[06:13] <MCR1> didrocks: I guess I need your help - got a minute ?
[06:13] <MCR1> didrocks: Hi, btw :)
[06:13] <didrocks> MCR1: hey, what's up?
[06:14] <MCR1> 1. Can you help with that: https://code.launchpad.net/~mc-return/compiz/compiz.merge-plugin-trip/+merge/113449 ?
[06:16] <didrocks> MCR1: ok, will handle that
[06:16] <MCR1> thx a lot, didrocks.
[06:17] <MCR1> 2. The Unity staging PPA does not want to upgrade Unity without removing unity-lens-music, unity-lens-video and unity-scope-video-remote
[06:17] <didrocks> MCR1: done, can be approved now
[06:18] <MCR1> didrocks: Thanx  again. I knew you are my man ;)
[06:19] <MCR1> Unity-2d also gets removed in case of upgrade, but I think that is known...
[06:20] <didrocks> MCR1: it's because you didn't get the rebuild yet, that will happen soon :)
[06:21] <didrocks> MCR1: seems to be built for me, what does apt-get install unity-2d says to you?
[06:21] <didrocks> Mirv: FYI, look at the comment I added to this merge request ^
[06:21] <MCR1> didrocks: unity-2d is already the newest version.
[06:21] <didrocks> MCR1: so, it's not uninstalled? :)
[06:23] <MCR1> didrocks: not yet, but that is not my problem - but removing the lenses for the upgrade seems wrong (looks like the lenses do not get their update build...)
[06:25] <MCR1> didrocks: or the lenses depend on a lower unity version... Am I correct here ?
[06:26] <didrocks> MCR1: what you are trying to do?
[06:26] <didrocks> what package do you have, -proposed?
[06:26] <didrocks> the lenses need latest unity version
[06:26] <MCR1> no, just plain Quantal sources plus Unity staging PPA, quantal
[06:27] <didrocks> MCR1: I don't know about the ppa, maybe some sources are missing
[06:27] <didrocks> MCR1: the transition is to avoid having people ending up with a broken configuration
[06:27] <didrocks> and work for the distro
[06:27] <didrocks> then, staging is an unsupported ppa that people shouldn't run (see the tagline I wrote on it :))
[06:28] <MCR1> didrocks: yes, :-[
[06:33] <MCR1> didrocks: Looks like you do not mean manual, but automatic tests for the "new" plug-ins ? Do the other, already existing plugins, have tests, so I could take a look at those ?
[06:33] <didrocks> MCR1: I mean, all code that are not in lp:compiz and entering should get under tests :)
[06:35] <MCR1> didrocks: I hope someone can help me with these then...
[06:35] <didrocks> MCR1: this merge is already approved, but for any new plugin yeah
[06:35] <didrocks> MCR1: we want to ensure the quality of them
[06:36] <didrocks> for that, there is a need for tests
[06:36] <MCR1> didrocks: Ofc. The quality and stability part is very important, especially for Compiz :)
[06:37] <didrocks> indeed :)
[06:49] <MCR1> didrocks: The 2 new ones currently already merged with lp:compiz are "workspacenames" "stack window switcher", "trip" is approved now <- those got hardcore manual tests and introduce no new bugs, but the stack window switcher shows a known and already reported bug with Unity's top panel shadow, which will hopefully be fixed soonish (just FYI)
[06:50] <didrocks> MCR1: will you do the manual tests for every compiz release? :)
[06:50] <MCR1> didrocks: But it would be helpful for me if someone could point me to the code of existing tests for the lp:compiz plugins, so I could analyze that...
[06:50] <didrocks> because having manual tests is good, but running them… :)
[06:51] <didrocks> MCR1: smspillaz surely can when he's around
[06:53] <MCR1> didrocks: I agree with tests ofc -> it is one of the reasons I wanted the useful plugins, which I am running since 0.7? versions of Compiz to get into lp:compiz, so I would not have to test them manually on each Compiz update ;)
[06:53] <didrocks> MCR1: that would be nice, all contributions are welcome, especially for tests ;)
[06:54] <MCR1> didrocks: I will try my best, but I still have to learn a lot...
[06:54] <didrocks> MCR1: take your team! Thanks for trying :)
[08:04] <MCR1> Trip has landed in lp:compiz 31 minutes ago :) Please take care, when tripping out your desktop - it is hard to stay productive then ;)
[08:18] <Mirv> didrocks: check.
[08:19] <Mirv> and now the gsettings test would be in as well
[08:20] <didrocks> Mirv: there are still some more tests branches under review, isn't it?
[08:21] <Mirv> didrocks: not that I see, this was supposed to be the last
[08:21] <didrocks> Mirv: excellent!
[08:22] <didrocks> Mirv: is Daniel confirming?
[08:22] <Mirv> didrocks: I got an ack from Daniel for a new snapshot release already before the gsettings tests
[08:23] <didrocks> Mirv: perfect!
[08:23] <didrocks> Mirv: well
[08:23] <didrocks> please confirm nothing is in the pipes
[08:23] <didrocks> the tests were mandatory, seems Daniel wasn't aligned to that :)
[08:24] <Mirv> checking
[08:25] <didrocks> thanks
[08:30] <Mirv> Daniel is fine, although he says Sam is working on some pile of gsettings conformance tests
[08:31] <Mirv> and I didn't yet get an answer if Sam is planning to get them in anytime soon
[08:32] <Mirv> now got it, it'll take some time and probably would not be wise to keep lp:compiz frozen for that duration
[08:32] <Mirv> so if we'd be ok with the basic tests we now have in, the snapshot release could be done
[08:33] <didrocks> Mirv: I'm ok if you can manual tests a lot of those
[08:33] <didrocks> Mirv: like, changing settings into ccsm
[08:33] <didrocks> see that they are refreshed compiz-side
[08:33] <didrocks> same with dconf-editor
[08:33] <didrocks> and see that keys changes as expected
[08:33] <Mirv> didrocks: ok...
[08:33] <didrocks> for a list, int and string key
[08:35] <didrocks> Mirv: hum, seems that I have contradictory information
[08:35] <didrocks> there is one branch almost ready for review
[08:35] <didrocks> should be up soon
[08:35] <didrocks> Mirv: so seems that people are not aligned? can you check please?
[08:37] <MCR1> didrocks, Mirv: I am sorry to interrupt here, but I found some serious problems with the hardcoded Unity keys - there is really some mess going on code-wise in lp:unity - I detailed the problems here: bug 1022743
[08:37] <didrocks> MCR1: yeah, I saw that
[08:37] <didrocks> MCR1: ping upstream about it :)
[08:38] <MCR1> who is that ?
[08:44] <didrocks> MCR1: well, they should read this channel, so hopefully they will answer at some points
[08:55] <Mirv> MCR1: I kind of do "just" packaging etc, so I don't do actual development, but I/we do track bug reports as well
[08:56] <Mirv> MCR1: anyway, quite a valid bug report
[08:57] <MCR1> Mirv: while CCSM handles all shortcuts with excellence since ages, I cannot say that Unity does ;P
[14:54] <Mirv> if you're running precise, please test the compiz from https://launchpad.net/~timo-jyrinki/+archive/compiz-precise-sru - same as the reverted SRU but with bug #1019337 patch added
[14:55] <Mirv> especially in the case you got the gtk-window-decorator problems with 1:0.9.7.8-0ubuntu1.1
[14:57] <Mirv> amd64 build still not started, though, but will be there later today
[16:53] <me4oslav> Anyone feeling like checking this MR? https://code.launchpad.net/~kokoto-java/unity/new-Dash-sheen/+merge/113948