/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2012/07/10/#ubuntu-motu.txt

thinkndevWhat does it mean when "Packaging Branch Status: OUT-OF-DATE" occurs when bzr-branching a project.00:04
thinkndev*package.00:04
ScottKIt means what you got is out of date and not what's currently in the archive.00:06
thinkndevAh, so it's not good when that happens.  How can this be fixed?00:10
thinkndevI've been looking at this right now00:10
thinkndevhttps://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-notifier/+bug/93451700:10
ubottuLaunchpad bug 934517 in update-notifier (Ubuntu) "update-notifier instructs to click "check for updates" although there is no such option" [Medium,Confirmed]00:10
ScottKWhining at someone on the appropriate mailing list, which is, I think ubuntu-distributed-devel@lists.ubuntu.com.00:11
ScottKMyself, I just stay away from the branches and pull the source from the archive.00:11
ScottKThere use is entirely optional.00:11
thinkndevahh, I see.00:12
thinkndevI'm new to development, btw.  Where can I find the update-notifier archive?00:13
ScottKIf you look at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-notifier you'll see the most recent version is 0.119ubuntu1500:15
thinkndevyeah, and from bzr, i pulled 0.119ubuntu1000:15
ScottKIf you have the package devscripts installed, you can get it with dget https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/primary/+files/update-notifier_0.119ubuntu15.dsc00:15
thinkndevwhat is a .dsc file?00:17
ScottKIt's part of the Debian source package (the format we use)00:17
ScottKdget will use that to also download the rest of the package.00:18
thinkndevfrom what I heard, it contains metadata of a package.00:19
ScottKIt does00:20
thinkndevNow, reading the bug description, it talks that the problem exists in Precise alpha.  Does that mean it's reproducible in future versions?00:28
thinkndevIs the precise stable considered as precise alpha?00:28
RAOFUnless it's been accidentally fixed (or fixded but the bug being missed) it probably still exists.00:29
thinkndevhow can I reproduce this specific problem? The directions don't seem suffice...00:32
RAOFIf you can't reproduce it, then maybe it's fixed?00:37
RAOFAh. String fix.00:38
RAOFYou can see whether those strings referenced have changed.00:38
=== _ruben_ is now known as _ruben
dholbachgood morning06:56
=== almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan
=== al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away
=== md_5 is now known as md_5|away
=== almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan
=== al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away
paultagAnyone know offhand how the Ubuntu theming is handled? E.g. for GDM, etc? I know desktop-base isn't used17:52
stgraberpaultag: well, for gdm I doubt there's really much modification as ubuntu no longer uses it. The rest should be covered by ubuntu-artwork18:06
paultagstgraber: ACK, thank you18:07
trijntjeHi all, before I figured out how to properly use ppa's, I messed around a lot and deleted a bunch of ppa's. Is there a way to revive the default ppa ~user/+archive/ppa after it has been deleted?18:57
paultagtrijntje: you might consider asking in #launchpad, but they use very exacting terms about PPA deletions being 4evah18:58
paultagtrijntje: but the LP guys should be able to explain it better then that18:58
LaneyI think it would just be easier to move on from that name18:59
Laneycall it phoenix18:59
trijntjeYeah, I was afraid of that, trial and error is not always the best method I guess ;)18:59
paultagnope :)19:17
paultagLaney++19:17
trijntjeI asked in launchpad, it's only possible to half-ressurect one, and then mess around with urls for the rest of your life ;)19:19
paultagmini-dinstall 4 lyfe :)19:20
arandYeah, if you go to the deleted ppa page and append /+edit to the url it appears as though you can revive it, it will remain a tad undead though.19:25
=== md_5|away is now known as md_5

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!