[03:30] <pitti> kees: thanks for driving
[16:00] <Daviey> o/
[16:00] <jamespage> o/
[16:00] <jimbaker> hi
[16:00] <Daviey> Mr Page!
[16:01]  * jamespage looks at his watch
[16:01] <smoser> o/
[16:01] <arosales> hello
[16:01] <adam_g> o/
[16:01] <zul> hilo
[16:01]  * Daviey notes that jimbaker isn't on the schedule 
[16:01]  * rbasak should probably be on the schedule too
[16:01] <jamespage> he is now
[16:02] <arosales> and m_3 :-)
[16:02] <jamespage> and so is m_3 and rbasak
[16:02]  * Daviey taps his watch.
[16:02] <jamespage> okay-dokay
[16:02] <jamespage> #startmeeting ubuntu-server-team
[16:02] <meetingology> Meeting started Tue Jul 10 16:02:26 2012 UTC.  The chair is jamespage. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology.
[16:02] <meetingology> Available commands: #accept #accepted #action #agree #agreed #chair #commands #endmeeting #endvote #halp #help #idea #info #link #lurk #meetingname #meetingtopic #nick #progress #rejected #replay #restrictlogs #save #startmeeting #subtopic #topic #unchair #undo #unlurk #vote #voters #votesrequired
[16:02] <jamespage> #topic Review ACTION points from previous meeting
[16:02] <jamespage> none
[16:02] <jamespage> \o/
[16:02] <jamespage> #topic Quantal Development
[16:02] <jamespage> #topic Release Bugs - http://reports.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/ubuntu-server/release-bugs.html
[16:03] <Daviey> It's mostly MIR bugs which are causing woe
[16:03] <jamespage> So we have quite a few MIR's to support cep work
[16:03] <jamespage> bug 1017972 1017978 1022493
[16:03] <Daviey> jamespage: perhaps someone should try to interface closer with the MIR team to get these progressing ?
[16:03] <jamespage> Daviey, as they are all mine I will do that
[16:04] <Daviey> jamespage: super!
[16:04] <jamespage> and then
[16:04] <jamespage> bug 974584
[16:04] <Daviey> hallyn: ^
[16:04] <jamespage> #action jamespage to checkin with MIR team on expected review timescales for server MIR's
[16:04] <meetingology> ACTION: jamespage to checkin with MIR team on expected review timescales for server MIR's
[16:04] <hallyn> Daviey: should be fixed ind ebian
[16:04] <hallyn> in debian
[16:04] <zul> there is quantum/quantumclient MIRs as well
[16:05] <jamespage> zul: please make sure you subscribe ubuntu-server-release
[16:05] <Daviey> zul: can you action following them up?
[16:05] <zul> jamespage: ack
[16:05] <zul> Daviey: i tried to get them moving today but no one from the MIR answered my query
[16:05] <jamespage> #action zul to make sure relevant MIR bugs have ubuntu-server-release subscribed
[16:05] <meetingology> ACTION: zul to make sure relevant MIR bugs have ubuntu-server-release subscribed
[16:05] <Daviey> jamespage: well, technically ubuntu-server-release is for issues we are blocking on.. MIR bugs mostly block on others, no?
[16:06] <jamespage> Daviey, I don't see much differentiation
[16:06] <Daviey> jamespage: Well, there is a separate section on the report specifically for tracking MIR's
[16:06] <Daviey> (without us having to subscribe ubuntu-server*)
[16:06] <jamespage> Daviey, oh - I see
[16:07] <jamespage> Daviey, what magic makes things appear their?
[16:07] <Daviey> jamespage: that is for packages that we are bug subscribers for and has ~ubuntu-mir subscribed to the bug, and not Fix'd
[16:07] <Daviey> ie, just works.
[16:07] <jamespage> Daviey, OK - so we just need to sub ~ubuntu-server to those packages then
[16:08] <jamespage> zul: ^^ got that?
[16:08] <jamespage> I'll update mine as well
[16:08] <Daviey> yah.. which is usually a prerequisite for MIR
[16:08] <zul> jamespage: yeah
[16:08] <jamespage> Daviey, ack
[16:09] <jamespage> hallyn: re bug 974584 - can I assign that bug to you or is there someone else more appropriate?
