[00:02] Ah, yes. [00:05] pragmaticenigma: If later there is some other incident you wish to report, please feel welcome to join the channel. It would be appreciated if you do not linger in here however. [00:05] how does one exit? [01:23] Hello I was told to come back a couple days later to get myself unquieted from #ubuntu. Here I am! [01:25] IdleOne, I believe it was your guidance :) [01:29] Anxi80: Do you remember why you were quieted from the channel and what we will expect of you if we unquiet you? [01:30] Anxi80: ? [01:37] yes [01:39] Anxi80: Could you tell me what we will expect of you so that we can be sure you will be able to comply? [01:44] No PSA bug declarations in #ubuntu [01:45] Anxi80: Okay but can you also please take a look at the IRC Guidelines and try to follow them in channels you join? [01:45] !rules > Anxi80 [01:45] Anxi80, please see my private message [01:45] I'm going to remove your mute now [01:46] I read the IRC guildelines already and I am aware of my obligations [01:47] and I will follow them [01:49] bkerensa, thanks [01:50] Anxi80: could you please join #ubuntu now and say something to make sure it was done properly [01:51] I joined and tried to reply to you but it said "cannot send to channel" [01:51] hmm [01:51] gimme a sec [01:52] say something in there now [01:52] just did, same result :( [01:52] still nothing? [01:52] err [01:53] ikonia is the one who applied it on me so maybe he/she would know? [01:53] for some reason it does not seem to be removing the mute, try saying something one more time and if not I'll try poking someone about it [01:54] ok you seem set now. [01:54] sorry it took so long :) [01:55] no worries, bkerensa, IdleOne, thanks again [01:55] Have an excellent evening/weekend [01:55] Thanks same to you [01:56] oh one last question, could you please direct me to the official channel for requesting cloaks? [01:56] bkerensa: would be awesome if you could fix that unmute thing in chanserv.py [01:56] Anxi80: what sort of cloak? [01:56] IdleOne: I will add it to my to do list :) but for now Angry Orchards are calling [01:56] the cloak that hides my ip and isp from my whois [01:57] Anxi80: you can request an unaffiliated cloak in #freenode [01:57] perfect, thanks [02:39] is cracking wifi on topic? [02:39] re: sven999 [02:41] umm, not really no. [02:42] it is one of those on the line sorta things i guess [02:44] aircrack is not in the repos, he's on BT: problem solved [02:45] yup [06:13] Hi guyd, I just registered my nick and want to join ubuntu, but it says I am banned [06:32] FloodBot1 called the ops in #ubuntu-ops-monitor (repeated abuse from croz) [08:01] suborbital (~dev@unaffiliated/tls) has joined #ubuntu [08:01] there must be an active ban? [08:02] uncalled for [08:02] why [08:02] you tell me [08:03] uubuntu doesnt need another admin ? [08:04] is that it ? [08:04] admin? [08:04] suborbital: you were banned. you evaded your ban. ban evasion is not acceptable, so you were banned again. [08:04] and i'm ignoring the things you said while joined [08:04] why was i banned in the first place ? [08:04] fun=chs [08:04] im not trying to evade either [08:05] i lied the last time [08:05] i didnt evaDE [08:05] i wasnt even banned [08:06] check you logs [08:06] i 8told* you i did [08:07] you ccant join achannel you are banned form afaik [08:07] suborbital: unless you join with a different hostmask. [08:07] uhh [08:07] that was well b4 [08:08] check the logs [08:08] lots of proof in the logs that show you getting muted, removed, banned, banevaded, never showed any intention to resolve, left, banevaded again etc. [08:08] w/e fuchs [08:08] this incident will be reported to freenode staff, and that is the end of this discussion [08:08] !appeals > suborbital [08:08] suborbital, please see my private message [08:08] w/e agenda you have opk [08:12] suborbital: please /part this channel since at this point there is nothing to discuss === Mamarok is now known as Guest22741 [09:15] yea i disagree [09:16] you people know you have some bad seeds === Guest22741 is now known as Mamarok [14:06] In #ubuntu+1, nperry said: !schedule is A schedule of Quantal Quetzal (12.10) release milestones can be found here: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QuantalQuetzal/ReleaseSchedule [14:08] In #ubuntu+1, nperry said: !schedule is A schedule of Quantal Quetzal (12.10) release milestones can be found here: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QuantalQuetzal/ReleaseSchedule [14:10] In #ubuntu+1, nperry said: !forget schedule === Mamarok is now known as Guest32084 === Guest32084 is now known as Mamarok [15:17] microsoft is behind suse. they are trying to infultrate linux [15:17] he gets really tiring in -ot [15:45] Has anybody any idea why has ubottu ignored me in #ubuntu-offtopic [15:45] ? [15:46] yes, because you're on ignore from the bot [15:46] Well, I am not ignored in any other channel [15:46] I believe there was a global one set by me, and an individual one set in offtopic from someone else [15:46] I remember IdleOne trying to unignore me , but he gave up [15:46] I suspect the one in offtopic is still active [15:47] then can you try to unignore me? [15:47] no, I'm quite happy with you not doing the bot every 5 seconds in #ubuntu [15:47] offtopic sorry [15:47] (bit quick on the enter) [15:48] I dont do the bot every 5 seconds [15:48] You are seriously mistaken [15:48] well, you do, that's why you got put on ignore [15:48] That was long ago? [15:48] probably [15:48] yes [15:49] But thats not the case now [15:49] I disagree [15:49] why? [15:49] because that's my opinion [15:49] try talking to people instead of hitting the factoids [15:50] fine [15:50] cool [19:01] and now, sweeping statement "PPAs are unstable" [19:01] this PPA thing is going to far [19:01] on the one hand we have PPAs promoted by Canonical/Launchpad/whatever [19:01] on the other they're the devil in #ubuntu and according to some, you're not even supported if you've touched them in any way [19:28] LjL: let me find you a bug number [19:31] ah my brain is fried, nevermind [19:39] LjL: I try to suppress my aversion of PPA's, but I find it difficult when others keep recommending any PPA they can think of, claiming it is stable, because "hey, worksforme" [19:39] I don't think the supportersguide helped on that subject [19:40] oCean: that's not very okay, but neither is saying that all PPAs are unstable, or informing someone that they won't be helped to restore their system after they *removed* a PPA, in #ubuntu [19:40] [21:12:55] i've always thought that ppas being "unsupported" was a dangerous move for us to take [19:40] [21:13:11] it *should* mean that once you've installed a PPA package, we can't help you with that particular package's operation [19:40] [21:13:28] it *shouldn't* mean we can't tell you how to install it, how to remove it, or how to fix things if they were broken by it after removing it [19:46] I'm just saying that I think it is a difficult topic. Last week someone recommends "install this PPA", user seems happy, returns after a while "Whatever I try to update, I get E: Broken packages". Same user that recommended PPA says "meh.. change your server by Synaptic to main server then try it again" [19:47] In ubottu, sinekonata said: great thanks I guess this is no reply though [19:47] I'm still waiting for Canonical to implement a "Golden seal of approval" badge on the PPA's [19:47] "this PPA is maintained by the project developers and gets 5 SUPER MUSHROOMS" [19:47] Myrtti: the way wordpress rates plugins and shows compatibility with specific versions is nice [19:48] "this PPA is maintained by the Ubuntu packagers as a staging area for bleeding edge software, and gets 5 SUPERBALL FLOWERS" [19:49] Also, I really wonder how we should deal with kernel updates from PPA. Several questions in #u are about "after upgrading to 3.4 I have no sound!" [19:50] "this PPA is by a kid who just tried how debian packaging works by packaging GNOME-Klondyke over again. This effort has been duplicated in X number of other PPA's, so this PPA gets 1 GOOMBA" [20:26] ActionParsnip called the ops in #ubuntu (Pussysale)