didrocks | sil2100: unity-scope-video-remote uploaded, ensure that the trunk and tarballs are published please :) | 08:38 |
---|---|---|
sil2100 | didrocks: so the scope branches were fine? | 08:38 |
didrocks | sil2100: yeah, I bumped the standards-version and Vcs-Bzr as for the other one though | 08:39 |
didrocks | so please look at the lintian warnings when building the package :) | 08:39 |
sil2100 | didrocks: thanks! ;) | 08:39 |
didrocks | yw, thanks to you | 08:39 |
sil2100 | Ooops | 08:39 |
sil2100 | I think I was in a hurry again, need to burn that down in my head... | 08:40 |
sil2100 | didrocks: what about the dee update? Is pygi on 12.04 insufficient for the release to make sense? | 09:05 |
didrocks | sil2100: I didn't had a hand over a precise machine yet, did you? | 09:05 |
sil2100 | didrocks: not yet | 09:07 |
sil2100 | didrocks: hm, would you mind if we'd release nux 3.0 along with unity 6.0..? | 09:46 |
didrocks | sil2100: nope, but you need to update the packaging for nux 3.0 | 09:46 |
didrocks | and merge the ABI branches that jay wants | 09:46 |
sil2100 | didrocks: since Jay poked me yesterday about that, the ABI change is not big | 09:46 |
sil2100 | didrocks: will do | 09:46 |
sil2100 | didrocks: for safety I would target this release for next week though | 09:48 |
didrocks | sil2100: well, as quick as possible, doing a release shouldn't take long :) | 09:51 |
sil2100 | didrocks: just out of curiosity (you probably told us that, but I forgot) - what's the difference between lp:~ubuntu-desktop/unity/ubuntu and lp:ubuntu/unity ? | 10:19 |
sil2100 | Since I see that those two are different | 10:19 |
didrocks | sil2100: now, all the ref are lp:ubuntu/<package> | 10:19 |
didrocks | for things that I've moved | 10:19 |
didrocks | looks at Vcs-Bzr to ensure you have the right target :) | 10:19 |
sil2100 | So lp:ubuntu/unity is the 'right' one? | 10:20 |
sil2100 | Ah, I see | 10:20 |
sil2100 | But the way those are created is the same, right? They're done through merge-upstream and such? | 10:20 |
didrocks | yeah | 10:22 |
didrocks | it's the same branch, just the newer location | 10:22 |
=== elky` is now known as elky | ||
and471 | hi I have an issue which is releated to indicators | 11:00 |
and471 | basically I want to make an indicator which has a button within one of the menuitems | 11:01 |
and471 | at the moment I am just using a Gtk.MenuBar, so I can test it out | 11:01 |
and471 | the issue is that whilst I can see the button after packing it into the Gtk.MenuItem | 11:01 |
and471 | I can't interact with it | 11:01 |
and471 | (i.e. press it) | 11:01 |
and471 | I have tried to link up the button-press-events but it isn't working | 11:01 |
and471 | here is the code http://pastebin.com/Rbe6B3Wv | 11:02 |
and471 | any help ? | 11:02 |
and471 | I should say that by connecting to the button_press_event of the button, I can see that the event is passed along, but the button shows no sign of being pressed | 11:05 |
and471 | (i.e. looking pressed in) | 11:05 |
=== MacSlow is now known as MacSlow|lunch | ||
didrocks | mhr3: hey, do you know when the branch for the music lens I did would be reviewed? | 11:35 |
sil2100 | didrocks, seb128: even though the video lens/scope for quantal is not yet released (since I'm waiting for David to show up and publish the new tarballs), what about the SRU version of those? | 11:38 |
sil2100 | Is everything ready and ok for that? | 11:39 |
didrocks | for me, it's in quantal, so ok for the SRU :) | 11:40 |
=== _salem is now known as salem_ | ||
didrocks | mhr3: is it on purpose that the gir files are not shipped by libunity? | 11:47 |
didrocks | mhr3: we usually ship them in the -dev package, but it's installed on make install | 11:47 |
didrocks | like for dee | 11:47 |
seb128 | didrocks, sil2100, sru got uploaded yesterday and is waiting for review: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/precise/+queue?queue_state=1&queue_text=video | 11:48 |
mhr3 | didrocks, as in not shipped in the tarball? | 11:48 |