[16:09] <hallyn> jamespage: assigning me wouldn't help :)  it's fixedin debian, just needs to be merged
[16:09] <hallyn> i just commented on the bug
[16:10] <hallyn> (needs to be merged, and i don't have upload rights)
[16:10] <Daviey> jamespage: hallyn is mostly on plus1 for now.. better someone else
[16:10] <jamespage> hallyn, ah - rightoh - its actually sysvinit not lxc - my mistake
[16:10] <jamespage> zul: bug 1020313
[16:11] <jamespage> OK to sweep that up in the next set of updates?
[16:11] <zul> jamespage: is that in precise?
[16:12] <Daviey> I don't think we can reasonably SRU that
[16:12] <jamespage> Daviey, I agree
[16:12] <Daviey> soren: ^^
[16:12] <Daviey> next?
[16:13] <jamespage> OK _ while we figure that out
[16:13] <jamespage> Still have a couple of FTBFS issue we are tracking
[16:13] <jamespage> I know the genshi one is not moving forward upstream
[16:13] <jamespage> so we may need to spend some time working a patch ourselves
[16:13] <jamespage> so if anyone wants to volunteer....
[16:14] <jamespage> other than that ... moving on
[16:14] <jamespage> #topic Blueprints - http://status.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-precise/ubuntu-server.html
[16:14] <jamespage> bah wrong ling
[16:14] <jamespage> link
[16:14] <arosales> trend line is still a bit off
[16:14] <jamespage> http://status.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-quantal/ubuntu-server.html
[16:14] <zul> oooh...lets do the time war again
[16:14] <jamespage> lol
[16:15] <arosales> Daviey: did you mention we need re-classify topics?
[16:15] <rbasak> smoser: I've been meaning to suggest that we redo the work items for the apt blueprint once we have feedback
[16:15] <Daviey> arosales: no
[16:15] <arosales> or reorder BPs under topics
[16:15] <arosales> or neither :-)
[16:15] <smoser> rbasak, that seems reasonable.
[16:16] <Daviey>  -Action arosales, update the topics/blueprints? :)
[16:16] <jamespage> Daviey, arosales: please can we understand the context for this change?
[16:17]  * Daviey hands the mic to arosales.
[16:17] <arosales> Daviey: I already put the dependencies on the BPs
[16:17] <arosales> perhaps I classified then under the incorrect topic though
[16:18] <arosales> I'll take an action to get this straigned out and get the trend line to track our work correctly
[16:18] <jamespage> #action arosales to sort out blueprints and get the trend line working correctly
[16:18] <meetingology> ACTION: arosales to sort out blueprints and get the trend line working correctly
[16:18] <jamespage> ta
[16:19] <Daviey> lets have a @daily reset-trend-line.py cronjob
[16:19] <jamespage> I'm not going to focus on any specific blueprints; but I would recommend everyone review ~weekly
[16:19] <jamespage> I've also been using the +upcomingwork view in Launchpad
[16:19] <jamespage> https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-server/+upcomingwork
[16:19] <jamespage> for example
[16:20] <jamespage> which gives you more of a time based view of whats next....
[16:20] <jamespage> anyone have anything else for blueprint status?
[16:20] <jamespage> .....
[16:20] <jamespage> ....
[16:20] <jamespage> ...
[16:20] <jamespage> ..
[16:20] <jamespage> .
[16:20] <jamespage> nope
[16:20] <jamespage> OK
[16:20] <Daviey> hometime \o/
[16:21] <jamespage> #topic 12.04.1 Development (jamespage & smoser)
[16:21] <smoser> i believe i was probably supposed to have done something here. i think i said i'd look at our list of items. but I have not.
[16:21]  * ScottK uploaded postfix 2.9.3 for a MRE SRU yesterday.  Waiting for someone else in ubuntu-sru to accept it.
[16:21] <jamespage> We have managed to push few quite a few SRU's
[16:21] <jamespage> thanks ScottK
[16:22] <jamespage> *push through
[16:22] <jamespage> smoser - lets do that tomorrow
[16:22] <jamespage> #action smoser and jamespage to review and assign SRU bug across team.
[16:22] <meetingology> ACTION: smoser and jamespage to review and assign SRU bug across team.
[16:22] <smoser> jamespage, ok.
[16:22] <smoser> http://status.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/kernel-bugs/reports/rls-p-tracking-bugs.html is the/one list, and as you can see, server has a nice long list of bugs
[16:22] <smoser> wee!
