.html -hw cert: brendand | 15:01 |
skaet | https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-release/2012-June/001465.html- security: mdeslaurs | 15:01 |
skaet | https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-release/2012-June/001467.html - desktop: seb128 | 15:02 |
skaet | https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-release/2012-June/001468.html - kernel: ogasawara | 15:02 |
skaet | https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-release/2012-June/001469.html - community testing: balloons | 15:02 |
skaet | ** 2100 UTC - due time ^ Thank you to those who submitted on time ** | 15:02 |
skaet | https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-release/2012-June/001471.html - lubuntu: gilir | 15:02 |
skaet | https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-release/2012-June/001472.html - server: arosales | 15:02 |
skaet | ** Reminder, please get your team's summary in by 2100 UTC, so there's time to prep, take care of issues on the mail list, and keep the meeting short. | 15:02 |
skaet | .. | 15:02 |
skaet | #topic Questions and Comments. | 15:03 |
=== meetingology changed the topic of #ubuntu-meeting to: Questions and Comments. | ||
skaet | hiya, any other team minutes available that I missed in my last pass? | 15:03 |
seb128 | hey | 15:03 |
skaet | Reminder: DebianImportFreeze is next Thursday 7/5, after that all imports will need to be explicit. | 15:03 |
skaet | Thank you to stgraber and balloons for the updates to the iso tracker, new features rolled out nice and smooth for A2 from my perspective. :) | 15:04 |
seb128 | sorry I assumed we had no meeting after alpha2 (as we didn't have one after a1 IIRC) ... anyway I'm here ;-) | 15:04 |
ScottK | Debian's freeze for Wheezy release is tomorrow, so the amount of new stuff from Debian should start to drop off in any case. | 15:04 |
skaet | thanks seb128, with holidays coming up, and A2 being so smooth (overall), seemed prudent to have one before DebianImportFreeze | 15:04 |
seb128 | yeah, makes sense ;-) | 15:05 |
skaet | General request: Leads please work through your alpha 2 work items, and for those items not accomplished, please retarget or postpone. Burn downs are showing us fallling behind where we wanted to be. | 15:05 |
skaet | .. | 15:05 |
skaet | anyone else have comments/questions before I start into my list? | 15:05 |
ogra_ | https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-release/2012-June/001473.html - foundations: ogra | 15:05 |
ogra_ | (sorry !) | 15:05 |
skaet | thanks ogra_ :) | 15:06 |
skaet | seb128, any update on the pending action item to post what desktop looks to land for 12.04.1? (did I miss it on the ubuntu-release list?) | 15:06 |
seb128 | sorry | 15:08 |
seb128 | skaet, I mentioned it last week in reply to my weekly report email | 15:08 |
seb128 | "I also had an action item to check what images the desktop team wants to support for the LTS .1 release: we will keep doing what we did for previous LTSes, and support the same set of images that for the release, including the DVD ones. " | 15:09 |
seb128 | skaet, ^ | 15:09 |
skaet | thanks seb128. I'll mark it done then. :) | 15:09 |
seb128 | thanks | 15:09 |
skaet | .. | 15:09 |
skaet | brendand, do you have a prioritized list (ie. most to least important) of the bugs cert wants fixed for 12.04.1? is bug 1013843 the key blocker? | 15:09 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 1013843 in casper (Ubuntu Quantal) "resolv.conf empty when doing PXE installations" [High,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1013843 | 15:09 |
brendand | skaet, as far as i know that's only in quantal | 15:10 |
skaet | brendand, ok. :) | 15:10 |
brendand | skaet, as for prioritization, i will need to discuss with ara. when would you like a list by - and how many bugs? 5? 10? | 15:11 |
brendand | skaet, or all of them, just prioritized? | 15:11 |
