[03:50] <thomi> lifeless: any ideas off the top of your head how I can abort a test suite being run from within a test case? It's an unusual request I realise. It seems I'd need to override RunTest to provde that sort of functionality?
[03:57] <lifeless> you need to call result.stop()
[03:57] <lifeless> you can use stack inspection to get the result object
[03:57] <lifeless> see some of the (heinous :P) code in testresources for an example of doing that
=== purserj_ is now known as purserj
[19:32] <chilts> morning
[19:55] <ibeardslee> morning
[20:26] <chilts> yay, two pieces of chocolate on my desk this morning
[20:26] <chilts> it's a mystery
[20:27] <ibeardslee> probably meant for me .. can you wander over and drop them off?
[20:28] <chilts> yeah, no worries
[20:29] <chilts> I'll try and regurgitate them for you
[20:29] <chilts> still interested? :)
[20:29] <chilts> ibeardslee: so what are you wearing today?
[20:29] <ibeardslee> let them solidify again .. remove the carrots etc first.
[20:30] <chilts> ewwww
[20:31] <ajmitch> morning
[20:43] <snail> so I'm writing a blog post about a new feature, testing all my links immediately before hitting 'publish' only to find that the feature has been reverted...
[20:46] <ibeardslee> bugger
[20:49] <ibeardslee> on the plus side .. you checked before you published.
[21:01] <chilts> snail: new feature in what?
[21:11] <hads> morning
[21:31] <snail> chilts: something completely un-ubuntu related, as it happens: http://search.victoria.ac.nz/
[21:32] <snail> it's a google-in-a-box
[21:51] <chilts> which search backend are you using?
[21:51] <chilts> looks cool
[22:33] <snail> chilts: it's a google-in-a-box: a google-yellow coloured physical box in our machine room
[22:44] <kcj> Morning.
[22:54] <chilts> oh right, I thought you were saying it was "like google-in-a-box" but it's the real thing
[22:54] <chilts> bright yellow I guess
[22:56] <snail> chilts: I've got to say that it appears that the google brand name has let the in-house people achieve things which would have been organisationally impossible otherwise
[22:57] <chilts> that's almost quite sad
[22:57] <chilts> but good they were able to get it done
[22:57] <chilts> costs a pretty packet though doesn't it?
[22:58] <thumper> I've seen the google search appliances before :)
[22:58] <thumper> not cheap
[23:07] <ojwb> it seems you're mostly paying for the name
[23:26] <chilts> ojwb: you could have done it for them! :)
[23:46] <ojwb> chilts: they have a few people with search expertise already I think
[23:47] <ojwb> they just don't throw much of it at the appliance...