[09:53]  * ogra_ dances ... fnially mx5 live images !!!
[09:54] <ogra_> infinity, if your mx5 has a spare cycle, could you give them a try ?
[09:57] <ogra_> (also, does anyone know why we build .1 as the default images nowadays ? seems that only recently started)
[09:58] <ogra_> looking at http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/cd-build-logs/ubuntu/quantal/ it started with 20120708.1 ... i cant find a commit in cdimage that would explain this
[10:00] <cjwatson> all stable builds are like that
[10:01] <cjwatson> it's because the thing that computes build numbers doesn't take the series into account
[10:01] <cjwatson> so there's typically already been a quantal build that day and it therefore selects .1
[10:01] <cjwatson> would probably not be that hard to fix but I haven't bothered
[10:05] <ogra_> well, there are no logs for other builds
[10:06] <cjwatson> oh this is quantal.  well, it'll be something similar to the above
[10:06] <cjwatson> precise is probably starting earlier
[10:06] <ogra_> (/me is mostly scared that we run into the 24h buildtime and start to overlap thanks to the many arm builds on a single machine which might cause delays)
[10:06] <cjwatson> yeah, look at http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/cd-build-logs/ubuntu/precise/, there are the other builds in question
[10:07] <ogra_> ah
[10:07] <ogra_> it doesnt see the releases as distinct
[10:07] <ogra_> now i get it
[10:07] <cjwatson> yep, series == release, sorry LP terminology
[10:07] <ogra_> heh, k
[11:12] <Laney> how does one go about uploading a rebootstrap?
[11:12]  * Laney is rebuilding ghc/armel
[11:12] <Laney> at least, I think I am. We'll know in 10 hours or so :-)
[11:15] <cjwatson> You'll probably need infinity to help you.
[11:15] <cjwatson> AIUI it requires shoving bootstrap binaries into an extra repository that buildd chroots are temporarily pointed at for build-dependencies.
[11:16] <Laney> oh, so it's not a binary upload
[11:17] <Laney> I'm just using Debian's ghc to bootstrap off
[11:27] <cjwatson> Laney: From LP's point of view, that involves bootstrap binaries
[11:27] <cjwatson> Assuming you mean Debian's ghc binaries and not just the source
[11:28] <Laney> yes
[11:29] <Laney> I thought you might do the bootstrap builds yourself and just smush them in somehow.
[11:30] <Laney> But having another repository which accepts binary uploads also works
[11:34] <cjwatson> Every binary in the archive must have been built by LP - absolute rule
[11:34] <cjwatson> Never AFAIK violated (although it used to be "built by buildds attached to dak", but same principle)
[11:36] <Laney> certainly makes sense
[14:42] <Laney> emacs24-non-dfsg should go to universe, btw
[14:44] <cjwatson> So it should (GFDL).  Done.
[14:46] <Laney> ta