skaet | brendand, top 5 most impact to fix would be good, or a list in descending order of inpact, so we can get some focus. | 15:11 |
skaet | possible to mail something out to ubuntu-release mail list by next week? | 15:12 |
brendand | skaet, asap | 15:12 |
highvoltage | ~/win 12 | 15:12 |
skaet | :) ok, will add it to the actions. :) | 15:13 |
skaet | .. | 15:13 |
skaet | mdeslaurs, for those AA uploads, is there someone identified, or just waiting in queue? | 15:13 |
brendand | skaet, about the 1013843 bug, i wanted to ask stgraber if he is blocked trying to reproduce it? | 15:13 |
stgraber | brendand: I'm not, just busy with other things | 15:14 |
brendand | stgraber, ok. whatever resources you need to try and reproduce it, the guys in montreal can provide | 15:14 |
skaet | ..? | 15:15 |
stgraber | brendand: I have a netboot setup at home so should be easy to reproduce locally (though the fixes I pushed in quantal were specifically to make it work ;)) | 15:15 |
stgraber | .. | 15:15 |
skaet | mdeslaur, ^ (sorry about the typo on your nick) | 15:16 |
seb128 | skaet, tab completion is handy ;-) | 15:16 |
skaet | yup. | 15:17 |
mdeslaur | skaet: jdstrand is identified, or he may sponsor sbeattie | 15:17 |
skaet | coolio, just wanted to make sure wasn't going to linger over holidays/debconf/etc. :) | 15:18 |
skaet | .. | 15:18 |
skaet | seb128, does it make sense to ask balloons to get the new gtk's ally enablement tested by the community? Would be nice to get early feedback, and a chance to fix before we get to beta. | 15:19 |
* skaet notes that balloons will need to be followed up by with email. | 15:19 | |
seb128 | skaet, that would be great | 15:19 |
seb128 | skaet, balloons: check with TheMuso if you need details on what needs testing | 15:20 |
seb128 | skaet, balloons: a slightly more detailed email on the topic is on https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-desktop/2012-June/003868.html | 15:20 |
skaet | seb128, ok, I'll put in a request and copy you and TheMuso on it. | 15:21 |
seb128 | thanks | 15:21 |
skaet | .. | 15:21 |
skaet | seb128, popey, when will the next unity, compiz drops land? | 15:21 |
seb128 | unity for quantal is being worked | 15:22 |
seb128 | next week if everything goes well | 15:22 |
seb128 | new compiz landed this week | 15:22 |
popey | oh hai, didnt realise there was a meeting right now | 15:22 |
popey | what seb128 says :) | 15:22 |
seb128 | we should have another compiz within 2 weeks with gsettings support (finger crossed) | 15:23 |
popey | quantal + nux should be testing monday, release tuesday | 15:23 |
seb128 | gsettings code is being worked, sam estimates to a good week of work so I count on 2 weeks for landing if that goes well | 15:23 |
popey | thanks seb128 | 15:23 |
ogra_ | we're still waiting for upstream to merge the gles patches for arm | 15:23 |
ogra_ | (compiz that is) | 15:23 |
seb128 | ogra_, that will be after gsettings, don't count before a month | 15:24 |
seb128 | .. | 15:24 |
ogra_ | current compiz is built with gles support, which will not work on arm | 15:24 |
seb128 | ogra_, right, well they have 2 compiz maintainers and work for 5, there is only so much they can get done at the time | 15:24 |
ogra_ | (that doesnt matter much though since we have no working drivers for any arm platform yet, waiting for TI as usual) | 15:24 |
seb128 | gsettings is first then they will do gles | 15:25 |
seb128 | .. | 15:25 |
skaet | thanks seb128, popey, ogra_ . ok, that helps with setting the expectations. | 15:25 |
ogra_ | seb128, i didnt mean to blame anyone or so :) just wanted to throw it in the meeting so people are aware and dont complain that their pandas dont show bling ;) | 15:25 |
seb128 | ogra_, my panda doesn't show screen atm, let's talk after bling later :p | 15:26 |
ogra_ | seb128, if there would have been dailies today, these would have a fix for that ;) | 15:26 |
ogra_ | .. | 15:26 |
skaet | ogra_, yeah glad you brought it up, sounds like its going to get close to feature freeze then before its all working, which is a bit worrying. | 15:26 |
