=== Logan_ is now known as Guest17881 | ||
=== Logan__ is now known as Logan_ | ||
=== jbicha is now known as Guest91535 | ||
r0csteady | TheLordOfTime: I spent quite a bit of time screwing around with launchpad before I could even get to the site (https://help.ubuntu.com/community/ReportingBugs), but am reading it now. | 05:55 |
---|---|---|
r0csteady | I had to generate a gpg key, push it to the ubuntu server, import it to launchpad, and then sign the ubuntu code of conduct. Learned tons! | 05:56 |
TheLordOfTime | BugSquad: this was sent via the mailing list for triaging. Additonal confirms from bugsquad are necessary, as the bug is *not* reproducable in three other systems here. Please confirm whether you can reproduce this bug. | 12:19 |
TheLordOfTime | bug control members: i was not able to personally reproduce this bug, but given there's a large number of reports of this thus far, it might be ready for triaging. i do not believe it is because it appears to be a randomly appearing bug in specific hardware configurations. | 12:20 |
TheLordOfTime | Bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg-server/+bug/1021517 | 12:20 |
ubot2 | Ubuntu bug 1021517 in xorg-server "Xorg-server crashes reproducible with GIMP usage" [Undecided,Confirmed] | 12:20 |
=== zyga is now known as zyga-food | ||
=== zyga-food is now known as zyga-food] | ||
=== zyga-food] is now known as zyga-food | ||
=== zyga-food is now known as zyga | ||
=== Logan__ is now known as Logan_ | ||
hjd | Bug 870006 is still present in Oneiric, but fixed in Precise. Looking at the changelog (http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/g/globs/current/changelog) this was resolved by 0.2.0~svn50-3 which added the dependency. When picking the right Fix Released comment (https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Responses#Fixed_in_Development_release_while_still_existing_in_a_previous_release), would this technically qualify for an SRU (under "Bugs whic | 14:32 |
hjd | do not fit under above categories, but (1) have an obviously safe patch and (2) affect an application rather than critical infrastructure packages")? | 14:32 |
ubot2 | Launchpad bug 870006 in globs "missing dependency to python-glade2" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/870006 | 14:33 |
hjd | I am not sure whether anyone would need an update for Oneiric at this point, but if they do... I will of course also mention this is easy to workaround by simply installing the dependency manually. | 14:33 |
seb128 | hjd, not likely to be worth a SRU at this point | 14:36 |
seb128 | hjd, users who are still using oneiric and need python-glade2 probably installed it after this time | 14:37 |
seb128 | hjd, it's not likely that oneiric is getting lot of new users with the LTS out | 14:37 |
hjd | Yes, I'm aware that most people will have installed it manually or upgraded to 12.04 at this point, so likely no one would apply for a SRU. Though, theoretically it would qualify, right? | 14:42 |
hjd | Or do you have a better suggestion for leaving a comment when marking it fix released? | 14:42 |
seb128 | hjd, it would apply for a SRU yes | 14:46 |
seb128 | hjd, you can use the first reply, if the user care enough to do the SRU paperwork etc we can revisit | 14:47 |
laserbled | Hi, i need help. I am an 12.04 with all new updates and when ever I play flash in mozilla/chrome the cpu usage shoots really high. I am on a quad core, and have nvidia integrated graphics...can someone tell me whats wrong ?. There is no issues in my 10.10 | 14:48 |
seb128 | hjd, or just use the third one and change the "doesn't fit the requirements for backporting" by "only important fixes are applied at this point for oneiric and this one is a bug easy to work around if needed" | 14:49 |