didrocks | mhr3: no, I mean, not installed on make install | 11:48 |
didrocks | seb128: sweet! | 11:48 |
mhr3 | didrocks, the gir is not installed? no way | 11:49 |
mhr3 | lenses wouldn't work then :P | 11:49 |
didrocks | mhr3: it's not or I am dreaming :) | 11:49 |
sil2100 | seb128: \o/ Thank you! | 11:49 |
didrocks | mhr3: well, the typelibs are | 11:49 |
mhr3 | hmmm | 11:49 |
didrocks | mhr3: and vapi, this is what they are using, isn't it? | 11:49 |
didrocks | the gir is just to generate them | 11:49 |
mhr3 | the vala ones are using vapi yea, python ones are using typelibs | 11:49 |
didrocks | yeah | 11:50 |
didrocks | so no need for the .gir files :) | 11:50 |
mhr3 | well... | 11:50 |
mhr3 | i'd say it should be there | 11:50 |
seb128 | sil2100, thank *you* for the work, I just tested and uploaded ;-) | 11:50 |
didrocks | but normally, we ship them in -dev, so that bindings depending on bindings can impotr them | 11:50 |
didrocks | mhr3: yeah, it should, see ^ | 11:50 |
mhr3 | didrocks, exactly | 11:50 |
mhr3 | didrocks, could you file a bug? | 11:50 |
didrocks | mhr3: I would even do better! | 11:50 |
didrocks | file a bug | 11:50 |
didrocks | and fix it :) | 11:50 |
mhr3 | omg! | 11:50 |
mhr3 | you're awesome! | 11:50 |
didrocks | crazy, isn't it? ;) | 11:50 |
mhr3 | indeed | 11:51 |
tjaalton | hey, I've re-added compiz to bug 966744, I've had the same symptoms on two different laptops, and the same "recovery" method | 12:03 |
ubot5 | Launchpad bug 966744 in linux (Ubuntu) "Resume from suspend leaves me with black screen or a screen of the desktop before it suspended (though the mouse still moves/changes cursor)" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/966744 | 12:03 |
=== MacSlow|lunch is now known as MacSlow | ||
=== salem_ is now known as _salem | ||
didrocks | sil2100: so, I tried on precise | 13:22 |
didrocks | sil2100: yeah, there are overrides python3 support in it | 13:22 |
didrocks | mhr3: FYI ^ | 13:22 |
didrocks | sil2100: so, the dee SRU is needed | 13:22 |
didrocks | can you do it now? | 13:23 |
mhr3 | didrocks, hmmm | 13:24 |
mhr3 | didrocks, aaaaah, there's an actual python3-gi package | 13:24 |
didrocks | mhr3: yep | 13:24 |
mhr3 | i guess installing that would help :) | 13:24 |
didrocks | it can ;) | 13:25 |
sil2100 | didrocks: ok, but hm, how should I do the package now exactly? Do we need to build it twice again? If so, how do we force that? | 13:28 |
didrocks | sil2100: oh right, you didn't look into that? | 13:28 |
didrocks | sil2100: ok, I'll do it for quantal | 13:28 |
didrocks | then, I'll backport it | 13:28 |
sil2100 | didrocks: I looked into normal ways of doing it - I never did tricks like 'building package twice' in debian/rules ;) | 13:30 |
didrocks | sil2100: can you look if there is a bug about that in dee and if not, opening one? | 13:31 |
sil2100 | didrocks: you mean, bug for the missing overrides? | 13:32 |
didrocks | yep | 13:33 |
sil2100 | didrocks: there is one: | 13:33 |
sil2100 | https://bugs.launchpad.net/dee/+bug/905085 | 13:33 |
ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 905085 in dee "Please make PyGI overrides available to Python3" [High,Triaged] | 13:33 |
didrocks | sil2100: excellent, thanks | 13:33 |
sil2100 | didrocks: the test case is missing since we didn't manage to start testing the SRU package even | 13:35 |
didrocks | sil2100: well, the test case is quite easy | 13:36 |
didrocks | sil2100: but for quantal, it seems that dee needs a new release | 13:36 |
didrocks | sil2100: you are taking care of that? | 13:38 |
didrocks | also, it seems that wrapping this into a package is failing on make install | 13:38 |
sil2100 | hm, so, we need a new dee release for quantal as well? | 13:40 |
sil2100 | Ok, hm, just tell me how to perform the double build for it to work for both python2 and python3 and I'll do the release ;) | 13:42 |
didrocks | sil2100: sure, when we talk about an unity release, it's the whole stack | 13:45 |
didrocks | lenses, dee, bamf, libunity, compiz, unity, nux… | 13:45 |
