/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2012/07/05/#ubuntu-installer.txt

jibelcan anyone look at bug 1020574, last working desktop image was June 29th10:26
ubot2Launchpad bug 1020574 in ubiquity "SystemError: Broken pipe while installing language packs" [Critical,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/102057410:26
cjwatsonjibel: xnox was looking at that yesterday10:31
xnoxjibel: still working on it.10:32
xnoxcjwatson: langpack installation suppose to catch and ignore SystemError, but for some reason sys.excepthook is called, after the SystemError has bubbledup in a loop....10:33
jibelok thanks. xnox I assigned the bug to you, so we know you're taking care of it.10:34
cjwatsondistraction; the SystemError shouldn't be occurring here in the first place10:34
xnoxcjwatson: then why the original code from ages ago has comment "ignore SystemError from langpack installation?"10:34
xnoxok10:34
cjwatsonwe didn't want random language pack failures to break the whole system; but that was more for things like package failed to unpack or something, not this sort of thing10:36
xnoxok10:36
stgraberxnox: can you easily reproduce that crash? if not, I have a pandaboard that's crashing every single time, so reproducing is easy here :)13:16
xnoxstgraber: oh, it is reproducible every time with quantal daily since 29th in VM/desktop13:18
stgraberok :) I only did arm installs recently, good to know any install will fail just as well :)13:18
xnoxstgraber: so far my strace-foo didn't actually show me SIGPIPE, only the write("E: Broken Pipe") which comes from printing the stack trace in python, way to late.13:19
xnoxstgraber: I can't wait to install my panda =)13:19
xnoxstgraber: it's reproducible in a vm, which is what I am using now.13:19
cjwatsonit might be EPIPE not SIGPIPE13:23
cjwatsonin fact I'd say that's likely given that we're seeing several of them13:23
xnoxcjwatson: not present in my strace either. I attached to the process just before clicking install now, cause otherwise the strace log was 300MB due to printing a line for almost each character of a debconf template fetch.13:24
xnoxcjwatson: I am doing a full one by executing ubiquity under strace and logging into a separate hard-drive now.13:25
xnoxalso no obvious changes in python-apt nor ubiquity around the time.13:25
cjwatsonapt and python-apt both had major changes at the relevant time13:38
brendandwe have a bug with updating precise, which only happens when running the upgrade from a preseed: https://bugs.launchpad.net/checkbox-satellite/+bug/102129314:02
ubot2Ubuntu bug 1021293 in checkbox-satellite "Ubuntu 12.04 install stalls when doing apt-get upgrade" [Undecided,New]14:02
cjwatsonfollowed up14:06
brendandcjwatson, funny you ask. we've observed 'apt-get <defunct>' in ps14:20
brendandcjwatson, i'll ask the reporter to give full details though14:20
cjwatsonyeah, I'm not going to get anything much out of one line14:20
brendandasap14:20
roadmrbrendand, cjwatson: bug updated with the requested process list14:23
cjwatsonhmph.14:26
cjwatsonnot obvious, will have to strace14:26
cjwatsonbrendand,roadmr: hm, worked for me in a normal session with strace attached14:55
brendandcjwatson, you mean without the preseed?14:55
cjwatsonoh, admittedly I'm using a newer image14:55
cjwatsonwith the presee14:56
cjwatsond14:56
brendandcjwatson, a newer image - of precise?14:56
cjwatsonyeah14:56
xnoxbrendand: there are daily precise images published with proposed enabled.14:56
cjwatsonmight be coincidental though and in any case wouldn't be a reason not to fix the underlying bug14:57
cjwatsonprobably just means I avoid some upgrade that triggers the bug, since it's already in the squashfs14:57
brendandxnox, details?14:57
cjwatsonhttp://cdimage.ubuntu.com/precise/daily/ - but they aren't guaranteed, you shouldn't be relying on them for anything any more than you would rely on random daily builds14:58
cjwatsonsorry, .../daily-live/14:58
brendandcjwatson, right. interesting to know they are there though14:58
brendandcjwatson, it would be good to know if it reproduces for you using the release image.14:59
cjwatsonI'm rsyncing back14:59
brendandcjwatson, by the way, this doesn't happen on servers14:59
cjwatsonyeah, I know, not surprising at all15:00
cjwatsonbut not very helpful either TBH :)15:00
cjwatsondifferent installer, so ...15:00
cjwatson(and ubiquity/success_command is already quite specific to ubiquity)15:01
brendandcjwatson, right - but the bug report is just to trim the symptoms down. the servers also use a preseed with the same steps - so the update is run in late_command15:02
cjwatsonI know, and fair enough, but it's not a big help in this case15:03
cjwatsonalthough granted, if a similar symptom had appeared on server, then it would probably have been quicker to diagnose there15:03
brendandcjwatson, if you need us to do anything, ping me or roadmr15:04
cjwatsonETA 40 mins or so for the image to arrive, so might not be today15:04
mptI think ... I am going to suggest removing the big pictogram icons from the "Installation type" step15:52
mptPartly to save space, and partly because they just aren't that expressive15:52
mpt(Saving space to make room for "[ ] Encrypt the new Ubuntu installation for security")15:52
BlackyuginHi all, I work to ubiquity and I want to create my DBus witch connect to Ubuntu One. I see oneconf's DBusconnect and I need to know service's name. In oneconf is "com.ubuntu.OneConf". How I can know the Ubuntu One's name and all informations (hosts_object_name, package_set_interface, host_interface, etc.). Thanks a lot19:41

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!