skaet | .. | 15:26 |
ogra_ | skaet, well, as i understand it, upstream expects that *all* plugins are ported to GLES before accepting the patch | 15:27 |
ogra_ | linaros patch only ports the ones we use in ubuntu | 15:27 |
ogra_ | .. | 15:27 |
skaet | ogra_, yeah that could indeed make things *interesting* :P | 15:27 |
ogra_ | right | 15:27 |
seb128 | that's being sorted, they will not block on that | 15:28 |
seb128 | still there is a bit of work needed | 15:28 |
ogra_ | not much we can do about it though | 15:28 |
seb128 | and they go asked to finish gsettings first since blocks desktop updates | 15:28 |
seb128 | i.e part of GNOME is blocked on it | 15:28 |
seb128 | and that work is overdue (it was meant to land in oneiric) | 15:28 |
ogra_ | well, as long as there is a chance it makes FF | 15:28 |
seb128 | that should be fine | 15:28 |
ogra_ | if not, it would be good to know about that early enough so we can think of alternatives | 15:29 |
seb128 | as said it should be one extra week or max 2 to clear the gsettings stuff and the important bug fixes they are on | 15:29 |
ogra_ | ok, that sounds fine | 15:29 |
seb128 | then it's gles, which hopefully with take 1 or 2 weeks | 15:29 |
seb128 | I will keep you guys updated | 15:29 |
seb128 | .. | 15:29 |
skaet | ogra_, on the subject of worrying, who has the lead for java on arm? is there a good pointer to the plan for that part? (me may have missed it in her last pass) | 15:29 |
ogra_ | thx | 15:29 |
ogra_ | .. | 15:29 |
ogra_ | skaet, hmm, usually thats doko, not sure, probably infinity is on it too nowadays | 15:30 |
ogra_ | i can collect info on that for next week | 15:30 |
skaet | ogra_, that would be appreciated. :) Thanks! | 15:31 |
skaet | .. | 15:31 |
* skaet looks around to see if anyone else has questions? | 15:31 | |
skaet | looks like that's it then for this week. | 15:33 |
skaet | Next week I'll be on vacation, and pgraner will be hosting the meeting. | 15:33 |
skaet | Thanks ogra_, arosales, mdeslaur, seb128, brendand, popey, stgraber, ScottK | 15:34 |
skaet | #endmeeting | 15:34 |
=== meetingology changed the topic of #ubuntu-meeting to: Ubuntu Meeting Grounds | Calendar/Scheduled meetings: http://fridge.ubuntu.com/calendar | Logs: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MeetingLogs | Meetingology documentation: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology | ||
meetingology | Meeting ended Fri Jun 29 15:34:03 2012 UTC. | 15:34 |
meetingology | Minutes (wiki): http://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting/2012/ubuntu-meeting.2012-06-29-15.00.moin.txt | 15:34 |
meetingology | Minutes (html): http://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting/2012/ubuntu-meeting.2012-06-29-15.00.html | 15:34 |
stgraber | thanks! | 15:34 |
mdeslaur | thanks skaet! | 15:34 |
ogra_ | thanks skaet | 15:34 |
seb128 | skaet, thanks, enjoy your vacs! | 15:34 |
arosales | thanks skaet for chairing :-) | 15:34 |
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
=== davidm` is now known as davidm | ||
ajmitch | #startmeeting | 21:04 |
meetingology | Meeting started Fri Jun 29 21:04:37 2012 UTC. The chair is ajmitch. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology. | 21:04 |
meetingology | Available commands: #accept #accepted #action #agree #agreed #chair #commands #endmeeting #endvote #halp #help #idea #info #link #lurk #meetingname #meetingtopic #nick #progress #rejected #replay #restrictlogs #save #startmeeting #subtopic #topic #unchair #undo #unlurk #vote #voters #votesrequired | 21:04 |
ajmitch | OK, arb agenda is https://wiki.ubuntu.com/AppReviewBoard/Agenda | 21:05 |
* stgraber waves | 21:05 | |
* highvoltage splashes | 21:05 | |
ajmitch | was looking over http://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting/2012/ubuntu-meeting.2012-05-25-21.09.log.html from the last meeting, there weren't any actions added aside from the UDS items | 21:06 |
