[05:55] <r0csteady> TheLordOfTime: I spent quite a bit of time screwing around with launchpad before I could even get to the site (https://help.ubuntu.com/community/ReportingBugs), but am reading it now.
[05:56] <r0csteady> I had to generate a gpg key, push it to the ubuntu server, import it to launchpad, and then sign the ubuntu code of conduct. Learned tons!
[12:19] <TheLordOfTime> BugSquad: this was sent via the mailing list for triaging.  Additonal confirms from bugsquad are necessary, as the bug is *not* reproducable in three other systems here.  Please confirm whether you can reproduce this bug.
[12:20] <TheLordOfTime> bug control members: i was not able to personally reproduce this bug, but given there's a large number of reports of this thus far, it might be ready for triaging.  i do not believe it is because it appears to be a randomly appearing bug in specific hardware configurations.
[12:20] <TheLordOfTime> Bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg-server/+bug/1021517
[12:20] <ubot2> Ubuntu bug 1021517 in xorg-server "Xorg-server crashes reproducible with GIMP usage" [Undecided,Confirmed]
[14:32] <hjd> Bug 870006 is still present in Oneiric, but fixed in Precise. Looking at the changelog (http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/g/globs/current/changelog) this was resolved by 0.2.0~svn50-3 which added the dependency. When picking the right Fix Released comment (https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Responses#Fixed_in_Development_release_while_still_existing_in_a_previous_release), would this technically qualify for an SRU (under "Bugs whic
[14:32] <hjd> do not fit under above categories, but (1) have an obviously safe patch and (2) affect an application rather than critical infrastructure packages")?
[14:33] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 870006 in globs "missing dependency to python-glade2" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/870006
[14:33] <hjd> I am not sure whether anyone would need an update for Oneiric at this point, but if they do... I will of course also mention this is easy to workaround by simply installing the dependency manually.
[14:36] <seb128> hjd, not likely to be worth a SRU at this point
[14:37] <seb128> hjd, users who are still using oneiric and need python-glade2 probably installed it after this time
[14:37] <seb128> hjd, it's not likely that oneiric is getting lot of new users with the LTS out
[14:42] <hjd> Yes, I'm aware that most people will have installed it manually or upgraded to 12.04 at this point, so likely no one would apply for a SRU. Though, theoretically it would qualify, right?
[14:42] <hjd> Or do you have a better suggestion for leaving a comment when marking it fix released?
[14:46] <seb128> hjd, it would apply for a SRU yes
[14:47] <seb128> hjd, you can use the first reply, if the user care enough to do the SRU paperwork etc we can revisit
[14:48] <laserbled> Hi, i need help. I am an 12.04 with all new updates and when ever I play flash in mozilla/chrome the cpu usage shoots really high. I am on a quad core, and have nvidia integrated graphics...can someone tell me whats wrong ?. There is no issues in my 10.10
[14:49] <seb128> hjd, or just use the third one and change the "doesn't fit the requirements for backporting" by "only important fixes are applied at this point for oneiric and this one is a bug easy to work around if needed"
[14:50] <LoT> laserbled: you may need to ask in #ubuntu about that, to see whether there's a bug or not.
[14:50] <LoT> and for the record, 10.10 isnt supported anymore :p
[14:50] <laserbled> yes I know but there is no issues there. Thats the funny part
[14:52] <laserbled> I have to end the plugin container process to stop the issue
[14:56] <LoT> laserbled: again, start in #ubuntu
[14:56] <laserbled> Yes yes, I have put the question there as well. :)
[14:56] <LoT> this is the channel for the Bug Squad.  The Bug Squad handles bugs, generally, in terms of getting them triaged.  We don't typically help diagnose whether there's a bug or not
[14:57] <laserbled> okie, got it. thanks anyway
[14:57] <LoT> yep, feel free to lurk if you want though
[14:57] <LoT> seb128: do you track the mailing list?
[14:57]  * LoT could use another opinion
[14:58] <seb128> LoT, "the" mailing list?
[14:58] <seb128> LoT, define the, Ubuntu has > 1 mailing list
[14:59] <LoT> seb128: the bugsquad list
[14:59] <seb128> LoT, I'm subscribed to this one, I don't read it regularly or in details though, why?