[16:23] <jamespage> smoser: most of those bugs are also on
[16:23] <jamespage> http://people.canonical.com/~jamespage/server-sru/precise-sru.html
[16:23] <jamespage> maas and juju specifically have a large number of unassigned high priority items
[16:24] <jamespage> anyway - looks like folk will have bugs coming their way tomorrow onwards....
[16:24] <zul> bugs are overated
[16:24] <jamespage> #topic Ubuntu Server Team Events
[16:24] <jamespage> any events in the next two weeks we should be aware of?
[16:25] <arosales> OSCON coming up on the 16th
[16:25] <arosales> m_3 and jcastro attending
[16:25] <jimbaker> i will also be at oscon
[16:25] <jamespage> a veritable server-team fest!
[16:25] <jamespage> OK
[16:25] <jamespage> #topic Weekly Updates & Questions for the QA Team (hggdh)
[16:25] <jamespage> hggdh, around for an update?
[16:26] <jamespage> ...
[16:26] <jamespage> #topic Weekly Updates & Questions for the Kernel Team (smb)
[16:26] <jamespage> smb?
[16:26] <smb> yup
[16:26] <smb> So I have been chasing some quantal regression of an older (b44) nic, trying to get kexec/kdump working in precise/quantal, chasing some 32bit Xen HVM problem and err, that might be all. Something else I should be aware (iow questions)? Oh, and /me being in Portland, OR next week.
[16:26] <smb> ..
[16:27] <jamespage> any questions for smb?
[16:28] <jamespage> nope - next!
[16:28] <jamespage> #topic Weekly Updates & Questions regarding Ubuntu ARM Server (rbasak)
[16:28] <rbasak> I've been working on a hacky patch against MAAS trunk that will make it provision ARM machines. The idea is that this can eventually be adapted into first class support. The patch is currently up-to-date against MAAS trunk, and I'm just waiting on the last cobbler-replacement pieces to land.
[16:28] <rbasak> Nothing else to report.
[16:28] <rbasak> Any questions for me?
[16:29] <jamespage> rbasak, I have a question - would it be possible to get the openvswitch kernel module enabled for the ARM kernels?
[16:29] <jamespage> I believe its upstream for the 3.4 series we are currently using
[16:29] <rbasak> That's something I'll have to ask of the kernel team
[16:29] <jamespage> rbasak, that would be helpful (only hit this today)
[16:30] <rbasak> In quantal? Or do you need a precise SRU?
[16:30] <jamespage> #action rbasak to find out whether openvswitch module can be enabled for quantal ARM kernels
[16:30] <meetingology> ACTION: rbasak to find out whether openvswitch module can be enabled for quantal ARM kernels
[16:30] <jamespage> rbasak, quantal is OK
[16:30] <rbasak> This is for the openstack module I presume? I forget its name
[16:30] <jamespage> quantum
[16:30] <rbasak> Yeah that's it
[16:30] <rbasak> OK I'll find out
[16:31] <jamespage> plus openvswitch is way cooler than doing old style bridging... :-)
[16:31] <rbasak> apw: ^^? :)
[16:31] <jamespage> any other questions for rbasak?
[16:31] <rbasak> jamespage: which kernels in particular?
[16:31] <rbasak> jamespage: omap4, armadaxp, highbank, all of the above? :)
[16:31] <Daviey> rbasak: whilst i remember, shall we have a quick catchup tomorrow morning?
[16:31] <jamespage> rbasak, all of the above
[16:31] <rbasak> :)
[16:31] <rbasak> Daviey: sure
[16:32] <jamespage> OK
[16:32] <jamespage> #topic Open Discussion
[16:32] <jamespage> anyone have anything for open discussion?
[16:32] <Daviey> nope
[16:32] <jamespage> right-oh
[16:32] <jamespage> #topic Announce next meeting date and time
[16:33] <zul> jamespage: we should be able to test if the dkms modules build
[16:33] <jamespage> zul: it does not
[16:33] <zul> oh...poop
[16:33] <jamespage> July 17th 2012, 1600 UTC right here
[16:33] <jamespage> until then...
[16:33] <jamespage> #endmeeting
[16:34] <meetingology> Meeting ended Tue Jul 10 16:34:00 2012 UTC.
