=== Guest84007 is now known as mfisch === mfisch is now known as Guest4997 === Guest65630 is now known as Ursinha === Ursinha is now known as Guest68258 === yofel_ is now known as yofel === zyga_ is now known as zyga === mythos_ is now known as mythos === Guest4997 is now known as mfisch === zyga is now known as zyga-food === Logan__ is now known as Logan_ === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-lunch === margo_ is now known as margo [19:57] but, make a sens mark as "confirmed" a bug, if you can't reproduce them because is a configuration related trouble, or it's related with his hw spec, or so on.... ? [20:00] mapreri: depends on the case. Usually, if you cannot reproduce then you cannot confirm [20:04] hggdh: so, the bug still new? [20:04] mapreri: IDK. Can you give me the bug #? Write it as 'bug xxxxxx', and the bot will give us a link to it [20:06] hggdh: first, thx for all the help you are give me :) next this, i'm talking about the bug 1020083 and bug 1019816 [20:06] Launchpad bug 1020083 in indicator-sound "No sound on headphones until setting "unamplified" volume" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1020083 [20:06] Launchpad bug 1019816 in unity-2d "dash in Unity 2D shows icons and responds to typing very slowly" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1019816 [20:08] mapreri: for the second one -- did you try it with Unity2d, instead of the standard Unity? [20:10] for the first one: we really need the logs for pulse when the OP has the issue. When it is working probably will not help much. But I agree it sounds more related to pulse than indicator-sound === Logan_ is now known as Guest53114 === Logan__ is now known as Logan_ [20:11] hggdh: for the second: i cant use unity-3d, 'couse my video card is not well supported, so i try a lot of times this thing.. [20:12] so you cannot reproduce. Add a comment stating it (and make sure you state you tried on 2d), and leave the bug as new [20:13] hggdh: the first, so will i ask him to post the log of pulseaudio immediatly after the issue? [20:18] after he sees the issue, yes [20:19] Is there a list for all 12.10 bugs. I want to try to see if I can help out and confirm a few. [20:20] hggdh: well [20:22] philipballew: if they were opened via apport, (or ubuntu-bug) they all should have a tag 'quantal' [20:22] * hggdh goes for a reboot [20:28] hggdh, Searching under one project on the https://bugs.launchpad.net/ page with the word quantal does not bring up anything. As I doing something wrong? === Logan_ is now known as Guest53317 === Logan__ is now known as Logan_ [20:32] Is there a way to filter it to show all quantal unconfirmed bugs? [21:39] philipballew: in the advance search there is a spece where you can choose the milestone [21:40] philipballew: not really since we don't file bugs by series yet [21:41] philipballew: it is a tag, so you have to run an extended search [21:42] philipballew: http://tinyurl.com/76pleab [21:43] hggdh, ah, The advanced search. i see that now [21:43] philipballew: using extended search you can select only incompletes, with a tag of 'quantal'. The link I gave you is searching only for the tag [21:44] philipballew: now, keep in mind that this will only show bugs opened by folks that know what to do (if the bug is manually entered) or the bugs opened via apport crash processing or ubuntu-bug [21:46] Alright, Im just looking to find ways to help with 12.10 and I figure since I suck at programing, I should try to conform bugs [21:46] heh [21:47] philipballew: and we appreciate it. Don't worry about sucking at programming, I suck too (was a programmer, but been off it for quite a long time) [21:48] If I have a laptop with 12.10 I need to put it to use. I figure Ill just wait till new bugs come in and then mark them as confirmed if they hold true on my system [21:48] you know, build that lp karma [21:52] :-) [21:52] my karma is quite low nowadays [21:54] philipballew: may I also suggest doing SRU work? You would need other UBuntu versions, of course. You can see what is in need of verification for SRUs by searching for the tag 'verification-needed' [22:09] philipballew, hggdh: actually, the *easiest* way to find SRUs that need verification is to look for blue bug numbers in http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/pending-sru.html [22:10] sbeattie: indeed. I had forgotten the link (and will save it now)