| === rickspencer3 is now known as rickspencer3_ | ||
| === rickspencer3_ is now known as rickspencer3 | ||
| micahg | is there a reason why all the kernel images since precise's release are still on archive.ubuntu.com? | 13:27 |
|---|---|---|
| cjwatson | Why wouldn't they be? | 13:28 |
| micahg | hrm, I thought only the latest were on archive.ubuntu.com | 13:29 |
| micahg | and the rest were garbage collected at some point | 13:30 |
| cjwatson | Oh, I see what you mean. We don't do NBS removal post-release | 13:30 |
| cjwatson | Partly because we've never got round to it, but also more importantly because it causes trouble for people who download updated installer images from -updates at some point and then never update them | 13:30 |
| micahg | oh, ok, I thought kernels were special in that regard, but maybe I'm just misremembering from 5+ months ago | 13:30 |
| cjwatson | It's easier to just keep the lot | 13:31 |
| * micahg is used to seeing the kernels not in the archive as a sign of removing them from his system | 13:31 | |
| herton | infinity, I fixed the bot regarding the wrong components it reported in bug 1020100. It now only complains about this: updates-modules-2.6.24-32-lpia-di 2.6.24-32.44 - is in main instead of universe | 14:52 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 1020100 in linux "linux: 2.6.24-32.103 -proposed tracker" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1020100 | 14:52 |
| herton | infinity, it looks the complaint is correct, since updates-modules-2.6.24-32-lpia-di was in universe in the release pocket | 14:53 |
| scott-work | skaet: can you approve this blueprint so that it shows on status.ubuntu.com ? thank you | 15:00 |
| jbicha | hi, I'd appreciate if someone could help libzapojit through the new queue, it's a new dependency for gnome-documents | 15:08 |
| skaet | scott-work, blueprint link? | 15:15 |
| scott-work | skaet: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/topic-quantal-flavor-ubuntustudio | 15:17 |
| scott-work | i'm sorry, i fully intended to link that earlier | 15:17 |
| skaet | scott-work, no worries. doing. | 15:17 |
| seb128 | jbicha, newed | 15:17 |
| seb128 | jbicha, would it make sense to have new libs multiarched directly? this one is not | 15:18 |
| jbicha | seb128: thanks, I think something didn't work when I tried multiarching it, I'll give it another look the next time I upload it though | 15:19 |
| seb128 | jbicha, yw, ok | 15:20 |
| skaet | scott-work, ok, have taken a pass and approved them. Also set the default milestone to my best guess, and all blueprints without a priority were set to medium. Adjust as appropriate. ;) | 15:37 |
| ScottK | skaet: Would it be possible to have the SRU meeting earlier? That's past EOD for me and I'll be playing father then (two hours would do). | 15:37 |
| scott-work | skaet: thank you | 15:42 |
| scott-work | skaet: this one still looks unapproved: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/topic-quantal-flavor-ubuntustudio | 15:42 |
| skaet | ScottK, challenge is getting it not too early for Australia... I'm probably going to set up a second one earlier in the day, since there are a couple in Europe who can't attend that time as well. | 15:43 |
| ScottK | OK. | 15:43 |
| skaet | scott-work, the topic was approved, just the direction needed tweaking, so wouldn't have been a blocker, but... sorted now. ;) | 15:45 |
| skaet | next publishing run should show them. Check back in about an hour | 15:45 |
| scott-work | sorry, skaet, wasn't meaning to be pedantic, i just wanted to make sure this shows up on status.ubuntu.com under 'flavour' (which it currently does not). thank you :) | 15:59 |
| skaet | scott-work, no worries. :) | 16:00 |
| herton | infinity, ping | 16:01 |
| infinity | herton: Yo. | 16:03 |
| infinity | herton: I'd argue that that one updates-modules override was wrong in the release pocket, since it was for a kernel in main. I don't much care that it was originally wrong. ;) | 16:04 |
| infinity | herton: (Thanks for fixing the bot for the rest, btw) | 16:04 |
| herton | infinity, about that hardy issue, updates-modules-2.6.24-32-lpia-di in main, pitti once told me that you don't change it, but yes, I can override this in the checker | 16:04 |
| infinity | herton: Well we don't/won't change the release pocket's overrides, but there's no reason to not make the post-release pockets correct. | 16:05 |