[15:00] <LoT> well, trying to get input on whether a bug is triagable
[15:00] <LoT> in one sense it is
[15:00] <LoT> in another, the bug's not able to be reproduced
[15:00] <LoT> this is the bug r,
[15:01] <LoT> bleh
[15:01] <LoT> damn one sec
[15:01] <LoT> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg-server/+bug/1021517
[15:01] <ubot2> Ubuntu bug 1021517 in xorg-server "Xorg-server crashes reproducible with GIMP usage" [Undecided,Confirmed]
[15:01] <LoT> putty is evil
[15:02] <hjd> seb128: ok thanks. :) I ended up using an edited version of the first response.
[15:03] <seb128> LoT, thanks for pointing it
[15:04] <LoT> seb128: yep, my issue is that its not reproducable here, and i've tested on three desktops, and six different laptops
[15:04] <LoT> including my heavily-modded-kernel-running laptop
[15:04] <seb128> LoT, it might be video card dependant?
[15:04] <LoT> seb128: it *appears* that way, or hardware dependent
[15:04] <LoT> but afaict, there's a few different cards in the mix
[15:04] <LoT> and different hardware configurations
[15:04] <LoT> which makes me think its not reproducable
[15:05] <LoT> that, and the stacktraces of Xorg show memory-level segfaults, i didnt see anything really descriptive there
[15:05] <LoT> also, it appears to be "GIMP dependent" too
[15:05] <LoT> that, and its against, what, three upstream packages?/
[15:05] <LoT> s/packages/projects/
[15:06] <LoT> if it were my call, i'd not be discussing this
[15:06] <LoT> but... it *could* be triagable
[15:06] <LoT> depending on the point of view
[15:06] <seb128> LoT, I'm going to point it to one of our xorg guys
[15:06] <seb128> LoT, I fear that has to do with https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg-server/2:1.11.4-0ubuntu10.3
[15:07] <LoT> seb128: lemme know what they say, if its triageable, if so i'll have at it and set that.
[15:07]  * LoT only responded to the email that went out about the bug because he at the time didnt think it triageable
[15:07] <seb128> LoT, well, you can set it to confirmed for sure, but we really need to have an hacker looking at it
[15:07] <LoT> it is indeed confirmed
[15:07] <LoT> last i checked there's a high confirmed rate
[15:08] <LoT> 26 people marked it as confirmed so...
[15:08] <LoT> seb128: i also believe that it shouldnt be targetted to gimp project on LP, because it was pointed from the gimp package to the xorg-server package, but i'm not going to make that call yet
[15:09] <seb128> LoT, right, I think it has to do with inputs btw
[15:09] <seb128> "For me this bug is reproducible/ not reproducible on my Thinkpad 410s depending on wheter I disable/enable the touchpad with Fn-F8 before or not."
[15:09] <seb128> on the bug
[15:09] <LoT> huh
[15:09] <LoT> then its xorg inputdependent
[15:09] <LoT> that, and also partially hardware dependent
[15:10] <LoT> because Fn-F8 i think is a weird thinkpad feature
[15:10] <LoT> (Dell has the decency to not have a function key to disable trackpad.  this is also a downside)
[15:10] <LoT> touchpad*
[15:10] <LoT> damn my faster-than-my-thoughts fingers.
[16:35] <LoT> seb128: who did you forward that bug to, the guy that just took it for Precise?
[16:36] <seb128> LoT, #ubuntu-x basically but yeah, I assigned it to somebody from the Canonical Desktop Team
[16:36] <seb128> LoT, feel free to join #ubuntu-x if you are interested into the details
[16:37] <LoT> seb128: heh, only marginally, it just showed up on Ask Ubuntu about this exact bug
[16:37] <LoT> so...
[16:38] <LoT> kind of now willing to send those who keep posting "This is an issue how do i fix it" on AU to /dev/chaos, because they're technically reporting a bug
[16:38] <LoT> (offtopic for there)
[16:38] <LoT> seb128: thanks for forwarding that though, i would have had *no clue* where to send it :P
[16:38] <LoT> (that's one of those "Uh...?" bugs :P)
[16:40] <seb128> LoT, yw, thanks for pointing it
[16:40] <LoT> indeed
[16:41] <LoT> why is it conversations on the email system though dont get past only a few messages back and ofrth...
