[00:24] <Noldorin> zzz
[04:04] <RAOF> Ra raw! The precise unapproved queue now features such unuseful links as http://lplibrarian-private-download.internal:8000/110401053/xen_4.1.2-2ubuntu2_4.1.2-2ubuntu2.2.diff.gz
[04:05]  * ajmitch heard that was being fixed
[04:06] <ajmitch> & apparantly a fix to be deployed tomorrow, if I'm reading the channel log correctly
[04:06] <RAOF> Ok.
[04:07] <RAOF> That'll make today's SRU processing annoying, but if it's fixed tomorrow that's ok.
[04:08] <StevenK> It will get deployed today or tomorrow
[04:09] <StevenK> Depending if my structsub branch passes QA or ends up as a bucket of a fail
[04:09] <RAOF> Heh.
[04:12] <wgrant> RAOF: Bug #1025515
[04:12] <RAOF> Ta
[05:31] <StevenK> RAOF: Colin's fix is deployed.
[05:33] <RAOF> StevenK: Thanks.
[09:47] <jfi> Hello, is there actually an issue with the brz import from svn? https://code.launchpad.net/~jfi/psensor/trunk is stuck since at least 30mn, svn repository is up
[09:50] <mgz> that seems to have in import and revs from yesterday
[09:50] <mgz> what do you think isn't working?
[09:52] <jfi> usually I can request manually an import
[09:52] <jelmer> jfi: are you logged in?
[09:52] <jfi> and there is the message: "The next import is scheduled to run as soon as possible. " in the page since at least 30mn (usually it takes a couple of minutes)
[09:52] <jelmer> jfi: actually, a new import is already scheduled
[09:52] <jfi> jelmer, yes I am logged
[09:53] <jelmer> jfi: so presumably there just is a big queue for the imports
[09:53] <jfi> ok
[10:42] <wgrant> jfi: One of the import machines ran into trouble after a hardware issue yesterday, causing a substantial queue to build up. We've just kicked it and it's started picking up jobs again, so it should clear within a few hours
[13:03] <Saviq> hey, trying to branch lp:ubuntu/precise/totem, getting an error:
[13:03] <Saviq> bzr: ERROR: Revision {package-import@ubuntu.com-20120109161939-wfwd46cy3ytl1qq3} not present in "Graph(StackedParentsProvider(bzrlib.repository._LazyListJoin(([CachingParentsProvider(None)], []))))".
[13:51] <jelmer> Saviq: that's a known issue; disabling the launchpad freshness checker in bzr should work around it
[13:51] <Saviq> jelmer, ok thanks
[16:04] <cecile_> Hello, I'm a developper at OpenERP. We just renewed our openerp-int project (private project) and we are no able to see the page on launchpad anymore.
[16:19] <czajkowski> sinzui: are you about to help on a call here for the next 40/50 mins
[16:25] <sinzui> czajkowski: I reactivated the project for the user. I will see if I can track his email address down to tell him
[16:27] <czajkowski> sinzui: mail is gone to commercial@lp.net
[16:27] <czajkowski> sinzui: thanks
[16:34] <Sweetshark> wth? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1026596 <- how can duplicate/new possible be a sensible state? why does lp allow that?
[16:52] <sinzui> Sweetshark: That is the state of the bug if it were unduplicated. this is bug 317244 and bug 524294
[16:57] <Sweetshark> sinzui: k. thx.
[18:26] <george_e> Is the fix for the problem with the PPA builders deployed yet?
[19:05] <george_e> Anyone know?
[19:10] <LordOfTime> george_e: so you broke PPAs, huh? (points at Ask Ubuntu chat briefly)
[19:10] <LordOfTime> lol, i kid, apparently you're having problems and my logs dont exist, so...
[19:11] <LordOfTime> george_e: is it returning any errors?
[19:11] <george_e> Well, I `dput`-ed a bunch of packages and they aren't showing up anywhere.
[19:11] <LordOfTime> george_e: where'd you dput them?
[19:11] <george_e> LordOfTime: No, I'm not getting anything at all?
[19:11] <george_e> LordOfTime: To ppa:george-edison55/nitroshare
[19:12] <LordOfTime> george_e: according to the build logs for your repo, there's stuff there...
[19:12] <LordOfTime> wonder why its not showing up though
[19:15] <george_e> I'll be AFK for a bit.
[19:15] <george_e> But feel free to ping me.
[21:10] <george_e> Something is still wrong with PPA uploads.
[21:10] <george_e> None of them are showing up anywhere.
[21:13] <czajkowski> george_e: are you seeing any errors?
[21:14] <george_e> None whatsoever.
[21:14] <george_e> This is what I get: http://paste.ubuntu.com/1100875/
[21:15] <dobey> george_e: those weren't uploaded; did you delete all the recipe builds in that ppa?
[21:15] <george_e> I deleted four recipe builds in the PPA.
[21:16] <dobey> george_e: in that pastebin, your packages are not signed with a gpg key that is associated with your account
[21:16] <dobey> george_e: and unfortunately in that case, you don't get an error e-mail
[21:16] <george_e> Oh... so that's the problem.
[21:16] <dobey> yes
[21:16] <dobey> well, that's the first problem
[21:16] <george_e> Thanks for clearing that up.
[21:17] <dobey> i don't think you'll be able to upload as a native package versioned as just 0.2 either
[21:17] <dobey> because it will be older than what was previously uploaded by the recipe
[21:19] <george_e> dobey: Even after deleting the packages?
[21:20] <dobey> george_e: yes; because even if it were uploaded, anyone who installed the older version will not be able to upgrade to the "new" version that is actually older
[21:27] <george_e> dobey: Actually, that's okay. The newest recipe build and the version I'm uploading have identical contents.
[21:27] <george_e> So users who have the package won't see the update...
[21:27] <george_e> ...and those who don't will get the one I'm uploading.
[21:28] <micahg> george_e: it's not ok to allow though since that won't necessarily be the case, you have to upload a different version
[22:31] <Logan_> Can a Launchpad admin please delete the upstream link for https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fftw3 ? It is currently linked to the python bindings for FFTW, not the actual upstream project.
[22:31] <micahg> Logan_: done
[22:32] <Logan_> micahg: Thanks. :)