| genii-around | Ah, yes. | 00:02 |
|---|---|---|
| genii-around | pragmaticenigma: If later there is some other incident you wish to report, please feel welcome to join the channel. It would be appreciated if you do not linger in here however. | 00:05 |
| pragmaticenigma | how does one exit? | 00:05 |
| Anxi80 | Hello I was told to come back a couple days later to get myself unquieted from #ubuntu. Here I am! | 01:23 |
| Anxi80 | IdleOne, I believe it was your guidance :) | 01:25 |
| bkerensa | Anxi80: Do you remember why you were quieted from the channel and what we will expect of you if we unquiet you? | 01:29 |
| bkerensa | Anxi80: ? | 01:30 |
| Anxi80 | yes | 01:37 |
| bkerensa | Anxi80: Could you tell me what we will expect of you so that we can be sure you will be able to comply? | 01:39 |
| Anxi80 | No PSA bug declarations in #ubuntu | 01:44 |
| bkerensa | Anxi80: Okay but can you also please take a look at the IRC Guidelines and try to follow them in channels you join? | 01:45 |
| bkerensa | !rules > Anxi80 | 01:45 |
| ubottu | Anxi80, please see my private message | 01:45 |
| bkerensa | I'm going to remove your mute now | 01:45 |
| Anxi80 | I read the IRC guildelines already and I am aware of my obligations | 01:46 |
| Anxi80 | and I will follow them | 01:47 |
| Anxi80 | bkerensa, thanks | 01:49 |
| IdleOne | Anxi80: could you please join #ubuntu now and say something to make sure it was done properly | 01:50 |
| Anxi80 | I joined and tried to reply to you but it said "cannot send to channel" | 01:51 |
| IdleOne | hmm | 01:51 |
| IdleOne | gimme a sec | 01:51 |
| IdleOne | say something in there now | 01:52 |
| Anxi80 | just did, same result :( | 01:52 |
| IdleOne | still nothing? | 01:52 |
| IdleOne | err | 01:52 |
| Anxi80 | ikonia is the one who applied it on me so maybe he/she would know? | 01:53 |
| IdleOne | for some reason it does not seem to be removing the mute, try saying something one more time and if not I'll try poking someone about it | 01:53 |
| IdleOne | ok you seem set now. | 01:54 |
| IdleOne | sorry it took so long :) | 01:54 |
| Anxi80 | no worries, bkerensa, IdleOne, thanks again | 01:55 |
| Anxi80 | Have an excellent evening/weekend | 01:55 |
| IdleOne | Thanks same to you | 01:55 |
| Anxi80 | oh one last question, could you please direct me to the official channel for requesting cloaks? | 01:56 |
| IdleOne | bkerensa: would be awesome if you could fix that unmute thing in chanserv.py | 01:56 |
| IdleOne | Anxi80: what sort of cloak? | 01:56 |
| bkerensa | IdleOne: I will add it to my to do list :) but for now Angry Orchards are calling | 01:56 |
| Anxi80 | the cloak that hides my ip and isp from my whois | 01:56 |
| IdleOne | Anxi80: you can request an unaffiliated cloak in #freenode | 01:57 |
| Anxi80 | perfect, thanks | 01:57 |
| bazhang | is cracking wifi on topic? | 02:39 |
| bazhang | re: sven999 | 02:39 |
| IdleOne | umm, not really no. | 02:41 |
| IdleOne | it is one of those on the line sorta things i guess | 02:42 |
| bazhang | aircrack is not in the repos, he's on BT: problem solved | 02:44 |
| IdleOne | yup | 02:45 |
| angel56 | Hi guyd, I just registered my nick and want to join ubuntu, but it says I am banned | 06:13 |
| ubottu | FloodBot1 called the ops in #ubuntu-ops-monitor (repeated abuse from croz) | 06:32 |
| oCean | suborbital (~dev@unaffiliated/tls) has joined #ubuntu | 08:01 |
| oCean | there must be an active ban? | 08:01 |
| suborbital | uncalled for | 08:02 |
| oCean | why | 08:02 |
| suborbital | you tell me | 08:02 |
| suborbital | uubuntu doesnt need another admin ? | 08:03 |
| suborbital | is that it ? | 08:04 |
| oCean | admin? | 08:04 |
| LjL | suborbital: you were banned. you evaded your ban. ban evasion is not acceptable, so you were banned again. | 08:04 |
| LjL | and i'm ignoring the things you said while joined | 08:04 |
| suborbital | why was i banned in the first place ? | 08:04 |
| suborbital | fun=chs | 08:04 |
| suborbital | im not trying to evade either | 08:04 |
| suborbital | i lied the last time | 08:05 |
| suborbital | i didnt evaDE | 08:05 |
| suborbital | i wasnt even banned | 08:05 |
| suborbital | check you logs | 08:06 |
| suborbital | i 8told* you i did | 08:06 |
| suborbital | you ccant join achannel you are banned form afaik | 08:07 |
| LjL | suborbital: unless you join with a different hostmask. | 08:07 |
| suborbital | uhh | 08:07 |
| suborbital | that was well b4 | 08:07 |
| suborbital | check the logs | 08:08 |
| oCean | lots of proof in the logs that show you getting muted, removed, banned, banevaded, never showed any intention to resolve, left, banevaded again etc. | 08:08 |
| suborbital | w/e fuchs | 08:08 |
| oCean | this incident will be reported to freenode staff, and that is the end of this discussion | 08:08 |
| oCean | !appeals > suborbital | 08:08 |
| ubottu | suborbital, please see my private message | 08:08 |
| suborbital | w/e agenda you have opk | 08:08 |
| oCean | suborbital: please /part this channel since at this point there is nothing to discuss | 08:12 |