| herton | infinity, no problem. I think for now I can workaround this, and avoid it complaining about this updates-modules package | 16:05 |
| infinity | herton: Check. Thanks. | 16:06 |
| jdstrand | cjwatson: hey, I just noticed the queue command hit ubuntu-archive-tools. anything I should be concerned about when using? | 16:12 |
| cjwatson | jdstrand: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2012/07/06/%23ubuntu-release.html#t20:31 | 16:17 |
| cjwatson | override support is still in the LP deployment queue, but http://lpqateam.canonical.com/qa-reports/deployment-stable.html looks much healthier now so that should happen tomorrow I think | 16:17 |
| jdstrand | cjwatson: thanks | 16:20 |
| cjwatson | jdstrand: So I guess the short answer is you may find that some bits don't work yet, but the things that do work should be safe to use | 16:20 |
| cjwatson | It is at least useful for info, accept, reject | 16:20 |
| cjwatson | fetch hit a roadblock and will be a few days | 16:21 |
| jdstrand | cool-- I tried it with info and will be trying accept in a moment | 16:23 |
| cjwatson | I'm in the process of converting the scripts that we had based around queue | 16:23 |
| jdstrand | I'm particularly looking forward to override and fetch. the former, just cause you know, its handy and the latter cause I have some scripts I can update to not have to ssh to fetch on cocplum and the scp home :) | 16:24 |
| jdstrand | (that is *horrible*) | 16:24 |
| cjwatson | Yeah, sorry for the delay on those, fetch turned out to require learning about more of the LP security infrastructure than I cared to | 16:24 |
| cjwatson | I was thinking of adding show-urls or something to make it easier to quickly inspect something on chinstrap or whatever | 16:25 |
| jdstrand | oh no need to be sorry. what I have works, it is just icky | 16:25 |
| jdstrand | cjwatson: thank you for all your work on this :) | 16:25 |
| cjwatson | No problem, ultimately it makes my own life easier | 16:25 |
| jdstrand | I have a feeling show-urls could be generally useful, but I can't quite put my finger on it | 16:26 |
| cjwatson | Certainly I don't always want to fetch stuff over my home internet connection, but I expect most of us have better-connected systems we can ssh to | 16:27 |
| jdstrand | personally, while I'd prefer not to pull it over my home connection, I do most of the time since I have tooling and a build vm, etc for doing various review tasks | 16:28 |
| jdstrand | huge stuff, not always | 16:28 |
| cjwatson | oh, thanks, I'd been meaning to deal with ddtp-translations | 16:46 |
| cjwatson | that'll want to go to main sooner or later | 16:46 |
| cjwatson | (one of the custom uploads it builds was already in main de facto anyway) | 16:47 |
| ScottK | cjwatson: multiple accepts are WAY easier with queue than with the +queue page. Thanks. | 17:16 |
| cjwatson | Oh good. | 17:18 |
| cjwatson | I was contemplating moving bug closures out to an asynchronous job to improve the timeout situation further. But (a) I haven't yet learned how to write async jobs so that might take a while and (b) it's possible that cure might be worse than the disease. | 17:19 |
| Laney | I thought it might get easier to deploy ben if it were in backports. So... there it is | 17:19 |
| ScottK | It would be nice to be able to accept usuing queue by version number. | 17:20 |
| ScottK | If I'm doing a (for example) mass accept of a KDE point release, they'll all have the same version number, but there's no common naming scheme. | 17:20 |
| micahg | ScottK: that seems very prone to accidents unless there's a prompt for each source | 17:21 |
| ScottK | queue accept will already just accept everything. | 17:21 |
| ScottK | This won't make it worse. | 17:21 |
| cjwatson | That's arguably a bug, mind :-) | 17:22 |
| cjwatson | You can use substrings plus a version number | 17:22 |
| ScottK | Something like: ./queue --queue=Unapproved --suite=precise-proposed --version=4;4.8.5-0ubuntu0.1" accept | 17:22 |
| cjwatson | Oh, I never added a version match option, true | 17:23 |
| cjwatson | Ah, because there was one in there with a weird syntax | 17:23 |
| cjwatson | queue -Q unapproved -s precise-proposed kde/4:4.8.5-0ubuntu0.1 | 17:23 |
| cjwatson | +accept | 17:23 |
| cjwatson | Might change that syntax, it's anomalous | 17:23 |
