[07:31] <popey> is it possible to get a package build score in a ppa bumped up the queue a bit please?
[07:33] <StevenK> popey: Link the build?
[07:33] <popey> https://launchpad.net/~timo-jyrinki/+archive/compiz-precise-sru/+packages
[07:33] <popey> oops
[07:33] <popey> https://launchpad.net/~timo-jyrinki/+archive/compiz-precise-sru/+build/3650330
[07:34] <StevenK> Yeah, found that myself.
[07:34] <StevenK> Bumped
[07:34] <popey> thank you!
[07:37] <popey> StevenK, out of interest, is this the best place to ask for these kinds of requests?
[07:37] <StevenK> popey: It will doe
[07:37] <StevenK> *do
[13:36] <dobey> man apt-get update is really slow with ppas right now :(
[13:40] <mgz> man should be fast :)
[15:42] <azat> Hi all, can anoy body explani why I can't compile project with this line 'unsigned long bufSize = 1024 * 1024 * 1024 * 2; // 2 gb', it failed with 'integer overflow in expression'
[15:42] <azat> *anobody
[15:47] <benji> azat: try this: unsigned long bufSize = (unsigned long)1024 * 1024 * 1024 * 2;
[15:47] <benji> and, azat... this is kind of a funny place to ask this question :)
[15:47] <azat> Thanks. I'll try. I ask here because on local machine this works
[15:48] <benji> and #launchpad is abotu non-local machines?  oh! you are getting this failure in a PPA build?
[15:50] <azat> yes
[15:50] <azat> What version of compiler and what compiler launchpad have?
[15:52] <benji> I don't know.
[15:52] <benji> You could ask at https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/
[17:34] <mdeslaur> hrm
[17:34] <mdeslaur> when I assigned LP: #1023931 to myself, I got this via email: "Marc Deslauriers (mdeslaur) has assigned this bug to you for Gentoo Linux:"
[17:34] <mdeslaur> Gentoo Linux? wazzit? :)
[17:54] <dobey> mdeslaur: did you assign it a task for the Gentoo distro?
[17:55] <mdeslaur> dobey: I didn't. There was one in the bug already
[17:55] <mdeslaur> dobey: but how does that relate to the email you get when you're assigned to an ubuntu task?
[17:55] <mdeslaur> it's picking the first one, or what?
[17:58] <dobey> hmm, i don't know
[17:59] <dobey> mdeslaur: maybe it got confused and picked the task for the original report
[18:07] <mdeslaur> ok
[21:37] <brendand> i have a question about build scores
[21:39] <brendand> why when i build a package do the quantal i386 and amd64 packages build quickly, the precise i386 package build quickly, but the precise amd64 package take forever?
[21:39] <brendand> https://launchpad.net/~brendan-donegan/+archive/ppa/+build/3651820
[21:39] <brendand> precise i386
[21:40] <brendand> https://launchpad.net/~brendan-donegan/+archive/ppa/+build/3651819
[21:40] <brendand> precise amd64
[21:46] <maxb> 2505 is the 'standard' build score for a PPA. I can't explain why the quantal/amd64 build happened quicker
[21:46] <maxb> Though you don't have any quantal packages in that PPA, so I'm not sure what you mean
[21:52] <wgrant> brendand: There's no difference beteween series -- you probably misread something.
[22:30] <brendand> maxb - yes, i saw that in a different ppa
[22:31] <brendand> wgrant, i'll hold my hands up and say i haven't consistently seen the precise/quantal split
[22:31] <brendand> wgrant, but the i386/amd64 one is very consistent
[22:39] <wgrant> brendand: Well, yes. The amd64 queue is large
[22:40] <wgrant> Because there are fewer amd64 builders
[23:40] <psusi> spam? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/775270/comments/4