[10:09] <davmor2> guys I'm hitting an issue on install that I had before in precise.  I get the the screen Choose a Picture, the webcam is initiated and then locks up the system, this is a regression again over precise, however I'm not sure how I can help diagnose it for you
[10:18] <virtx> hello
[10:18] <virtx> is there a way to recompile *only* one module (ext2, in this case) using build directory in /lib/modules ?
[10:18] <virtx> i just copied the ext2/ dir from kernel tree... how can i compile it?
[11:09] <virtx> uhuh?
=== dileks_ is now known as dileks
[11:55] <caribou> smb: ping
[17:41] <hggdh> ogra_: hi, a quick question -- are there no new images for quantal server omap4?
[17:42] <ogra_> hggdh, preinstalled seems to fail atm, we are actually waiting for x86 server to switch to squashfs images and were planning to do that switch as well on arm
[17:42] <ogra_> if you need to install headless use netinst 
[17:42] <hggdh> ogra_: thank you sir
[18:32] <jjohansen> ogasawara, bjf: I plan to be joining you guys wed, thurs
[18:32] <bjf> jjohansen: ack, 
[18:35] <ogasawara> bjf: ack.  just fyi, we'll only be around till around 1pm on wed.  we're doing a team activity wed afternoon.
[18:35] <ogasawara> bah
[18:35] <ogasawara> jjohansen: ^^
[18:37] <jjohansen> ogasawara: oh, hrmm okay that will be fine. /me can't make the other days
[20:55] <slangasek> apw: /etc/initramfs-tools/initramfs.conf
[20:55] <slangasek> (fwiw)
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel
[20:59] <slangasek> apw, smb`: to test disabling plymouth, hack /usr/share/initramfs-tools/conf-hooks.d/cryptsetup
[21:04] <bjf> arges: just updated the leap-second incident page
=== kentb is now known as kentb-out
[23:17] <infinity> bjf: I'm confused by bug #1020888 which has a "verification-done" tag, but the regression-testing task isn't done.
[23:17] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 1020888 in linux-armadaxp "linux-armadaxp: 3.2.0-1605.8 -proposed tracker" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1020888
[23:18] <infinity> bjf: Also, speaking of the verification-* tags, which you don't normally use in the kernel SRU workflow, it wouldn't hurt if you set verification-done when those tracking bugs land in the "promote-to-{updates,security}" state.
[23:18] <infinity> bjf: (But, I'm going to twiddle our scripts to better interpret the kernel SRU bugs anyway)
[23:32] <bjf> infinity, the bug looks correct. though we don't normally use the 'verification-needed' / 'verification-done' tags
[23:38] <RAOF> Can I file a bug against linux that won't show up on any of your lists?
[23:39] <RAOF> There's a drm limitation that is relevant to the system compositor; I'd like to file the bug and associate it with the blueprint, but I don't want it to bug you guys at all.
[23:39] <bjf> RAOF, we are used to ignoring your bugs, a new one will not have a big impact
[23:40] <RAOF> And I guess I'll add bot-stop-nagging to it, too.
[23:48] <infinity> bjf: Yeah, I know you don't normally set the tag, I noticed cause it lit up green in our list. ;)
[23:49] <bjf> infinity: heh, i just bugged vanhoof, he removed the tag
[23:49] <infinity> (saw that too)