LoT | laserbled: you may need to ask in #ubuntu about that, to see whether there's a bug or not. | 14:50 |
LoT | and for the record, 10.10 isnt supported anymore :p | 14:50 |
laserbled | yes I know but there is no issues there. Thats the funny part | 14:50 |
laserbled | I have to end the plugin container process to stop the issue | 14:52 |
LoT | laserbled: again, start in #ubuntu | 14:56 |
laserbled | Yes yes, I have put the question there as well. :) | 14:56 |
LoT | this is the channel for the Bug Squad. The Bug Squad handles bugs, generally, in terms of getting them triaged. We don't typically help diagnose whether there's a bug or not | 14:56 |
laserbled | okie, got it. thanks anyway | 14:57 |
LoT | yep, feel free to lurk if you want though | 14:57 |
LoT | seb128: do you track the mailing list? | 14:57 |
* LoT could use another opinion | 14:57 | |
seb128 | LoT, "the" mailing list? | 14:58 |
seb128 | LoT, define the, Ubuntu has > 1 mailing list | 14:58 |
LoT | seb128: the bugsquad list | 14:59 |
seb128 | LoT, I'm subscribed to this one, I don't read it regularly or in details though, why? | 14:59 |
LoT | well, trying to get input on whether a bug is triagable | 15:00 |
LoT | in one sense it is | 15:00 |
LoT | in another, the bug's not able to be reproduced | 15:00 |
LoT | this is the bug r, | 15:00 |
LoT | bleh | 15:01 |
LoT | damn one sec | 15:01 |
LoT | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg-server/+bug/1021517 | 15:01 |
ubot2 | Ubuntu bug 1021517 in xorg-server "Xorg-server crashes reproducible with GIMP usage" [Undecided,Confirmed] | 15:01 |
LoT | putty is evil | 15:01 |
hjd | seb128: ok thanks. :) I ended up using an edited version of the first response. | 15:02 |
seb128 | LoT, thanks for pointing it | 15:03 |
LoT | seb128: yep, my issue is that its not reproducable here, and i've tested on three desktops, and six different laptops | 15:04 |
LoT | including my heavily-modded-kernel-running laptop | 15:04 |
seb128 | LoT, it might be video card dependant? | 15:04 |
LoT | seb128: it *appears* that way, or hardware dependent | 15:04 |
LoT | but afaict, there's a few different cards in the mix | 15:04 |
LoT | and different hardware configurations | 15:04 |
LoT | which makes me think its not reproducable | 15:04 |
LoT | that, and the stacktraces of Xorg show memory-level segfaults, i didnt see anything really descriptive there | 15:05 |
LoT | also, it appears to be "GIMP dependent" too | 15:05 |
LoT | that, and its against, what, three upstream packages?/ | 15:05 |
LoT | s/packages/projects/ | 15:05 |
LoT | if it were my call, i'd not be discussing this | 15:06 |
LoT | but... it *could* be triagable | 15:06 |
LoT | depending on the point of view | 15:06 |
seb128 | LoT, I'm going to point it to one of our xorg guys | 15:06 |
seb128 | LoT, I fear that has to do with https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg-server/2:1.11.4-0ubuntu10.3 | 15:06 |
LoT | seb128: lemme know what they say, if its triageable, if so i'll have at it and set that. | 15:07 |
* LoT only responded to the email that went out about the bug because he at the time didnt think it triageable | 15:07 | |
seb128 | LoT, well, you can set it to confirmed for sure, but we really need to have an hacker looking at it | 15:07 |
LoT | it is indeed confirmed | 15:07 |
LoT | last i checked there's a high confirmed rate | 15:07 |
LoT | 26 people marked it as confirmed so... | 15:08 |
LoT | seb128: i also believe that it shouldnt be targetted to gimp project on LP, because it was pointed from the gimp package to the xorg-server package, but i'm not going to make that call yet | 15:08 |
