[00:43] <rolandixor> hi all
[06:41] <glosoli> Hey, anyone out here
[06:41] <glosoli>  ?
[07:05] <glosoli> where could I get Global Menu Bar XPI File ?
[07:05] <micahg> glosoli: it's not shipped as an xpi, but as a package (firefox-globalmenu)
[07:06] <glosoli> Doh :/
[07:06] <micahg> glosoli: why?
[07:06] <glosoli> I need to put it somehow into Komodo Edit, as it uses XUL  for GUI, so there is the same problem of gui not being integrated, if somehow I will be able to laod that extension in komodo edit, it's likely everything would be fine
[07:09] <micahg> glosoli: maybe try to talk to chrisccoulson as he's the developer of it
[07:10] <glosoli> not sure if it would be appropriate to pm him ?
[08:20] <glosoli> chrisccoulson: hey, you here ?
[14:28] <chrisccoulson> hmmmm, i wonder if our bug reporting guidelines are too long for people to bother reading now? https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Bugs
[14:28] <chrisccoulson> hi, wassup glosoli
[14:31] <glosoli> chrisccoulson: hey, I wonder if there is any possible way to get XPI file of Global Menu Bar Integration, as Komodo Edit is based on XUL I think that might help that cool editor to get global menu too, as I see it also supports installing XPI addons from file, and I have also heard that you are the one developing that addon
[14:33] <chrisccoulson> glosoli, there isn't an xpi for it atm, as we bundle it with firefox (and thunderbird) in ubuntu
[14:34] <glosoli> ehh
[14:39] <chrisccoulson> glosoli, i notice it's also based off gecko 7.0, which i dropped support for quite some time ago
[14:39] <glosoli> Hmm I am using Komodo Edit 7.1 beta at the moment, not sure if it uses gecko 7.0
[19:23] <chrisccoulson> heh, bhearsum, are you following the "Large market share loss..." thread on mozilla.dev.apps.firefox?
[19:23] <bhearsum> nope...
[19:23] <bhearsum> that newsgroup is a timesink =)
[19:24] <chrisccoulson> bhearsum, yeah, i don't look at it often ;)
[19:24] <chrisccoulson> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/mozilla.dev.apps.firefox/lECm73XkyQY/gUXYH1uoxsEJ
[19:24] <chrisccoulson> does anyone else see the irony in the last post? ;)
[19:24] <bhearsum> that's hilarious
[19:25] <glosoli> "I have come to the conclusion that firefox is a browser designed for
[19:25] <glosoli> idiots and there will be sacrifices to its integrity due to this. "
[19:25] <glosoli> <<< what??
[19:25] <chrisccoulson> glosoli, yeah, he disabled updates on all of his systems and chooses to run insecure software because it's a browser designed for idiots :)
[19:26] <glosoli> Hmm, Firefox is designed for higher end users I think :) Chrome is for idiots, as there is not much you can change
[19:26] <glosoli> I use both of them vice versa, from time to time :)
[19:57] <micahg> chrisccoulson: did dropping the plugin switch code also drop the pfs integration?
[19:59] <chrisccoulson> micahg, no