| infinity | Or, to not worry about package name at all, just "/1.2.3" | 17:23 |
| infinity | queue -s precise-proposed -Q unapproved info /3.12.2 | 17:23 |
| infinity | ^-- For a current example. | 17:23 |
| ScottK | Something like that. | 17:24 |
| infinity | ScottK: That works right now was my point. | 17:24 |
| ScottK | As you say though it's a bit anomalous. | 17:24 |
| infinity | It's certainly lacking in the intuitive department. | 17:24 |
| cjwatson | Might be better to put some kind of confirmation prompt in there in some cases. Not sure. | 17:24 |
| infinity | Though, it's faster to type foo/ver than -p foo -v ver. | 17:25 |
| cjwatson | For the first pass I was just trying to emulate the LP script as closely as possible to make sure I'd got it all right. But its syntax was pretty awful. | 17:25 |
| ScottK | Whatever you end up with, please make it painfully clear in the -h how it works for occasional users. | 17:32 |
| * jdstrand is done fiddling with NEW for the day | 17:53 | |
| stgraber | ogra_: any idea what's going on with the index there: http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/edubuntu/dvd/20120709/ ? | 18:19 |
| stgraber | ogra_: duplicate headers and wrong oversize check for arm images | 18:19 |
| stgraber | 2.2G definitely fits on a single-sided single-layer dvd ;) not that the .img will ever be burnt to a dvd though... | 18:21 |
| infinity | stgraber: I assume the oversized warning is because it's not a "DVD" image, but a "USB" image. Might need some special-casing in there. | 18:22 |
| infinity | stgraber: Similar issues for he duplicate headers, I'd guess. It's still thinking it's a "different" image type. | 18:22 |
| skaet | balloons, did you and seb128 figure out a plan for getting the accessibility community to help test the new GTK changes? or is that still pending? | 18:28 |
| * skaet going through the pending milestones from last week's meeting ... | 18:29 | |
| skaet | ogra_ - were you able to find out where the arm java plans are written down, and who the lead is? | 18:30 |
| balloons | skaet, no we haven't synced up | 18:30 |
| stgraber | infinity: hmm, indeed, looks like we override SIZELIMIT to "1024 * 1024 * 1024" if file -b on the .raw returns "x86 boot sector", which is the case for the arm images | 18:30 |
| skaet | balloons, ack. | 18:31 |
| infinity | skaet: arm java plans, in which regard? | 18:37 |
| infinity | stgraber: s/which is/which isn't/, I assume. | 18:37 |
| stgraber | infinity: nope :) | 18:38 |
| stgraber | /home/stgraber/Desktop/quantal-dvd-armhf+omap4.img: x86 boot sector; partition 1: ID=0xc, active, starthead 1, startsector 32, 147424 sectors; partition 2: ID=0x83, starthead 0, startsector 147456, 4494080 sectors, code offset 0x0 | 18:38 |
| skaet | infinity, pending action item from weekly release meeting. Not finding info from the blueprint scans, but may have missed something. | 18:39 |
| stgraber | infinity: added an exception for Edubuntu (after the bit of code doing the magic for .raw images) so that SIZELIMIT is set to 4.7GB in all cases. Hopefully I wasn't confused with edubuntu vs edubuntu-dvd this time and it'll just work :) | 18:40 |
| * stgraber will need to cleanup the edubuntu-dvd vs edubuntu mess at some point, using one for the livefs and the other for debian-cd just makes things confusing... | 18:42 | |
| infinity | stgraber: There's something horribly weird going on if the arm "dvd" image has an x86 boot sector. Or if it's being detected as such. | 18:57 |
| stgraber | infinity: well, it boots fine ;) | 19:02 |
| * stgraber checks the beginning of that .img for weirdness | 19:03 | |
| Laney | apt-cache policy libtiff5-dev | 19:03 |
| Laney | oops | 19:03 |
| stgraber | quantal-desktop-armhf+omap4.img: x86 boot sector; partition 1: ID=0xc, active, starthead 1, startsector 32, 147424 sectors; partition 2: ID=0x83, starthead 0, startsector 147456, 1136000 sectors, code offset 0x0 | 19:05 |
| stgraber | infinity: ^ so not specific to dvd images | 19:05 |
| infinity | stgraber: No, I assumed it wouldn't be, but still odd. | 19:41 |
| ScottK | The kolab rejects were me. I discussed it with the uploader. | 19:44 |
| === popey_ is now known as popey | ||
| Laney | Please keep an eye on lucid NEW; a few rounds will be required to get ben in. | 22:25 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!