seb128 | LoT, right, I think it has to do with inputs btw | 15:09 |
seb128 | "For me this bug is reproducible/ not reproducible on my Thinkpad 410s depending on wheter I disable/enable the touchpad with Fn-F8 before or not." | 15:09 |
seb128 | on the bug | 15:09 |
LoT | huh | 15:09 |
LoT | then its xorg inputdependent | 15:09 |
LoT | that, and also partially hardware dependent | 15:09 |
LoT | because Fn-F8 i think is a weird thinkpad feature | 15:10 |
LoT | (Dell has the decency to not have a function key to disable trackpad. this is also a downside) | 15:10 |
LoT | touchpad* | 15:10 |
LoT | damn my faster-than-my-thoughts fingers. | 15:10 |
LoT | seb128: who did you forward that bug to, the guy that just took it for Precise? | 16:35 |
seb128 | LoT, #ubuntu-x basically but yeah, I assigned it to somebody from the Canonical Desktop Team | 16:36 |
seb128 | LoT, feel free to join #ubuntu-x if you are interested into the details | 16:36 |
LoT | seb128: heh, only marginally, it just showed up on Ask Ubuntu about this exact bug | 16:37 |
LoT | so... | 16:37 |
LoT | kind of now willing to send those who keep posting "This is an issue how do i fix it" on AU to /dev/chaos, because they're technically reporting a bug | 16:38 |
LoT | (offtopic for there) | 16:38 |
LoT | seb128: thanks for forwarding that though, i would have had *no clue* where to send it :P | 16:38 |
LoT | (that's one of those "Uh...?" bugs :P) | 16:38 |
seb128 | LoT, yw, thanks for pointing it | 16:40 |
LoT | indeed | 16:40 |
LoT | why is it conversations on the email system though dont get past only a few messages back and ofrth... | 16:41 |
* LoT thinks the bugsquad and bugcontrol should host a Bugs 101 session on the classroom | 16:41 | |
LoT | so far there's support for ti, but nobody has stepped up to the challenge of proposing what we would talk about, nor has anyone stepped up to lead it :/ | 16:42 |
dpwrussell | Hi, I'm filing bug on booting liveCDs with UEFI, but I'm unsure what package it's supposed to be, the FindRightPackage indicates it should be filed against the kernel, but if I search for "kernel" in the Select a Package dialog, there are too many results. So I'm unsure how to procede. | 16:47 |
seb128 | LoT, what do you mean "conversations on the email system though dont get past only a few messages back and ofrth" ? | 16:48 |
seb128 | dpwrussell, ther kernel is "linux" | 16:48 |
dpwrussell | thanks | 16:48 |
seb128 | yw | 16:49 |
eee444 | hi, could someone hwlp me get my dwl650 to work with aircrack? | 16:59 |
LoT | seb128: theres never long-term discussions about what to do, email responsiveness just drops to zero after about 48 hours (so therefore nothing gets done with proposed ideas unless I dredge them back up) | 17:15 |
LoT | (sorry if my responsiveness is slow, irssi is lagging and i've got work stuff to do xE) | 17:15 |
LoT | xD * | 17:15 |
seb128 | LoT, yeah, sometimes it's hard to get buy off | 17:18 |
LoT | hey seb128, where do wiki bugs get filed on LP, if at all? | 17:28 |
LoT | s/wiki/help.u.c/ | 17:28 |
seb128 | LoT, dunno | 17:29 |
seb128 | LoT, try https://launchpad.net/ubuntu-website/ maybe | 17:29 |
LoT | seb128: LP Bug 1025375 if you care | 17:31 |
ubot2 | Launchpad bug 1025375 in ubuntu-docs "Doom3 Source links appear to be broken on the wiki" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1025375 | 17:31 |
hggdh | micahg: yous subscirption to bugsquad was disabled, excessive bounces (just a warning, just got a mailserv about it) | 17:31 |
seb128 | LoT, thanks | 17:31 |
LoT | IMO its not a bug, but i'm too lazy (also lagging too much) to change it xD | 17:31 |
