[15:23] <jdsanders> SpamapS: ping?
[16:30] <SpamapS> jdsanders: pong
[16:30] <SpamapS> jdsanders: another day, more fun?
[16:32] <jdsanders> lol, thanks for ponging but whatever it was I was gonna ask, I've figured out at this point
[16:35] <jdsanders> oh i remember now - I was wondering what you think the "expect" value should be if I'm using start-stop-daemon
[16:36] <jdsanders> is it "expect fork" because it forks to run the given --exec?
[16:38] <jdsanders> it seems to work fine without "expect fork", so I just left it off, but logically it seems like it should have it
[16:38] <jdsanders> SpamapS: ^^
[16:47] <SpamapS> jdsanders: no
[16:48] <SpamapS> jdsanders: expect is only for processes that detach from their parents
[16:48] <SpamapS> jdsanders: if redis has a "run in the foreground" mode, just use that
[16:48] <jdsanders> oh ho ho!
[16:48] <jdsanders> well, i am
[16:48] <SpamapS> then no expect is needed
[16:48] <jdsanders> so your point is that even though multiple processes are created, none of them are detached
[16:48] <jdsanders> so everything tracks properly
[16:48] <jdsanders> gotcha
[16:48] <jdsanders> that clears up some confusion
[16:56] <jdsanders> thanks again SpamapS!