[00:24] zzz === jtv1 is now known as jtv === Pendulum_ is now known as Pendulum [04:04] Ra raw! The precise unapproved queue now features such unuseful links as http://lplibrarian-private-download.internal:8000/110401053/xen_4.1.2-2ubuntu2_4.1.2-2ubuntu2.2.diff.gz [04:05] * ajmitch heard that was being fixed [04:06] & apparantly a fix to be deployed tomorrow, if I'm reading the channel log correctly [04:06] Ok. [04:07] That'll make today's SRU processing annoying, but if it's fixed tomorrow that's ok. [04:08] It will get deployed today or tomorrow [04:09] Depending if my structsub branch passes QA or ends up as a bucket of a fail [04:09] Heh. [04:12] RAOF: Bug #1025515 [04:12] Launchpad bug 1025515 in Launchpad itself "LP diffs are being linked at http://lplibrarian-private-download.internal:8000" [Critical,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1025515 [04:12] Ta [05:31] RAOF: Colin's fix is deployed. [05:33] StevenK: Thanks. === czajkowski changed the topic of #launchpad to: Help contact: czajkowski | Launchpad is an open source project: https://dev.launchpad.net/ | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ | User Guide: https://help.launchpad.net/ | Support: https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad | For packaging help: join #ubuntu-packaging [09:47] Hello, is there actually an issue with the brz import from svn? https://code.launchpad.net/~jfi/psensor/trunk is stuck since at least 30mn, svn repository is up [09:50] that seems to have in import and revs from yesterday [09:50] what do you think isn't working? [09:52] usually I can request manually an import [09:52] jfi: are you logged in? [09:52] and there is the message: "The next import is scheduled to run as soon as possible. " in the page since at least 30mn (usually it takes a couple of minutes) [09:52] jfi: actually, a new import is already scheduled [09:52] jelmer, yes I am logged [09:53] jfi: so presumably there just is a big queue for the imports [09:53] ok [10:42] jfi: One of the import machines ran into trouble after a hardware issue yesterday, causing a substantial queue to build up. We've just kicked it and it's started picking up jobs again, so it should clear within a few hours === matsubara is now known as matsubara-afk [13:03] hey, trying to branch lp:ubuntu/precise/totem, getting an error: [13:03] bzr: ERROR: Revision {package-import@ubuntu.com-20120109161939-wfwd46cy3ytl1qq3} not present in "Graph(StackedParentsProvider(bzrlib.repository._LazyListJoin(([CachingParentsProvider(None)], []))))". === Quintasan_ is now known as Quintasan [13:51] Saviq: that's a known issue; disabling the launchpad freshness checker in bzr should work around it [13:51] jelmer, ok thanks === Guest69730 is now known as jrgifford === matsubara-afk is now known as matsubara [16:04] Hello, I'm a developper at OpenERP. We just renewed our openerp-int project (private project) and we are no able to see the page on launchpad anymore. [16:19] sinzui: are you about to help on a call here for the next 40/50 mins [16:25] czajkowski: I reactivated the project for the user. I will see if I can track his email address down to tell him [16:27] sinzui: mail is gone to commercial@lp.net [16:27] sinzui: thanks [16:34] wth? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1026596 <- how can duplicate/new possible be a sensible state? why does lp allow that? [16:34] Ubuntu bug 1026528 in libreoffice (Ubuntu) "duplicate for #1026596 Quantal daily Alternate amd64 failed to install: missing dependency libreoffice-common - amd64/i386 desync" [Critical,Fix released] [16:52] Sweetshark: That is the state of the bug if it were unduplicated. this is bug 317244 and bug 524294 [16:52] Launchpad bug 524294 in Launchpad itself "duplicate for #317244 Completely unobvious that a bug is a duplicate / why duplicate bug status etc can't be edited" [Low,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/524294 [16:52] Launchpad bug 524294 in Launchpad itself "Completely unobvious that a bug is a duplicate / why duplicate bug status etc can't be edited" [Low,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/524294 [16:57] sinzui: k. thx. === czajkowski changed the topic of #launchpad to: Help contact:- | Launchpad is an open source project: https://dev.launchpad.net/ | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ | User Guide: https://help.launchpad.net/ | Support: https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad | For packaging help: join #ubuntu-packaging === zyga is now known as zyga-afk === dpb_ is now known as Guest78961 [18:26] Is the fix for the problem with the PPA builders deployed yet? [19:05] Anyone know? [19:10] george_e: so you broke PPAs, huh? (points at Ask Ubuntu chat briefly) [19:10] lol, i kid, apparently you're having problems and my logs dont exist, so... [19:11] george_e: is it returning any errors? [19:11] Well, I `dput`-ed a bunch of packages and they aren't showing up anywhere. [19:11] george_e: where'd you dput them? [19:11] LordOfTime: No, I'm not getting anything at all? [19:11] LordOfTime: To ppa:george-edison55/nitroshare === yofel_ is now known as yofel [19:12] george_e: according to the build logs for your repo, there's stuff there... [19:12] wonder why its not showing up though [19:15] I'll be AFK for a bit. [19:15] But feel free to ping me. [21:10] Something is still wrong with PPA uploads. [21:10] None of them are showing up anywhere. [21:13] george_e: are you seeing any errors? [21:14] None whatsoever. [21:14] This is what I get: http://paste.ubuntu.com/1100875/ [21:15] george_e: those weren't uploaded; did you delete all the recipe builds in that ppa? [21:15] I deleted four recipe builds in the PPA. [21:16] george_e: in that pastebin, your packages are not signed with a gpg key that is associated with your account [21:16] george_e: and unfortunately in that case, you don't get an error e-mail [21:16] Oh... so that's the problem. [21:16] yes [21:16] well, that's the first problem [21:16] Thanks for clearing that up. [21:17] i don't think you'll be able to upload as a native package versioned as just 0.2 either [21:17] because it will be older than what was previously uploaded by the recipe [21:19] dobey: Even after deleting the packages? [21:20] george_e: yes; because even if it were uploaded, anyone who installed the older version will not be able to upgrade to the "new" version that is actually older [21:27] dobey: Actually, that's okay. The newest recipe build and the version I'm uploading have identical contents. [21:27] So users who have the package won't see the update... [21:27] ...and those who don't will get the one I'm uploading. [21:28] george_e: it's not ok to allow though since that won't necessarily be the case, you have to upload a different version [22:31] Can a Launchpad admin please delete the upstream link for https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fftw3 ? It is currently linked to the python bindings for FFTW, not the actual upstream project. [22:31] Logan_: done [22:32] micahg: Thanks. :)