[16:41]  * LoT thinks the bugsquad and bugcontrol should host a Bugs 101 session on the classroom
[16:42] <LoT> so far there's support for ti, but nobody has stepped up to the challenge of proposing what we would talk about, nor has anyone stepped up to lead it :/
[16:47] <dpwrussell> Hi, I'm filing bug on booting liveCDs with UEFI, but I'm unsure what package it's supposed to be, the FindRightPackage indicates it should be filed against the kernel, but if I search for "kernel" in the Select a Package dialog, there are too many results. So I'm unsure how to procede.
[16:48] <seb128> LoT, what do you mean "conversations on the email system though dont get past only a few messages back and ofrth" ?
[16:48] <seb128> dpwrussell, ther kernel is "linux"
[16:48] <dpwrussell> thanks
[16:49] <seb128> yw
[16:59] <eee444> hi, could someone hwlp me get my dwl650 to work with aircrack?
[17:15] <LoT> seb128: theres never long-term discussions about what to do, email responsiveness just drops to zero after about 48 hours (so therefore nothing gets done with proposed ideas unless I dredge them back up)
[17:15] <LoT> (sorry if my responsiveness is slow, irssi is lagging and i've got work stuff to do xE)
[17:15] <LoT> xD *
[17:18] <seb128> LoT, yeah, sometimes it's hard to get buy off
[17:28] <LoT> hey seb128, where do wiki bugs get filed on LP, if at all?
[17:28] <LoT> s/wiki/help.u.c/
[17:29] <seb128> LoT, dunno
[17:29] <seb128> LoT, try https://launchpad.net/ubuntu-website/ maybe
[17:31] <LoT> seb128: LP Bug 1025375 if you care
[17:31] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 1025375 in ubuntu-docs "Doom3 Source links appear to be broken on the wiki" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1025375
[17:31] <hggdh> micahg: yous subscirption to bugsquad was disabled, excessive bounces (just a warning, just got a mailserv about it)
[17:31] <seb128> LoT, thanks
[17:31] <LoT> IMO its not a bug, but i'm too lazy (also lagging too much) to change it xD
[17:31] <LoT> seb128: its just invalid links :p
[17:32] <micahg> hggdh: fixed, thanks
[18:40] <littlegirl> Hey there, I just fixed a bug. How do I close it out in Launchpad? I've never done this before. (:
[18:42] <LoT> littlegirl: which bug
[18:42] <LoT> and define "fixed"
[18:42] <LoT> did yuo fix it and upload a patch, or...?
[18:42] <littlegirl> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kubuntu-docs/+bug/852519
[18:42] <ubot2> Ubuntu bug 852519 in kubuntu-docs "Typos and missing entity in Kubuntu 11.10 documentation" [Undecided,New]
[18:42] <littlegirl> LoT: Yeah, I commited the changes to Launchpad already.
[18:42] <LoT> committed how
[18:42]  * LoT checks the bug
[18:43] <littlegirl> With Bazaar. I'm on the Kubuntu doc team. (:
[18:43] <LoT> oh.
[18:43] <LoT> well you put into the debian changelog for the next version of the package Closes LP: #bugnum
[18:43] <LoT> or similar
[18:43] <LoT> what you would do is put "Fix Committed"
[18:44] <LoT> until the package is released, or whatever, at which point "Fix Released"
[18:44] <LoT> not sure if the docs package refers to the actual package with documentation or not
[18:44]  * LoT doesnt normally watch docs packages, outside of nginx or stackapplet)
[18:44] <littlegirl> This is an old release. It's for Oneiric. Do I still do that? I'm just trying to close this bug out. (:
[18:44] <littlegirl> It was typos and errors in the Kubuntu system documentation. It didn't affect Debian.
[18:45] <LoT> can you link me to the branch you pushed the changes to?
[18:45] <LoT> if it exists
[18:45] <LoT> otherwise i'll ping Riddel or someone to take a look and advise
[18:45] <littlegirl> http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-core-doc/kubuntu-docs/oneiric/files
[18:45] <littlegirl> I just want to know how to work the https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kubuntu-docs/+bug/852519 page and close out the bug since it's now solved. I have no idea how to change the status of a bug.
[18:45] <ubot2> Ubuntu bug 852519 in kubuntu-docs "Typos and missing entity in Kubuntu 11.10 documentation" [Undecided,New]
[18:46] <LoT> i just said, you'd put "fix committed"
[18:46] <LoT> BUT
[18:46] <LoT> you'd need to have the package nominated against oneiric
[18:46] <LoT> hey micahg around?