LoT | seb128: its just invalid links :p | 17:31 |
micahg | hggdh: fixed, thanks | 17:32 |
littlegirl | Hey there, I just fixed a bug. How do I close it out in Launchpad? I've never done this before. (: | 18:40 |
LoT | littlegirl: which bug | 18:42 |
LoT | and define "fixed" | 18:42 |
LoT | did yuo fix it and upload a patch, or...? | 18:42 |
littlegirl | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kubuntu-docs/+bug/852519 | 18:42 |
ubot2 | Ubuntu bug 852519 in kubuntu-docs "Typos and missing entity in Kubuntu 11.10 documentation" [Undecided,New] | 18:42 |
littlegirl | LoT: Yeah, I commited the changes to Launchpad already. | 18:42 |
LoT | committed how | 18:42 |
* LoT checks the bug | 18:42 | |
littlegirl | With Bazaar. I'm on the Kubuntu doc team. (: | 18:43 |
LoT | oh. | 18:43 |
LoT | well you put into the debian changelog for the next version of the package Closes LP: #bugnum | 18:43 |
LoT | or similar | 18:43 |
LoT | what you would do is put "Fix Committed" | 18:43 |
LoT | until the package is released, or whatever, at which point "Fix Released" | 18:44 |
LoT | not sure if the docs package refers to the actual package with documentation or not | 18:44 |
* LoT doesnt normally watch docs packages, outside of nginx or stackapplet) | 18:44 | |
littlegirl | This is an old release. It's for Oneiric. Do I still do that? I'm just trying to close this bug out. (: | 18:44 |
littlegirl | It was typos and errors in the Kubuntu system documentation. It didn't affect Debian. | 18:44 |
LoT | can you link me to the branch you pushed the changes to? | 18:45 |
LoT | if it exists | 18:45 |
LoT | otherwise i'll ping Riddel or someone to take a look and advise | 18:45 |
littlegirl | http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-core-doc/kubuntu-docs/oneiric/files | 18:45 |
littlegirl | I just want to know how to work the https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kubuntu-docs/+bug/852519 page and close out the bug since it's now solved. I have no idea how to change the status of a bug. | 18:45 |
ubot2 | Ubuntu bug 852519 in kubuntu-docs "Typos and missing entity in Kubuntu 11.10 documentation" [Undecided,New] | 18:45 |
LoT | i just said, you'd put "fix committed" | 18:46 |
LoT | BUT | 18:46 |
LoT | you'd need to have the package nominated against oneiric | 18:46 |
LoT | hey micahg around? | 18:46 |
LoT | or mdeslaur | 18:46 |
littlegirl | I'm totally new to all this and have no idea how it's done. (: | 18:46 |
LoT | some other bugcontrol person :P | 18:46 |
LoT | littlegirl: :P sometimes its a bit confusing, even for those of us who triage daily :P | 18:47 |
LoT | someone else on bug control: LP Bug 852519 needs assigning to Oneiric, and probably "Invalid" against Quantal. | 18:47 |
ubot2 | Launchpad bug 852519 in kubuntu-docs "Typos and missing entity in Kubuntu 11.10 documentation" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/852519 | 18:47 |
littlegirl | LOL | 18:47 |
mdeslaur | LoT: one sec, looking | 18:47 |
LoT | mdeslaur: thanks much | 18:48 |
LoT | apparently LP doesnt want me to assign to individual releases *ever*, so... | 18:48 |
LoT | even with bugcontrol it won't let me *shrugs* | 18:48 |
littlegirl | mdeslaur: The changes have been committed and the bug is satisfied. I just don't know the next step(s). | 18:48 |
LoT | LAUNCHPAD, Y U NO ACCEPT MY BZR COMMIT | 18:48 |
LoT | :/ | 18:48 |
* LoT was uploading to a personal junk branch, and apparently bzr does not like that. | 18:49 | |
mdeslaur | littlegirl: commited where? | 18:49 |
littlegirl | LoT: I see the FixCommitted status if I click the triangle next to the kubuntu-docs entry near the top of that page. | 18:49 |