* wendar waves | 21:07 | |
ajmitch | yay, people :) | 21:07 |
highvoltage | I'm really tired so sorry for my lack of enthusiasm :) | 21:08 |
ajmitch | do we want to quickly go over the developer portal bugs, or just be happy that they're there & being looked at? :) | 21:08 |
* ajmitch mostly wants to get people voting on submissions, fwiw :) | 21:09 | |
highvoltage | Ok, I'll catch up with the votes tomorrow. And also all the nice things dolbach has been talking about. | 21:09 |
ajmitch | yeah, I've been talking with dholbach a bit & following what he's been doing with the apps branch & arb-lint | 21:10 |
highvoltage | and also try to get some sense of how many competition apps there are and what I can do about it | 21:10 |
ajmitch | apparantly there are 30+ for the competition | 21:10 |
ajmitch | I expect some won't be packaged for /opt/extras.ubuntu.com | 21:10 |
ajmitch | this sort of covers some of the UDS workitems, with the competition & the tools for reviewing | 21:11 |
ajmitch | one thing that came up this week was whether ~ubuntu-dev should be added to the ~ubuntu-app-review-contributors team | 21:12 |
ajmitch | thoughts? | 21:12 |
highvoltage | sounds like it makes sense | 21:14 |
highvoltage | the more the arb process is integrated in the rest of ubuntu, the better | 21:14 |
highvoltage | (imho) | 21:14 |
ajmitch | it'd allow any ubuntu developer to commit to the branches dholbach is importing, and let them comment & change state of apps on myapps | 21:15 |
ajmitch | which I think is fine | 21:15 |
ajmitch | assuming you find the branches useful | 21:15 |
wendar | well, remember that ubuntu-app-review-contributors gets special access in MyApps | 21:15 |
wendar | do we want to grant that to all ubuntu-devs? | 21:16 |
ajmitch | right, that's what I'm asking | 21:16 |
wendar | it seems like some kind of verification step makes sense | 21:16 |
ajmitch | since changing the myapps state doesn't affect a whole lot unless they're rejected | 21:16 |
highvoltage | I guess in that case they might as well just join #ubuntu-arb and ask to be added | 21:17 |
highvoltage | (or mail or whatever) | 21:17 |
wendar | I thought review contributors could do more than just change state? | 21:17 |
highvoltage | what's the concern? that someone might do something malicious? | 21:18 |
wendar | more concerned about accidental disruptive changes, from people who don't know the interface yet | 21:19 |
wendar | it's still a little buggy | 21:19 |
wendar | but, if they really only have access to comment and non-destructive state changes, then I have no concern | 21:19 |
wendar | it is worth asking ubuntu-dev if they *want* to be added though | 21:19 |
wendar | aren't there default notifications sent out to review contributors? | 21:20 |
wendar | or, is that only direct to the arb mailing list, and not individual notifications? | 21:20 |
ajmitch | that's what dholbach was checking, he said he hadn't received any | 21:20 |
wendar | is that because they're going to ubuntu-app-review-board members? or to the mailing list? | 21:21 |
ajmitch | to the mailing list | 21:21 |
wendar | ok, limited access and not spamming ubuntu-devs are my only concerns | 21:22 |
wendar | if that's all sorted, and ubuntu-dev wants to be added, I'm fine with it | 21:23 |
ajmitch | alright | 21:23 |
highvoltage | sounds reasonable | 21:23 |
stgraber | +1 | 21:23 |
wendar | another possibility is to just ask achuni to grant access to all ubuntu-dev, without joining up the launchpad teams | 21:23 |
ajmitch | it's a bit hard to ask a team that encompasses everyone with upload rights, ~ubuntu-dev is often added to other teams | 21:23 |
ajmitch | that could work | 21:24 |
* ajmitch just wants more people reviewing | 21:24 | |
wendar | yeah, making that as easy as possible is a good idea | 21:24 |
wendar | though, there something neat about being granted priviledges when you join a team :) | 21:25 |
