| === meetingology` is now known as meetingology | ||
| rickspencer3 | pitti, this doesn't look so bad today: https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/view/Quantal/view/ISO%20Testing%20Dashboard/ | 05:33 |
|---|---|---|
| rickspencer3 | ;) | 05:33 |
| pitti | indeed! but that doesn't have an image for today yet, for the post-alpha 2 rush | 05:33 |
| pitti | I'm a bit worried about the ubiquity failure on https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/view/Quantal/view/AutoPkg%20Test/ | 05:34 |
| pitti | but it seems it did not actually break the manual testing | 05:34 |
| rickspencer3 | pitti, this one? https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/view/Quantal/view/AutoPkg%20Test/job/quantal-adt-ubiquity/ | 05:38 |
| pitti | yes | 05:39 |
| rickspencer3 | seems like it hasn't ever passed, I guess it needs some attention? | 05:39 |
| pitti | oh, sure it passed in the past | 05:39 |
| pitti | look at the green dots at the left | 05:40 |
| pitti | the debconf error is most probably a bug in the test, but the 'NetworkManagerWidget' object has no attribute 'view' one is real | 05:40 |
| rickspencer3 | oops | 05:40 |
| rickspencer3 | I wonder if the ubiquity tests combined with the upgrade tests will make getting ubuntu installed and upgraded much more robust? | 05:41 |
| pitti | that was the idea | 05:42 |
| pitti | that, and breaking the installer with e. g. a new GTK or a new pygobject (which did happen a lot in the past) | 05:42 |
| trijntje | short question, has the deadline for these tests passed? http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/222/builds/17847/testcases | 10:37 |
| mwozniak00 | Hi, I have a small question? Is it possible to attach to the official repository the drivers written by third party person. I mean specifically about stk11xx for Syntek webcams. | 10:37 |
| jibel | trijntje, yes, alpha 2 has been released yesterday. Quantal daily is open for testing http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/219/builds | 10:40 |
| === jibel changed the topic of #ubuntu-testing to: Welcome to Ubuntu QA and Testing | http://qa.ubuntu.com/ | Currently Testing Quantal and Precise 12.04.1 dailies | http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com | ||
| trijntje | jibel: k thanks. I've subscribed to a number of images so I guess I'll get an e-mail when there are new ones available | 10:45 |
| jibel | trijntje, there is no notification for daily builds | 10:45 |
| jibel | and I'm wondering why todays are not on the tracker | 10:47 |
| jibel | trijntje, thanks for the heads up | 10:47 |
| mwozniak00 | Hmm... Beter is use Quantal alpha2 iso or daily build ? | 10:47 |
| mwozniak00 | for standalone istall of corse... i wana help whitch searching bug ;) | 10:48 |
| trijntje | jibel: I just noticed that the zsync link for the core images is broken, could that be related? | 10:48 |
| trijntje | http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/219/builds/17742/downloads | 10:48 |
| jibel | trijntje, it is related. It points to the version of the images before Alpha2. New images have been published and the old ones deleted | 10:50 |
| jibel | trijntje, latest build is there http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-core/daily/ | 10:50 |
| jibel | mwozniak00, personally I use daily builds | 10:51 |
| jibel | you'll get the latest updates which is good for testing purpose | 10:51 |
| mwozniak00 | ok. thx. i have hope that this is a little bit stable because i wanu use it for daily work ;) i know that is not recommendet but i like test unstable soft... | 10:55 |
| trijntje | jibel: should that be http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-core/daily/current? | 11:06 |
| === _salem is now known as salem_ | ||
| jibel | trijntje, yes, current is a link to the latest build which in this case is 20120629/ | 11:51 |
| trijntje | ok, thanks, then I know what images to test! | 11:52 |
| trijntje | (slightly offtopic, how are you able to run so many tests? I see your name everywhere) | 11:53 |
| === salem_ is now known as _salem | ||
| === patdk-wk_ is now known as patdk-wk | ||
| brendand | is there a particular package i need to install to get the quantal xorg packages on precise? | 13:12 |
| brendand | despite the fact that i have the ppa enabled my xorg packages don't match the versions in the ppa | 13:12 |
| === zyga is now known as zyga-food | ||
| === _salem is now known as salem_ | ||
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| === zyga-food is now known as zyga | ||
| jibel | stgraber, lxc question. Can I tell to lxc-create to create the container filesystem in a different location than /var/lib/lxc ? | 19:48 |
| stgraber | jibel: I vaguely remember that path being hardcoded (or almost hardcoded) in quite a few places. In theory you could pass a .conf file (-f) to lxc-create with lxc.rootfs set to an alternate path, but I doubt it'll work | 19:50 |
| stgraber | I usually end up symlinking /var/lib/lxc somewhere else | 19:50 |
| stgraber | but feel free to file a bug about it as we certainly should allow containers to be stored in a different place | 19:51 |
| jibel | setting it in lxc.conf doesn't work. I'll bind mount the other drive | 19:51 |
| jibel | stgraber, ta | 19:51 |
| stgraber | np (I have /var/lib/lxc and /var/cache/lxc be symlinks to /data/internal/containers/ on most of my servers) | 19:52 |
| jibel | bug 1019398 | 19:58 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1019398 in lxc (Ubuntu) "Allow creation of container root filesystem in a user defined location" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1019398 | 19:58 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!