didrocks | sil2100: yeah, I'm adding an upstream fix as well so that it works | 13:45 |
sil2100 | didrocks: thanks! | 13:50 |
sil2100 | didrocks: I'm testing the new nux (3.0) and unity on my PPA right now | 13:51 |
didrocks | good | 13:51 |
sil2100 | didrocks: so... when we'll be releasing unity 6.0, along with it we have to release bamf, dee, libunity, nux and compiz? | 13:51 |
sil2100 | But actually compiz for quantal was released this week right..? | 13:52 |
didrocks | sil2100: the lenses as well | 13:52 |
didrocks | yeah, compiz can wait | 13:52 |
sil2100 | Ok, so just everything besides compiz | 13:52 |
* sil2100 notes it down | 13:52 | |
mhr3 | lenses didn't change yet | 13:52 |
sil2100 | mhr3: so only video lens, righ? | 13:52 |
sil2100 | We'll have to rebuild them anyway | 13:52 |
mhr3 | no you wont | 13:52 |
mhr3 | libunity is abi stable | 13:53 |
sil2100 | Because of the major version bump in unity, the assets changed place | 13:53 |
sil2100 | They're in 6 now | 13:53 |
mhr3 | oh, that needs fixing in the lenses then iirc | 13:53 |
didrocks | mhr3: well, the music lens is my branch is merged :p | 13:53 |
sil2100 | So this needs a bump anyways :( | 13:53 |
mhr3 | it's not read out from anywhere | 13:53 |
sil2100 | mhr3: it's hard-coded? | 13:54 |
mhr3 | didrocks, oh, is it? | 13:54 |
mhr3 | sil2100, let me check but i think it is | 13:54 |
didrocks | mhr3: "if" ;) | 13:54 |
didrocks | sil2100: FYI: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-desktop/dee/ubuntu/revision/245 | 13:54 |
didrocks | sil2100: so, that in quantal and the precise SRU | 13:54 |
sil2100 | mhr3: since I know when I used the unity 6.0.0 test package I built, the lenses were missing graphics | 13:55 |
sil2100 | Since I didn't rebuild them | 13:55 |
mhr3 | sil2100, yea, the .lens files have the version hardcoded | 13:56 |
mhr3 | but other than that a rebuild wouldn't be needed | 13:56 |
sil2100 | mhr3: true | 13:57 |
sil2100 | didrocks: ah, hacky! | 14:02 |
sil2100 | didrocks: thanks | 14:02 |
didrocks | sil2100: only way to not move to cdbs and anyway, we don't want to build anything else for nothing :) | 14:02 |
=== dandrader is now known as dandrader|afk | ||
sil2100 | davidcalle: hi! | 14:10 |
sil2100 | didrocks: I've been waiting for you... ;) | 14:10 |
davidcalle | hi sil2100 | 14:10 |
sil2100 | (that's never a good thing!) | 14:10 |
didrocks | you meant davidcalle | 14:10 |
sil2100 | Ah, ouch, yes! | 14:10 |
sil2100 | davidcalle: that was to you actually ^ | 14:10 |
davidcalle | sil2100, :) | 14:11 |
sil2100 | davidcalle: anyway, didrocks switched the video lens and scope branches to the new, 'cool' architecture - which means I had to release new tarballs for quantal | 14:11 |
sil2100 | davidcalle: sould you upload those on the main project page? | 14:11 |
davidcalle | didrocks, thank you! | 14:12 |
sil2100 | And, probably also, merge in the changes I made to lens and scope trunks? Since we're getting rid of the debian/ directory there | 14:12 |
didrocks | davidcalle: yw ;) | 14:12 |
sil2100 | davidcalle: I'll post the links in a moment | 14:12 |
sil2100 | davidcalle: http://ubuntuone.com/6uJF8oLJzKmLIXHWNjBzsU <- lens new tarball | 14:13 |
sil2100 | davidcalle: http://ubuntuone.com/37ldvMpNknG1bTaUINn3km <- scope new tarball | 14:13 |
davidcalle | sil2100, so the idea is to have a trunk and distro branches containing the packaging? | 14:13 |
sil2100 | davidcalle: yes, trunk should have only sources, while a packaging branch has actually packaging + sources, created in a neat way | 14:14 |
sil2100 | So, actually I would like you to merge in the changes from these branches: | 14:14 |
sil2100 | https://code.launchpad.net/~sil2100/unity-lens-videos/scope_trunk_PRE <- for the scope branch you have | 14:14 |
sil2100 | And | 14:14 |
sil2100 | https://code.launchpad.net/~sil2100/unity-lens-videos/trunk_PRE <- for the lens branch you have | 14:14 |
sil2100 | Sorry for all the chaos in your project, but it's for unifications and future simplifications sake | 14:15 |
sil2100 | So, what I would need: | 14:16 |
davidcalle | Good chaos actually. | 14:16 |