ajmitch | ideally we'd have some active arb helpers who could then go on to the arb team (election, appointment, whatever) & vote on apps | 21:25 |
ajmitch | the term length is indefinite in LP for some reason, but I know we all won't want to do this forever :) | 21:26 |
ajmitch | ok, that vaguely covers the recruiting agenda item from last month | 21:29 |
* ajmitch isn't sure if any of us have managed to set aside a regular reviewing time lately, so will skip that :) | 21:30 | |
ajmitch | #topic General state of the ARB queue | 21:30 |
=== meetingology changed the topic of #ubuntu-meeting to: General state of the ARB queue | ||
wendar | ajmitch: hmmm... we all had term expirations last I checked... | 21:30 |
ajmitch | I'm worried that applications are getting lost in the voting process | 21:30 |
ajmitch | wendar: I checked the other day, we no longer do | 21:30 |
wendar | ajmitch: how odd. I know mine's coming up soon | 21:31 |
ajmitch | https://launchpad.net/~app-review-board/+members shows no expiry dates | 21:31 |
wendar | ajmitch: yup, you're right | 21:32 |
wendar | ajmitch: well, it's 2 years after start anyway | 21:32 |
ajmitch | it's a life sentence :) | 21:32 |
highvoltage | oh dear | 21:32 |
wendar | so, 3 of us are out this September | 21:33 |
wendar | but, I don't think we should wait until then to add new people | 21:33 |
ajmitch | no, nominally there are 7 on the board, but a couple haven't been heard from for quite some time | 21:33 |
wendar | really, I'd be happy to treat it as more of a promotion process | 21:33 |
ajmitch | so would I | 21:33 |
wendar | we'd still need to do the poll of all ubuntu-devs | 21:34 |
wendar | but, it could be on a one-off basis | 21:34 |
ajmitch | & not require adjusting quorum for votes on apps, even universe just requred 2 +1s from MOTUs for new apps | 21:34 |
wendar | yeah, quorum is a fixed number, shouldn't vary by the size of the board | 21:34 |
wendar | (it already is that way, so no change needed) | 21:35 |
ajmitch | we've struggled to get 3 votes lately, I know everyone's been busy (myself included) | 21:35 |
wendar | ajmitch: yes, I'm thinking I may switch to making voting my first priority | 21:35 |
ajmitch | I came across an example of a lens that had the vote started about 7 weeks ago, but never got to +3 | 21:35 |
wendar | especially if we get some regular arb contributors | 21:35 |
ajmitch | what do you think of a trello board for being able to see the state of the apps being worked on & reviewed? too much duplication? | 21:36 |
highvoltage | yeah I think it makes sense priorotising voting, the last thing we want is a backlog of perfectly good apps. | 21:36 |
wendar | reviewing an app that's already been cleaned up takes a lot less time than cleaning up a new one | 21:36 |
wendar | ajmitch: yeah, I wondered about using trello too | 21:36 |
ajmitch | really, the arb's only role should need to be voting | 21:36 |
wendar | ajmitch: it doesn't have to be a lot of work to maintain trello, if it's just the name and link for each app | 21:37 |
ajmitch | we can all do package clean up if we want, but voting is the main task | 21:37 |
ajmitch | wendar: right | 21:37 |
wendar | trello is far, far simpler to maintain than a wiki page for app status :) | 21:37 |
ajmitch | that way if you put an app up for vote, move it to the voting list in trello so we can see what to look at | 21:37 |
* ajmitch uses it a bit at work now | 21:37 | |
wendar | and we can grant arb contributors full edit rights on trello | 21:38 |
ajmitch | yep | 21:38 |
wendar | and, any app submitter can quickly check the status of their app | 21:38 |
ajmitch | stgraber, highvoltage: in favour of it? | 21:38 |
highvoltage | yep | 21:38 |
stgraber | sounds good | 21:40 |
ajmitch | #action ajmitch to set up trello board for tracking application votes & reviewer notes | 21:40 |
meetingology | ACTION: ajmitch to set up trello board for tracking application votes & reviewer notes | 21:40 |
ajmitch | ok | 21:40 |
