[08:11] <MCR> Launchpad should also add a compliments tracker ;) - By just having the possibility to file bug reports, there is no place to honor achievements and advancements that have been made in the same projects, which just get new bug reports filed against...
[08:12] <MCR> I want to note here: 8-) :-D Great job on Compiz 0.9.8-1+bzr3279-staging1-201207091053~quantal1 :-D 8-)
[08:15] <MCR> It runs that fast and fluid on gallium here, no one would believe that it is NOT fglrx running...
[08:36] <seb128> MCR, kudos to smspillaz and duflu for their work ;-)
[08:43] <MCR> seb128: duflu ?
[08:44] <seb128> MCR, Daniel Van Vugt's IRC nickname
[08:45] <MCR> seb128: oh then, ofc I agree :) -> Daniel's work is GREAT
[08:45] <seb128> ;-)
[08:49] <Mirv> Trevinho: what'd be the status of http://pad.lv/991926 regarding 5.x branch, considering the wish the get the SRU out this week?
[08:57] <MCR> Is it a design decision to not have the Dash use overlay scrollbars or is it a bug here ?
[09:06] <Mirv> Trevinho: in the same vein, bug 999171 claims that 5.0 branch has fix committed, but I don't find it. would require a merge request?
[09:08] <Mirv> Trevinho: forget the latter, that's in but without a bug number so no problem
[09:18] <MCR> Does anyone know who feels responsible for packaging and releasing the AMD fglrx driver Ubuntu version ?
[09:24] <seb128> MCR, tseliot on #ubuntu-devel
[09:24] <seb128> MCR, he's not online atm though
[09:24] <seb128> MCR, why?
[09:24] <MCR> It is currently quite outdated already (most recent version in Quantal:8.960-0ubuntu5), but AMD already has released 12.6 (8.980)
[09:25] <MCR> There are also preview versions (press releases) of 8.99.2 and 9.0.0, see http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=amd_hd7950_evolve&num=1
[09:25] <seb128> not sure, maybe there was issues with the new version, best to ask him when he's online
[09:25] <seb128> or open a bug to request the update
[09:26] <MCR> seb128: Thanks for the info. Any idea which package I should file the bug report against ?
[09:27] <seb128> fglrx-installer?
[09:27] <MCR> fglrx-installer does not have a bug tracker afaik
[09:27] <seb128> https://launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/+source/fglrx-installer
[09:27] <seb128> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fglrx-installer/+filebug
[09:27] <seb128> MCR, you mean?
[09:29] <MCR> seb128: Thanks, I was just confused because of all the red Xs... I will file a report then... :)
[09:33] <MCR> seb128: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fglrx-installer/+bug/1022898
[09:34] <seb128> MCR, thanks
[09:38] <MCR> seb128: You are welcome and I thank you ;) - Once I got fglrx also running here, I will have to anchor my desktop on my table, because otherwise I think it'll fly away ;)
[09:39] <seb128> lol
[09:46] <MCR> didrocks, will we see Unity 6.0 today ? :)
[09:46] <didrocks> MCR: it's building in -proposed
[09:47] <MCR> oh, good news. - but I still fear proposed, so I'll wait ;)
[09:48] <didrocks> heh :)
[09:52] <greyback> didrocks: hey, sil2100 is on holidays, no? Will Unity2D be broken unless lp:~sil2100/unity-2d/bump_new_nux_libunity is merged?
[09:52] <didrocks> greyback: yeah, he's on holidays
[09:52] <didrocks> greyback: he didn't wait on your merge and didn't want to take trunk
[09:52] <didrocks> so we divert the packaging
[09:52] <didrocks> which is a hell for me to deal with unfortunately :/
[09:52] <didrocks> once it's release, yeah, please got those merged
[09:55] <greyback> didrocks: ok
[09:55] <didrocks> greyback: btw, did you get any progress on the google's issue?
[09:58] <greyback> didrocks: none. Something strange is going on with the dbus messages, but I simply cannot figure out why
[09:59] <greyback> didrocks: I hope to attack it again during this week. Then if I have no luck I'll need to ask for help
[09:59] <didrocks> greyback: keep me posted please :)
[10:00] <greyback> didrocks: will do
[10:01] <MCR> unityshell.cpp has 2 obvious mistakes btw in line 331 and 339: ubus_manager_.RegisterInterest(UBUS_LAUNCHER_START_KEY_SWTICHER,
[10:02] <MCR> line 339:  ubus_manager_.RegisterInterest(UBUS_LAUNCHER_END_KEY_SWTICHER,
[10:02] <MCR> SWTICHER instead of SWITCHER
[10:08] <seb128> MCR, you made a merge request for that yesterday right?
