[01:08] I thought I'd give submittodebian a try, but it's not working for me: http://paste.ubuntu.com/1066966/ [08:52] bah [08:52] broder: the path to your lintian.log changed [08:54] can you symlink or redirect /lintian.log to //lintian.log? [08:54] one less place for consumers to update === yofel_ is now known as yofel [09:23] micahg, are you still looking for help with the chromium ppa? [10:24] Am I able to use these icons (crediting the artists at debian/copyright): http://tux.crystalxp.net/en.id.18355-pusio-angus-young.html The Lisence is Creative Commons BY-NC-SA, which is lested at http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep5/#license-specification but in the left it says Copying and/or reproducing the Tux Factory in any way, partially or completely, is strictly forbidden. I am confused. [10:24] listed* [10:26] use them for what? [10:32] the Non-Commercial clause isn't suitable for things in main/universe, if that's the question? [10:36] Laney, use them in my application [10:44] hakermania: Are those images based on templates provided by that site? In that case, no, unless you ask the site to relicense this content and the author to clarify the license. If all the bits of the image are based on bits which have a free license, [10:45] ... Then it might work, but you still would need to ask the author if the image is provided from some other source. [10:46] Since it appears CrystalXP automaticallly imposes an additional set of non-free conditions for any works which are hosted there (and presumably the author agreed to these when uploading the work there...) [11:08] arand, I hate copyrights :( Especially when the copyright isn't clear! [11:10] it is clear [11:10] there's a non-commercial restriction which makes the work non-free [11:10] either get the author to relicense or find something else to use [11:12] Yeah, in either case, you might want to look elsewhere for an image. [14:02] when do automatic pulls from debian end, this cycle? [14:03] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QuantalQuetzal/ReleaseSchedule [14:03] july 5 [14:03] directhex: Do you Debian Import Freeze? [14:03] k [14:29] if I use the version in quantal in total for a precise bugfix, how should the changelog look like? [14:29] based on precise or the quantal version? [15:00] see bug 1019604 [15:00] Launchpad bug 1019604 in pudb (Ubuntu) "pudb shell does not work with ipython 0.12 and configuration issue" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1019604 [15:01] I've done both [15:02] Don't think it particularly matters as long as the version number is in between the two [15:04] so its no problem to have last entry lower than the bfore last? [15:05] I don't see why [15:05] k I'll upload that then to proposed [15:06] but I'm not on the SRU team, etc. [15:06] * Laney needs MOAR TEAMS [15:06] let's see if this emacs24 backport builds for us [15:06] ftbfs on debian/i386 :/ === Guest30426 is now known as Zic [19:54] Laney: fixed, sorry about that [21:00] cyphermox: there ? [21:12] cyphermox: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager/+bug/1015350 any chance you can upload new NM version soon ? :) [21:12] Launchpad bug 1015350 in network-manager (Ubuntu) "openvpn connection start successfully, and fail in ~ 2 minutes" [Undecided,Confirmed] [22:56] What would be an easy way to make config changes to -generic, and upload with a custom name to PPA? [22:57] I've been trying to get my head around a lot of it. Know my way around git, but not as much when it comes to debian packaging. [22:57] I'm able to upload fine, but the build fails because of the change in the configs that I made [22:58] Here's a build log https://launchpadlibrarian.net/109017347/buildlog_ubuntu-quantal-i386.linux_3.5.0-2.3-lowlatency_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz [23:26] ailo: the ubuntu kernel is a particularly complex package, that most of us don't know at all. I suggest chatting to kernel people in #ubuntu-kernel [23:35] tumbleweed: Yep