LoT | mdeslaur: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-core-doc/kubuntu-docs/oneiric/files apparently | 18:49 |
LoT | (read up) | 18:49 |
* littlegirl nods | 18:49 | |
LoT | s/read/scroll/ | 18:49 |
littlegirl | The translation team asked me to fix that bug, so I committed the changes. | 18:49 |
LoT | SERIOUSLY?!?!? *beats his EC2 instance* | 18:50 |
littlegirl | LOL | 18:50 |
LoT | sorry about the rant, was working on a bug that required me to push a commit, and its failing | 18:50 |
* LoT blames LP | 18:50 | |
littlegirl | I had gone in there and asked if there was anything we could do better and that was his wish. (: | 18:50 |
penguin42 | LoT: It does like the naming of the branches to be just right as I remember | 18:50 |
mdeslaur | littlegirl: the bug is about the package in ubuntu, so someone needs to prepare an SRU for the bug to be marked as "fix commited" | 18:50 |
littlegirl | What command are you using for the push? | 18:50 |
LoT | mdeslaur: sorry to pull you out of lurkmode :P | 18:50 |
* penguin42 good thing about virtual machines in a cloud - you can't get to them to throw them out of the window | 18:51 | |
littlegirl | mdslaur: Who would do that? | 18:51 |
LoT | littlegirl: anyone with SRU knowledge | 18:51 |
LoT | i can write one up, but you'll have to wait until after i get home | 18:51 |
* mdeslaur goes back into lurk mode | 18:51 | |
* littlegirl is brand new to all this | 18:51 | |
LoT | apaprently the net here at work is headed to implosion-mode, so... | 18:51 |
littlegirl | LoT: Okay, that sounds good. Should I do anything at all on the https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kubuntu-docs/+bug/852519 page or will you do that after you do the SRU stuff? | 18:51 |
ubot2 | Ubuntu bug 852519 in kubuntu-docs "Typos and missing entity in Kubuntu 11.10 documentation" [Undecided,New] | 18:52 |
littlegirl | LoT: Then you must work from home instead. (: | 18:52 |
LoT | mdeslaur: the SRU can be done within that same bug, right? | 18:54 |
LoT | i wont have to create an additional? | 18:54 |
LoT | (typically i've created additional SRU requests) | 18:54 |
mdeslaur | LoT: same bug | 18:54 |
LoT | wonderful | 18:54 |
LoT | you can go back to lurkmode now :) | 18:54 |
LoT | either that or you can beat LP's BZR system for me | 18:55 |
mdeslaur | LoT: I've just nominated it for oneiric-quantal | 18:55 |
mdeslaur | LoT: is it fixed in precise and quantal? | 18:55 |
LoT | mdeslaur: ask littlegirl, i havent thoroughly checked | 18:55 |
littlegirl | Checking... | 18:55 |
littlegirl | This may take a while... | 18:56 |
LoT | :P | 18:56 |
littlegirl | It was a lot of little changes. (: | 18:56 |
LoT | ***WARNING: Networking will go down in 15 minutes for emergency maintenance* | 18:56 |
LoT | well that's my queue to email me the data and show up later | 18:56 |
LoT | littlegirl: if you wouldnt mind privmsging TheLordOfTime, that's my ZNC that I access from home, i dont normally read scrollbacks if i can avoid it (unless i'm pinged, in which case its logged anyways) | 18:57 |
LoT | to send me a reminder XD | 18:57 |
littlegirl | LoT: Are you the one who will be doing whatever needs to be done to it when I'm done? | 18:57 |
LoT | bleh | 19:02 |
littlegirl | Oh, good, you're back! How do I private message TheLordOfTime? I can't find that as an option anywhere in this program. (: | 19:03 |
LoT | littlegirl: use this as a base, but change the information accordingly and add that to the end of your bug: http://paste.ubuntu.com/1095371/ | 19:04 |
LoT | s/your/the/ | 19:04 |
penguin42 | /msg TheLordOfTime secret evil stuff | 19:04 |
