/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2012/06/29/#ubuntu-testing.txt

=== meetingology` is now known as meetingology
rickspencer3pitti, this doesn't look so bad today: https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/view/Quantal/view/ISO%20Testing%20Dashboard/05:33
rickspencer3;)05:33
pittiindeed! but that doesn't have an image for today yet, for the post-alpha 2 rush05:33
pittiI'm a bit worried about the ubiquity failure on https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/view/Quantal/view/AutoPkg%20Test/05:34
pittibut it seems it did not actually break the manual testing05:34
rickspencer3pitti, this one? https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/view/Quantal/view/AutoPkg%20Test/job/quantal-adt-ubiquity/05:38
pittiyes05:39
rickspencer3seems like it hasn't ever passed, I guess it needs some attention?05:39
pittioh, sure it passed in the past05:39
pittilook at the green dots at the left05:40
pittithe debconf error is most probably a bug in the test, but the 'NetworkManagerWidget' object has no attribute 'view' one is real05:40
rickspencer3oops05:40
rickspencer3I wonder if the ubiquity tests combined with the upgrade tests will make getting ubuntu installed and upgraded much more robust?05:41
pittithat was the idea05:42
pittithat, and breaking the installer with e. g. a new GTK or a new pygobject (which did happen a lot in the past)05:42
trijntjeshort question, has the deadline for these tests passed? http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/222/builds/17847/testcases10:37
mwozniak00Hi, I have a small question? Is it possible to attach to the official repository the drivers written by third party person. I mean specifically about stk11xx for Syntek webcams.10:37
jibeltrijntje, yes, alpha 2 has been released yesterday. Quantal daily is open for testing  http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/219/builds10:40
=== jibel changed the topic of #ubuntu-testing to: Welcome to Ubuntu QA and Testing | http://qa.ubuntu.com/ | Currently Testing Quantal and Precise 12.04.1 dailies | http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com
trijntjejibel: k thanks. I've subscribed to a number of images so I guess I'll get an e-mail when there are new ones available10:45
jibeltrijntje, there is no notification for daily builds10:45
jibeland I'm wondering why todays are not on the tracker10:47
jibeltrijntje, thanks for the heads up10:47
mwozniak00Hmm... Beter is use Quantal alpha2 iso or daily build ?10:47
mwozniak00for standalone istall of corse... i wana help whitch searching bug ;)10:48
trijntjejibel: I just noticed that the zsync link for the core images is broken, could that be related?10:48
trijntjehttp://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/219/builds/17742/downloads10:48
jibeltrijntje, it is related. It points to the version of the images before Alpha2. New images have been published and the old ones deleted10:50
jibeltrijntje, latest build is there http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-core/daily/10:50
jibelmwozniak00, personally I use daily builds10:51
jibelyou'll get the latest updates which is good for testing purpose10:51
mwozniak00ok. thx. i have hope that this is a little bit stable because i wanu use it for daily work ;) i know that is not recommendet but i like test unstable soft...10:55
trijntjejibel: should that be http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-core/daily/current?11:06
=== _salem is now known as salem_
jibeltrijntje, yes, current is a link to the latest build which in this case is 20120629/11:51
trijntjeok, thanks, then I know what images to test!11:52
trijntje(slightly offtopic, how are you able to run so many tests? I see your name everywhere)11:53
=== salem_ is now known as _salem
=== patdk-wk_ is now known as patdk-wk
brendandis there a particular package i need to install to get the quantal xorg packages on precise?13:12
brendanddespite the fact that i have the ppa enabled my xorg packages don't match the versions in the ppa13:12
=== zyga is now known as zyga-food
=== _salem is now known as salem_
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel
=== zyga-food is now known as zyga
jibelstgraber, lxc question. Can I tell to lxc-create to create the container filesystem in a different location than /var/lib/lxc ?19:48
stgraberjibel: I vaguely remember that path being hardcoded (or almost hardcoded) in quite a few places. In theory you could pass a .conf file (-f) to lxc-create with lxc.rootfs set to an alternate path, but I doubt it'll work19:50
stgraberI usually end up symlinking /var/lib/lxc somewhere else19:50
stgraberbut feel free to file a bug about it as we certainly should allow containers to be stored in a different place19:51
jibelsetting it in lxc.conf doesn't work. I'll bind mount the other drive19:51
jibelstgraber, ta19:51
stgrabernp (I have /var/lib/lxc and /var/cache/lxc be symlinks to /data/internal/containers/ on most of my servers)19:52
jibelbug 101939819:58
ubot5Launchpad bug 1019398 in lxc (Ubuntu) "Allow creation of container root filesystem in a user defined location" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/101939819:58

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!