[07:24] <dholbach> good morning
[07:26] <geser> good morning
[07:35] <iulian> Morning.
=== almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan
[09:24] <tumbleweed> micahg: urgh, grumble. The sks backport didn't build the same way on the buildds as locally
[09:24] <tumbleweed> /usr/lib/sks/berkeley_db.txt is empty
[09:25]  * tumbleweed noticed that when verifying the SRU I did at the same time :(
[09:30] <tumbleweed> meh, affects quantal too. So it'll beb a re-backport when fixed
[10:36] <Laney> tsk
=== al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away
=== vibhav is now known as ILoveUbuntuOMG
=== ILoveUbuntuOMG is now known as vibhav
=== ninjak_ is now known as ninjak
[14:33] <psusi> I"m going to kill printf, I swear to god... am I losing my mind, or isn't %.1d supposed to print the number with one decimal place?  as in 1.2 instead of 12?
[15:06] <CareBear\> psusi : no
[15:06] <CareBear\> psusi : %d can only ever print integers
[17:38] <micahg> tumbleweed: ACK, I'll have a look sat night unless you need it sooner, is it worth pulling the backport?
[17:54] <tumbleweed> micahg: I'm about to head off to debconf, so I'll be offline for > 24 hours
[17:55] <tumbleweed> I'll have a quick look at it at the airport, though
[17:55] <tumbleweed> as to pulling the backport. I doubt there are enough users to be worth it :)
[17:57] <micahg> tumbleweed: as long as it won't break users more than the precise version, it's fine
[17:57] <micahg> otherwise, I'll get it pulled
[17:58] <tumbleweed> thankfully, it doesn't break users, but it does use several GB in /var/backup during the upgrade, and take forever
[17:58] <tumbleweed> (it was already broken in precise, re upgrades, which was why I was SRUing it) :/
[17:58] <micahg> ah, ok, it can stay then if it's the same shape as teh current version
[17:59] <micahg> tumbleweed: might want to mark the SRU verification-failed if it's indeed the case
[17:59] <tumbleweed> yeah, did so
[18:51] <highvoltage> tumbleweed, Laney: only one more day!
[18:54] <Laney> highvoltage: hmm?
[18:54] <Laney> I do hope you're not referring to Debconf, becuase I will not be there :( :( :( :( :( :(
[18:57] <highvoltage> Laney: oh no, for some reason I thought you were :'(
[18:57] <highvoltage> (...were going to debconf, that is)
[18:59] <Laney> hopefully next year!
[19:20] <tumbleweed> people at work are starting to grumble about me running around. Someone told me to plant a small forest when I get home to offset the CO2
[19:26] <Laney> heh
[19:26] <Laney> as long as it's not the boss
[19:26] <tumbleweed> kinda :P
[19:27] <iulian> :)
[20:09] <ScottK> tumbleweed: Remind them you're saving them from the next ice age.
[20:13] <tumbleweed> hah
[20:49] <tumbleweed> micahg: sks bug 1021650 squashed. I'd appreciate a rebackport.
[20:49] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 1021650 in sks (Ubuntu Precise) "/usr/lib/sks/berkeley_db.txt is empty" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1021650
[20:49] <tumbleweed> I can't test it now, but the build log looks correct
[20:50]  * tumbleweed wanders off to board his flight
[21:11] <micahg> tumbleweed: it needs run/install, if you'd like to do that at some point of the weekend and ping me (or hand off to someone else to do), I'll be happy to ACK/upload