[07:31] is it possible to get a package build score in a ppa bumped up the queue a bit please? [07:33] popey: Link the build? [07:33] https://launchpad.net/~timo-jyrinki/+archive/compiz-precise-sru/+packages [07:33] oops [07:33] https://launchpad.net/~timo-jyrinki/+archive/compiz-precise-sru/+build/3650330 [07:34] Yeah, found that myself. [07:34] Bumped [07:34] thank you! [07:37] StevenK, out of interest, is this the best place to ask for these kinds of requests? [07:37] popey: It will doe [07:37] *do === czajkowski changed the topic of #launchpad to: Help contact: czajkowski| Launchpad is an open source project: https://dev.launchpad.net/ | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ | User Guide: https://help.launchpad.net/ | Support: https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad | For packaging help: join #ubuntu-packaging === zyga is now known as zyga-afk === zyga-afk is now known as zyga === posulliv_ is now known as posulliv === jam1 is now known as jam [13:36] man apt-get update is really slow with ppas right now :( [13:40] man should be fast :) === zyga is now known as zyga-food === Ursinha` is now known as Ursinha === zyga-food is now known as zyga [15:42] Hi all, can anoy body explani why I can't compile project with this line 'unsigned long bufSize = 1024 * 1024 * 1024 * 2; // 2 gb', it failed with 'integer overflow in expression' [15:42] *anobody [15:47] azat: try this: unsigned long bufSize = (unsigned long)1024 * 1024 * 1024 * 2; [15:47] and, azat... this is kind of a funny place to ask this question :) [15:47] Thanks. I'll try. I ask here because on local machine this works [15:48] and #launchpad is abotu non-local machines? oh! you are getting this failure in a PPA build? [15:50] yes [15:50] What version of compiler and what compiler launchpad have? [15:52] I don't know. [15:52] You could ask at https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/ === czajkowski changed the topic of #launchpad to: Help contact:-| Launchpad is an open source project: https://dev.launchpad.net/ | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ | User Guide: https://help.launchpad.net/ | Support: https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad | For packaging help: join #ubuntu-packaging [17:34] hrm [17:34] when I assigned LP: #1023931 to myself, I got this via email: "Marc Deslauriers (mdeslaur) has assigned this bug to you for Gentoo Linux:" [17:34] Gentoo Linux? wazzit? :) [17:54] mdeslaur: did you assign it a task for the Gentoo distro? === zyga is now known as zyga-afk [17:55] dobey: I didn't. There was one in the bug already [17:55] dobey: but how does that relate to the email you get when you're assigned to an ubuntu task? [17:55] it's picking the first one, or what? [17:58] hmm, i don't know [17:59] mdeslaur: maybe it got confused and picked the task for the original report [18:07] ok === posulliv_ is now known as posulliv [21:37] i have a question about build scores [21:39] why when i build a package do the quantal i386 and amd64 packages build quickly, the precise i386 package build quickly, but the precise amd64 package take forever? [21:39] https://launchpad.net/~brendan-donegan/+archive/ppa/+build/3651820 [21:39] precise i386 [21:40] https://launchpad.net/~brendan-donegan/+archive/ppa/+build/3651819 [21:40] precise amd64 [21:46] 2505 is the 'standard' build score for a PPA. I can't explain why the quantal/amd64 build happened quicker [21:46] Though you don't have any quantal packages in that PPA, so I'm not sure what you mean [21:52] brendand: There's no difference beteween series -- you probably misread something. [22:30] maxb - yes, i saw that in a different ppa [22:31] wgrant, i'll hold my hands up and say i haven't consistently seen the precise/quantal split [22:31] wgrant, but the i386/amd64 one is very consistent [22:39] brendand: Well, yes. The amd64 queue is large [22:40] Because there are fewer amd64 builders === Mission-Critical is now known as MissionCritical [23:40] spam? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/775270/comments/4 [23:40] Ubuntu bug 775270 in grub2 (Ubuntu) "package linux-image-2.6.38-8-generic 2.6.38-8.42 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2" [Undecided,Confirmed]