LoT | make sure to edit the information accordingly though | 19:04 |
LoT | so it actually matches what is being asked | 19:04 |
penguin42 | littlegirl: Like that ^ | 19:04 |
LoT | then lemme know, i'll help out | 19:04 |
LoT | /msg penguin42 OMG WTH STOP GIVING THE EVIL STUFF OUT TO PEOPLE | 19:05 |
LoT | xD | 19:05 |
LoT | </random> | 19:05 |
LoT | anyways... | 19:05 |
penguin42 | exactly | 19:05 |
littlegirl | Heh, I take it the msg command does it? | 19:06 |
penguin42 | yep | 19:06 |
LoT | although do not do this: /msg TheLordofTime HAI! | 19:07 |
LoT | i'll actually ignore that | 19:07 |
LoT | :P | 19:07 |
littlegirl | LoT: Do I paste the results of editing that template into a comment at the bottom of that bug, or do I click the triangle next to Oneiric, Precise, and Quantal and paste the stuff in the correct one(s) and change the status of each? | 19:08 |
LoT | put it as a comment | 19:08 |
LoT | DO NOT CHANGE THE STATUS OF THE BUG | 19:08 |
LoT | AT ALL | 19:08 |
LoT | the SRU team will have to do that | 19:08 |
* LoT will subscribe them after you add the SRU templace (which I showed you, which i got from here https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Procedure ) | 19:09 | |
LoT | s/template/stuff | 19:09 |
littlegirl | LoT: Ah, okay, gotcha. Good to know. This is why I'm here. If I hadn't come in here, I would probably have just changed the status after figuring out where that was, and imploded the bug. (: | 19:09 |
littlegirl | LoT: Thank you so much for the help! I like to know how things are done properly before attempting them. (: | 19:10 |
littlegirl | I guess I've got my work cut out for me. First I have to find out which releases this affects and whether it needed to be done elsewhere as well. Then I can play with the template and the bug comment. (: | 19:11 |
LoT | mhm | 19:11 |
LoT | make a note for each though, you'll need a separate SRU for each. | 19:11 |
LoT | and i would take a diff from the BZR and upload that as "This is the diff for [blah]" | 19:12 |
LoT | where [blah] is the release | 19:12 |
LoT | but that's just me | 19:12 |
littlegirl | LoT: Good idea, but only needed for ones where the bug is valid, though, right? | 19:12 |
LoT | let me know though if the other releases do not get affected | 19:12 |
LoT | because i'll mark them as... what... | 19:12 |
littlegirl | LoT: Will do. I'm about to grep them all after making a list of what to grep for. (: | 19:12 |
LoT | mdeslaur: what would those get marked as if it doesnt affect, "Invalid"? | 19:13 |
LoT | or "Won't Fix" | 19:13 |
LoT | (i keep pulling you out of lurkmode dont I :P) | 19:13 |
mdeslaur | LoT: I'd put "Fix released" | 19:15 |
* mdeslaur shrugs | 19:15 | |
LoT | heh | 19:15 |
LoT | cool, i'll do that then | 19:15 |
littlegirl | Oooh, messy. Cleanup in aisle nine. (: | 19:35 |
* littlegirl is finding the bug in Precise and Quantal | 19:36 | |
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
epikvision | Hey guys, I wish to fix my first bug. | 21:19 |
epikvision | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pidgin/+bug/1022935 | 21:19 |
ubot2 | Ubuntu bug 1022935 in pidgin "libpurple0 package description typo" [Undecided,New] | 21:19 |
epikvision | it looks pretty manageable. how can I tackle this bug? | 21:20 |
littlegirl | epikvision: I don't have the answer, but maybe you can find it here: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment/FAQ | 21:25 |
epikvision | littlegirl: how do you know if a package has a packaging system? | 21:28 |
littlegirl | epikvision: I don't know - sorry! I'm not a developer. I do documentation. But I would assume if it's a package it must have a packaging system, or at least it must be handled by one. (: | 21:29 |