[10:08] <MCR> yep
[10:10] <seb128> MCR, I'm sure somebody will review it soon ;-)
[11:58] <Mirv> my Unity SRU PPA is at https://launchpad.net/~timo-jyrinki/+archive/prerelease-unity514-sru (not yet build)
[11:59] <Mirv> I suspect though that we are waiting for at least https://code.launchpad.net/~andyrock/unity/fix-987955-5.0/+merge/113274 and https://code.launchpad.net/~bilalakhtar/unity/5.0series-sru-software-center-integration-fixes/+merge/110214
[12:25] <seb128> Mirv, hey, great to see work starting on the SRU, do you want people to test that ppa then?
[12:45] <Mirv> seb128: sure it would be useful for people to run the Unity from that PPA, even if it wouldn't be final
[12:46] <seb128> Mirv, ok, thanks, looking forward seeing that SRU uploaded ;-)
[12:46] <didrocks> Mirv: hum, you remember about the unity SRU ppa, right?
[12:46] <Mirv> seb128: me too ;)
[12:46] <seb128> Mirv, do you already have a list of bugs fixed by the update somewhere if I want to see if I can confirm the fixes etc?
[12:46] <didrocks> Mirv: which is built automatically for you from 5.0
[12:46] <didrocks> maybe it's easier to just use it?
[12:47] <Mirv> didrocks: yes https://launchpad.net/~unity-team/+archive/sru - maybe so, the packaging only has changelog entry changes compared to that
[12:47] <Mirv> seb128: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/109744281/unity_5.12%2Bbzr2384-0ubuntu1~test1_source.changes
[12:48] <seb128> Mirv, thanks
[12:48] <didrocks> Mirv: so use that ppa for testing rather, the packaging changelog change can be done separately, without having to spend time upload/building a new one :)
[12:48] <Mirv> didrocks: okay, sure
[12:49] <Mirv> so, folks, test https://launchpad.net/~unity-team/+archive/sru instead :)
[12:57] <c10ud> there's a bug in unity, nautilus maximized+thumbnailer
[12:58] <c10ud> the unity bar disappears (!)
[13:05] <jaytaoko1> popey: didrocks: thanks for the release!
[13:05] <jaytaoko1> popey: extend my thanks to sil2100
[13:06] <popey> will do, thanks
[13:06] <didrocks> jaytaoko1: yw :)
[13:44] <andyrock> om26er_, ping
[13:47] <om26er_> andyrock, hey
[13:47] <andyrock> om26er_, can you reproce this bug? 974510
[13:47] <andyrock> https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/974510
[13:47] <om26er_> bug 974510
[13:48] <om26er_> andyrock, that seems fixed with trunk
[13:48] <om26er_> I can't reproduce it here but it does happen in 12.04
[13:48] <andyrock> cool :)
[13:49] <andyrock> i have 12.04
[13:49] <andyrock> with unity 5.0
[13:49] <andyrock> let's say SRU-1
[13:49] <om26er_> the something might have fixed it
[13:51] <andyrock> om26er_, invalid or fix released?
[13:52] <andyrock> or committed?
[13:52] <om26er_> andyrock, fix committed would be cool then later fixed
[13:52] <andyrock> ok thank you
[13:52] <om26er_> welcome.
[14:01] <didrocks> Trevinho: hey, my sublimetext editor is still not matched by the launcher, even with latest bamf/unity
[14:03] <seb128> didrocks, emacs, use emacs!
[14:03] <seb128> ;-)
[14:04] <didrocks> tssss :p I'll switch back to vim rather!
[14:04] <didrocks> :)
[14:08] <popey> \o/ gvim
[14:11] <seb128> Mirv, popey: btw is there any way one of you could verify the 3 bugs from the current compiz SRU which are still verification-needed?
[14:12] <popey> seb128, do you have the bug numbers to hand?
