/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2012/07/14/#ubuntu-kernel.txt

deffragHello! Is <sudo cat /dev/sda5 | md5sum> the right way to get md5sum for sda5 partition? Or what exactly will the command do?07:01
ryant5000how would I go about building a 3.4 kernel on/for Amazon EC2? i'm on Precise, and I grabbed a clone of the git repo, but i don't see how to build the "virtual" flavour13:46
bjfryant5000, https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/BuildYourOwnKernel , down in the "Building the Kernel" section substitute "binary-virtual" for "binary-generic"15:36
bjfryant5000, i just kicked one off myself, if that doesn't work, i'll know in a little bit15:37
ryant5000bjf: hm, i tried that, but it said it couldn't find binary-virtual15:37
ryant5000bjf: where did you get your sources?15:37
ryant5000bjf: i was building from a tag in git clone git://kernel.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ubuntu-precise.git15:38
ryant5000bjf: i got the impression that somehow the sources i had didn't include a virtual flavour15:39
bjfryant5000, i did: fakeroot debian/rules clean; fakeroot debian/rules binary-virtual15:43
bjfryant5000: and it's building as we speak15:44
ryant5000hm, ok; and was your source from that same git repo?15:44
bjfryant5000: i am building precise which was cloned from the ubuntu precise repo15:45
ryant5000bjf: ok, i guess maybe it was a mistake to check out a tag; i'll give it a try from master15:45
bjfryant5000: which tag did you use ?15:46
ryant5000bjf: i don't recall exactly, but i think it was the latest tag with a 3.4 version number15:46
bjfryant5000: that should work15:47
bjfryant5000: um, actually ... 3.4? precise is based on 3.215:47
ryant5000bjf: right :) i was hoping to upgrade15:48
ryant5000bjf: i'd like to use a couple of features from the new kernel15:48
bjfryant5000: so you have a different option, use the "lts backport" kernel which is a quantal kernel built to run on precise userspace15:49
ryant5000bjf: ah, ok; i think i recall seeing that branch15:49
bjfryant5000: it's not really a "backport" just what we call it15:49
ryant5000bjf: right; makes sense15:49
bjfryant5000: there's one all built15:49
bjfryant5000: it is built everytime the regular quantal kernel is built15:50
ryant5000bjf: oh, can i just grab the deb? i'm not trying to do anything fancy, just a stock 3.4 or later kernel15:50
ryant5000(i did try searching for it, but I wasn't able to find it)15:50
bjfryant5000: yes, or it's in a ppa ... one sec15:50
bjfryant5000: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat/+archive/q-lts-backport15:52
bjfryant5000: there are other packages there but you want "linux-lts-quantal"15:53
ryant5000ok, cool15:53
ryant5000bjf: thanks; i'll give that a shot15:53
bjfryant5000: easier than building your own (though that isn't too bad)15:54
ryant5000bjf: yeah, definitely; the build process is way easier than the last time i tried (years ago)15:55
ryant5000bjf: so, that backports ppa doesn't seem to have the -virtual packages either16:30
ryant5000bjf: if i'm going to build myself, should i be building out of the precise or quantal repositories?16:30
bjfryant5000: in quantal the virtual flavour was eliminated17:47
ryant5000bjf: hm; so i guess i'll have to tell pv-grub to take the generic flavour17:47
ryant5000bjf: it says something about ignoring the generic kernel when it updates grub17:48
ryant5000maybe i'll just run on the quantal daily for a while17:48
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel
dilekshi18:55
dileksI used a quantal kernel-config as base for my linux-next kernel18:55
dileksdiff: http://paste.ubuntu.com/1091987/18:56
dileksnow there are new variables CONFIG_MEDIA_*_SUPPORT to sort camera|tv|radio|rc18:56
dilekswhat I did was a 'yes "" | make oldconfig'18:57
dileksas CONFIG_MEDIA_*_SUPPORT=n turned off all dvb|radio|rc|camera modules/built-in stuff18:58
dileksany other magic make-option where I can keep old media-configs?18:59
deffrag_Hello! I've a question related to ARM. As mentioned in line comment 23-28 here - http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/arch/arm/kernel/kprobes-common.c - R15 gives PC+8 in the first cycle of an instruction then PC19:33
deffrag_Oops! R15 gives PC+8 in the first cycle of an instruction then PC+12 in subsequent cycles. What is the reason for that?19:49

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!