[03:05] <LLStarks> tjaalton, re the ppa bullet of the hybrid graphics spec, airlied now has a how-to for building prime: http://people.freedesktop.org/~airlied/prime-notes.txt there's also arch build scripts now: https://github.com/Samsagax/prime-AUR
[03:07] <LLStarks> it all works
[06:20] <mlankhorst> tjaalton: I'm waiting until the api is settled first, no good packaging it yet
[06:22] <tjaalton> LLStarks: yup, what mlankhorst said :)
[06:22] <mlankhorst> plus hoping to get the synch stuff in kernel for 3.6 which might be too optimistic, but still aiming for it
[06:23] <tjaalton> also, i bet it's better in august when i'm back
[06:37] <mlankhorst> we'll see
[06:38] <mlankhorst> netboot first, then some more kernel testing, I fear that I have to reboot so many times today it will make sense to optimize that.
[07:15] <mlankhorst> welp, seems I had 3 to 4 different places where I kept all kinds of xorg packages in various states of freshness
[07:16] <RAOF> Heh
[07:18] <mlankhorst> down to 4 now, prime tree, debian git, original quantal stack and renamed :)
[11:01] <mlankhorst> ergh, too damned hot
[17:03] <mattgriffin> just filed pad.lv/1021393 and happy to help debug if anyone is available. thanks!
[17:06] <tjaalton> does downgrading xserver-xorg-core make it work again?
[17:11] <mattgriffin> tjaalton: to https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg-server/2:1.11.4-0ubuntu10.2/+build/3470874 ?
[17:12] <mattgriffin> tjaalton: i tried downgrading to xserver-xorg-core_1.11.4-0ubuntu10.2_amd64.deb but that didn't fix it
[17:33] <mattgriffin> tjaalton: i was going to try to downgrade xserver-common but can only find an i386 build. where can i find an amd64 build?
[17:37] <tjaalton> that's mostly just a metapackage
[17:38] <mattgriffin> tjaalton: so downgrading isn't worth trying?
[17:38] <mattgriffin> or it's okay to try the i386 version?
[17:40] <tjaalton> don't bother
[18:44] <mlankhorst> weeee more dma
[19:35] <Sarvatt> OOPS-de3dc66a98c00d0e8904d5ad19f82462
[19:35] <Sarvatt> darn, bot doesn't send me a link to the oops decoder anymore :)
[19:35] <Sarvatt> sorry for the noise
[19:35]  * mlankhorst puts Sarvatt in a sg list
[19:36] <mlankhorst> timeouts for launchpad seem really low which is probably the issue here
[19:57] <tjaalton> pushed a patch to xorg-server for precise
[19:57] <tjaalton> apparently fixes bug 921236
[19:57] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 921236 in xserver-xorg-input-evdev (Ubuntu) "[12.04 Xorg, xserver 1.11.3] Dual monitor, after entering password, mouse pointer stuck on LHS of screen, no desktop." [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/921236
[19:59] <tjaalton> is there something else, or should I just upload to -proposed?
[20:07] <tjaalton> guess I'll upload then :)
[20:08] <tjaalton> would be nice to get the input refresh from 1.12.3 when it's released
[20:09] <tjaalton> for 12.04.1
[20:12] <mlankhorst> tjaalton: isn' t the xserver still in -proposed state?
[20:13] <tjaalton> nope
[20:13] <tjaalton> hmm wait
[20:14] <tjaalton> right, .3 is in updates
[20:14] <mlankhorst> ah sure go for it then
[20:16] <mlankhorst> didn't expect it that fast :)
[20:18] <tjaalton> uhh :) https://launchpad.net/xserver
[20:22] <mlankhorst> https://launchpad.net/xorg-server
[20:22] <tjaalton> yeah
[20:25] <`rand`> I've been comparing the xserver code from Merkat, Ocelot, and Pangolin to try finding the sticky keys error--and argh!  I need to finally learn C--or at least get a good IDE that can locate function definitions.  I see XkbClearAllLatchesAndLocks defined as an extern in xkbsrv.h--but where is it actually defined?
[20:27] <jcristau> that's what ctags is for
[20:28] <jcristau> xkb/xkbActions.c
[20:29] <`rand`> ty, jcristau--again, I need to finally learn C. :)
[20:30] <jcristau> sounds like a good plan :)
[20:30] <jcristau> then again, xkb is probably not the best introduction
[20:30] <jcristau> possibly the worst possible one actually
[20:32] <`rand`> true, but I need sticky keys working properly for Pangolin to be useful. :)
[22:32] <bjsnider> tjaalton, so, it seems that the 3.5-rc4 kernel is bulletproof here
[22:33] <bjsnider> regarding 999910 that is
[22:33] <tjaalton> bjsnider: ok, did you have a way to reproduce it at will?
[22:33] <bjsnider> no, not really
[22:34] <bjsnider> but i've been using this kernel for a few days and no problems
[22:34] <bjsnider> i'll keep using it until quantal probably
[22:34] <tjaalton> i heard of someone on X230 that ran -27 for several days until it hung 
[22:34] <bjsnider> mine never lasted more than a day
[22:34] <tjaalton> would be great to find more fixes :)
[22:35] <tjaalton> to backport
[22:35] <tjaalton> though at some point we'll probably just tell people to use the backport kernel
[22:36] <tjaalton> but 12.04.1 will be at least a bit more stable