[01:39] FloodBot1 called the ops in #ubuntu-ops-monitor (repeated abuse from wawowe) [01:40] chu, c'mon man [01:40] some reason we are allowing him to continue? [01:40] Do you think he's broken any rules though elky? :/ [01:41] he started acusing moocow of prostitution [01:41] chu: be aware that he was heavily trolling earlier today [01:42] Mmm, yeah, ok. [01:42] So, I would take everything he says with a grain of salt the size of a bus. [01:42] elky: I wasn't really sure, I didn't want to explicitly *say* anything to him about it, on the off-chance he would think it was ok and keep going with it [01:43] eh [01:44] wawowe? [01:44] elky! [01:44] What brings you here? [01:45] well. it just so happens that i've been banned [01:45] an i relize i was slightly uncool towards the boss, but.. [01:46] no uncool enough to be slapped down [01:47] wawowe, i think it was mostly your persistence in being uncool. [01:47] k [01:47] well what about my off-topic ban [01:47] is that gonna go away anytime soon? [01:48] cuz it's been there for a couple months [01:48] I don't think i am familiar with that one [01:49] o snap i'm banned [01:49] tried to join #ubuntu-offtopic [01:50] i would like to be persistently uncool, if that's aloud [01:50] even in the support channel [01:50] it's not [01:50] of course, i won't support cursing [01:50] and being funny with ops [01:50] much more than that. [01:51] being continually offtopic, unhelpful, and abusive towards others [01:51] oh yes, i know. we can't have that [01:52] but i'd like to see evidence of my offtopic/unhelpfulness [01:52] !1984 | wawowe [01:52] wawowe: Official channel logs can be found at http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ . LoCo channels are now logged there too; for older LoCo channel logs, see http://logs.ubuntu-eu.org/freenode/ [01:53] should i copy and paste my case? [01:53] no [01:53] wawowe, the ban wont be lifted. [01:53] ok [01:54] can you tell me your reason? [01:54] just for fun [01:54] There are other places on freenode to be uncool. #defocus for one. [01:54] you failure to follow the guidelines of the channel, and the code of conduct in ubuntu channels, for one [01:54] +r [01:54] i was at least helping people, while being uncool [01:55] i didn't really go "that" far [01:55] You can help people in other places. askubuntu.com for example [01:55] i don't really need help [01:55] just wanted to help [01:56] Perhaps you should re-read what i said, then. [01:56] which time [01:56] You'll figure it out. [01:57] haha [01:57] what does it take to become an op here? [01:57] !canibeanop [01:57] If you are interested in joining the Ops team, take a look at both http://www.siltala.net/2010/03/24/ops-teams-applications-announcement/ and https://wiki.ubuntu.com/IRC/IrcTeam/OperatorRequirements for info on the process and requirements. You can also learn about what the job entails from people in #ubuntu-irc. [01:58] wawowe, you clearly have no intention of taking this seriously. Please exit the channel [01:58] Being banned from our channels sort of disqualifies you. [01:59] bazhang: i'm an op of several other channels.. just wondering [01:59] i actually would have more interest in taking over these channels [01:59] than formally becoming an op [02:00] wanting to take over IMHO disqualifies you...never mind [02:00] taking over? [02:00] Good luck to him on that. [05:15] L3top called the ops in #ubuntu (sjork) [06:15] jussi: He was doing it in #ubuntu earlier too. (see ubottu's message above) === pangolin is now known as IdleOne [06:39] IdleOne called the ops in #ubuntu-offtopic () [06:40] chu, was that your first? [06:40] that was a worthy first [06:40] Yes [06:40] Congrats. [06:40] YAY! [06:41] (That's why it took so long for me to work out what was going on) [06:41] heh [06:41] :) [06:41] I now need to talk to ubottu about it! [07:03] chu: councilor to make sure there's no trauma left [07:46] if you have trauma from kicking a spammer, opping ain't for you ;) [07:46] There, counselling done. :D [08:23] @mark #ubuntu qubits using backtrack, serious issue, trying to get help in #ubuntu [08:23] The operation succeeded. === mrmist is now known as groupcat [09:38] In #ubuntu, Darkened said: ubottu,my issue is that I have no sound at all Running Ubuntu 10.04 LTC Lucid my output is a onbaord Realtek ALC655 sound port with two satalite Philips desk speakers [11:00] judging from what a few people are saying now in #ubuntu, i'm not sure why we have #ubuntu [11:00] what's up ? [11:02] fidel and ok_ bashing fellow because they need to "spend five minutes to understand how apt works" - when the reality seems to be that an APT command that should work just fine, doesn't [11:02] why is he using apt rather than the gui if he's not comfortable with apt ? [11:02] LjL: unacceptable, the channel is for support, not telling "you should learn" (: [11:03] "rtfm" kind of [11:04] well, it's not unacceptable to tell someone they are going to have to learn if they are going to continue to use these commands [11:04] more so as the user is saying "not got time to learn" [11:04] ikonia: why would he use the GUI if he's not comfortable with it? [11:04] not like because something is CLI it magically needs more comfortability to use [11:04] LjL: use the gui if he's not comfortable with apt [11:04] ikonia: yes, but the way it's been told makes me think "rtfm" [11:04] Tm_T: I wasn't reading so I don't know the context, I'm trying to read back now [11:06] either way, it seems the issue was the sources, which he should be helped to fix [11:06] i'm doing that [11:07] so I see [11:08] ikonia: and that's the difference, telling people "go learn basics" or actually help them (: [11:09] blindly helping them isn't always good either [11:09] it's got to be measured [11:09] ofcourse [11:09] one can say "it's good to learn basics first" in a good way too [11:09] well to me the person didn't show any particularly glaring lack of understanding of the "basics of apt" [11:10] LjL: not that I see, he was just confused why it wasn't working === pangolin is now known as IdleOne [18:49] Pici: thanks, I think that was also what I mentioned / recommended 2 days ago, since he usually is logged in [18:49] Fuchs: yep [18:49] thanks