epikvision | alrighty, ty | 21:29 |
littlegirl | Any time, and good luck. (: | 21:30 |
TheLordOfTime | ohai epikvision | 22:09 |
epikvision | HEY | 22:10 |
epikvision | nice to see you again, LordOfTime | 22:10 |
TheLordOfTime | epikvision: i'm not certain we submit fixes for minor typos | 22:10 |
TheLordOfTime | usually if we can compound that into another bug's fix, we can kill two birds with one stone | 22:10 |
TheLordOfTime | but typically minor typos don't get an upload. | 22:10 |
epikvision | I see. Perhaps I need to find a more suitable challenge. | 22:10 |
TheLordOfTime | might check bitesize bugs | 22:11 |
epikvision | but I'm not adept with any program languages yet. | 22:11 |
TheLordOfTime | where the hell is that list... | 22:11 |
epikvision | it's hard to judge what define an easy and a hard bug. | 22:11 |
epikvision | :( | 22:11 |
TheLordOfTime | now you know why i prefer triaging to fixing :P | 22:12 |
TheLordOfTime | less work for me | 22:12 |
epikvision | Oh yes. | 22:12 |
TheLordOfTime | well... not true when you're the security bug changes guy for ubuntu for a specific package | 22:13 |
* TheLordOfTime glares at nginx for a few seconds, then returns focus to IRC | 22:13 | |
TheLordOfTime | speaking of which | 22:13 |
* TheLordOfTime hops over to -hardened | 22:14 | |
TheLordOfTime | REALLY? | 22:14 |
TheLordOfTime | damn it how do i miss these things | 22:14 |
epikvision | TheLordOfTime: what is the recommended way to install quantal? | 22:19 |
epikvision | while still keeping precise? QEMU totally fails, Virtualbox not so convenient, | 22:19 |
epikvision | say I want to fix a typo. How do I access the command's output to fix it up? | 23:23 |
epikvision | I'm stumped on working on a fix right now. | 23:24 |
TheLordOfTime | epikvision: which bug | 23:27 |
epikvision | remember the typo one I showed you earlier? I want to at least try fixing something. | 23:27 |
TheLordOfTime | i'll walk you through via privmsg in a bit, currently having a discussion with the security team on an nginx bug | 23:27 |
TheLordOfTime | epikvision: bug number. my logs routinely clear :P | 23:27 |
epikvision | 1022935 | 23:27 |
TheLordOfTime | LP Bug 1022935 | 23:28 |
ubot2 | Launchpad bug 1022935 in pidgin "libpurple0 package description typo" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1022935 | 23:28 |
epikvision | as mentioned earlier, I have to no experience in bug fixing, so even trying it out seems like a good way to get a feel for bug fixing. | 23:28 |
TheLordOfTime | epikvision: if you want, i'll guide you through where you need to edit, but it'll take a while | 23:29 |
* TheLordOfTime is addressing an nginx security bug with the security team | 23:29 | |
epikvision | ok, thanks. | 23:29 |
epikvision | that'll help Lord. | 23:29 |
epikvision | ofTime. lol | 23:29 |
* epikvision waits patiently. | 23:31 | |
TheLordOfTime | epikvision: do me a favor (first task). confirm if this was fixed in Quantal. | 23:39 |
TheLordOfTime | (if its fixed in quantal, well... the bug gets marked "Fix Released" or "Invalid" against quantal) | 23:40 |
TheLordOfTime | or something. | 23:40 |
epikvision | it hasn't been fixed. | 23:43 |
TheLordOfTime | okay, you'll need to fix it for Quantal then | 23:44 |
epikvision | whoa | 23:44 |
epikvision | how can I get quantal set up in my computer? | 23:44 |
TheLordOfTime | you wont need quantal to fix it :P | 23:45 |
TheLordOfTime | i'll explain shortly give me a few minutes | 23:45 |
* TheLordOfTime is downloading the quantal package right now | 23:45 | |
* epikvision grips his chair. | 23:45 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!