* ajmitch thought this weekend was going to be completely full with work, but it seems next weekend will be | 21:40 | |
ajmitch | dholbach's suggested this apps sprint this week, I'll probably be lurking around #ubuntu-arb in the evenings as usual | 21:41 |
ajmitch | not sure how crazy everyones' schedules are, but it'd be nice to get through a few apps for the competition over the next few days | 21:42 |
wendar | Sunday is okay for me this week | 21:42 |
wendar | and Wednesday is a holiday | 21:42 |
ajmitch | lucky :) | 21:43 |
wendar | but otherwise I've got a couple hours in the morning and a couple in the evening | 21:43 |
wendar | so, I can do short snippets | 21:43 |
ajmitch | any time is helpful | 21:43 |
wendar | but, not big stuff | 21:43 |
wendar | like, a whole app review usually takes me 4 hours | 21:43 |
wendar | (with finding and fixing bugs) | 21:43 |
ajmitch | I can understand that, it can be quite involved | 21:43 |
ajmitch | we'll try & get some cleaned up apps for voting on | 21:44 |
wendar | I know I've got a couple that are just about ready to go up for vote | 21:44 |
ajmitch | they should take less time | 21:44 |
wendar | so, I can focus on those for this week | 21:44 |
wendar | and, on voting on the ones that are already up for vote | 21:44 |
wendar | does trello let you assign a task to a person/ | 21:44 |
wendar | ? | 21:45 |
ajmitch | yes | 21:45 |
ajmitch | just drag their icon onto the card | 21:45 |
wendar | cool, that'll help | 21:45 |
ajmitch | I'll probably need to get the email you use for trello so I can add people | 21:45 |
wendar | like, when I'm working on an app, I can put it in an active channel, and then tag it with my user | 21:45 |
wendar | because honestly, right now it'll take me 30minutes just to find all my active apps, check on their status, and figure out what the next step is for each :( | 21:46 |
ajmitch | yeah, and you can leave comments on each card, it's fairly quick to use | 21:46 |
wendar | okay, that'll help alot :) | 21:47 |
ajmitch | with that, is there any other business to talk about? | 21:48 |
ajmitch | apart from the meeting time & the next chair | 21:48 |
wendar | sounds like not :) | 21:50 |
ajmitch | ok :) | 21:50 |
ajmitch | does this meeting time still work for people, and who volunteers to be the next chair? :) | 21:50 |
* ajmitch will have to volunteer someone for it soon | 21:53 | |
ajmitch | highvoltage: you're next alphabetically, available for it next month? | 21:53 |
highvoltage | ajmitch: ok | 21:53 |
ajmitch | thanks | 21:54 |
ajmitch | next meeting at 21:00UTC on 27 july | 21:54 |
ajmitch | #endmeeting | 21:54 |
=== meetingology changed the topic of #ubuntu-meeting to: Ubuntu Meeting Grounds | Calendar/Scheduled meetings: http://fridge.ubuntu.com/calendar | Logs: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MeetingLogs | Meetingology documentation: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology | ||
meetingology | Meeting ended Fri Jun 29 21:54:59 2012 UTC. | 21:54 |
meetingology | Minutes (wiki): http://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting/2012/ubuntu-meeting.2012-06-29-21.04.moin.txt | 21:54 |
meetingology | Minutes (html): http://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting/2012/ubuntu-meeting.2012-06-29-21.04.html | 21:54 |
ajmitch | thanks everyone | 21:55 |
wendar | thanks ajmitch! | 21:55 |
ajmitch | you can go & have your friday drinks now, if you haven't started already | 21:55 |
highvoltage | thank ajmitch | 21:55 |
wendar | hah, I've got to launch 2 features before friday drinks :) | 21:55 |
wendar | (launching them after is not a good idea, we used to do that in the dot-com days ;) | 21:56 |
highvoltage | wendar: ouch! good luck :) | 21:56 |
* ajmitch was going to be spending all day today doing work, but that's deferred thankfully :) | 21:56 | |
wendar | ajmitch: happy Saturday :) | 21:56 |
ajmitch | heh, thanks | 21:57 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!