[12:03] <Letozaf__> Hello my name is Carla
[12:03] <Letozaf__> Yesterday I tested the daily iso of Quantal and encountered a bug
[12:03] <Letozaf__> I reported it here:
[12:03] <Letozaf__> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1022726
[12:04] <Letozaf__> I would like to know if I have to try continuing to install even if the letter of my Hard drive
[12:04] <Letozaf__> is wrong
[12:04] <Letozaf__> or if I can consider the test ended this way
[13:16] <me4oslav> brendand roadmr did any of you guys checked this? https://code.launchpad.net/~kokoto-java/checkbox/new-QT-home-screen/+merge/114021
[13:18] <roadmr> me4oslav: yes, cr3 also had a look, thanks for replying to his information request
[13:19] <roadmr> me4oslav: could you fix the ABBA string in qt/checkbox-qt.ui? I notice you said it "doesn't count" but as it is, it will still be present. One thing you could do is revert your changes to that file: bzr revert qt/checkbox-qt.ui
[13:19] <roadmr> me4oslav: then commit and push to the same launchpad branch, changes should be reflected automatically
[13:21] <roadmr> me4oslav: I'd wait for cr3 to have a look at your explanation for the changes - I'm pretty sure he will grill you about the string for the 'Confirm' button
[13:22] <roadmr> me4oslav: cr3 should be here in one or two hours :)
[13:43] <me4oslav> roadmr, so 1st "bzr revert qt/checkbox-qt.ui" then "bzr commit" and than "bzr push lp:~ ..." right?
[13:44] <roadmr> me4oslav: yep!
[13:51] <brendand> roadmr, revert is only going to pull back to the last commit right?
[13:51] <roadmr> brendand: er, yes, I think you're right :/
[13:51] <roadmr> me4oslav: ok, so no bzr revert please :/
[13:52] <roadmr> me4oslav: oh! never mind, it's fixed now, you did the right thing :)
[13:53] <me4oslav> roadmr ... I figured that "revert" sounded like a "be all end all" command and did not used it. Editing the file manually
[13:53] <me4oslav> than "commit" then "push"
[13:53] <roadmr> me4oslav: well if you specify a particular file, it only reverts that one
[13:54] <roadmr> me4oslav: I was wrong anyway (brendand pointed it out), but you can have it revert to a specific revision, bzr revert -r 483 qt/checkbox-qt.ui would have done the trick
[13:55] <me4oslav> roadmr that sounds logical, but then in this case it was easier (and safer) for me to edit it manually :) Anyway, now I'll wait for cr3 to show up
[15:13] <me4oslav> Ahhh, charming cr3 is here. I just needed to talk to him :)
[15:14] <cr3> me4oslav: how so?
[15:15] <me4oslav> cr3, about this: https://code.launchpad.net/~kokoto-java/checkbox/new-QT-home-screen/+merge/114021 You did requested more info yeterday and removal of the ABBA string and I fixed those
[15:19] <cr3> me4oslav: right, I still need to test your changes and validate that "the new banner fits Ambiance (the default theme) so much better"
[15:20] <cr3> me4oslav: this is rather subjective, so I will take the time to get feedback from others. what I've heard so far is that the letters are way too big, but I did point out that you seem to follow the guidelines for naming the project with the ubuntu logo and all
[15:20] <me4oslav> cr3, no worries, take your time :) If you find ANYTHING wrong with that banner, tell me, I will fix it
[15:20] <cr3> me4oslav: does that sound fair enough?
[15:20] <cr3> me4oslav: cool, I appreciate how responsive you were on the review. would you mind if I follow up directly in your merge request in launchpad, if I have more questions for example?
[15:21] <cr3> me4oslav: also note that your merge request came quite a bit as a surprise, giving a heads up might've prevented some whiplash effect :)
[15:21] <me4oslav> cr3 - of course :)
[21:16] <phillw> balloons: ping
[21:16] <balloons> phillw, :-)
[21:16] <phillw> hi balloons a quick Q. re: new Q kernel?
[21:18] <balloons> ok, what's up?
[21:19] <phillw> is the kernel mentioned at http://pastebin.com/GFd8pxnf purely dependant on asking people to use the PPA? It's just so I can give the correct information to the L-QA people.
[21:20] <balloons> I'm not sure what you mean as purely dependant
[21:20] <balloons> that ppa is intended for precise users
[21:20] <phillw> as in, do they need to enable the ppa to get it?
[21:20] <balloons> the quantal kernel gets pushed to quantal itself
[21:21] <balloons> so it depends on which distro your on
[21:21] <balloons> if your running quantal, your getting the new kernels
[21:21] <balloons> if not, partiticpate in the 'call for testing' using that ppa
[21:21] <balloons> make sense?
[21:21] <phillw> ah, thanks, so for the L-QA people testing the new kernel on 12.04 it is needed.
[21:23] <phillw> I expected it to be on the kernel iso tracker for 12.04 updated kernel, or is this in advance of it being placed on there?
[21:28] <balloons> phillw, heh.. I'm confused again but what your asking
[21:28] <balloons> btw, how did the test go?
[21:29] <phillw> balloons: I'm also a little confused, I'm not quite sure what they're asking for. If it is a Q kernel for P, then shouldn't it be on the kernel tracker as opposed to a PPA?
[21:30] <phillw> The day of the test was a nightmare from start to end. Given the weather situation and what it had done to the trains, I should have taken the chance to re-schedule.
[21:30] <phillw> I failed miserably.
[21:34] <balloons> phillw, I'm really sorry to hear that. Are you going to keep at it?
[21:34] <balloons> it is the Q kernel for P
[21:35] <balloons> it's in a ppa, and the results and instructions, etc are in the tracker here: http://packages.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/223/builds
[21:38] <phillw> balloons: I've still got my 100% pass record for RHCSA :) I'm applying for those jobs. There are quite a few of them about; even nicer, they ask for knowledge of RH & Ubutnu linux's :D
[21:51] <balloons> phillw, well that's good to hear.. and you've got both :-)
[21:51] <balloons> does that make sense on the tracker now?
[21:51] <balloons> I hope we're all coming in clear, heh
[21:55] <phillw> balloons: does this make sense to you? http://pastebin.com/AEtzNJZh
[21:59] <balloons> phillw, perhaps this post of mine would help
[21:59] <balloons> http://www.theorangenotebook.com/2012/07/call-for-testing-1210-kernel-on-1204.html
[22:00] <phillw> yikes!!!!
[22:00] <balloons> I see a couple lubuntu folks on the list here and in the results actually I think :-) https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/Kernel
[22:01] <phillw> balloons: what the L-QA team get up to is always a wonder to me :) As we both know, they are not just lubuntu testers :)
[22:01] <balloons> nope.. they are pure awesome
[22:02] <balloons> :-)
[22:03] <phillw> I'll simply make them aware of your posting. Saves me explaining stuff :DF
[22:03] <balloons> lol
[22:04] <balloons> It's hard sometimes trust me
[22:04] <balloons> trying to communicate and say things over again.. you get confused
[22:04] <balloons> quite quite easily
[22:14] <phillw> balloons: trust is not the issue, trying to keep L-QA mailing list "quiet" but condensing important information to them is. L-QA  mailing list was going to be having some changes, but one of the guys pointed out a better way.