[16:34] <meetingology> Minutes (wiki):        http://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting/2012/ubuntu-meeting.2012-07-10-16.02.moin.txt
[16:34] <meetingology> Minutes (html):        http://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting/2012/ubuntu-meeting.2012-07-10-16.02.html
[16:34] <arosales> Thanks for chairing jamespage
[16:37] <apw> rbasak, it seems to be enabled for everything but ti-omap4, and we'll be reviewing that next week
[16:37] <rbasak> Thanks apw. May I leave that with you?
[16:37] <rbasak> jamespage: ^^
[16:38] <jamespage> rbasak, action completed - ta
[16:40] <Daviey> thanks jamespage
[16:40] <jamespage> np
[16:42] <m_3> win 23
[17:00] <jsalisbury> #startmeeting
[17:00] <jsalisbury> ##
[17:00] <jsalisbury> ## This is the Ubuntu Kernel Team weekly status meeting.
[17:00] <jsalisbury> ##
[17:00] <jsalisbury> [LINK] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelTeam/Meeting
[17:00] <meetingology> Meeting started Tue Jul 10 17:00:13 2012 UTC.  The chair is jsalisbury. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology.
[17:00] <meetingology> Available commands: #accept #accepted #action #agree #agreed #chair #commands #endmeeting #endvote #halp #help #idea #info #link #lurk #meetingname #meetingtopic #nick #progress #rejected #replay #restrictlogs #save #startmeeting #subtopic #topic #unchair #undo #unlurk #vote #voters #votesrequired
[17:00] <jsalisbury> [LINK] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelTeam/ReleaseStatus/Quantal
[17:00] <jsalisbury> # Meeting Etiquette
[17:00] <jsalisbury> #
[17:00] <jsalisbury> # NOTE: '..' indicates that you are finished with your input.
[17:00] <jsalisbury> #       'o/' indicates you have something to add (please wait until you are recognized)
[17:00] <jsalisbury> Roll Call for Ubuntu Kernel Weekly Status Meeting
[17:00] <ppisati> o/
[17:00] <herton> o/
[17:00] <ogasawara> o/
[17:00] <henrix> o/
[17:00] <sforshee> o/
[17:00] <bjf> _o_
[17:00] <cking> o/
[17:00] <smb> \o
[17:00] <Daviey> o/
[17:01] <jsalisbury> [TOPIC] ARM Status (ppisati)
[17:01] <ppisati> Q/omap4: rebased on 3.4.4 (Ubuntu-3.4.0-204.9).
[17:01] <ppisati> ..
[17:01] <jsalisbury> [TOPIC] Release Metrics and Incoming Bugs (jsalisbury)
[17:01] <jsalisbury> Release metrics and incoming bug data can be reviewed at the following link:
[17:01] <jsalisbury> [LINK] http://people.canonical.com/~kernel/reports/kt-meeting.txt
[17:01] <jsalisbury> ..
[17:01] <jsalisbury> [TOPIC] Milestone Targeted Work Items (ogasawara)
[17:01] <ogasawara> [LINK] http://status.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-quantal/canonical-kernel-distro-team-quantal-alpha-3.html
[17:01] <ogasawara> || apw         || hardware-q-kernel-config-review || 1 work item   ||
[17:01] <ogasawara> ||             || hardware-q-kernel-delta-review  || 3 work items  ||
[17:01] <ogasawara> ||             || hardware-q-kernel-versions-and-flavors || 1 work item ||
[17:01] <ogasawara> || cking       || hardware-q-kernel-delta-review  || 1 work items  ||
[17:01] <ogasawara> || cooloney    || hardware-q-kernel-config-review || 1 work item   ||
[17:01] <ogasawara> || jjohansen   || hardware-q-kernel-config-review || 1 work item   ||
[17:01] <ogasawara> || ogasawara   || hardware-q-kernel-config-review || 1 work items  ||
[17:01] <ogasawara> || ppisati     || hardware-q-kernel-config-review || 1 work item   ||
[17:02] <ogasawara> || tgardner    || hardware-q-kernel-config-review || 2 work items  ||
[17:02] <ogasawara> ||             || hardware-q-kernel-delta-review  || 1 work items  ||
[17:02] <ogasawara> || kernel-team || hardware-q-kernel-config-review || 3 work items ||
[17:02] <ogasawara> ||             || hardware-q-kernel-versions-and-flavors || 2 work items ||
[17:02] <ogasawara> If your name is in the above table, please review your Alpha-3 work items.
[17:02] <ogasawara> ..