sil2100 | 1) uploading new tarballs, I made them out of the debian-less trunks | 14:16 |
sil2100 | 2) pulling those few changes from the *trunk* branches I made | 14:16 |
sil2100 | This way will be safe, as didrocks already checked all these things I prepared yesterday | 14:17 |
=== zyga is now known as zyga-food | ||
=== dandrader|afk is now known as dandrader | ||
davidcalle | Ok. What about the packaging branches, is there a naming convention, "unity-lens-videos/ubuntu" ? | 14:18 |
sil2100 | davidcalle: I think they're available through lp:ubuntu/unity-lens-video etc. | 14:19 |
sil2100 | didrocks: could you confirm that ^ ? | 14:19 |
davidcalle | sil2100, oh right. I'm asking in case I need to do a daily ppa for some tests. To know which packaging branch I should merge in the recipe. | 14:21 |
sil2100 | didrocks: btw. for dee, should I use lp:ubuntu/dee or lp:~ubuntu-desktop/dee/ubuntu ? | 14:21 |
=== _salem is now known as salem_ | ||
sil2100 | didrocks: when should I use the first one and when the other? Since I see sometimes lp:ubuntu/* is not up-to-date | 14:27 |
sil2100 | So confusing | 14:28 |
didrocks | sil2100: I'm pushing for every new project thoses to lp:ubuntu/</package> | 14:29 |
didrocks | for every new release | 14:29 |
didrocks | that's why I explained last week :) | 14:30 |
didrocks | so we are in the transition period | 14:30 |
didrocks | for now, use the branch I pointed | 14:30 |
didrocks | davidcalle: btw, it would be cool to have one project per source | 14:30 |
sil2100 | didrocks: what about lenses? Since I'll need to mod them up a bit - should I use lp:ubuntu* or the old one? | 14:31 |
didrocks | so a unity-scope-remote | 14:31 |
didrocks | sil2100: start always from the old one | 14:31 |
didrocks | until it's transitionned | 14:31 |
didrocks | as told, Vcs-Bzr is the ref :) | 14:31 |
davidcalle | didrocks, ok. I'm creating it. I suppose I will need to change the watch file in the packaging branch too. | 14:32 |
sil2100 | ACK | 14:32 |
didrocks | davidcalle: yep :) | 14:32 |
sil2100 | didrocks: will you help davidcalle with all the transitioning now? ;) | 14:32 |
davidcalle | sil2100, trunks are now trunk only. | 14:32 |
sil2100 | davidcalle: yay \o/ | 14:33 |
sil2100 | davidcalle: did you also upload the tarballs? | 14:33 |
davidcalle | Yes | 14:33 |
davidcalle | 3.6 release for both | 14:33 |
sil2100 | \o/ | 14:33 |
sil2100 | Awesome | 14:33 |
davidcalle | didrocks, sil2100: https://launchpad.net/unity-scope-video-remote (trunk and latest tarball are in) Now, do I just need to change the upstream in https://launchpad.net/+ubuntu/+source/unity-scope-video-remote ? | 14:46 |
didrocks | davidcalle: well, we can do it for next release, do not worry :) | 14:47 |
davidcalle | didrocks, ok then, thank you both for all the sanity :) | 14:47 |
didrocks | yw ;) | 14:48 |
sil2100 | davidcalle: np ;) | 14:49 |
sil2100 | didrocks: so, regarding lens/scopes we're all done, yes? | 14:53 |
sil2100 | didrocks: I mean the video lens and scopes | 14:53 |
didrocks | sil2100: yeah, for this one, we are all done :) | 14:53 |
sil2100 | didrocks: ok... now regarding dee - is everything done here as well? I mean, the precise branch is precisely the same as the one you did, right? | 14:54 |
didrocks | sil2100: hum no? | 14:54 |
didrocks | you need two things | 14:54 |
didrocks | making the new dee release for quantal | 14:54 |
didrocks | with all the fixes for build and such | 14:54 |
didrocks | (new vala) | 14:54 |
didrocks | and just cherry-pick the override fix + packaging for precise | 14:55 |
sil2100 | didrocks: ah, ok ok, hm, ok | 14:55 |
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
=== zyga-food is now known as zyga | ||
=== dandrader is now known as dandrader|lunch | ||
=== daker is now known as daker_ | ||
=== daker_ is now known as daker__ | ||
=== dandrader|lunch is now known as dandrader | ||
=== dandrader is now known as dandrader|afk | ||
=== dandrader|afk is now known as dandrader |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!