| PaoloRotolo | Good morning | 06:30 |
|---|---|---|
| dpm | morning PaoloRotolo :) | 09:08 |
| PaoloRotolo | hi dpm | 09:52 |
| coolbhavi | hi PaoloRotolo dpm :) good noon! | 10:37 |
| PaoloRotolo | hey coolbhavi | 10:41 |
| dpm | hey coolbhavi :) | 12:55 |
| coolbhavi | hey dpm | 12:56 |
| coolbhavi | how have you been? | 12:56 |
| dpm | busy busy, but well :) | 12:57 |
| dpm | how's the voting coming along? | 12:57 |
| coolbhavi | almost done around 90 apps | 12:57 |
| coolbhavi | still to go | 12:58 |
| coolbhavi | yours? | 12:58 |
| coolbhavi | dpm, how to test time widget for harvest? | 13:02 |
| dpm | coolbhavi, sorry, I don't know, I haven't come to that one | 13:27 |
| dpm | slow progress here while I'm doing other things | 13:27 |
| coolbhavi | dpm, no issues figured out it needs a harvest account on getharvest.com | 13:28 |
| dpm | ok, cool | 13:30 |
| mhall119 | highvoltage: would it be considered bad form for me to review my own app submission and submit it for voting? | 15:30 |
| mhall119 | quickly-gtk is the only app showdown submission in "Needs Review" | 15:36 |
| dpm | \o/ | 15:37 |
| dpm | I guess you know how to contact the author :) | 15:37 |
| mhall119 | yeah, but I don't want to be the one to give it the green-light for voting | 15:38 |
| mhall119 | unless everyone else is okay with that | 15:38 |
| dpm | makes sense :) | 15:51 |
| stgraber | I don't have a problem with that, we're still going to review it as part of the voting process | 15:51 |
| stgraber | it's not like you're voting on it or anything like that and I'm sure you passed it through the same checks as the rest of the lot | 15:52 |
| mhall119 | stgraber: cool,thanks | 15:55 |
| mhall119 | Pending Review == 0 \o/ | 15:59 |
| highvoltage | mhall119: I can't see a reason why it would be bad form | 16:17 |
| highvoltage | mhall119: actually I'm fine with any author giving their app up for voting, in an ideal world I guess that's how it would work | 16:17 |
| highvoltage | mhall119: I think the only reason we mostly do things the way we do now is so that submitters can have an extra step where they get some guidance with their package | 16:18 |
| mhall119 | highvoltage: thanks, I've sent it to the ML | 16:27 |
| jvrbanac | If someone has a spare moment, could someone move (On Trello) Wizz RSS over to Voting? I re-reviewed the app and the issues have been fixed. | 17:50 |
| dpm | jvrbanac, done | 18:00 |
| jvrbanac | dpm, Thanks! | 18:04 |
| highvoltage | steam4linux!? | 18:46 |
| highvoltage | and it's gplv3? | 18:46 |
| stgraber | you didn't read the description apparently ;) | 18:49 |
| highvoltage | yeah it was rather dissapointing :( | 18:50 |
| jono | highvoltage, man, you are rocking the voting :-) | 19:10 |
| pratik_narain | I would like to help reviewing the showdown apps | 19:14 |
| mhall119 | highvoltage: thanks for the votes, can you put your concerns about RedThat and Trading Cards as feedback on their MyApps page? | 19:34 |
| highvoltage | mhall119: I can't see redthat in myapps, do you have a link? | 19:41 |
| mhall119 | highvoltage: https://myapps.developer.ubuntu.com/dev/apps/1138/ | 19:48 |
| === achuni_ is now known as achuni | ||
| Phoenix87 | hallo | 20:50 |
| Phoenix87 | mhall119: hallo! you here? | 20:50 |
| Phoenix87 | i have received your comment on the feedback tab | 20:51 |
| mhall119 | Phoenix87: here | 20:54 |
| Phoenix87 | mhall119: do I have to change my branch or repackage the app again? | 20:55 |
| Phoenix87 | or both | 20:55 |
| mhall119 | Phoenix87: you should make the changes to debian/rules in your branch | 20:55 |
| Phoenix87 | mhall119: you mean debian/control ? | 20:56 |
| mhall119 | but you don't need to resubmit until you have other changes you want to submit, I've sent the current code + my changes for voting to get it into the Software Center | 20:56 |
| mhall119 | yes, sorry, debian/control | 20:56 |
| Phoenix87 | mhall119: ok. I have just merged your changes into my branch | 20:57 |
| Phoenix87 | thank you | 20:57 |
| Phoenix87 | mhall119: anyway, is there some sort of ubuntu arb policy about how "clean" lintian should be? In the past I had quite a hard times with debian mentors complaining about any warning spitted out by lintian | 20:59 |
| Phoenix87 | *time | 21:00 |
| mhall119 | Phoenix87: for ARB apps lintian will always spit out a bunch of file-or-dir-in-opt errors | 21:03 |
| mhall119 | but other than that I try and fix everything else | 21:03 |
| mhall119 | unless there's a good reason for not fixing it | 21:03 |
| mhall119 | the ARB is generally more lenient than DMs and DDs (though some of them are DMs or DDs I think) | 21:04 |
| Phoenix87 | mhall119: ok, good to know that. I should probably try to correct them myself then in order to ease your reviewing process. I just didn't know you were also aiming for a reasonable clean lintian | 21:04 |
| mhall119 | I think "reasonably clen" is a good standard :) | 21:06 |
| Phoenix87 | mhall119: :) | 21:20 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!