[17:02] <jsalisbury> [TOPIC] Status: Quantal Development Kernel (ogasawara)
[17:02] <ogasawara> We have recently rebased the Quantal kernel to the latest v3.5-rc6
[17:02] <ogasawara> upstream kernel and have uploaded.  This has also been uploaded to the
[17:02] <ogasawara> q-lts-backport [1] PPA to help facilitate testing of the 12.10 kernel
[17:02] <ogasawara> in 12.04.  We welcome any early adopters to please install, test, and
[17:02] <ogasawara> let us know your feedback.
[17:02] <ogasawara> [1] https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat/+archive/q-lts-backport
[17:02] <ogasawara> Important upcoming dates:
[17:02] <ogasawara>  * Thurs July 26 - Alpha 3 (~2 weeks)
[17:02] <ogasawara> ..
[17:02] <jsalisbury> [TOPIC] Status: CVE's (bjf)
[17:03] <bjf> == 2012-07-10 (weekly) ==
[17:03] <bjf> Currently we have 93 CVEs on our radar, with 1 CVE retired this week.
[17:03] <bjf> See the CVE matrix for the current list:
[17:03] <bjf> [LINK] http://people.canonical.com/~kernel/cve/pkg/ALL-linux.html
[17:03] <bjf> Overall the backlog has decreased slightly this week:
[17:03] <bjf> [LINK] http://people.canonical.com/~kernel/status/cve-metrics.txt
[17:03] <bjf> [LINK] http://people.canonical.com/~kernel/cve/pkg/CVE-linux.txt
[17:03] <bjf> ..
[17:03] <jsalisbury> [TOPIC] Status: Stable, Security, and Bugfix Kernel Updates - Precise/Oneiric/Natty/Lucid/Hardy (bjf/herton/henrix)
[17:03] <henrix> Here is the status for the main kernels, until today (July 10):
[17:03] <henrix>  * Hardy – 2.6.24-32.103 – Verified, ready for testing; 1 CVE (4 commits)
[17:03] <henrix>  * Lucid – 2.6.32-41.94 – In verification (2 commits) (2 commits)
[17:03] <henrix>  * Natty – 2.6.38-15.64 – In verification (2 commits) (2 commits)
[17:03] <henrix>  * Oneiric – 3.0.0-23.38 – In verification; 3 upstream stable release (approx. 94 commits)
[17:03] <henrix>  * Precise – 3.2.0-27.43 – In verification; 2 upstream stable release (approx. 183 commits)
[17:03] <henrix> Current opened tracking bugs details:
[17:03] <henrix>  * http://people.canonical.com/~kernel/reports/kernel-sru-workflow.html
[17:03] <henrix> For SRUs, SRU report is a good source of information:
[17:03] <henrix>  * http://people.canonical.com/~kernel/reports/sru-report.html
[17:03] <henrix> Future stable cadence cycles:
[17:03] <henrix>  * https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QuantalQuetzal/ReleaseInterlock
[17:03] <henrix> The week of Sept. 6 is the week the last Natty kernel will be built.
[17:04] <henrix> ..
[17:04] <jsalisbury> [TOPIC] Open Discussion or Questions? Raise your hand to be recognized (o/)
[17:04] <jjohansen> gah why is it that pulse audio doesn't play all my beeps?
[17:04] <jjohansen> sorry wrong channel
[17:04] <jsalisbury> Should we cancel next weeks meeting due to the sprint?
[17:04] <jsalisbury> ..
[17:04] <ogasawara> jsalisbury: yes
[17:04] <ogasawara> ..
[17:04] <jsalisbury> ok
[17:04] <jsalisbury> ..
[17:05] <jsalisbury> Also, I will be on vacation for the July 24th meeting.  Is there someone else that can chair?
[17:05] <jsalisbury> ..
[17:05] <ogasawara> jsalisbury: I can chair
[17:05] <jsalisbury> ogasawara, great, thanks!
[17:05] <jsalisbury> ..
[17:05] <jsalisbury> Any other open discussions?
[17:06] <jsalisbury> Thanks everyone
[17:06] <jsalisbury> #endmeeting
[17:06] <meetingology> Meeting ended Tue Jul 10 17:06:02 2012 UTC.
[17:06] <meetingology> Minutes (wiki):        http://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting/2012/ubuntu-meeting.2012-07-10-17.00.moin.txt
[17:06] <meetingology> Minutes (html):        http://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting/2012/ubuntu-meeting.2012-07-10-17.00.html