[18:46] <LoT> or mdeslaur
[18:46] <littlegirl> I'm totally new to all this and have no idea how it's done. (:
[18:46] <LoT> some other bugcontrol person :P
[18:47] <LoT> littlegirl: :P  sometimes its a bit confusing, even for those of us who triage daily :P
[18:47] <LoT> someone else on bug control:  LP Bug 852519 needs assigning to Oneiric, and probably "Invalid" against Quantal.
[18:47] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 852519 in kubuntu-docs "Typos and missing entity in Kubuntu 11.10 documentation" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/852519
[18:47] <littlegirl> LOL
[18:47] <mdeslaur> LoT: one sec, looking
[18:48] <LoT> mdeslaur: thanks much
[18:48] <LoT> apparently LP doesnt want me to assign to individual releases *ever*, so...
[18:48] <LoT> even with bugcontrol it won't let me *shrugs*
[18:48] <littlegirl> mdeslaur: The changes have been committed and the bug is satisfied. I just don't know the next step(s).
[18:48] <LoT> LAUNCHPAD, Y U NO ACCEPT MY BZR COMMIT
[18:48] <LoT> :/
[18:49]  * LoT was uploading to a personal junk branch, and apparently bzr does not like that.
[18:49] <mdeslaur> littlegirl: commited where?
[18:49] <littlegirl> LoT: I see the FixCommitted status if I click the triangle next to the kubuntu-docs entry near the top of that page.
[18:49] <LoT> mdeslaur: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-core-doc/kubuntu-docs/oneiric/files apparently
[18:49] <LoT> (read up)
[18:49]  * littlegirl nods
[18:49] <LoT> s/read/scroll/
[18:49] <littlegirl> The translation team asked me to fix that bug, so I committed the changes.
[18:50] <LoT> SERIOUSLY?!?!?  *beats his EC2 instance*
[18:50] <littlegirl> LOL
[18:50] <LoT> sorry about the rant, was working on a bug that required me to push a commit, and its failing
[18:50]  * LoT blames LP
[18:50] <littlegirl> I had gone in there and asked if there was anything we could do better and that was his wish. (:
[18:50] <penguin42> LoT: It does like the naming of the branches to be just right as I remember
[18:50] <mdeslaur> littlegirl: the bug is about the package in ubuntu, so someone needs to prepare an SRU for the bug to be marked as "fix commited"
[18:50] <littlegirl> What command are you using for the push?
[18:50] <LoT> mdeslaur: sorry to pull you out of lurkmode :P
[18:51]  * penguin42 good thing about virtual machines in a cloud - you can't get to them to throw them out of the window
[18:51] <littlegirl> mdslaur: Who would do that?
[18:51] <LoT> littlegirl: anyone with SRU knowledge
[18:51] <LoT> i can write one up, but you'll have to wait until after i get home
[18:51]  * mdeslaur goes back into lurk mode
[18:51]  * littlegirl is brand new to all this
[18:51] <LoT> apaprently the net here at work is headed to implosion-mode, so...
[18:51] <littlegirl> LoT: Okay, that sounds good. Should I do anything at all on the https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kubuntu-docs/+bug/852519 page or will you do that after you do the SRU stuff?
[18:52] <ubot2> Ubuntu bug 852519 in kubuntu-docs "Typos and missing entity in Kubuntu 11.10 documentation" [Undecided,New]
[18:52] <littlegirl> LoT: Then you must work from home instead. (:
[18:54] <LoT> mdeslaur: the SRU can be done within that same bug, right?
[18:54] <LoT> i wont have to create an additional?
[18:54] <LoT> (typically i've created additional SRU requests)
[18:54] <mdeslaur> LoT: same bug
[18:54] <LoT> wonderful
[18:54] <LoT> you can go back to lurkmode now :)
[18:55] <LoT> either that or you can beat LP's BZR system for me
[18:55] <mdeslaur> LoT: I've just nominated it for oneiric-quantal
[18:55] <mdeslaur> LoT: is it fixed in precise and quantal?
[18:55] <LoT> mdeslaur: ask littlegirl, i havent thoroughly checked
[18:55] <littlegirl> Checking...
[18:56] <littlegirl> This may take a while...