[14:12] <seb128> popey,
[14:12] <seb128> http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/pending-sru.html
[14:12] <popey> ta
[14:12] <seb128> popey, look for compiz in the precise section
[14:12] <seb128> the ones which are not green
[14:12] <seb128> popey, thanks
[14:13] <seb128> popey, if those are bugs hard to verify like random segfault just attesting there is no regression is good enough
[14:13] <popey> seb128, yeah, I always worry about those types.. no real way to verify :S
[14:13] <seb128> popey, well, if it doesn't fix the issue but doesn't create new ones it's still good to go
[14:14] <seb128> i.e no reason to block the SRU on those
[14:14] <popey> right
[14:24] <popey> seb128, will look at in just a mo, my precise box is a bit messed up, booting a clean one :)
[14:28] <seb128> popey, ok
[14:40] <popey> seb128, Mirv for bug 993608, I'm doing a bzr branch lp:compiz-wall-plugin, cd compiz-wall-plugin, mkdir build, cd build, cmake ../
[14:40] <popey> is that sane?
[14:41] <popey> (the description isn't exactly clear on the steps to reproduce)
[14:42] <popey> http://paste.ubuntu.com/1084585/ is the result.. which isnt the same but still doesn't look good
[14:47] <seb128> popey, seems fine to me
[14:47] <seb128> popey, it's not an user facing change in any case so I'm not too concerned about it
[14:47] <popey> ok
[14:48] <popey> those 3 are done then seb128
[14:50] <seb128> popey, thanks! ;-)
[14:50] <popey> np
[16:06] <semitones> Are the icons in Unity-2D supposed to be moveable?
[16:10] <seb128> semitones, yes, but not on the side, just click on them for over a second
[16:10] <semitones> oh, awesome! I would not have figured that out :p
[16:11] <semitones> thanks
[16:13] <semitones> Also I've noticed it takes a lot longer to login to 2D over regular, even though 2D is then snappier... is that known?
[16:15] <seb128> semitones, it shouldn't be, check .xsession-errors in your user dir to see if anything timeout in your session
[16:16] <semitones> wow there are many errors...
[16:17] <semitones> can I pastebin it here?
[16:17] <seb128> semitones, no, the way pastebin is that you paste on the site and give the url
[16:17] <seb128> http://paste.ubuntu.com
[16:18] <semitones> haha, yeah I meant if I put it up here, would people have time to look at it
[16:18] <semitones> guess so :) thanks
[16:19] <seb128> well you can still post it here even if nobody has time then to look at it
[16:19] <seb128> what is sure is that if you don't post the url nobody will look at it ;-)
[16:20] <semitones> sorry, I was configuring pastebinit for the first time: http://paste.ubuntu.com/1084747/
[16:21] <seb128> no timeout in there, not sure what takes time
[16:21] <seb128> I guess you could bootchart your system
[16:22] <seb128> like install pybootchartgui bootchart, reboot, and look in /var/log/bootchart to the image generated
[16:22] <seb128> you will have timelines for what starts when
[16:22] <seb128> it should tell you what is slow
[16:24] <semitones> alright, I'll try that, thanks
[16:25] <semitones> so those metacity errors, and gnome-settings-daemon and ubuntu-2d-shell errors... are they fairly harmless?
[17:48] <seb128> popey, Mirv: bug #1019337 seems a regression from the current compiz SRU, can check with duflu when he's online or via email?
[18:02] <popey> seb128, yup
[18:04] <popey> seb128, done
[18:05] <seb128> popey, thanks
[18:08] <seb128> popey, to add to the fun you can run #ubuntu-release backlog
[18:09] <seb128> popey, they got it copied to -updates before the tracker updated to show the regression in red
[18:09] <popey> arf
[18:10] <shakaran> Hi, aparently I have a .xsession-error related to a packaged called checkbox-unity. I ask on ubuntu-bugs because It has a broken exec .desktop  http://pastebin.com/kUQawLye should I report a bug?
[18:12] <seb128> popey, I need to run but I will read backlog, can you make sure it's being actively tracked, regression in the LTS updates is not really something we should sit on...if there is anything for Didier or I to act on please drop an email
[18:12] <popey> seb128, hmm
[18:12] <popey> my guys are end of day..
[18:12] <seb128> popey, welcome to our world...
[18:12] <popey> :)
[18:58] <doctormon> What is nux? Is it just a clutter clone?