| === Mamarok is now known as Guest22741 | ||
| suborbital | yea i disagree | 09:15 |
| suborbital | you people know you have some bad seeds | 09:16 |
| === Guest22741 is now known as Mamarok | ||
| ubottu | In #ubuntu+1, nperry said: !schedule is A schedule of Quantal Quetzal (12.10) release milestones can be found here: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QuantalQuetzal/ReleaseSchedule | 14:06 |
| ubottu | In #ubuntu+1, nperry said: !schedule is <reply> A schedule of Quantal Quetzal (12.10) release milestones can be found here: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QuantalQuetzal/ReleaseSchedule | 14:08 |
| ubottu | In #ubuntu+1, nperry said: !forget schedule | 14:10 |
| === Mamarok is now known as Guest32084 | ||
| === Guest32084 is now known as Mamarok | ||
| bazhang | <joint> microsoft is behind suse. they are trying to infultrate linux | 15:17 |
| bazhang | he gets really tiring in -ot | 15:17 |
| vibhav | Has anybody any idea why has ubottu ignored me in #ubuntu-offtopic | 15:45 |
| vibhav | ? | 15:45 |
| ikonia | yes, because you're on ignore from the bot | 15:46 |
| vibhav | Well, I am not ignored in any other channel | 15:46 |
| ikonia | I believe there was a global one set by me, and an individual one set in offtopic from someone else | 15:46 |
| vibhav | I remember IdleOne trying to unignore me , but he gave up | 15:46 |
| ikonia | I suspect the one in offtopic is still active | 15:46 |
| vibhav | then can you try to unignore me? | 15:47 |
| ikonia | no, I'm quite happy with you not doing the bot every 5 seconds in #ubuntu | 15:47 |
| ikonia | offtopic sorry | 15:47 |
| ikonia | (bit quick on the enter) | 15:47 |
| vibhav | I dont do the bot every 5 seconds | 15:48 |
| vibhav | You are seriously mistaken | 15:48 |
| ikonia | well, you do, that's why you got put on ignore | 15:48 |
| vibhav | That was long ago? | 15:48 |
| ikonia | probably | 15:48 |
| vibhav | yes | 15:48 |
| vibhav | But thats not the case now | 15:49 |
| ikonia | I disagree | 15:49 |
| vibhav | why? | 15:49 |
| ikonia | because that's my opinion | 15:49 |
| ikonia | try talking to people instead of hitting the factoids | 15:49 |
| vibhav | fine | 15:50 |
| ikonia | cool | 15:50 |
| LjL | and now, sweeping statement "PPAs are unstable" | 19:01 |
| LjL | this PPA thing is going to far | 19:01 |
| LjL | on the one hand we have PPAs promoted by Canonical/Launchpad/whatever | 19:01 |
| LjL | on the other they're the devil in #ubuntu and according to some, you're not even supported if you've touched them in any way | 19:01 |
| Myrtti | LjL: let me find you a bug number | 19:28 |
| Myrtti | ah my brain is fried, nevermind | 19:31 |
| oCean | LjL: I try to suppress my aversion of PPA's, but I find it difficult when others keep recommending any PPA they can think of, claiming it is stable, because "hey, worksforme" | 19:39 |
| oCean | I don't think the supportersguide helped on that subject | 19:39 |
| LjL | oCean: that's not very okay, but neither is saying that all PPAs are unstable, or informing someone that they won't be helped to restore their system after they *removed* a PPA, in #ubuntu | 19:40 |
| LjL | [21:12:55] <LjL> i've always thought that ppas being "unsupported" was a dangerous move for us to take | 19:40 |
| LjL | [21:13:11] <LjL> it *should* mean that once you've installed a PPA package, we can't help you with that particular package's operation | 19:40 |
| LjL | [21:13:28] <LjL> it *shouldn't* mean we can't tell you how to install it, how to remove it, or how to fix things if they were broken by it after removing it | 19:40 |
| oCean | I'm just saying that I think it is a difficult topic. Last week someone recommends "install this PPA", user seems happy, returns after a while "Whatever I try to update, I get E: Broken packages". Same user that recommended PPA says "meh.. change your server by Synaptic to main server then try it again" | 19:46 |
| ubottu | In ubottu, sinekonata said: great thanks I guess this is no reply though | 19:47 |
| Myrtti | I'm still waiting for Canonical to implement a "Golden seal of approval" badge on the PPA's | 19:47 |
| Myrtti | "this PPA is maintained by the project developers and gets 5 SUPER MUSHROOMS" | 19:47 |
| oCean | Myrtti: the way wordpress rates plugins and shows compatibility with specific versions is nice | 19:47 |
| Myrtti | "this PPA is maintained by the Ubuntu packagers as a staging area for bleeding edge software, and gets 5 SUPERBALL FLOWERS" | 19:48 |
| oCean | Also, I really wonder how we should deal with kernel updates from PPA. Several questions in #u are about "after upgrading to 3.4 I have no sound!" | 19:49 |
| Myrtti | "this PPA is by a kid who just tried how debian packaging works by packaging GNOME-Klondyke over again. This effort has been duplicated in X number of other PPA's, so this PPA gets 1 GOOMBA" | 19:50 |
| ubottu | ActionParsnip called the ops in #ubuntu (Pussysale) | 20:26 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!