[18:56] <LoT> :P
[18:56] <littlegirl> It was a lot of little changes. (:
[18:56] <LoT> ***WARNING: Networking will go down in 15 minutes for emergency maintenance*
[18:56] <LoT> well that's my queue to email me the data and show up later
[18:57] <LoT> littlegirl: if you wouldnt mind privmsging TheLordOfTime, that's my ZNC that I access from home, i dont normally read scrollbacks if i can avoid it (unless i'm pinged, in which case its logged anyways)
[18:57] <LoT> to send me a reminder XD
[18:57] <littlegirl> LoT: Are you the one who will be doing whatever needs to be done to it when I'm done?
[19:02] <LoT> bleh
[19:03] <littlegirl> Oh, good, you're back! How do I private message TheLordOfTime? I can't find that as an option anywhere in this program. (:
[19:04] <LoT> littlegirl: use this as a base, but change the information accordingly and add that to the end of your bug:  http://paste.ubuntu.com/1095371/
[19:04] <LoT> s/your/the/
[19:04] <penguin42>  /msg TheLordOfTime secret evil stuff
[19:04] <LoT> make sure to edit the information accordingly though
[19:04] <LoT> so it actually matches what is being asked
[19:04] <penguin42> littlegirl: Like that ^
[19:04] <LoT> then lemme know, i'll help out
[19:05] <LoT>  /msg penguin42 OMG WTH STOP GIVING THE EVIL STUFF OUT TO PEOPLE
[19:05] <LoT> xD

[19:05] <LoT> anyways...
[19:05] <penguin42> exactly
[19:06] <littlegirl> Heh, I take it the msg command does it?
[19:06] <penguin42> yep
[19:07] <LoT> although do not do this: /msg TheLordofTime HAI!
[19:07] <LoT> i'll actually ignore that
[19:07] <LoT> :P
[19:08] <littlegirl> LoT: Do I paste the results of editing that template into a comment at the bottom of that bug, or do I click the triangle next to Oneiric, Precise, and Quantal and paste the stuff in the correct one(s) and change the status of each?
[19:08] <LoT> put it as a comment
[19:08] <LoT> DO NOT CHANGE THE STATUS OF THE BUG
[19:08] <LoT> AT ALL
[19:08] <LoT> the SRU team will have to do that
[19:09]  * LoT will subscribe them after you add the SRU templace (which I showed you, which i got from here https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Procedure )
[19:09] <LoT> s/template/stuff
[19:09] <littlegirl> LoT: Ah, okay, gotcha. Good to know. This is why I'm here. If I hadn't come in here, I would probably have just changed the status after figuring out where that was, and imploded the bug. (:
[19:10] <littlegirl> LoT: Thank you so much for the help! I like to know how things are done properly before attempting them. (:
[19:11] <littlegirl> I guess I've got my work cut out for me. First I have to find out which releases this affects and whether it needed to be done elsewhere as well. Then I can play with the template and the bug comment. (:
[19:11] <LoT> mhm
[19:11] <LoT> make a note for each though, you'll need a separate SRU for each.
[19:12] <LoT> and i would take a diff from the BZR and upload that as "This is the diff for [blah]"
[19:12] <LoT> where [blah] is the release
[19:12] <LoT> but that's just me
[19:12] <littlegirl> LoT: Good idea, but only needed for ones where the bug is valid, though, right?
[19:12] <LoT> let me know though if the other releases do not get affected
[19:12] <LoT> because i'll mark them as... what...
[19:12] <littlegirl> LoT: Will do. I'm about to grep them all after making a list of what to grep for. (:
[19:13] <LoT> mdeslaur: what would those get marked as if it doesnt affect, "Invalid"?
[19:13] <LoT> or "Won't Fix"
[19:13] <LoT> (i keep pulling you out of lurkmode dont I :P)
[19:15] <mdeslaur> LoT: I'd put "Fix released"
[19:15]  * mdeslaur shrugs
[19:15] <LoT> heh
[19:15] <LoT> cool, i'll do that then
[19:35] <littlegirl> Oooh, messy. Cleanup in aisle nine. (:
[19:36]  * littlegirl is finding the bug in Precise and Quantal
[21:19] <epikvision> Hey guys, I wish to fix my first bug.
