[06:30] Good morning [09:08] morning PaoloRotolo :) [09:52] hi dpm [10:37] hi PaoloRotolo dpm :) good noon! [10:41] hey coolbhavi [12:55] hey coolbhavi :) [12:56] hey dpm [12:56] how have you been? [12:57] busy busy, but well :) [12:57] how's the voting coming along? [12:57] almost done around 90 apps [12:58] still to go [12:58] yours? [13:02] dpm, how to test time widget for harvest? [13:27] coolbhavi, sorry, I don't know, I haven't come to that one [13:27] slow progress here while I'm doing other things [13:28] dpm, no issues figured out it needs a harvest account on getharvest.com [13:30] ok, cool [15:30] highvoltage: would it be considered bad form for me to review my own app submission and submit it for voting? [15:36] quickly-gtk is the only app showdown submission in "Needs Review" [15:37] \o/ [15:37] I guess you know how to contact the author :) [15:38] yeah, but I don't want to be the one to give it the green-light for voting [15:38] unless everyone else is okay with that [15:51] makes sense :) [15:51] I don't have a problem with that, we're still going to review it as part of the voting process [15:52] it's not like you're voting on it or anything like that and I'm sure you passed it through the same checks as the rest of the lot [15:55] stgraber: cool,thanks [15:59] Pending Review == 0 \o/ [16:17] mhall119: I can't see a reason why it would be bad form [16:17] mhall119: actually I'm fine with any author giving their app up for voting, in an ideal world I guess that's how it would work [16:18] mhall119: I think the only reason we mostly do things the way we do now is so that submitters can have an extra step where they get some guidance with their package [16:27] highvoltage: thanks, I've sent it to the ML [17:50] If someone has a spare moment, could someone move (On Trello) Wizz RSS over to Voting? I re-reviewed the app and the issues have been fixed. [18:00] jvrbanac, done [18:04] dpm, Thanks! [18:46] steam4linux!? [18:46] and it's gplv3? [18:49] you didn't read the description apparently ;) [18:50] yeah it was rather dissapointing :( [19:10] highvoltage, man, you are rocking the voting :-) [19:14] I would like to help reviewing the showdown apps [19:34] highvoltage: thanks for the votes, can you put your concerns about RedThat and Trading Cards as feedback on their MyApps page? [19:41] mhall119: I can't see redthat in myapps, do you have a link? [19:48] highvoltage: https://myapps.developer.ubuntu.com/dev/apps/1138/ === achuni_ is now known as achuni [20:50] hallo [20:50] mhall119: hallo! you here? [20:51] i have received your comment on the feedback tab [20:54] Phoenix87: here [20:55] mhall119: do I have to change my branch or repackage the app again? [20:55] or both [20:55] Phoenix87: you should make the changes to debian/rules in your branch [20:56] mhall119: you mean debian/control ? [20:56] but you don't need to resubmit until you have other changes you want to submit, I've sent the current code + my changes for voting to get it into the Software Center [20:56] yes, sorry, debian/control [20:57] mhall119: ok. I have just merged your changes into my branch [20:57] thank you [20:59] mhall119: anyway, is there some sort of ubuntu arb policy about how "clean" lintian should be? In the past I had quite a hard times with debian mentors complaining about any warning spitted out by lintian [21:00] *time [21:03] Phoenix87: for ARB apps lintian will always spit out a bunch of file-or-dir-in-opt errors [21:03] but other than that I try and fix everything else [21:03] unless there's a good reason for not fixing it [21:04] the ARB is generally more lenient than DMs and DDs (though some of them are DMs or DDs I think) [21:04] mhall119: ok, good to know that. I should probably try to correct them myself then in order to ease your reviewing process. I just didn't know you were also aiming for a reasonable clean lintian [21:06] I think "reasonably clen" is a good standard :) [21:20] mhall119: :)