[21:19] <epikvision> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pidgin/+bug/1022935
[21:19] <ubot2> Ubuntu bug 1022935 in pidgin "libpurple0 package description typo" [Undecided,New]
[21:20] <epikvision> it looks pretty manageable.  how can I tackle this bug?
[21:25] <littlegirl> epikvision: I don't have the answer, but maybe you can find it here: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment/FAQ
[21:28] <epikvision> littlegirl: how do you know if a package has a packaging system?
[21:29] <littlegirl> epikvision: I don't know - sorry! I'm not a developer. I do documentation. But I would assume if it's a package it must have a packaging system, or at least it must be handled by one. (:
[21:29] <epikvision> alrighty, ty
[21:30] <littlegirl> Any time, and good luck. (:
[22:09] <TheLordOfTime> ohai epikvision
[22:10] <epikvision> HEY
[22:10] <epikvision> nice to see you again, LordOfTime
[22:10] <TheLordOfTime> epikvision:  i'm not certain we submit fixes for minor typos
[22:10] <TheLordOfTime> usually if we can compound that into another bug's fix, we can kill two birds with one stone
[22:10] <TheLordOfTime> but typically minor typos don't get an upload.
[22:10] <epikvision> I see.  Perhaps I need to find a more suitable challenge.
[22:11] <TheLordOfTime> might check bitesize bugs
[22:11] <epikvision> but I'm not adept with any program languages yet.
[22:11] <TheLordOfTime> where the hell is that list...
[22:11] <epikvision> it's hard to judge what define an easy and a hard bug.
[22:11] <epikvision> :(
[22:12] <TheLordOfTime> now you know why i prefer triaging to fixing :P
[22:12] <TheLordOfTime> less work for me
[22:12] <epikvision> Oh yes.
[22:13] <TheLordOfTime> well... not true when you're the security bug changes guy for ubuntu for a specific package
[22:13]  * TheLordOfTime glares at nginx for a few seconds, then returns focus to IRC
[22:13] <TheLordOfTime> speaking of which
[22:14]  * TheLordOfTime hops over to -hardened
[22:14] <TheLordOfTime> REALLY?
[22:14] <TheLordOfTime> damn it how do i miss these things
[22:19] <epikvision> TheLordOfTime: what is the recommended way to install quantal?
[22:19] <epikvision> while still keeping precise?  QEMU totally fails, Virtualbox not so convenient,
[23:23] <epikvision> say I want to fix a typo.  How do I access the command's output to fix it up?
[23:24] <epikvision> I'm stumped on working on a fix right now.
[23:27] <TheLordOfTime> epikvision:  which bug
[23:27] <epikvision> remember the typo one I showed you earlier? I want to at least try fixing something.
[23:27] <TheLordOfTime> i'll walk you through via privmsg in a bit, currently having a discussion with the security team on an nginx bug
[23:27] <TheLordOfTime> epikvision:  bug number.  my logs routinely clear :P
[23:27] <epikvision> 1022935
[23:28] <TheLordOfTime> LP Bug 1022935
[23:28] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 1022935 in pidgin "libpurple0 package description typo" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1022935
[23:28] <epikvision> as mentioned earlier, I have to no experience in bug fixing, so even trying it out seems like a good way to get a feel for bug fixing.
[23:29] <TheLordOfTime> epikvision:  if you want, i'll guide you through where you need to edit, but it'll take a while
[23:29]  * TheLordOfTime is addressing an nginx security bug with the security team
[23:29] <epikvision> ok, thanks.
[23:29] <epikvision> that'll help Lord.
[23:29] <epikvision> ofTime. lol
[23:31]  * epikvision waits patiently.
[23:39] <TheLordOfTime> epikvision:  do me a favor (first task).  confirm if this was fixed in Quantal.
[23:40] <TheLordOfTime> (if its fixed in quantal, well... the bug gets marked "Fix Released" or "Invalid" against quantal)
[23:40] <TheLordOfTime> or something.
[23:43] <epikvision> it hasn't been fixed.
[23:44] <TheLordOfTime> okay, you'll need to fix it for Quantal then
[23:44] <epikvision> whoa
[23:44] <epikvision> how can I get quantal set up in my computer?
[23:45] <TheLordOfTime> you wont need quantal to fix it :P
[23:45] <TheLordOfTime> i'll explain shortly give me a few minutes
[23:45]  * TheLordOfTime is downloading the quantal package right now
[23:45]  * epikvision grips his chair.